Code of Conduct enough already

ricky roma

2005-01-27





Now this is good stuff. Complaining about people responding to the

thread while responding to it yourself.



rr





mark duff wrote:

 Ok my delete key is starting to wear out! We are all adults and we

should no

the laws of the road. If we abide by them, all is fine. Yes there is

extreme

cases with problem stoplight triggers/sensors and all, but really we

know if

we are breaking a law or not...can we please move on....maybe even go

ride

our bikes.



Cheers

Mark



 From: Peter Murphy <murphy_-@hotmail.com>

Reply-To: murphy_-@hotmail.com

To: ob-@topica.com, shi-@lists.riseup.net

Subject: RE: [shift] Re: [OBRA Chat] Code of Conduct (long, but

hopefully

worth your tim

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:37:26 -0800



mark duff

2005-01-26



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_d8_1fda_2912

Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed



Ok my delete key is starting to wear out! We are all adults and we should no

the laws of the road. If we abide by them, all is fine. Yes there is extreme

cases with problem stoplight triggers/sensors and all, but really we know if

we are breaking a law or not...can we please move on....maybe even go ride

our bikes.



Cheers

Mark



 From: Peter Murphy <murphy_-@hotmail.com>

Reply-To: murphy_-@hotmail.com

To: ob-@topica.com, shi-@lists.riseup.net

Subject: RE: [shift] Re: [OBRA Chat] Code of Conduct (long, but hopefully

worth your tim

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:37:26 -0800





------=_NextPart_000_d8_1fda_2912

Content-Type: message/rfc822



X-SID-PRA: Peter Murphy <murphy_-@hotmail.com>

X-SID-Result: SoftFail

X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEqc/YxMjp29kpqQZJDiqv1Pve3wi3pBCk=

Received: from out006.topica-platinum-y.com ([66.227.60.26]) by mc3-f37.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:38:15 -0800

Return-Path: <murphy_-@hotmail.com>

Received: (qmail 14215 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jan 2005 20:38:06 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (64.4.31.13)

by 0 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 20:38:06 -0000

Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:38:02 -0800

Received: from 206.169.232.146 by by13fd.bay13.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:37:26 GMT

X-Originating-IP: [206.169.232.146]

X-Originating-Email: [murphy_-@hotmail.com]

X-Sender: murphy_-@hotmail.com

In-Reply-To: <02E94C19C5F2A6409572-@pdot65.trans.city>

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/html; format=flowed

X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2005 20:38:02.0112 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE0D0800:01C503E6]

To: ob-@topica.com, shi-@lists.riseup.net

From: Peter Murphy <murphy_-@hotmail.com>

Subject: RE: [shift] Re: [OBRA Chat] Code of Conduct (long, but hopefully worth your

tim

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:37:26 -0800

Message-ID: <62365179-1463792638-1106771891@boing.topica.com>

Errors-To: <QxZarwEJATBP5cI-@boing.topica.com>

Reply-To: murphy_-@hotmail.com

X-Topica-Id: <1106771886.inmta008.topica.com.19485.1413086>

List-Help: <http://topica.com/lists/obra@topica.com/>

List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:obra-uns-@topica.com>



<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>

<P>A moving violation is a moving violation. Are they going to up the fines on large trucks that run red lights? The big truck's impact to public safety is much greater than a honda Civic's. <BR><BR><BR>Pete Murphy </P></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>>From: "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff.-@pdxtrans.org>

<DIV></DIV>>To: 'Peter Murphy' <murphy_-@hotmail.com>, ob-@topica.com,shi-@lists.riseup.net

<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: [shift] Re: [OBRA Chat] Code of Conduct (long, but hopefully worth your time)

<DIV></DIV>>Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:48:27 -0800

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>I agree, Pete --- except that as it currently stands the fine for a cyclist

<DIV></DIV>>& a motorist running a red light is exactly the same.  Which, when viewed in

<DIV></DIV>>terms of the risk to public safety, is ridiculous.  Fine schedules for

<DIV></DIV>>traffic violations were increased in the last legislative session, with (for

<DIV></DIV>>Portland at least) the increased income devoted to a traffic safety fund

<DIV></DIV>>(for enforcement, education, & some engineering).  In the current

<DIV></DIV>>legislature i saw last week a bill had been introduced in the State Senate

<DIV></DIV>>to reduce the traffic fines on cyclists --- an excellent idea.

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>jeff

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>Pete wrote:

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>Advocate for heavier traffic fines and prosecution of the people who break

<DIV></DIV>>the law. This includes cyclists. If a cyclist blows a red light and gets

<DIV></DIV>>caught, fine 'em, but also fine the car that did not come to a complete stop

<DIV></DIV>>beore making a right turn on a red light.

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>_________________________________________

<DIV></DIV>>The homepage for this list can be found at http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/shift

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>People may unsubscribe by sending mail to

<DIV></DIV>>shift-uns-@lists.riseup.net

<DIV></DIV></div><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE>



</html>







------=_NextPart_000_d8_1fda_2912--