OBRA Race Season

Brian Baumann

2017-01-31

Not that it matters for the discussion, but the estimate numbers I posted are for Sport Male only.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 30, 2017, at 4:45 PM, My Computer wrote:
>
> Not to mention, I think Sisters Stampede is very well attended at end of May, I think they typically sell out the 500 or so available entries, which looks to be a lot more than Mich has. Not sure what that means in the grand scheme besides it's a good time of year (warm) and a great race.
>
>> On Jan 30, 2017 4:40 PM, "Brian Baumann via OBRA" wrote:
>> Agreed, but I guess my point is that they are able to maintain large fields throughout the entire season (including muggy, hot, mosquito-infested Summer days) for some reason(s). I realize there are many variables when looking at these kinds of things, but I thought it might help to look at data from another area.
>> I am grateful for the racing available to us here in Oregon. Thanks to everyone who puts in the time to make it all happen.
>> Cheers!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 30, 2017 4:07 PM, Mike Murray via OBRA wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have to point out that the March and April weather in WI is substantially different from the lowland weather in OR at that time of year.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of craig austin via OBRA
>> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 12:00
>> To: Brian Baumann
>> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>>
>> Huh. And they don't start till the middle of May.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA wrote:
>> I had a minute so I looked at the numbers for the Sport Male category in Wisconsin for 2016. WI has a Summer break for public school students, and I believe they have one of the most popular XC series in the nation. Here is a quick breakdown of some of their races (close estimates, not exact counts) for Sport Male:
>> May 15-170 racers
>> June 5- 200+ racers
>> June 26- 180 racers
>> July 10- 200+ racers
>> Aug 21- 160 racers
>>
>> This is their 2017 schedule. 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
>>
>> 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
>> Year 26 of WORS Date Event #1 May 6, 2017 Englewood Opener #2 May 21, 2017 Iola Bump & Jump #3 June 4, 201...
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 30, 2017 9:48 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a thought.
>> Cheers!
>>
>> On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet expect different results is dumb.
>> --
>> Sent by an Android >^•^<
>> On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky wrote:
>> It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road races are way to go.
>>
>> You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there are no races in December.
>>
>> To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I agree it's complicated. I love complicated.
>>
>> There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.
>>
>> There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly.
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA wrote:
>> Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,
>> “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+
>> and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team and training together year around….
>>
>> “
>>
>> From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert via OBRA
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
>> To: obra@list.obra.org
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>>
>> We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time for racing.
>> Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.
>> On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>> Chad,
>> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>>
>> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!
>>
>> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers).
>>
>> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.
>>
>> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:
>>
>> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:
>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:
>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>
>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> Rick Johnson
>> Bend, Oregon
>>
>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>> One, it's completely impossible.
>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>
>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>
>>
>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.
>>
>> -- Manville
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>


My Computer

2017-01-31

Not to mention, I think Sisters Stampede is very well attended at end of
May, I think they typically sell out the 500 or so available entries, which
looks to be a lot more than Mich has. Not sure what that means in the
grand scheme besides it's a good time of year (warm) and a great race.

On Jan 30, 2017 4:40 PM, "Brian Baumann via OBRA"
wrote:

> Agreed, but I guess my point is that they are able to maintain large
> fields throughout the entire season (including muggy, hot,
> mosquito-infested Summer days) for some reason(s). I realize there are many
> variables when looking at these kinds of things, but I thought it might
> help to look at data from another area.
> I am grateful for the racing available to us here in Oregon. Thanks to
> everyone who puts in the time to make it all happen.
> Cheers!
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2017 4:07 PM, Mike Murray via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>
> I have to point out that the March and April weather in WI is
> substantially different from the lowland weather in OR at that time of year.
>
> Mike
>
> *From:* OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] *On Behalf Of *craig
> austin via OBRA
> *Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2017 12:00
> *To:* Brian Baumann
> *Cc:* obra@list.obra.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>
> Huh. And they don't start till the middle of May.
>
> Craig
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
> I had a minute so I looked at the numbers for the Sport Male category in
> Wisconsin for 2016. WI has a Summer break for public school students, and I
> believe they have one of the most popular XC series in the nation. Here is
> a quick breakdown of some of their races (close estimates, not exact
> counts) for Sport Male:
> May 15-170 racers
> June 5- 200+ racers
> June 26- 180 racers
> July 10- 200+ racers
> Aug 21- 160 racers
>
> This is their 2017 schedule. 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
>
>
> 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
> Year 26 of WORS Date Event #1 May 6, 2017 Englewood Opener #2 May 21,
> 2017 Iola Bump & Jump #3 June 4, 201...
>
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2017 9:48 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
> Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round
> schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If
> not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a
> thought.
> Cheers!
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
> Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something
> different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like
> I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with
> success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet
> expect different results is dumb.
> --
> Sent by an Android >^•^<
> On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky <
> marek.litinsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of
> insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data
> and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road
> races are way to go.
>
> You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after
> Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I
> don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there
> are no races in December.
>
> To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year
> is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I
> agree it's complicated. I love complicated.
>
> There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We
> are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.
>
> There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want
> to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not
> force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems
> to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers
> unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to
> race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and
> totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources
> on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly.
>
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA
> wrote:
> Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,
> “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
> competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or
> three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and
> equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+
> and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for
> anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you
> want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say
> less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as
> many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping
> the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality
> well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get
> something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended
> races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for
> training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every
> weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying
> engaged as a team and training together year around….
>
> “
>
> *From:* OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Robert via OBRA
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
> *To:* obra@list.obra.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>
> We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May
> thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is
> championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for
> cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between
> road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships
> at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time
> for racing.
> Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
> competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or
> three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and
> equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.
> On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>
> Chad,
> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are
> trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>
> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of
> pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there
> would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!
>
> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that
> promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their
> races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers
> and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL
> customers (racers).
>
> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There
> have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that
> could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended
> that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with
> this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get
> tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to
> add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo
> riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of
> these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different
> than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the
> current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving
> up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely
> using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.
>
> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all
> the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!",
> it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for
> me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't
> work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are
> used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather
> racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter
> wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and
> have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily
> the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market
> driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the
> commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons)
> where "individual users acting independently according to their own
> self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting
> that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my
> opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote
> their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this
> is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not
> the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people
> excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the
> limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.
> John
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA
> wrote:
>
>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
> weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
> impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
> the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
> late season events and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> wrote:
> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to
> sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
> frames?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>
> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
> One, it's completely impossible.
> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
> shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
> UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
> cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
> short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
> entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> OBRA mailing list
>
> obra@list.obra.org
>
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Brian Baumann

2017-01-31

Agreed, but I guess my point is that they are able to maintain large fields throughout the entire season (including muggy, hot, mosquito-infested Summer days) for some reason(s). I realize there are many variables when looking at these kinds of things, but I thought it might help to look at data from another area. I am grateful for the racing available to us here in Oregon. Thanks to everyone who puts in the time to make it all happen.Cheers!

On Monday, January 30, 2017 4:07 PM, Mike Murray via OBRA wrote:

#yiv8096970146 #yiv8096970146 -- _filtered #yiv8096970146 {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8096970146 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8096970146 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8096970146 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8096970146 {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv8096970146 #yiv8096970146 p.yiv8096970146MsoNormal, #yiv8096970146 li.yiv8096970146MsoNormal, #yiv8096970146 div.yiv8096970146MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv8096970146 h2 {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:18.0pt;}#yiv8096970146 a:link, #yiv8096970146 span.yiv8096970146MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8096970146 a:visited, #yiv8096970146 span.yiv8096970146MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8096970146 pre {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv8096970146 p.yiv8096970146MsoAcetate, #yiv8096970146 li.yiv8096970146MsoAcetate, #yiv8096970146 div.yiv8096970146MsoAcetate {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}#yiv8096970146 span.yiv8096970146Heading2Char {color:#4F81BD;font-weight:bold;}#yiv8096970146 span.yiv8096970146HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;}#yiv8096970146 span.yiv8096970146EmailStyle20 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8096970146 span.yiv8096970146BalloonTextChar {}#yiv8096970146 .yiv8096970146MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv8096970146 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv8096970146 div.yiv8096970146WordSection1 {}#yiv8096970146 I have to point out that the March and April weather in WI is substantially different from the lowland weather in OR at that time of year. Mike From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of craig austin via OBRA
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 12:00
To: Brian Baumann
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season Huh. And they don't start till the middle of May.  Craig On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA wrote:I had a minute so I looked at the numbers for the Sport Male category in Wisconsin for 2016. WI has a Summer break for public school students, and I believe they have one of the most popular XC series in the nation. Here is a quick breakdown of some of their races (close estimates, not exact counts) for Sport Male:May 15-170 racersJune 5- 200+ racersJune 26- 180 racersJuly 10- 200+ racersAug 21- 160 racers This is their 2017 schedule.  2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series 
|
|
|
| | |

|

|
|
| |
2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
Year 26 of WORS   Date Event #1 May 6, 2017 Englewood Opener #2 May 21, 2017 Iola Bump & Jump #3 June 4, 201... | |

|

|

  On Monday, January 30, 2017 9:48 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA wrote: Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a thought.Cheers! On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA wrote: Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet expect different results is dumb.
--
Sent by an Android >^•^ wrote:It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road races are way to go.  You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there are no races in December.  To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I agree it's complicated. I love complicated.  There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.  There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly. 
On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA wrote:Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years, “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day.  It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment.  What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team and training together year around…. “ From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert via OBRA
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
To: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season We should define seasons for races...  March thru August for road, May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for cross, with champs in Jan.  This would eliminate some cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time for racing.Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day.  It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment.  What we are really lacking here is leadership. On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
Chad,  I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.  My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race! My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers). The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.  Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money. John   On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:
 This whole thread is funny!  It is all market driven.  Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend.  After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field.  Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!  Chad On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?     On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1)  It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 

_______________________________________________OBRA mailing listobra@list.obra.orghttp://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obraUnsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 _______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org  _______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mike Murray

2017-01-31

I have to point out that the March and April weather in WI is substantially
different from the lowland weather in OR at that time of year.

Mike

*From:* OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] *On Behalf Of *craig
austin via OBRA
*Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2017 12:00
*To:* Brian Baumann
*Cc:* obra@list.obra.org
*Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season

Huh. And they don't start till the middle of May.

