Sarah Tisdale

This seems like a very dicey way to settle a dispute. Here's my opinion.

If Evan, after finding out about the extra work required, asked to
cancel the exchange within ~30 days and before seriously riding the
frame, I'd side with him.

But since Evan had it for "a few months" and rode the frame
"~200miles", I'm inclined to side with Dan.

Still, its a little grey and $100 is *fairly* small.

I vote for "do whatever results in fewest hard feelings": Split it
$50/$50. Evan eats $50 of the cost. Dan gives $50 to Evan. Seems
the best way to get past any bad feelings.

Sarah

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Ron and Dorothy
Strasser wrote:
> Good post Chriss.  I also think Dan should be talking to the person who gave
> him frame "with the understanding that it was a rideable frame" about what
> that was all about.  Sounds like that was NOT the case at all.  Might have
> been an honest lack of knowledge about this frame.  The story (facts left
> our or added)  can change as it passes from one person to the next.  I do
> hope Dan and Evan can work this out in a manner that does not get nasty.
> There are more important things in life than bike stuff, including finding
> ways to keep your stress levels low.
> Good luck you two.  I am sure you will receive even more "verdicts" from
> your peers.
> ron
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "chriss"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 9:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Jury of peers needed
>
>
>> No real side here but hey a debate is a debate.  As someone who has had to
>> warranty a frame or two that i've sold I am wondering what Dan would do if
>> there was a roll reversal here?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>