FW: Results-Tuesday PIR

Jon Walpole

2000-07-13

I'm surprised how many people feel comfortable offering up their

opinion on what the rules should be for PIR. It just goes to show

that few people actually agree on what PIR is (a race or a training

ride) or understand how to race it. This goes some way to explaining

the bizarre behaviour I see out there -- and I don't just mean missing

laps and sprinting. Nowadays I even find myself confused about what the

objective is when I'm riding out there, but maybe thats just old age

setting in.



This confusion can easily be cleared up by the organizers. If its a

race, then apply the USCF/OBRA rule book to the letter. This means

identifying which of the recognized race formats it corresponds to

and following the rules. For example, in "points races" laps take

precedence over points, so even if you keep your points they only

serve to differentiate you from others on the same lap. Following these

rules explains how to score the night's racing. When it comes to

calculating the monthly series results there are more problems though.

Is each monthly series a stage race (scored on time) or an omnium

(scored on placings for the nights) or some other kind of event that

nobody does elsewhere? The current practice of accumulating the points

for all riders, and disregarding the lap they are on is bound to confuse

people -- why not just run it as an omnium?



On the other hand, if PIR is not a race but a training event, then there

is no need for officials, finish line cameras, commentators etc etc. Lets

save the money, lower the entry fee, and just go out on the track and hammer.



-- Jon



Mike Murray

2000-07-13

-----Original Message-----

From: Matthew Miner [mailto:tok-@excelonline.com]

Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 12:07 AM

To: mmur-@teleport.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Results-Tuesday PIR





Completely agree with you, Mike. Let me think about a solution. I forwarded

this to my good buddy, Will Hall down in Bezerkely. I bet he'll get back to

us with some bright ideas.

See you at the track,



Matthew Miner



 -----Original Message-----

From: Mike Murray [mailto:mmur-@teleport.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 11:46 PM

To: OBRA Remailer

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Results-Tuesday PIR





--- Sponsor's Message --------------------------------------

FREE digital photo album software. FlipAlbum organizes digital

photos/graphics into 3D page-flipping photo albums. You can

play music while viewing them, email them & run slide shows.

FREE phonecard too!

http://click.topica.com/aaaasLaVxiDpaVD4Sfa/1011eBookAd1

------------------------------------------------------------

Actually it was NOT a mistake. The officials were well aware that some of

the placed riders did not finish the race. They told me that "Jeff wants

the riders to keep their points". Personally I think that is BS

and against

the rules of racing. YMMV.



The number of people jumping back in last night was huge. I

would estimate

20 or so riders went down a lap and then came back in. Add to

that at least

2 of the riders that were listed as placing didn't even finish

the distance.



I agree that PIR is not the World Championships but either it is a race or

it is not a race. If it is not a race then we should not have placings

awarded. If placings are awarded then it is a race. If it is a race then

we should follow the racing rules. It is really an all or none situation.

If we ignore some of the rules where do we start to NOT ignore them?



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Valente, Norrene [mailto:Norrene.-@nike.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 1:08 PM

To: 'ob-@topica.com'

Subject: [OBRA Chat] Results-Tuesday PIR



Jim Anderson

2000-07-12

I agree with Mike and it is unfair with what went on. Technically OBRA

has adopted the SAME Racing Rules as the USCF on all types of races.

Just because its OBRA doesnt mean that we can bend the rules or make

amendments to them for certain circumstances. PIR is almost a "mix"

between a criterium and a Road Race. I think the officals blend the

rules for both? Rules governing road racing and Criterium racing

regarding lapped riders is as follows:



SECTION 3C3:

"A lapped rider or one who as fallen too far behind and is considered to

be out contention may be called off the course by the Chief Ref."

Note: PIR riders are allowed to continue to "race/ride". however PIR is

a "training" race, but there is NO such thing as "training" race rules

and road race rules. training road race=road race, no difference.



"Riders on differnt laps may not give or receive pace(drafting) from one

another." easy enough rule, if you are lapped you ride at the back of

the field, not taking pace from the draft of the field. THIS also means

that to do this you let the field pass then continue to ride.

Technically you are neutral as the field passes, then you can continue

on your way. THIS also doesnt mean that you think you can "squezze"

into the field when its strung out single file, and think someone will

let you in.



"A Lapped rider may not interfere in ANY prime sprint or finishing

sprint...." a very simple rule. enough said.



Criterium Rules state about lapped riders is:

3D3:

"...Lapped riders may be permitted to remain in the race and will finish

on the same lap as the leaders..."



3D4:

"Riders on different laps may work together except that no rider may

drop back to assist a rider that has broken away from the field."



pages 56, 58. 2000 uscf rulebk



Please let me know if im at ALL incorrect on the statements above,

officals, race directors?....

thanks.

--Jim



Mike Murray wrote:

 

--- Sponsor's Message --------------------------------------

ASK. ANALYZE. ACT

All at Internet speed. Get real-time feedback with

Zoomerang. Click now to see.

http://click.topica.com/aaaatjaVxiDpaVzpb0a/1028ZoomrangComAd1

------------------------------------------------------------

I reading these results I notice that there is at least one rider who is

listed as placing who did not complete the full distance of the race. One

rider quit with 10 or so laps to go! Since this is a points race format the

points should be used to resolve the placing of riders that are on the same

number of laps. Is it far or reasonable to place people that don't even

finish the race?



The other problem with lapped riders that was particularly bad last night is

that many people were getting dropped or stopping (often from the middle of

the field) and then re-joining the race after sitting out a lap and

continuing to sprint and chase breaks and otherwise effect the race. Even

worse they would often re-join and then get dropped again while many riders

on even laps were gapped behind them.