Craig

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA
wrote:

I had a minute so I looked at the numbers for the Sport Male category in
Wisconsin for 2016. WI has a Summer break for public school students, and I
believe they have one of the most popular XC series in the nation. Here is
a quick breakdown of some of their races (close estimates, not exact
counts) for Sport Male:

May 15-170 racers

June 5- 200+ racers

June 26- 180 racers

July 10- 200+ racers

Aug 21- 160 racers

This is their 2017 schedule. 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series

2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series

Year 26 of WORS Date Event #1 May 6, 2017 Englewood Opener #2 May 21,
2017 Iola Bump & Jump #3 June 4, 201...

On Monday, January 30, 2017 9:48 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA <
obra@list.obra.org> wrote:

Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round
schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If
not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a
thought.

Cheers!

On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA
wrote:

Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something
different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like
I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with
success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet
expect different results is dumb.
--
Sent by an Android >^•^<

On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky <
marek.litinsky@gmail.com> wrote:

It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of
insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data
and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road
races are way to go.

You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after
Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I
don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there
are no races in December.

To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year
is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I
agree it's complicated. I love complicated.

There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We
are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.

There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want
to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not
force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems
to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers
unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to
race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and
totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources
on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly.

On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA
wrote:

Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,

“Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or
three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and
equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+

and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but
then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I
think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races
and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races
as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the
schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well
attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get
something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended
races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for
training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every
weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying
engaged as a team and training together year around….

*From:* OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org ]
*On Behalf Of *Robert via OBRA
*Sent:* Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
*To:* obra@list.obra.org
*Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season

We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May thru
August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is
championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for
cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between
road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships
at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time
for racing.

Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or
three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and
equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.

On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:

Chad,

I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are
trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.

My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of
pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there
would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!

My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that
promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their
races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers
and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL
customers (racers).

The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have
been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be
addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if
the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and
see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of
being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add
different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo
riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of
these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different
than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the
current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving
up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely
using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.

Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all
the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!",
it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for
me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't
work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are
used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather
racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter
wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and
have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily
the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market
driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the
commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons)
where "individual users acting independently according to their own
self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting
that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my
opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote
their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this
is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not
the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people
excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the
limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.

John

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA
wrote:

This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
late season events and forgo March races!

Chad

On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
wrote:

Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to
sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
frames?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
wrote:

That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:

Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six
weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


craig austin

2017-01-30

Huh. And they don't start till the middle of May.

Craig

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA wrote:

> I had a minute so I looked at the numbers for the Sport Male category in
> Wisconsin for 2016. WI has a Summer break for public school students, and I
> believe they have one of the most popular XC series in the nation. Here is
> a quick breakdown of some of their races (close estimates, not exact
> counts) for Sport Male:
> May 15-170 racers
> June 5- 200+ racers
> June 26- 180 racers
> July 10- 200+ racers
> Aug 21- 160 racers
>
> This is their 2017 schedule. 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
>
>
> 2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
> Year 26 of WORS Date Event #1 May 6, 2017 Englewood Opener #2 May 21,
> 2017 Iola Bump & Jump #3 June 4, 201...
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2017 9:48 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>
> Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round
> schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If
> not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a
> thought.
> Cheers!
>
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something
> different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like
> I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with
> success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet
> expect different results is dumb.
> --
> Sent by an Android >^•^<
>
> On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky <
> marek.litinsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of
> insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data
> and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road
> races are way to go.
>
> You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after
> Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I
> don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there
> are no races in December.
>
> To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year
> is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I
> agree it's complicated. I love complicated.
>
> There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We
> are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.
>
> There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want
> to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not
> force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems
> to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers
> unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to
> race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and
> totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources
> on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly.
>
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA
> wrote:
>
> Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,
> “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
> competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or
> three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and
> equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+
> and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for
> anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you
> want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say
> less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as
> many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping
> the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality
> well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get
> something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended
> races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for
> training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every
> weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying
> engaged as a team and training together year around….
>
> “
>
> *From:* OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Robert via OBRA
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
> *To:* obra@list.obra.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>
> We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May
> thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is
> championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for
> cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between
> road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships
> at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time
> for racing.
> Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
> competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or
> three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and
> equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.
> On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>
> Chad,
> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are
> trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>
> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of
> pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there
> would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!
>
> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that
> promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their
> races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers
> and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL
> customers (racers).
>
> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There
> have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that
> could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended
> that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with
> this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get
> tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to
> add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo
> riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of
> these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different
> than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the
> current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving
> up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely
> using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.
>
> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all
> the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!",
> it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for
> me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't
> work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are
> used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather
> racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter
> wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and
> have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily
> the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market
> driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the
> commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons)
> where "individual users acting independently according to their own
> self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting
> that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my
> opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote
> their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this
> is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not
> the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people
> excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the
> limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.
> John
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA
> wrote:
>
>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
> weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
> impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
> the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
> late season events and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> wrote:
> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to
> sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
> frames?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>
> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
> One, it's completely impossible.
> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
> shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
> UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
> cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
> short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
> entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> OBRA mailing list
>
> obra@list.obra.org
>
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Brian Baumann

2017-01-30

I had a minute so I looked at the numbers for the Sport Male category in Wisconsin for 2016. WI has a Summer break for public school students, and I believe they have one of the most popular XC series in the nation. Here is a quick breakdown of some of their races (close estimates, not exact counts) for Sport Male:May 15-170 racersJune 5- 200+ racersJune 26- 180 racersJuly 10- 200+ racersAug 21- 160 racers
This is their 2017 schedule.  2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series

|
|
|
| | |

|

|
|
| |
2017 Schedule - Wisconsin Off Road Series
Year 26 of WORS   Date Event #1 May 6, 2017 Englewood Opener #2 May 21, 2017 Iola Bump & Jump #3 June 4, 201... | |

|

|


On Monday, January 30, 2017 9:48 AM, Brian Baumann via OBRA wrote:

Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a thought.Cheers!

On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA wrote:

Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet expect different results is dumb.
--
Sent by an Android >^•^<

On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky wrote:
It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road races are way to go. 
You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there are no races in December. 
To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I agree it's complicated. I love complicated. 
There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them. 
There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly. 
On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA wrote:

#yiv1899173309 -- filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}#yiv1899173309 filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv1899173309 filtered {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv1899173309 filtered {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv1899173309 p.yiv1899173309MsoNormal, #yiv1899173309 li.yiv1899173309MsoNormal, #yiv1899173309 div.yiv1899173309MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv1899173309 a:link, #yiv1899173309 span.yiv1899173309MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1899173309 a:visited, #yiv1899173309 span.yiv1899173309MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1899173309 p {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv1899173309 pre {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;color:black;}#yiv1899173309 span.yiv1899173309HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;color:black;}#yiv1899173309 span.yiv1899173309EmailStyle20 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv1899173309 .yiv1899173309MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv1899173309 filtered {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv1899173309 div.yiv1899173309WordSection1 {}#yiv1899173309 Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years, “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day.  It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment.  What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team and training together year around…. “  From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert via OBRA
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
To: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season We should define seasons for races...  March thru August for road, May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for cross, with champs in Jan.  This would eliminate some cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time for racing.Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day.  It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment.  What we are really lacking here is leadership. On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
Chad,  I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.  My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race! My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers). The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.  Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money. John   On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:
 This whole thread is funny!  It is all market driven.  Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend.  After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field.  Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!  Chad On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?     On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1)  It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 

_______________________________________________OBRA mailing listobra@list.obra.orghttp://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obraUnsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Brian Baumann

2017-01-30

Regarding the XC race season, do other states who do not have year-round schooling experience the same decline in race numbers in the Summer? If not, it might be good to know what they do differently than us. Just a thought.Cheers!

On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:13 PM, Robert via OBRA wrote:

Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet expect different results is dumb.
--
Sent by an Android >^•^<

On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky wrote:
It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road races are way to go. 
You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there are no races in December. 
To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I agree it's complicated. I love complicated. 
There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them. 
There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly. 
On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA wrote:

#yiv9723595884 #yiv9723595884 -- _filtered #yiv9723595884 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv9723595884 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv9723595884 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv9723595884 {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv9723595884 #yiv9723595884 p.yiv9723595884MsoNormal, #yiv9723595884 li.yiv9723595884MsoNormal, #yiv9723595884 div.yiv9723595884MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9723595884 a:link, #yiv9723595884 span.yiv9723595884MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9723595884 a:visited, #yiv9723595884 span.yiv9723595884MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9723595884 p {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9723595884 pre {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9723595884 span.yiv9723595884HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;color:black;}#yiv9723595884 span.yiv9723595884EmailStyle20 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv9723595884 .yiv9723595884MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv9723595884 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv9723595884 div.yiv9723595884WordSection1 {}#yiv9723595884 Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years, “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day.  It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment.  What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team and training together year around…. “  From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert via OBRA
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
To: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season We should define seasons for races...  March thru August for road, May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for cross, with champs in Jan.  This would eliminate some cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time for racing.Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day.  It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment.  What we are really lacking here is leadership. On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
Chad,  I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.  My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race! My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers). The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.  Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money. John   On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:
 This whole thread is funny!  It is all market driven.  Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend.  After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field.  Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!  Chad On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?     On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1)  It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org 

_______________________________________________OBRA mailing listobra@list.obra.orghttp://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obraUnsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
 
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Robert

2017-01-26

Perhaps we are not ignoring it. Perhaps we are suggesting something different to achieve different results from what we have now. It's not like I'm the only one who has had this idea and implemented it - some with success and some without. To do the same things over and over again yet expect different results is dumb.
--
Sent by an Android >^•^<

On January 26, 2017 11:02:33 AM PST, Marek Litinsky wrote:
>It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of
>insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to
>data and historical context telling you it's market driven and early
>season road races are way to go.
>
>You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after
>Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and
>I don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now
>there are no races in December.
>
>To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the
>year is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and
>demand. I agree it's complicated. I love complicated.
>
>There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road.
>We are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.
>
>There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would
>want to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can
>not force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what
>seems to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of
>racers unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an
>ability to race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they
>aspire and totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and
>other resources on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly.
>
>> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,
>> “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid
>putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to
>have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers,
>officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is
>leadership. “+
>> and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for
>anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what
>you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also
>say less races and more quality races is more important than just
>putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be
>low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as
>possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone
>wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their
>efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy
>with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together
>etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at
>Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team
>and training together year around….
>>
>> “
>>
>> From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert
>via OBRA
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
>> To: obra@list.obra.org
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>>
>> We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road,
>May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike,
>September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru
>December for cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some
>cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of
>recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong,
>and still allow for plenty of time for racing.
>>
>> Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid
>putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to
>have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers,
>officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is
>leadership.
>>
>> On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>> Chad,
>> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people
>are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>>
>> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race
>because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was
>July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so
>excited to race!
>>
>> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that
>promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling
>their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from
>customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should
>listen to ALL customers (racers).
>>
>> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down.
>There have been several people in this thread offering possible
>problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions.
>Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers
>would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I
>race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop
>racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that
>include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially
>decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub
>people the wrong way because they are different than the current
>system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current
>system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up
>on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely
>using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible
>solutions.
>>
>> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to
>all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March
>races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this
>doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the
>end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of
>races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are
>small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will
>be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should
>be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of
>hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall
>health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you
>call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons"
>(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where
>"individual users acting independently according to their own
>self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by
>depleting that resource through their collective action." In other
>words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting
>independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which
>they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because
>OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from
>later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The
>early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time,
>motivation, and money.
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA
> wrote:
>>
>> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in
>crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st
>it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field.
>Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to
>start attending late season events and forgo March races!
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> wrote:
>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an
>organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of
>these suggested time frames?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
> wrote:
>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far
>it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times
>over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely
>remember.
>>
>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
>dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> Rick Johnson
>> Bend, Oregon
>>
>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>> One, it's completely impossible.
>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>
>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>
>>
>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back
>a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows
>skiers to get in shape before the races come.
>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with
>the UCI Season.
>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB
>Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with
>cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to
>Jan/Feb)
>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>singletrack to short-track
>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>great entry point into road racing.
>>
>> -- Manville
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


JUSTON MANVILLE

2017-01-26

"Seems to me like much easier solution than crying I'm too cold in March, I haven't trained so please could we postpone it till June?"

Marek, I'm not crying when it is too cold in March; I'm SKIING.... However, I am crying when there are no MTB races in the summer; I am crying when I have to drive 50-70 miles in order to mountain bike on single track.

Propaganda: Why I am attending tonight's Off-Road Cycling Master Plan Meeting at 4pm in Portland and have a race team dedicated to trail advocacy Bethany Bike Repair pb mtbpdx.com

Nobody tells me when I can cry, OK.-- Manville


T. Kenji Sugahara

2017-01-26

Just as a heads up-

Promoters agreed to the following:

Existing events get first rights to dates in an overlapping discipline
in a region if they submit their paperwork and payment by February
1st.

Events submitted after that date will be subject to ED/Board approval,
including having one race per overlapping discipline per region.

No weekend cyclocross before Labor Day. (Midweek series ok)

Only 1 OBRA Championship event per weekend if possible.

Regions are defined below though Mt. Hood/Gorge combined with Portland.

Discipline regions are defined as follows:

1. Crit/Track- all regions
2. Road- all regions
3. Stage races/Omniums- all regions
4. TT- Portland/Willamette Valley, Central/Eastern Oregon, Coast,
Southern Oregon
5. MTB XC- all regions
6. MTB/Enduro- all regions
7. MTB STXC- Portland/Willamette Valley, Central/Eastern Oregon,
Coast, Southern Oregon
8. CX- Portland/Willamette Valley, Central/Eastern Oregon, Coast,
Southern Oregon
9. Weekly series- Portland, Willamette Valley, Central Oregon, Eastern
Oregon, Coast, Southern Oregon
10. Gran Fondos- all regions

Priorities that were highlighted at the meeting:

1. More people at races/improving user experiences/generating event energy
2. Women/Junior recruitment and programs
3. Diversity
4. Promoter best practices knowledgebase
5. Equal prize payout

Some strategies to execute the priorities.

1. Outreach to groups including Native Americans, Veterans, Latinos,
African Americans and Parathletes.
2. Creation of an OBRA ambassador program. Engage well known people in
the community to serve as ambassadors. Create an incentive program.
3. Encourage cross-promoter (not cyclocross) communication to create
best practices for creating and marketing events.
4. Explore and implement an auto-renewal system for OBRA membership.
5. Make it easy for bike shops to create a pathway to racing bikes.
6. Explore a "bike shop membership". Look at creating incentives for
bike shops to talk about bike racing.

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:19 AM, My Computer via OBRA
wrote:
> Nothing about this is obvious and I do like Gills outlook. It���s a complex
> issue and the open ���market��� is a complex subject especially when you
> consider human emotion, consumer decisions and financial implications.
> Anybody want to guess how many MIT graduates are employed by financial
> institutions to figure all this stuff out? In any event, I like where Ricks
> and Johns heads are, participation may be more tied with what the promoters
> are doing rather than promoters changing to meet participation needs.
>
>
>
> Throwing up our hands and saying ���then you put on a race��� or ���you���re lucky
> to have anything��� doesn���t really fly when trying to make something better.
> Nobody has all the answers, nobody knows it all, but at getting it into the
> open and having the discussion seems like the healthy thing to do.
>
>
>
> Why not define seasons via OBRA? Should rider participation define our
> alignment with the rest of the country (or world)? If we got more riders
> racing CX in March, maybe we should move it to then? If road is in decline,
> why let that define the CX and MTB seasons?
>
>
>
> My personal opinion, right or wrong, are that people race based on peer
> involvement and common consensus among the community, it���s what I did. I���ve
> only been racing for 4-5 years, I accepted racing schedules and assumed it���s
> always been that way. Based on some of the comments here, it seems that
> things used to align to what intuitively makes sense, MTB in the sun, CX in
> the rain and road in a little bit of both.
>
>
>
> Can we at least all agree the winters would seem a lot shorter if we started
> racing in Nov and ended end of Jan with a week off for Xmas?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
> wrote:
>>
>> To test that hypothesis that the majority favor an early season:
>> If all races were held exclusively in the unpredictable weather of spring
>> - would that ensure large and sustained annual participation? Why are we not
>> seeing this in fact?
>>
>> And the converse question:
>> Since the race calendar has in fact evolved with a markedly strong bias
>> towards early races in spring - why has overall participation declined over
>> the same period? If the greater part of the market is getting what they
>> desire participation should be increasing should it not?
>>
>> John Gill: Your previous post was well stated. Anyone serious about this
>> issue would be well advised to consider it seriously.
>>
>> Rick Johnson
>> Bend, Oregon
>>
>> On 1/26/2017 8:38 AM, stevea.long via OBRA wrote:
>>
>> Chad is right. If I'm remembering correctly, this topic has been hashed
>> and rehashed and we come to the same conclusion each time. People come out
>> to race in Spring but less so in Summer.
>>
>>
>> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S��4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Chad Sperry via OBRA
>> Date:01/25/2017 12:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: obra@list.obra.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>>
>>
>> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
>> weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
>> impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase the
>> numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late
>> season events and forgo March races!
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter
>>> to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
>>> frames?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
>>>> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
>>>> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>>>
>>>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
>>>> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>> Rick Johnson
>>>> Bend, Oregon
>>>>
>>>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>>>> One, it's completely impossible.
>>>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>>>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>>>
>>>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to
>>>>> get in shape before the races come.
>>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>>> UCI Season.
>>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Manville
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>

--
Kenji Sugahara
Executive Director
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association
Phone: 503-278-5550
http://www.obra.org


Marek Litinsky

2017-01-26

It's funny how bunch of you totally choose to ignore information of insiders with experience. You have long time promoter with access to data and historical context telling you it's market driven and early season road races are way to go.

You have most experienced official telling you that cross races after Thanksgiving were a flop, people didn't show up in crappy weather (and I don't care how brave you are on computer screen in January) and now there are no races in December.

To me the main reason for scheduling races at the certain time of the year is TRADITION of the sport adjusted by market rules of supply and demand. I agree it's complicated. I love complicated.

There's hundred year tradition of hard races in the Spring on the road. We are fortunate enough to be able to do few of them.

There is also a tradition to race cross well after new year. I would want to everybody who race cross to have chance to do that. But one can not force people who promote races to dedicate THEIR resources for what seems to be not working in Oregon. Talking about depleting resources of racers unable to time and manage their training and recovery to have an ability to race for more than eight weeks a year on whatever level they aspire and totally ignore question of depleting of financial ,time and other resources on the promoters side is pretty simply put silly.

> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Tedder via OBRA wrote:
>
> Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,
> “Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+
> and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team and training together year around….
>
> “
>
> From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert via OBRA
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
> To: obra@list.obra.org
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>
> We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time for racing.
>
> Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.
>
> On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
> Chad,
> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>
> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!
>
> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers).
>
> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.
>
> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.
> John
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:
>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:
> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:
> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>
> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
> One, it's completely impossible.
> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Jeff Tedder

2017-01-26

Yes Robert…… I have been saying this for years,

“Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership. “+

and finally gave up…piling races on top of races is not good for anyone…but then you get those that say hey, it’s a free market, do what you want…I think losing some races is a direct effect from this….I also say less races and more quality races is more important than just putting on as many races as possible…..and then having attendance be low…focus on keeping the schedule with as little cross over as possible….and putting on quality well attended races and everyone wins…..the teams an promoters actually get something back for all their efforts and OBRA members get well attended races that people are happy with…..Plus it brings back more team aspect for training together etc….Not have 2 or 3 or 4 race options every weekend…Something we at Hammer Velo have done for years anyway, is staying engaged as a team and training together year around….

From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Robert via OBRA
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
To: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season

We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow for plenty of time for racing.

Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials, and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.

On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:

Chad,

I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.

My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!

My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers).

The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.

Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.

John

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:

This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!

Chad

On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:

Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:

That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:

Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


My Computer

2017-01-26

Nothing about this is obvious and I do like Gills outlook. It’s a complex
issue and the open “market” is a complex subject especially when you
consider human emotion, consumer decisions and financial implications.
Anybody want to guess how many MIT graduates are employed by financial
institutions to figure all this stuff out? In any event, I like where
Ricks and Johns heads are, participation may be more tied with what the
promoters are doing rather than promoters changing to meet participation
needs.

