oregonyankee@comcast.net

Didn't we go around on this topiclast year? Seems that I recall a similar line of emails. . . Maybe not; might be that I am getting confused with advancing age.

At a racing age of 62, I cannot, on average, stay up with the the forty-somethings much less the thirty-somethings. How many classifications can we have and still field a race? "Masters 30 -39" "Senior Masters 40 - 50" 'Senior - Senior Masters 50 - 60" "Geezer Masters 60+" ???

I'm just trying to stay with the wheel in front of me.
Peter

--
Want another angle on cycling? Read my Bike Blog at www.OregonLive.com/weblogs/bikeblog/

-------------- Original message --------------
From: Edward Kendrick Sr

That's a good question, too. Everything else being equal, 39 yr olds can not, on average, stay up with 20 yr olds. (even though it often seems like they can???) If significant percentages of riders try to do this, those individuals are leading us toward unpleasant imbalances.

mark duff wrote:
This year that wont be a problem at any of the BB as the Masters field
starts at 40+ and the isn't a 30-39 field for the masters. Why have all the
promoters gone to a 40+ field and are leaving out those who want to race
Masters 30-39. Just a question????

What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos