Fwd: [FIXED-GEAR] Fwd: yak Digest #505

jo-@aracnet.com

2003-07-24



Roger Joys wrote:

 

Worth writing an email or letter to your representatives.



-r



-----Original Message-----

From: Rob Snyder [mailto:rls3-@yahoo.com]

Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 04:09 PM

To: 'tandem', 'fixed gear', 'seawheels'

Subject: [FIXED-GEAR] Fwd: yak Digest #505



This was posted to the Bike Friday (yak) list, but I think it is worth

cross posting to all my lists.



Rob

--- ya-@bikefriday.com wrote:

 Message-ID: <004701c35105$c079cd00$10dba618@woh.rr.com>

From: "Claire Lea" <SloTw-@woh.rr.com>

Subject: To the defenses

Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 06:32:38 -0400



More information is available at:

http://www.americabikes.org/



SloTw-@woh.rr.com

aka Claire Lea



A house subcommittee has voted to cut all funding for

bike paths and other pollution-free transportation

programs.



- - - - - - - - - - - -

By Katharine Mieszkowski



July 22, 2003 | For every bike commuter who proudly

pedals to work under the mantra "one less car,"

Congress has a message for you: Get back on the

highway where you belong, burning fossil fuel like a

real American. That goes for you, too, you

traffic-hazard pedestrians.



Fresh out of subcommittee, a new congressional

transportation appropriations bill will entirely

eliminate some $600 million worth of annual federal

funding for bike paths, walkways and other such

transportation niceties in fiscal year 2004.



Never mind the political fallout of U.S. oil

dependency on the Middle East, or the fact that the

average mileage per gallon for new cars and trucks in

the U.S. is at its lowest level in 20 years. Members

of the House's Appropriations Subcommittee on

Transportation, Treasury and Independent Agencies know

that what America needs now is fewer bike paths and

walkways -- but more highways.



Defenders of the bill argue that, in light of huge

federal deficits, something has to go, but for bike

activists and environmentalists who have been pushing

for decades for alternatives to driving, the cuts are

a giant step backward.



"The irony of trying to make it easier for people to

drive when we're clearly running up against major

roadblocks on providing oil for driving is just too

much," says Leah Shahum, executive director of the San

Francisco Bicycle Coalition, a nonprofit that promotes

bikes for transportation.



Under the new bill, which the full Committee on

Appropriations is likely to consider this week, before

it goes to the House floor for a vote, highways would

receive $34.1 billion in fiscal year 2004, which is

$2.5 billion more than this year, while the

Transportation Enhancements program that funds bike

paths and walkways would get nothing. The bill would

also significantly reduce funding for everything from

Amtrak to reverse-commute transportation programs that

connect low-income urban workers to jobs in the

suburbs.



"It's saying: 'We're not really that interested in

community restoration or improvement. We just want the

money going toward highway development,'" says Susan

Prolman, government relations counsel for Defenders of

Wildlife. She points out that the bill puts $4.8

billion more into highway projects than President Bush

asked for in his 2004 budget.



<snip>



"They essentially gutted funding for sensible

alternatives in favor of more road building," says

Eric Olson, who works for the Sierra Club's Challenge

to Sprawl campaign in Washington.



After 40 years of funding highways, in 1991 the

Department of Transportation started the

Transportation Enhancements program to develop a more

"modally balanced transportation system by encouraging

projects that are more than asphalt, concrete and

steel." Environmentalists and historical

preservationist groups viewed its creation as a

watershed in federal transportation policy -- an

acknowledgement that the U.S.'s vast federal highway

system can do more than just seamlessly move cars and

trucks.



Who said regime change DOESN'T begin at home...



Joe

--

#----------------------------------------------------------#

#                   Penguinix Consulting                   #

#----------------------------------------------------------#

#            Software development, QA and testing.         #

#                Linux support and training.               #

#                "Don't fear the penguin!"                 #

#----------------------------------------------------------#

# Registered Linux user: #309247     http://counter.li.org #

#----------------------------------------------------------#



Roger Joys

2003-07-24



Worth writing an email or letter to your representatives.