Throwing up our hands and saying “then you put on a race” or “you’re lucky
to have anything” doesn’t really fly when trying to make something better.
Nobody has all the answers, nobody knows it all, but at getting it into the
open and having the discussion seems like the healthy thing to do.

Why *not* define seasons via OBRA? Should rider participation define our
alignment with the rest of the country (or world)? If we got more riders
racing CX in March, maybe we should move it to then? If road is in
decline, why let that define the CX and MTB seasons?

My personal opinion, right or wrong, are that people race based on peer
involvement and common consensus among the community, it’s what I did.
I’ve only been racing for 4-5 years, I accepted racing schedules and
assumed it’s always been that way. Based on some of the comments here, it
seems that things used to align to what intuitively makes sense, MTB in the
sun, CX in the rain and road in a little bit of both.

Can we at least all agree the winters would seem a lot shorter if we
started racing in Nov and ended end of Jan with a week off for Xmas?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
wrote:

> To test that hypothesis that the majority favor an early season:
> If all races were held exclusively in the unpredictable weather of spring
> - would that ensure large and sustained annual participation? Why are we
> not seeing this in fact?
>
> And the converse question:
> Since the race calendar has in fact evolved with a markedly strong bias
> towards early races in spring - why has overall participation declined over
> the same period? If the greater part of the market is getting what they
> desire participation should be increasing should it not?
>
> John Gill: Your previous post was well stated. Anyone serious about this
> issue would be well advised to consider it seriously.
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
>
> On 1/26/2017 8:38 AM, stevea.long via OBRA wrote:
>
> Chad is right. If I'm remembering correctly, this topic has been hashed
> and rehashed and we come to the same conclusion each time. People come out
> to race in Spring but less so in Summer.
>
>
> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Chad Sperry via OBRA
> Date:01/25/2017 12:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: obra@list.obra.org
> Cc:
> Subject: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season
>
>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
> weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
> impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
> the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
> late season events and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> wrote:
>
>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter
>> to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
>> frames?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
>>> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
>>> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>>
>>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
>>> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> Rick Johnson
>>> Bend, Oregon
>>>
>>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>>> One, it's completely impossible.
>>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>>
>>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>> UCI Season.
>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>
>>>> -- Manville
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing listobra@list.obra.orghttp://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Robert

2017-01-26

We should define seasons for races... March thru August for road, May
thru August for track, April thru august for Mountain bike, September is
championship month for all except cross, and October thru December for
cross, with champs in Jan. This would eliminate some cross over between
road/track/ MB and cross allowing for a bit of recovery, put
championships at the end of seasons where they belong, and still allow
for plenty of time for racing.

Also, OBRA should be managing the schedule for racing to avoid putting
competing events on the same day. It does no one any good to have two
or three events on one day splitting up the available racers, officials,
and equipment. What we are really lacking here is leadership.

On 1/26/2017 08:55, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
> Chad,
> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people
> are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>
> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because
> of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st,
> there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!
>
> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that
> promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling
> their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from
> customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should
> listen to ALL customers (racers).
>
> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There
> have been several people in this thread offering possible problems
> that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just
> recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low.
> I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some
> early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek
> offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include
> different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease
> overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people
> the wrong way because they are different than the current system.
> However, the conversation is occurring because the current system
> isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on
> promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely
> using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible
> solutions.
>
> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to
> all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March
> races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this
> doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the
> end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number
> of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are
> small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will
> be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should
> be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of
> hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the
> overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach
> (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons"
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons)
> where "individual users acting independently according to their own
> self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by
> depleting that resource through their collective action." In other
> words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting
> independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which
> they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because
> OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit
> from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season.
> The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers
> time, motivation, and money.
> John
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA
> > wrote:
>
>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing
> in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend.
> After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable
> road race field. Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it
> is up to all the racers to start attending late season events
> and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> > wrote:
>
> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an
> organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if
> falls outside of these suggested time frames?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
> > wrote:
>
> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become
> skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said
> this myself many, many times over the years - as long
> time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>
> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it
> uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage
> participation.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages
> of reaction...
> One, it's completely impossible.
> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>
> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our
> entire season back a month or two. Most of my
> arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early
> races into May improves the chances of good
> weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to
> get in shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime
> race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the
> months of July and August; this aligns with the
> UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand
> Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and
> great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early;
> OBRA was done with cross six weeks before
> Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to
> Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass
> fields makes racing boring; short-track is not
> cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
> singletrack to short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in
> Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain
> biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
> entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Marek Litinsky

2017-01-26

Btw. If we would make system and way to bring one day mass start events (fondos, grinders etc) into the fold of "real" racing we would "magically" gained half a dozen of amazing already organized, permitted and scheduled races.

Just allow racers to line up in front (like any serious marathon race out there with 10000 participants) and make sure their result is counted, recognized and rewarded as any other road race.

Seems to me like much easier solution than crying I'm too cold in March, I haven't trained so please could we postpone it till June?

> On Jan 26, 2017, at 8:55 AM, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>
> Chad,
> I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.
>
> My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!
>
> My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL customers (racers).
>
> The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.
>
> Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!", it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons) where "individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.
> John
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA wrote:
>>
>> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!
>>
>> Chad
>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:
>>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:
>>>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>>>
>>>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>> Rick Johnson
>>>> Bend, Oregon
>>>>
>>>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>>>> One, it's completely impossible.
>>>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>>>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>>>
>>>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
>>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
>>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
>>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Manville
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Rick Johnson

2017-01-26





To test that hypothesis that the majority favor an early season:

If all races were held exclusively in the unpredictable weather of
spring - would that ensure large and sustained annual participation?
Why are we not seeing this in fact?



And the converse question:

Since the race calendar has in fact evolved with a markedly strong
bias towards early races in spring - why has overall participation
declined over the same period? If the greater part of the market is
getting what they desire participation should be increasing should
it not?



John Gill: Your previous post was well stated. Anyone serious about
this issue would be well advised to consider it seriously.



Rick Johnson

Bend, Oregon


On 1/26/2017 8:38 AM, stevea.long via
OBRA wrote:




Chad is right. If I'm remembering correctly, this topic has
been hashed and rehashed and we come to the same conclusion each
time. People come out to race in Spring but less so in Summer.










Sent via the Samsung
GALAXY S��4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone






-------- Original message --------

From: Chad Sperry via OBRA <obra@list.obra.org>

Date:01/25/2017 12:10 PM (GMT-08:00)


Cc:

Subject: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season











This whole thread is funny!�� It is all
market driven.�� Racing in crappy weather in March is
when the most riders attend.�� After July 1st it is
impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field.��
Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to
all the racers to start attending late season events and
forgo March races!




Chad






On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM,
"Steven Beardsley via OBRA" <obra@list.obra.org>
wrote:


Are you all suggesting that OBRA
should not allow an organizer/promoter to
sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of
these suggested time frames?
















On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at
11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <obra@list.obra.org>
wrote:

That's the
gospel truth - our race season has become
skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I
have said this myself many, many times over
the years - as long time members of this
chat group will likely remember.



Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is.
Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does
nothing to encourage participation.



Rick



Rick Johnson

Bend, Oregon



Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke
three stages of reaction...

One, it's completely impossible.

Two, it's possible, but it's not worth
doing.

Three, I said it was a good idea all along.



Arthur C. Clarke






On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville
via OBRA wrote:


Maybe participation would improve if
we pushed our entire season back a
month or two. Most of my arguments are
weather related:

1)�� It rains all the time in April;
pushing early races into May improves
the chances of good weather and safe
roads.It also allows skiers to get in
shape before the races come.

2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in
June; prime race weather for XCO
length MTB races are in the months of
July and August; this aligns with the
UCI Season.

3) Early fall is an excellent time for
Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
cooler weather and great base for
cross season

4) Cross season begins and ends way
too early; OBRA was done with cross
six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a
winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)

5) The obsession of turning circles in
grass fields makes racing boring;
short-track is not cyclocross on fat
tires. Let's add some singletrack to
short-track

6) Most importantly, let's get some
singletrack in Forest Park so we can
build interest in mountain biking in
Portland; mountain biking is a great
entry point into road racing.



-- Manville

_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org




_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org










_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


















_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org





John Gill

2017-01-26

Chad,
I don't know why you call it funny. Races are disappearing and people are
trying to help promoters understand why it might be happening.

My point is that the market will ALWAYS reward an earlier race because of
pent up demand. If the first road race of the season was July 1st, there
would be a HUGE field because people would be so excited to race!

My point is not that there SHOULD be limits, but it is something that
promoters as operators of businesses should consider when scheduling their
races. Just as any other business owner listens to feedback from customers
and makes changes when profits die off, promoters should listen to ALL
customers (racers).

The complaint from promoters is that numbers of racers are down. There have
been several people in this thread offering possible problems that could be
addressed, or offering possible solutions. Juston just recommended that if
the season starts too early, numbers would be low. I agree with this and
see this in my own racing habits. I race some early races, get tired of
being cold and wet, and stop racing. Marek offered a solution to add
different kinds of races that include different kinds of racers (fondo
riders) and potentially decrease overhead for more profits. But both of
these ideas seem to rub people the wrong way because they are different
than the current system. However, the conversation is occurring because the
current system isn't working. Racing numbers are down, promoters are giving
up on promoting due to lack of profitability and the customers are merely
using this platform to communicate their opinions as to possible solutions.

