jakebigham
The great attraction of an indoor track is on the days when it's
too rainy, cold, snowy, icy or dark to have much fun outside
That might be regarded as a positive point for looking at the
(relatively) low cost solution to a tensile structure for seasonal
use only. This would be a project that would involve the seasonal
"tenting" of the Alpenrose track that might include the resurfacing
of the existing track as another phase of the project. perhaps I
shouldn't have been so quick to discount that idea - because it does
respond to the seasonal nature of the appetite for sheltered track
riding without fundamentally changing the regular track season at
Alpenrose (except perhaps to extend it and make it less vulnerable to
rain cancellation in season). The idea is to have a "convertible"
outdoor track, unconditioned space, retractable "tent" without walls.
You could still operate the track as an outdoor venue when conditions
are right.
None of this does anything to discount the points made by many that
there isn't enough support of track racing to inspire additional
outlay of cash. What does change with this scheme is the initial cost
and cost of upkeep (reckon on a tenfold reduction more or less).
On Jan 30, 2006, at 9:30 AM, RCJoh-@attglobal.net wrote:
Sounds to me like a "which came first / chicken or egg" situation.
Until there's an indoor option there's a whole lot of people that
will be riding somewhere else (or not at all). I live in Bend and
therefore don't see myself driving 6 hours to ride a track anytime
soon. But, if it were in my town the only time I'd be interested in
track riding is indoors in the winter. I think it's a pretty near
universal thing that most of us ride in great part for the pleasure
of being outdoors, and never more so than when the weather is nice.
The great attraction of an indoor track is on the days when it's
too rainy, cold, snowy, icy or dark to have much fun outside. Then
a track becomes the preferred option over the mind numbing bore of
trainer pedaling.
So, I think it's safe to say that with an indoor track you could
expect to see a lot more interest through the winter. Enough to
meet the financial needs? Still doubtful, an important piece of the
puzzle none the less.
Rick
martin cohen wrote:
I agree. Let's see current usage/spectatorship increase before
going further. I raced there 2 years ago, Fast Twitch Fridays, and
in the beginner field there were at most 8-10 racers. Considering
that could have included on-the-road cat 3-5, that's not alot. I
drove 1.5 hours from Hood River, and I knew of at least 1 other
guy who came up from Corvallis. Where the homies at?!!
I'd rather see the resources go into re-paving the current track.
Then again, if an indoor track would market/allow contests such as
rollerblading,skateboarding, or roller derby, it might have a chance.
Marty
mike.m-@obra.org wrote:
Most of the posts to this list on this subject have come from
people that don't use the velodrome that we are already lucky
enough to have. The first step in supporting the idea of an indoor
velodrome would be to come to events at the current outdoor
velodrome. Even better would be to support it by helping with
organizing programs or finding sponsorship. As use of the current
velodrome grows the possibility of supporting an indoor velodrome
becomes much more likely.
To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.
To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org
To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com
To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.
To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org
To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com