-r





-----Original Message-----

From: Rob Snyder [mailto:rls3-@yahoo.com]

Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 04:09 PM

To: 'tandem', 'fixed gear', 'seawheels'

Subject: [FIXED-GEAR] Fwd: yak Digest #505



This was posted to the Bike Friday (yak) list, but I think it is worth

cross posting to all my lists.



Rob

--- ya-@bikefriday.com wrote:

 Message-ID: <004701c35105$c079cd00$10dba618@woh.rr.com>

From: "Claire Lea" <SloTw-@woh.rr.com>

Subject: To the defenses

Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 06:32:38 -0400



More information is available at:

http://www.americabikes.org/



SloTw-@woh.rr.com

aka Claire Lea



A house subcommittee has voted to cut all funding for

bike paths and other pollution-free transportation

programs.



- - - - - - - - - - - -

By Katharine Mieszkowski



July 22, 2003 | For every bike commuter who proudly

pedals to work under the mantra "one less car,"

Congress has a message for you: Get back on the

highway where you belong, burning fossil fuel like a

real American. That goes for you, too, you

traffic-hazard pedestrians.



Fresh out of subcommittee, a new congressional

transportation appropriations bill will entirely

eliminate some $600 million worth of annual federal

funding for bike paths, walkways and other such

transportation niceties in fiscal year 2004.



Never mind the political fallout of U.S. oil

dependency on the Middle East, or the fact that the

average mileage per gallon for new cars and trucks in

the U.S. is at its lowest level in 20 years. Members

of the House's Appropriations Subcommittee on

Transportation, Treasury and Independent Agencies know

that what America needs now is fewer bike paths and

walkways -- but more highways.



Defenders of the bill argue that, in light of huge

federal deficits, something has to go, but for bike

activists and environmentalists who have been pushing

for decades for alternatives to driving, the cuts are

a giant step backward.



"The irony of trying to make it easier for people to

drive when we're clearly running up against major

roadblocks on providing oil for driving is just too

much," says Leah Shahum, executive director of the San

Francisco Bicycle Coalition, a nonprofit that promotes

bikes for transportation.



Under the new bill, which the full Committee on

Appropriations is likely to consider this week, before

it goes to the House floor for a vote, highways would

receive $34.1 billion in fiscal year 2004, which is

$2.5 billion more than this year, while the

Transportation Enhancements program that funds bike

paths and walkways would get nothing. The bill would

also significantly reduce funding for everything from

Amtrak to reverse-commute transportation programs that

connect low-income urban workers to jobs in the

suburbs.



"It's saying: 'We're not really that interested in

community restoration or improvement. We just want the

money going toward highway development,'" says Susan

Prolman, government relations counsel for Defenders of

Wildlife. She points out that the bill puts $4.8

billion more into highway projects than President Bush

asked for in his 2004 budget.



<snip>



"They essentially gutted funding for sensible

alternatives in favor of more road building," says

Eric Olson, who works for the Sierra Club's Challenge

to Sprawl campaign in Washington.



After 40 years of funding highways, in 1991 the

Department of Transportation started the

Transportation Enhancements program to develop a more

"modally balanced transportation system by encouraging

projects that are more than asphalt, concrete and

steel." Environmentalists and historical

preservationist groups viewed its creation as a

watershed in federal transportation policy -- an

acknowledgement that the U.S.'s vast federal highway

system can do more than just seamlessly move cars and

trucks.





__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________

Fixed-Gear mailing list

Fixed-@lists.davintech.ca

http://lists.davintech.ca/mailman/listinfo/fixed-gear

Your info is at:

http://lists.davintech.ca/mailman/options/fixed-gear/you--at--yourdomain