Regarding the "Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all
the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!",
it was my intent in my earlier post to illustrate why this doesn't work for
me (and many people I know). Adding more races to the end of a season won't
work because people will only go to "x" number of races and if those are
used up in early races where the fields are small because fair weather
racers don't show up, then the fields will be low all season. If a promoter
wants to fill a race up, they should be the first race of the season and
have it well promoted with lots of hype. However, this is not necessarily
the right answer for the overall health of the OBRA community. This "market
driven" approach (as you call it) is suffering from the "tragedy of the
commons" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons)
where "individual users acting independently according to their own
self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting
that resource through their collective action." In other words, in my
opinion, the early season promoters are acting independently to promote
their own race and make it successful (which they SHOULD BE DOING) but this
is contrary to the common good because OBRA as a whole (the community not
the organization) would benefit from later races that keep more people
excited longer into the season. The early race promoters are using up the
limited resource of racers time, motivation, and money.
John

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Chad Sperry via OBRA
wrote:

>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
> weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
> impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
> the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
> late season events and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> wrote:
>
>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter
>> to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
>> frames?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
>>> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
>>> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>>
>>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
>>> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> Rick Johnson
>>> Bend, Oregon
>>>
>>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>>> One, it's completely impossible.
>>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>>
>>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>> UCI Season.
>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>
>>>> -- Manville
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


stevea.long

2017-01-26

Chad is right. If I'm remembering correctly, this topic has been hashed and rehashed and we come to the same conclusion each time. People come out to race in Spring but less so in Summer.

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Chad Sperry via OBRA
Date:01/25/2017 12:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: obra@list.obra.org
Cc:
Subject: [OBRA Chat] Fwd: Re: OBRA Race Season


This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending late season events and forgo March races!

Chad

On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA" wrote:
Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time frames?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA wrote:
That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Jonathan lyons

2017-01-26

It is far from "obvious." So I respectfully disagree: there is no good reason why OBRA should not take over responsibility for setting race dates, events, and cats.

Leaving it to the promoters and the marketplace clearly is not working for many members.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:54 PM, Marek Litinsky via OBRA wrote:
>
> I think Steven Beardsley already pointed out obvious. It is not in OBRAs hands to set dates of races. That's purely on promoters.
>
> Early season races in crappy weather are awesome and definitely part of cycling tradition. As long as there are races in spring I'll be there.
>
> I'm pretty sure promoters would make more winter cross races if people would want them. Start your season whenever you want and if there are no races for you in the end of cross season put on your own race. Just a suggestion.
>
> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:27 PM, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>
>> I am not a promoter, never have been, and I am still pretty new to the OBRA scene compared to many around here so this is just anecdotal opinions based on a limited consumer experience.
>>
>> What I have noticed with low numbers in later races not due to weather, trail conditions, etc. Rather it seems to be (at least in my case) just burnout.
>>
>> When there are early season road races, I get excited because there is a lot of chat about them. I have been training all winter, want to see my friends, and am excited to get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But, after a few uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR, etc. I get tired of doing the cleaning and maintainin of the equipment, ditching my kids to race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So, by June and July I am done being excited to road race and would just rather do something else.
>>
>> Same with cyclocross. When races start in early September, I am so excited to race that I go to as many as I can, even though I dislike racing in dry conditions. The promoters do such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere, that I have a hard time not going to early races. Then, by thanksgiving, I have done 8+ weekends of racing and don't feel as excited anymore about going through the motions.
>>
>> Based on the way I approach these things, the promoters who do the earliest races get the most of my attendance, and it seems that they know this. Capitalizing on pent-up demand and excitement. That does not mean the races are better or more desirable, just marketed to me at a time when I am excited to race.
>>
>> If OBRA and or the promoters were to set calendar limits for different kinds of races then I would probably still attend the same number of races, just later into a season than I do now.
>>
>> I think of this sort of like a coffee shop. I will drink coffee every day, and if i wake up early, I will go to the one that opens at the right time for me. Say I wake up at 5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee shops in town agreed to not open until 7, then I would drink coffee no earlier than 7. However, if they competed to keep opening earlier and earlier to get my business, I will likely choose to go to the one that is open earlier out of convenience and a demand for coffee that has built up overnight. In turn, I will likely not go to a superior shop that opens later because my demand has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to delaying the start of selling coffee (or starting a racing season) because the one who opens first gets the best turnout, while the one that opens late misses out even if they have a superior product.
>>
>> If people want later races, promoters should be attentive to that. The entries will not reflect this, as suggested, because pent up demand from the off-season will create good numbers in any early season race. That does not mean they are the highest possible turnout numbers. And, as someone else mentioned, to boycott an early season race because it is a crappy time of year just means missing out on more racing and potentially losing another race from the calendar...not a calendar shift.
>>
>> Just my thoughts. I may be way off on this, but it is what I think about every year as the weather gets ideal, the races get fewer, and attendance (the number of friends to hang out with, people in the field, and overall energy) decline.
>> John
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM, "Jon Myers via OBRA" wrote:
>> Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250 racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Chad Sperry

2017-01-25

Remember OBRA is a free market system. If the organization starts
mandating when races can be run it opens a whole other can of worms.

Chad

On Jan 25, 2017 12:10 PM, chad.breakaway@gmail.com wrote:

>
> This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
> weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
> impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
> the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
> late season events and forgo March races!
>
> Chad
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
> wrote:
>
>> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter
>> to sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
>> frames?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
>>> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
>>> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>>
>>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
>>> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> Rick Johnson
>>> Bend, Oregon
>>>
>>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>>> One, it's completely impossible.
>>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>>
>>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>> UCI Season.
>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>
>>>> -- Manville
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>


Chad Sperry

2017-01-25

This whole thread is funny! It is all market driven. Racing in crappy
weather in March is when the most riders attend. After July 1st it is
impossible to get any kind of sizeable road race field. Promoters chase
the numbers so ultimately it is up to all the racers to start attending
late season events and forgo March races!

Chad

On Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM, "Steven Beardsley via OBRA"
wrote:

> Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to
> sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
> frames?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
>> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
>> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>>
>> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
>> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> Rick Johnson
>> Bend, Oregon
>>
>> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
>> One, it's completely impossible.
>> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
>> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>>
>> Arthur C. Clarke
>>
>>
>> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>> UCI Season.
>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
>>> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
>>> short-track
>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
>>> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
>>> entry point into road racing.
>>>
>>> -- Manville
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Rick Johnson

2017-01-26





Ken,


That describes me. Please see my previous posts.


Rick


Rick Johnson

Bend, Oregon


On 1/25/2017 9:47 PM, Ken Luke via OBRA
wrote:




OBRA needs to talk to former racers, people that
have let their OBRA membership lapse. Most of the people on this
list probably aren���t the ones that need to be persuaded to race.





Maybe sending that survey to OBRA members over the
last 4-5 years that are no longer active would provide some
insight.












Ken Luke �� �� �� kenl@hungri-yeti.com








On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Darell C.
Provencher via OBRA <obra@list.obra.org>
wrote:





Lots
of good discussion, conjectures, unproven hypotheses
(and alternate facts��<OutlookEmoji-����.png>).
Maybe we could get a small group together to create an
OBRA survey (e.g., Survey Monkey or Survey Gizmo) that
looks at things like Communications, Marketing, Race
Schedules, Fees, Categories, Racer Incentives, etc.��
Anybody interested?





D










From:��OBRA <obra-bounces@list.obra.org>
on behalf of craig austin via OBRA <obra@list.obra.org>

Sent:��Wednesday,
January 25, 2017 6:57:21 PM

To:��John
Gill

Cc:��Jon
Myers;��obra@list.obra.org

Subject:��Re: [OBRA Chat]
OBRA Race Season
��



Bingo. Ten years ago the MTB state champs
were in September and cross started in October. Burnout
is definitely a big factor in the decline.��





Great discussion. I hope to make it to the
meeting this weekend, but if not I still hope this issue
is discussed.��





Craig



Sent from my iPhone




On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:27 PM, John Gill via OBRA <obra@list.obra.org>
wrote:






I am not a promoter, never
have been, and I am still pretty new to the OBRA
scene compared to many around here so this is just
anecdotal opinions based on a limited consumer
experience.




What I have noticed with
low numbers in later races not due to weather,
trail conditions, etc. Rather it seems to be (at
least in my case) just burnout.��





When there are early season
road races, I get excited because there is a lot
of chat about them. I have been training all
winter, want to see my friends, and am excited to
get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But, after
a few uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR,
etc. I get tired of doing the cleaning and
maintainin of the equipment, ditching my kids to
race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So,
by June and July I am done being excited to road
race and would just rather do something else.





Same with cyclocross.�� When
races start in early September, I am so excited to
race that I go to as many as I can, even though I
dislike racing in dry conditions. The promoters do
such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere,
that I have a hard time not going to early races.
Then, by thanksgiving, I have done 8+ weekends of
racing and don't feel as excited anymore about
going through the motions.��





Based on the way I approach
these things, the promoters who do the earliest
races get the most of my attendance, and it seems
that they know this. Capitalizing on pent-up
demand and excitement. That does not mean the
races are better or more desirable, just marketed
to me at a time when I am excited to race.��





If OBRA and or the
promoters were to set calendar limits for
different kinds of races then I would probably
still attend the same number of races, just later
into a season than I do now.





I think of this sort of
like a coffee shop. I will drink coffee every day,
and if i wake up early, I will go to the one that
opens at the right time for me. Say I wake up at
5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee
shops in town agreed to not open until 7, then I
would drink coffee no earlier than 7. However, ��if
they competed to keep opening earlier and earlier
to get my business, I will likely choose to go to
the one that is open earlier out of convenience
and a demand for coffee that has built up
overnight. In turn, I will likely not go to a
superior shop that opens later because my demand
has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race
promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to
delaying the start of selling coffee (or starting
a racing season) because the one who opens first
gets the best turnout, while the one that opens
late misses out even if they have a superior
product.��





If people want later races,
promoters should be attentive to that. The entries
will not reflect this, as suggested, because pent
up demand from the off-season will create good
numbers in any early season race. That does not
mean they are the highest possible turnout
numbers. And, as someone else mentioned, to
boycott an early season race because it is a
crappy time of year just means missing out on more
racing and potentially losing another race from
the calendar...not a calendar shift.





Just my thoughts. I may be
way off on this, but it is what I think about
every year as the weather gets ideal, the races
get fewer, and attendance (the number of friends
to hang out with, people in the field, and overall
energy) decline.

John





On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM,
"Jon Myers via OBRA" <obra@list.obra.org>
wrote:

Last
year the Mudslinger was in early April and had
somewhere around 250 racers.�� The Alsea
Switchback which took place in early July had
about half the amount.�� Both races start in the
same part of the state geographically.�� I think
anyone who has done those races would agree the
weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the
turnout was half.�� The main difference is the
time of year.�� ��I love the later season mountain
bike races and as long as I don't have a broken
thumb I make sure to make it to all of them.�� As
the former OBRA mountain bike representative I
have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the
schedule. I'm only guessing that the same
decline in attendance is in force on the road
side.