It appears that the most effective technique to ride PIR under the current

format would be to sit out all but the sprint laps.



Is this something that bothers just me or do other people think it is unfair

also? Does anyone have a solution?



Personally I think that we need to have a lead vehicle for each field. This

would make the officiating much easier. Lapped riders would be noted

immediately. Currently the officials have little idea if someone is a lap

down. Neutralizing when different fields pass each other would be much

safer and more fair. Officials could actually make some judgments for foul

riding. Perhaps having a designated lantern rouge rider that lapped riders

needed to stay behind would be a way to allow lapped riders to continue to

ride without effecting the race.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Oregon Bicycle Racing [mailto:ob-@teleport.com]

Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:10 PM

To: ob-@teleport.com

Subject: Results-Tuesday PIR



PIR Race Series

July 11, 2000



Cately 1/2/3



1st. Graham Hill, Logie velo           12      13      28

2nd. Evan Elken, Bike&Hike             12      12      24

3rd. Pietro Buttita, Bike&Hike         10      7       17

4th. Terry McLeod, Saturn of Belluvue 7       4       11

5th. Steve Wright, Logie Velo          0       9       9

6th. Charles Hailey, Team Nissan       8               8

7th/ Jeff Mitchem, Logie Velo          5       3       8

8th. John Leonard, Team S&M            3       4       7

9th. Kelly Wieber, Safeway/Sturn       6               6

10th. Corey Stayton, Wizards           0       5       5

11th. Steve Swartzendruber, Logie      4               4

12th. Jamie Mikami, Safeway/Saturn     0       2       2

13th. Duncan Oliphant, River's Edge    0       2       2

14th. Andreas Oswald, North River Racing       1       1



Category 4/5



1st. DAvid Hopper, Logie Velo          15      3       18

2nd. Nathan Hobbson,bike/Seratto       8       6       14

3rd. Eric Hopper, Logie Velo           10      3       13

4th. Sam Richardson                    12              12

5th. Dominic VanHorn, Team Oregon      7               7

6th. Dean Tracy, Safeway/Saturn        6               6

7th. Pete Piva, Hutch's                5               5

8th. Patrick Edenfield                 4               4

9th. Brian Spears, Lakeside            3               3

10th. Robert Nobles, Team Oreogn       2               2



--- Sponsor's Message --------------------------------------

RETIRE OVERSEAS: Learn about the world's six best places to

live or retire. Live like royalty on $14 a day. Own an exotic

beachfront getaway for $35,000. Or romantic pied-a-terre for

under $60,000. Enjoy fine restaurant dining for $7 per person.

Get the details in your FREE report now.

http://click.topica.com/aaaar3aVxiDpaVzpb0c/Agora

------------------------------------------------------------

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics



--

Jim Anderson

503-975-8229



Mike Murray

2000-07-12

I reading these results I notice that there is at least one rider who is

listed as placing who did not complete the full distance of the race. One

rider quit with 10 or so laps to go! Since this is a points race format the

points should be used to resolve the placing of riders that are on the same

number of laps. Is it far or reasonable to place people that don't even

finish the race?



The other problem with lapped riders that was particularly bad last night is

that many people were getting dropped or stopping (often from the middle of

the field) and then re-joining the race after sitting out a lap and

continuing to sprint and chase breaks and otherwise effect the race. Even

worse they would often re-join and then get dropped again while many riders

on even laps were gapped behind them.



It appears that the most effective technique to ride PIR under the current

format would be to sit out all but the sprint laps.



Is this something that bothers just me or do other people think it is unfair

also? Does anyone have a solution?



Personally I think that we need to have a lead vehicle for each field. This

would make the officiating much easier. Lapped riders would be noted

immediately. Currently the officials have little idea if someone is a lap

down. Neutralizing when different fields pass each other would be much

safer and more fair. Officials could actually make some judgments for foul

riding. Perhaps having a designated lantern rouge rider that lapped riders

needed to stay behind would be a way to allow lapped riders to continue to

ride without effecting the race.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Oregon Bicycle Racing [mailto:ob-@teleport.com]

Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:10 PM

To: ob-@teleport.com

Subject: Results-Tuesday PIR





PIR Race Series

July 11, 2000



Cately 1/2/3



1st. Graham Hill, Logie velo 12 13 28

2nd. Evan Elken, Bike&Hike 12 12 24

3rd. Pietro Buttita, Bike&Hike 10 7 17

4th. Terry McLeod, Saturn of Belluvue 7 4 11

5th. Steve Wright, Logie Velo 0 9 9

6th. Charles Hailey, Team Nissan 8 8

7th/ Jeff Mitchem, Logie Velo 5 3 8

8th. John Leonard, Team S&M 3 4 7

9th. Kelly Wieber, Safeway/Sturn 6 6

10th. Corey Stayton, Wizards 0 5 5

11th. Steve Swartzendruber, Logie 4 4

12th. Jamie Mikami, Safeway/Saturn 0 2 2

13th. Duncan Oliphant, River's Edge 0 2 2

14th. Andreas Oswald, North River Racing 1 1



Category 4/5



1st. DAvid Hopper, Logie Velo 15 3 18

2nd. Nathan Hobbson,bike/Seratto 8 6 14

3rd. Eric Hopper, Logie Velo 10 3 13

4th. Sam Richardson 12 12

5th. Dominic VanHorn, Team Oregon 7 7

6th. Dean Tracy, Safeway/Saturn 6 6

7th. Pete Piva, Hutch's 5 5

8th. Patrick Edenfield 4 4

9th. Brian Spears, Lakeside 3 3

10th. Robert Nobles, Team Oreogn 2 2