_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe:��obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org











_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe:��obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org




_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe:��obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org










_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org





Joel Fletcher

2017-01-26


Rick Johnson

2017-01-26





John (Gill),


I believe you describe a real phenomenon - one I have also voiced
on this very forum in years past. At one time I conducted my own
informal survey among team members and there seemed to be
indication of the effect being real and not purely theoretical. I
also recall there was a survey done some years past that had a
question that delved into participants seasonal preferences. I
suggest it would be worth making inquires to see if that survey
data is still available somewhere. It may be useful in identifying
historical trends.


If one where to take the long view it appears the majority of
promoters have often responded to competing events by trying to
leap frog one another in an attempt to have more well attended
events. Notice I say well attended as opposed to better. The two
are not necessarily synonymous.


Rick


Rick Johnson

Bend, Oregon


On 1/25/2017 6:27 PM, John Gill via
OBRA wrote:



I am not a promoter, never have been, and I am
still pretty new to the OBRA scene compared to many around here
so this is just anecdotal opinions based on a limited consumer
experience.




What I have noticed with low numbers in later
races not due to weather, trail conditions, etc. Rather it
seems to be (at least in my case) just burnout.��





When there are early season road races, I get
excited because there is a lot of chat about them. I have been
training all winter, want to see my friends, and am excited to
get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But, after a few
uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR, etc. I get tired of
doing the cleaning and maintainin of the equipment, ditching
my kids to race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So, by
June and July I am done being excited to road race and would
just rather do something else.





Same with cyclocross.�� When races start in early
September, I am so excited to race that I go to as many as I
can, even though I dislike racing in dry conditions. The
promoters do such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere,
that I have a hard time not going to early races. Then, by
thanksgiving, I have done 8+ weekends of racing and don't feel
as excited anymore about going through the motions.��





Based on the way I approach these things, the
promoters who do the earliest races get the most of my
attendance, and it seems that they know this. Capitalizing on
pent-up demand and excitement. That does not mean the races
are better or more desirable, just marketed to me at a time
when I am excited to race.��





If OBRA and or the promoters were to set
calendar limits for different kinds of races then I would
probably still attend the same number of races, just later
into a season than I do now.





I think of this sort of like a coffee shop. I
will drink coffee every day, and if i wake up early, I will go
to the one that opens at the right time for me. Say I wake up
at 5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee shops in
town agreed to not open until 7, then I would drink coffee no
earlier than 7. However, ��if they competed to keep opening
earlier and earlier to get my business, I will likely choose
to go to the one that is open earlier out of convenience and a
demand for coffee that has built up overnight. In turn, I will
likely not go to a superior shop that opens later because my
demand has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race
promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to delaying the
start of selling coffee (or starting a racing season) because
the one who opens first gets the best turnout, while the one
that opens late misses out even if they have a superior
product.��





If people want later races, promoters should be
attentive to that. The entries will not reflect this, as
suggested, because pent up demand from the off-season will
create good numbers in any early season race. That does not
mean they are the highest possible turnout numbers. And, as
someone else mentioned, to boycott an early season race
because it is a crappy time of year just means missing out on
more racing and potentially losing another race from the
calendar...not a calendar shift.





Just my thoughts. I may be way off on this, but
it is what I think about every year as the weather gets ideal,
the races get fewer, and attendance (the number of friends to
hang out with, people in the field, and overall energy)
decline.

John





On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM, "Jon Myers via
OBRA" <obra@list.obra.org>
wrote:

Last year
the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around
250 racers.�� The Alsea Switchback which took place in early
July had about half the amount.�� Both races start in the
same part of the state geographically.�� I think anyone who
has done those races would agree the weather and trails were
better at Alsea yet the turnout was half.�� The main
difference is the time of year.�� ��I love the later season
mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken
thumb I make sure to make it to all of them.�� As the former
OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel
for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the
same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.

_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org












_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org





Marek Litinsky

2017-01-26

Im not trying to be disrespectful but I think it is obvious. OBRA doesn't promote any single race. It provides services needed for race, rules of racing, some legal framework and link to other similar organization out there. You as a promoter could and don't have to hire OBRA for any race of any type you wish to put on during any time of the year that seems fine to you.

If I let's say organize fixie crit in parking garage in December I could hire OBRA to provide some equipment and staff. If I'd have money in the budget I would definitely do that because those guys and ladies in yellow shirts know their stuff and can do things I'd need and can't do my self.

They are not gods capable of conjuring money, people and place for race. That's pretty obvious to me.

When I ask for combining fields I don't think of rule requiring anything from any promoter. As a promoter you can do anything at any time of the year. Only thing I'm suggesting is creating possibility for promoters and racers to participate in mass one or two category races and still be able to get points, upgrades etc. Fondo, grinders etc are the way to go and it would be nice to be able to include them in "real" race calendar. I've heard it said many times racers would attend one day mass start events but they don't really count.

It would be an option not a requirement. If I would be disrespectful I would want to come with rules that limit options being it time of the year to organize race or way it should be organized from field size point of view. That's not the right way to go.

More options and flexibility is the respectful thing to do.

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Jonathan lyons wrote:
>
> It is far from "obvious." So I respectfully disagree: there is no good reason why OBRA should not take over responsibility for setting race dates, events, and cats.
>
> Leaving it to the promoters and the marketplace clearly is not working for many members.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:54 PM, Marek Litinsky via OBRA wrote:
>>
>> I think Steven Beardsley already pointed out obvious. It is not in OBRAs hands to set dates of races. That's purely on promoters.
>>
>> Early season races in crappy weather are awesome and definitely part of cycling tradition. As long as there are races in spring I'll be there.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure promoters would make more winter cross races if people would want them. Start your season whenever you want and if there are no races for you in the end of cross season put on your own race. Just a suggestion.
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:27 PM, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>>
>>> I am not a promoter, never have been, and I am still pretty new to the OBRA scene compared to many around here so this is just anecdotal opinions based on a limited consumer experience.
>>>
>>> What I have noticed with low numbers in later races not due to weather, trail conditions, etc. Rather it seems to be (at least in my case) just burnout.
>>>
>>> When there are early season road races, I get excited because there is a lot of chat about them. I have been training all winter, want to see my friends, and am excited to get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But, after a few uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR, etc. I get tired of doing the cleaning and maintainin of the equipment, ditching my kids to race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So, by June and July I am done being excited to road race and would just rather do something else.
>>>
>>> Same with cyclocross. When races start in early September, I am so excited to race that I go to as many as I can, even though I dislike racing in dry conditions. The promoters do such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere, that I have a hard time not going to early races. Then, by thanksgiving, I have done 8+ weekends of racing and don't feel as excited anymore about going through the motions.
>>>
>>> Based on the way I approach these things, the promoters who do the earliest races get the most of my attendance, and it seems that they know this. Capitalizing on pent-up demand and excitement. That does not mean the races are better or more desirable, just marketed to me at a time when I am excited to race.
>>>
>>> If OBRA and or the promoters were to set calendar limits for different kinds of races then I would probably still attend the same number of races, just later into a season than I do now.
>>>
>>> I think of this sort of like a coffee shop. I will drink coffee every day, and if i wake up early, I will go to the one that opens at the right time for me. Say I wake up at 5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee shops in town agreed to not open until 7, then I would drink coffee no earlier than 7. However, if they competed to keep opening earlier and earlier to get my business, I will likely choose to go to the one that is open earlier out of convenience and a demand for coffee that has built up overnight. In turn, I will likely not go to a superior shop that opens later because my demand has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to delaying the start of selling coffee (or starting a racing season) because the one who opens first gets the best turnout, while the one that opens late misses out even if they have a superior product.
>>>
>>> If people want later races, promoters should be attentive to that. The entries will not reflect this, as suggested, because pent up demand from the off-season will create good numbers in any early season race. That does not mean they are the highest possible turnout numbers. And, as someone else mentioned, to boycott an early season race because it is a crappy time of year just means missing out on more racing and potentially losing another race from the calendar...not a calendar shift.
>>>
>>> Just my thoughts. I may be way off on this, but it is what I think about every year as the weather gets ideal, the races get fewer, and attendance (the number of friends to hang out with, people in the field, and overall energy) decline.
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM, "Jon Myers via OBRA" wrote:
>>> Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250 racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Joel Fletcher

2017-01-26


craig austin

2017-01-26

Bingo. Ten years ago the MTB state champs were in September and cross started in October. Burnout is definitely a big factor in the decline.

Great discussion. I hope to make it to the meeting this weekend, but if not I still hope this issue is discussed.

Craig

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:27 PM, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>
> I am not a promoter, never have been, and I am still pretty new to the OBRA scene compared to many around here so this is just anecdotal opinions based on a limited consumer experience.
>
> What I have noticed with low numbers in later races not due to weather, trail conditions, etc. Rather it seems to be (at least in my case) just burnout.
>
> When there are early season road races, I get excited because there is a lot of chat about them. I have been training all winter, want to see my friends, and am excited to get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But, after a few uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR, etc. I get tired of doing the cleaning and maintainin of the equipment, ditching my kids to race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So, by June and July I am done being excited to road race and would just rather do something else.
>
> Same with cyclocross. When races start in early September, I am so excited to race that I go to as many as I can, even though I dislike racing in dry conditions. The promoters do such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere, that I have a hard time not going to early races. Then, by thanksgiving, I have done 8+ weekends of racing and don't feel as excited anymore about going through the motions.
>
> Based on the way I approach these things, the promoters who do the earliest races get the most of my attendance, and it seems that they know this. Capitalizing on pent-up demand and excitement. That does not mean the races are better or more desirable, just marketed to me at a time when I am excited to race.
>
> If OBRA and or the promoters were to set calendar limits for different kinds of races then I would probably still attend the same number of races, just later into a season than I do now.
>
> I think of this sort of like a coffee shop. I will drink coffee every day, and if i wake up early, I will go to the one that opens at the right time for me. Say I wake up at 5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee shops in town agreed to not open until 7, then I would drink coffee no earlier than 7. However, if they competed to keep opening earlier and earlier to get my business, I will likely choose to go to the one that is open earlier out of convenience and a demand for coffee that has built up overnight. In turn, I will likely not go to a superior shop that opens later because my demand has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to delaying the start of selling coffee (or starting a racing season) because the one who opens first gets the best turnout, while the one that opens late misses out even if they have a superior product.
>
> If people want later races, promoters should be attentive to that. The entries will not reflect this, as suggested, because pent up demand from the off-season will create good numbers in any early season race. That does not mean they are the highest possible turnout numbers. And, as someone else mentioned, to boycott an early season race because it is a crappy time of year just means missing out on more racing and potentially losing another race from the calendar...not a calendar shift.
>
> Just my thoughts. I may be way off on this, but it is what I think about every year as the weather gets ideal, the races get fewer, and attendance (the number of friends to hang out with, people in the field, and overall energy) decline.
> John
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM, "Jon Myers via OBRA" wrote:
> Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250 racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Marek Litinsky

2017-01-26

I think Steven Beardsley already pointed out obvious. It is not in OBRAs hands to set dates of races. That's purely on promoters.

Early season races in crappy weather are awesome and definitely part of cycling tradition. As long as there are races in spring I'll be there.

I'm pretty sure promoters would make more winter cross races if people would want them. Start your season whenever you want and if there are no races for you in the end of cross season put on your own race. Just a suggestion.

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:27 PM, John Gill via OBRA wrote:
>
> I am not a promoter, never have been, and I am still pretty new to the OBRA scene compared to many around here so this is just anecdotal opinions based on a limited consumer experience.
>
> What I have noticed with low numbers in later races not due to weather, trail conditions, etc. Rather it seems to be (at least in my case) just burnout.
>
> When there are early season road races, I get excited because there is a lot of chat about them. I have been training all winter, want to see my friends, and am excited to get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But, after a few uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR, etc. I get tired of doing the cleaning and maintainin of the equipment, ditching my kids to race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So, by June and July I am done being excited to road race and would just rather do something else.
>
> Same with cyclocross. When races start in early September, I am so excited to race that I go to as many as I can, even though I dislike racing in dry conditions. The promoters do such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere, that I have a hard time not going to early races. Then, by thanksgiving, I have done 8+ weekends of racing and don't feel as excited anymore about going through the motions.
>
> Based on the way I approach these things, the promoters who do the earliest races get the most of my attendance, and it seems that they know this. Capitalizing on pent-up demand and excitement. That does not mean the races are better or more desirable, just marketed to me at a time when I am excited to race.
>
> If OBRA and or the promoters were to set calendar limits for different kinds of races then I would probably still attend the same number of races, just later into a season than I do now.
>
> I think of this sort of like a coffee shop. I will drink coffee every day, and if i wake up early, I will go to the one that opens at the right time for me. Say I wake up at 5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee shops in town agreed to not open until 7, then I would drink coffee no earlier than 7. However, if they competed to keep opening earlier and earlier to get my business, I will likely choose to go to the one that is open earlier out of convenience and a demand for coffee that has built up overnight. In turn, I will likely not go to a superior shop that opens later because my demand has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to delaying the start of selling coffee (or starting a racing season) because the one who opens first gets the best turnout, while the one that opens late misses out even if they have a superior product.
>
> If people want later races, promoters should be attentive to that. The entries will not reflect this, as suggested, because pent up demand from the off-season will create good numbers in any early season race. That does not mean they are the highest possible turnout numbers. And, as someone else mentioned, to boycott an early season race because it is a crappy time of year just means missing out on more racing and potentially losing another race from the calendar...not a calendar shift.
>
> Just my thoughts. I may be way off on this, but it is what I think about every year as the weather gets ideal, the races get fewer, and attendance (the number of friends to hang out with, people in the field, and overall energy) decline.
> John
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM, "Jon Myers via OBRA" wrote:
> Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250 racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


John Gill

2017-01-26

I am not a promoter, never have been, and I am still pretty new to the OBRA
scene compared to many around here so this is just anecdotal opinions based
on a limited consumer experience.

What I have noticed with low numbers in later races not due to weather,
trail conditions, etc. Rather it seems to be (at least in my case) just
burnout.

When there are early season road races, I get excited because there is a
lot of chat about them. I have been training all winter, want to see my
friends, and am excited to get out to race REGARDLESS of weather. But,
after a few uncomfortably cold races and weeks of PIR, etc. I get tired of
doing the cleaning and maintainin of the equipment, ditching my kids to
race, and the "excitement factor" wears off. So, by June and July I am done
being excited to road race and would just rather do something else.

Same with cyclocross. When races start in early September, I am so excited
to race that I go to as many as I can, even though I dislike racing in dry
conditions. The promoters do such a good job of promoting a fun atmosphere,
that I have a hard time not going to early races. Then, by thanksgiving, I
have done 8+ weekends of racing and don't feel as excited anymore about
going through the motions.

Based on the way I approach these things, the promoters who do the earliest
races get the most of my attendance, and it seems that they know this.
Capitalizing on pent-up demand and excitement. That does not mean the races
are better or more desirable, just marketed to me at a time when I am
excited to race.

If OBRA and or the promoters were to set calendar limits for different
kinds of races then I would probably still attend the same number of races,
just later into a season than I do now.

I think of this sort of like a coffee shop. I will drink coffee every day,
and if i wake up early, I will go to the one that opens at the right time
for me. Say I wake up at 5am (not likely in reality). If all of the coffee
shops in town agreed to not open until 7, then I would drink coffee no
earlier than 7. However, if they competed to keep opening earlier and
earlier to get my business, I will likely choose to go to the one that is
open earlier out of convenience and a demand for coffee that has built up
overnight. In turn, I will likely not go to a superior shop that opens
later because my demand has been met. However, to a coffee shop (or race
promoter) there seems to not be an incentive to delaying the start of
selling coffee (or starting a racing season) because the one who opens
first gets the best turnout, while the one that opens late misses out even
if they have a superior product.

If people want later races, promoters should be attentive to that. The
entries will not reflect this, as suggested, because pent up demand from
the off-season will create good numbers in any early season race. That does
not mean they are the highest possible turnout numbers. And, as someone
else mentioned, to boycott an early season race because it is a crappy time
of year just means missing out on more racing and potentially losing
another race from the calendar...not a calendar shift.

Just my thoughts. I may be way off on this, but it is what I think about
every year as the weather gets ideal, the races get fewer, and attendance
(the number of friends to hang out with, people in the field, and overall
energy) decline.
John

On Jan 25, 2017 4:32 PM, "Jon Myers via OBRA" wrote:

Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250
racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half
the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state
geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the
weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main
difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike
races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to
all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a
pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that
the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mike Murray

2017-01-26

Jon's guess about road race participation and time of year is spot on. A
foul weather race in April will easily outdraw a race in nice weather in
September.

Mike Murray

-----Original Message-----
From: OBRA [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Jon Myers via
OBRA
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 16:33
To: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: [OBRA Chat] OBRA Race Season

Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250
racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half
the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically.
I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails
were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the
time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I
don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the
former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the
mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in
attendance is in force on the road side.
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


marky mark

2017-01-26

I always thought the mountain bike races declined in the hot summer months because people were on vacations. I personally would LOVE to race cross country mountain bike in July and August. I don't know....maybe add a short mtn race category to the mtn endurance races?

Sent from my wicked phone yo

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Jon Myers via OBRA wrote:
>
> Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250 racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Jon Myers

2017-01-26

Last year the Mudslinger was in early April and had somewhere around 250 racers. The Alsea Switchback which took place in early July had about half the amount. Both races start in the same part of the state geographically. I think anyone who has done those races would agree the weather and trails were better at Alsea yet the turnout was half. The main difference is the time of year. I love the later season mountain bike races and as long as I don't have a broken thumb I make sure to make it to all of them. As the former OBRA mountain bike representative I have a pretty good feel for the mtb side of the schedule. I'm only guessing that the same decline in attendance is in force on the road side.


My Computer

2017-01-25

Jon - do race entry's really drop off in Summer, that boggles my mind, what
do you think the driver is? For me, the whole race season as a whole needs
to make sense. If there are races in May/June I won't tend to race MTB's
consistently from April through Sept....but if all the races are
collectively moved I'd happily focus my season on summer.

Same goes for cross, Oct through Jan would be great, but I understand most
people DONT want to race cross in the winter. But for MTB's, are people
really going to complain about NOT racing Echo when its 28 degrees out or
Bear Springs without snow and sub freezing temps?

I'd love to vote with my race entry, but that would mean I'd just not be
racing at all given there aren't many races later in the year and I'd be
giving up all the ones at the start....perpetuating the problem of low race
entry.

I'm happy we have what we do, so not complaining as much as trying to
understand why things are as they are. I realize the venues / courses are
not always available in the middle of summer.

N

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jon Myers via OBRA
wrote:

> Vote with your entry and convince your friends and teamates to race as you
> suggest.
> Promoters are very aware how many racers show up for events and during
> what time of year. That is why the calendar is what it is.
> Why are there fewer mtb races in July, August, and September? The
> attendance goes way down.
> Why are there a bunch of week day races in the middle of the year? Racers
> show up. If you want to see fun single track XC mountain bike races later
> in the year skip the week day races in the middle of the year and enter
> races later in the year.
> -Jon
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Jon Myers

2017-01-25

Vote with your entry and convince your friends and teamates to race as you suggest.
Promoters are very aware how many racers show up for events and during what time of year. That is why the calendar is what it is.
Why are there fewer mtb races in July, August, and September? The attendance goes way down.
Why are there a bunch of week day races in the middle of the year? Racers show up. If you want to see fun single track XC mountain bike races later in the year skip the week day races in the middle of the year and enter races later in the year.
-Jon


Rick Johnson

2017-01-25





I am saying that we would be wise to examine this phenomenon if
OBRA and the promoters are serious about reversing the trend of
declining participation. I feel like I may be beating a dead horse
here and quite frankly I gave up on it a while ago.


There are ways to encourage and manage the race schedule short of
dictatorial decrees. Cooperation can be a wonderful thing when
everyone agrees that it is in best interest of all. OBRA policies
are only part it.


Rick


Rick Johnson

Bend, Oregon


On 1/25/2017 11:59 AM, Steven Beardsley
via OBRA wrote:



Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow
an organizer/promoter to sanction a race through OBRA if falls
outside of these suggested time frames?
















On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick
Johnson via OBRA <obra@list.obra.org> wrote:

That's the
gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many
times over the years - as long time members of this chat
group will likely remember.



Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it
uncomfortable and dangerous does nothing to encourage
participation.



Rick



Rick Johnson

Bend, Oregon



Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of
reaction...

One, it's completely impossible.

Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.

Three, I said it was a good idea all along.



Arthur C. Clarke






On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:


Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our
entire season back a month or two. Most of my
arguments are weather related:

1)�� It rains all the time in April; pushing early
races into May improves the chances of good weather
and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape
before the races come.

2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race
weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of
July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.

3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos
and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for
cross season

4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA
was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross
is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)

5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields
makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on
fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track

6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in
Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain
biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry
point into road racing.



-- Manville

_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org




_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list

obra@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra

Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org













_______________________________________________

OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org





Candi Murray

2017-01-25

I seem to remember attendance dropping off after Thanksgiving do that those
organizers in December all lost money
C

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Steven Beardsley via OBRA
wrote:

Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to
sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
frames?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
wrote:

> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>
> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
> One, it's completely impossible.
> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>
>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
>> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
>> shape before the races come.
>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>> UCI Season.
>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
>> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
>> short-track
>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
>> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
>> entry point into road racing.
>>
>> -- Manville
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Steven Beardsley

2017-01-25

Are you all suggesting that OBRA should not allow an organizer/promoter to
sanction a race through OBRA if falls outside of these suggested time
frames?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rick Johnson via OBRA
wrote:

> That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
> become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
> years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.
>
> Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
> dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Johnson
> Bend, Oregon
>
> Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
> One, it's completely impossible.
> Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
> Three, I said it was a good idea all along.
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
>
>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
>> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
>> shape before the races come.
>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>> UCI Season.
>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
>> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
>> short-track
>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
>> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
>> entry point into road racing.
>>
>> -- Manville
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Rick Johnson

2017-01-25

That's the gospel truth - our race season has become skewed so far it's
become dysfunctional. I have said this myself many, many times over the
years - as long time members of this chat group will likely remember.

Bicycle racing is hard enough as it is. Making it uncomfortable and
dangerous does nothing to encourage participation.

Rick

Rick Johnson
Bend, Oregon

Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction...
One, it's completely impossible.
Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing.
Three, I said it was a good idea all along.

Arthur C. Clarke

On 1/25/2017 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA wrote:
> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Juston Manville

2017-01-25

Kelly, are you aware of the Off-Road Cycling Master Plan being developed by the City of Portland? It would be great to have you at the meeting on Jan 26th. It would actually be great if every OBRA member got behind real Mountain Biking in Portland; It can happen. I am interested in your HS Cycling League and would love to help.

https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/68157

[https://www.portlandoregon.gov/shared/cfm/slb.cfm?id=538289]

Portland Off-road Cycling Master Plan | The City of ...
www.portlandoregon.gov
The Portland Off-road Cycling Master Plan project will develop a citywide plan for a system of off-road cycling facilities – such as sustainable trail networks ...

[https://www.portlandoregon.gov/shared/cfm/slb.cfm?id=538289]
[https://www.portlandoregon.gov/shared/cfm/slb.cfm?id=538289]

Portland Off-road Cycling Master Plan | The City of ...
www.portlandoregon.gov
The Portland Off-road Cycling Master Plan project will develop a citywide plan for a system of off-road cycling facilities – such as sustainable trail networks ...

Portland Off-road Cycling Master Plan | The City of ...
www.portlandoregon.gov
The Portland Off-road Cycling Master Plan project will develop a citywide plan for a system of off-road cycling facilities – such as sustainable trail networks ...

________________________________
From: Kelly Myers
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:22:37 AM
To: My Computer
Cc: Jake; OBRA remailer; Juston Manville
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] OBRA Race Season

I would like to add, there are a good handful of people working to get a NICA High School MTB League going here in Oregon. It is looking like a bid to do so is going in this year. That said, if it does happen (it will!!) there would be a working and wonderful system put-in place for middle and high school students to race MTB's.

I am certain if this happens their participation will carry over into other races and disciplines...I have seen it greatly in other states.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:11 AM, My Computer via OBRA > wrote:
Besides, how cool would it have been to race cross in all that snow back in Dec?

Answer: bodacious

On Jan 25, 2017 11:09 AM, "Jake Witty via OBRA" > wrote:
^^^The truth

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Robert Jackson via OBRA > wrote:
Juston for Event Organizer...

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, craig austin via OBRA > wrote:
Juston for President.

Craig

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA > wrote:
Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

--
Robert M. Jackson
RMJacksonIV@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

--
Kelly E. Myers, BS/MA Psychology
Secondary Science Teacher
(503) 409-4217
(503) 431-5723


Kelly Myers

2017-01-25

I would like to add, there are a good handful of people working to get a
NICA High School MTB League going here in Oregon. It is looking like a bid
to do so is going in this year. That said, if it does happen (it will!!)
there would be a working and wonderful system put-in place for middle and
high school students to race MTB's.

I am certain if this happens their participation will carry over into other
races and disciplines...I have seen it greatly in other states.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:11 AM, My Computer via OBRA
wrote:

> Besides, how cool would it have been to race cross in all that snow back
> in Dec?
>
> Answer: bodacious
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:09 AM, "Jake Witty via OBRA"
> wrote:
>
>> ^^^The truth
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Robert Jackson via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Juston for Event Organizer...
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, craig austin via OBRA <
>>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Juston for President.
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
>>>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back
>>>>> a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>>> UCI Season.
>>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB
>>>>> Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with
>>>>> cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to
>>>>> Jan/Feb)
>>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Manville
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Robert M. Jackson
>>> RMJacksonIV@gmail.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>

--
Kelly E. Myers, BS/MA Psychology
Secondary Science Teacher
(503) 409-4217
(503) 431-5723


craig austin

2017-01-25

True, it would've been excellent training for those going to nationals.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:11 AM, My Computer via OBRA
wrote:

> Besides, how cool would it have been to race cross in all that snow back
> in Dec?
>
> Answer: bodacious
>
> On Jan 25, 2017 11:09 AM, "Jake Witty via OBRA"
> wrote:
>
>> ^^^The truth
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Robert Jackson via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Juston for Event Organizer...
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, craig austin via OBRA <
>>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Juston for President.
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
>>>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back
>>>>> a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>>> UCI Season.
>>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB
>>>>> Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with
>>>>> cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to
>>>>> Jan/Feb)
>>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Manville
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Robert M. Jackson
>>> RMJacksonIV@gmail.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Kelly Myers

2017-01-25

I agree...

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
obra@list.obra.org> wrote:

> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
> shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
> UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
> cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
> short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
> entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>

--
Kelly E. Myers, BS/MA Psychology
Secondary Science Teacher
(503) 409-4217
(503) 431-5723


My Computer

2017-01-25

Besides, how cool would it have been to race cross in all that snow back in
Dec?

Answer: bodacious

On Jan 25, 2017 11:09 AM, "Jake Witty via OBRA" wrote:

> ^^^The truth
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Robert Jackson via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>> Juston for Event Organizer...
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, craig austin via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Juston for President.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
>>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>>> UCI Season.
>>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing
>>>> boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some
>>>> singletrack to short-track
>>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we
>>>> can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a
>>>> great entry point into road racing.
>>>>
>>>> -- Manville
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Robert M. Jackson
>> RMJacksonIV@gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


My Computer

2017-01-25

+100 on moving seasons forward. Racing cross when it's 75 and dry out
seems wrong (especially in Oregon) as is racing MTBS when it's snowing and
below 30, both all too common.

Probably more of a promoter issue than OBRA but worthy of discussion.

On Jan 25, 2017 11:00 AM, "Juston Manville via OBRA"
wrote:

> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
> shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
> UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
> cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
> short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
> entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Jake Witty

2017-01-25

^^^The truth

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Robert Jackson via OBRA <
obra@list.obra.org> wrote:

> Juston for Event Organizer...
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, craig austin via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>> Juston for President.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
>> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May
>>> improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers
>>> to get in shape before the races come.
>>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>>> UCI Season.
>>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
>>> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
>>> short-track
>>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
>>> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
>>> entry point into road racing.
>>>
>>> -- Manville
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Robert M. Jackson
> RMJacksonIV@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Robert Jackson

2017-01-25

Juston for Event Organizer...

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, craig austin via OBRA
wrote:

> Juston for President.
>
> Craig
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
> obra@list.obra.org> wrote:
>
>> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
>> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
>> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
>> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
>> shape before the races come.
>> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
>> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
>> UCI Season.
>> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
>> cooler weather and great base for cross season
>> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
>> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
>> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
>> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
>> short-track
>> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
>> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
>> entry point into road racing.
>>
>> -- Manville
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>

--
Robert M. Jackson
RMJacksonIV@gmail.com


craig austin

2017-01-25

Juston for President.

Craig

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Juston Manville via OBRA <
obra@list.obra.org> wrote:

> Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a
> month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
> 1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves
> the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in
> shape before the races come.
> 2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO
> length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the
> UCI Season.
> 3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races;
> cooler weather and great base for cross season
> 4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross
> six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
> 5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring;
> short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to
> short-track
> 6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can
> build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great
> entry point into road racing.
>
> -- Manville
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Juston Manville

2017-01-25

Maybe participation would improve if we pushed our entire season back a month or two. Most of my arguments are weather related:
1) It rains all the time in April; pushing early races into May improves the chances of good weather and safe roads.It also allows skiers to get in shape before the races come.
2) XCO mountain bike racing stops in June; prime race weather for XCO length MTB races are in the months of July and August; this aligns with the UCI Season.
3) Early fall is an excellent time for Grand Fondos and long MTB Races; cooler weather and great base for cross season
4) Cross season begins and ends way too early; OBRA was done with cross six weeks before Nationals. Cross is a winter sport (Oct/ Nov to Jan/Feb)
5) The obsession of turning circles in grass fields makes racing boring; short-track is not cyclocross on fat tires. Let's add some singletrack to short-track
6) Most importantly, let's get some singletrack in Forest Park so we can build interest in mountain biking in Portland; mountain biking is a great entry point into road racing.

-- Manville