rule changes

eric.k-@kingdesign.com

2003-01-13

one group.

no categories.



-----Original Message-----

From: Reid, Pam [mailto:pam.-@intel.com]

Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:00 AM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; Dav-@Hevanet.Com

Cc: obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Hum,

Woman's races are already Women versus Women (regardless of age, catagory

etc)...95% of the time....



Maybe it should be changed to Men vs Men.



Pam





-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:17 PM

To: Dav-@Hevanet.Com

Cc: obra

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Well, It's like I said to Candy " if you allow masters to race down in

age you might as well change the categories to 30+, 40+ and so on. Is

that what we want? For that matter you might as well just have 30+

only!!! Why do you think at the State TT the 1/2 field is usually the

smallest group???? Racers want clearly defined age groups. My team puts

on the State TT, if we offered one masters category [30+] I guarantee

you we would have the worst attendance ever....



Bicycle racing isn't always about who is the best all around rider. If

it was, there would be no categories at all. Just men vs men and women

vs women. Having specific age group allows you to test your self

against people your own approx age. What is so wrong with that? It's not

about some older guy wanting to see if he can beat a younger guy. If you

want to do that, race with the 1/2's......



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Reid, Pam

2003-01-13

Hum,

Woman's races are already Women versus Women (regardless of age, catagory

etc)...95% of the time....



Maybe it should be changed to Men vs Men.



Pam





-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:17 PM

To: Dav-@Hevanet.Com

Cc: obra

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Well, It's like I said to Candy " if you allow masters to race down in

age you might as well change the categories to 30+, 40+ and so on. Is

that what we want? For that matter you might as well just have 30+

only!!! Why do you think at the State TT the 1/2 field is usually the

smallest group???? Racers want clearly defined age groups. My team puts

on the State TT, if we offered one masters category [30+] I guarantee

you we would have the worst attendance ever....



Bicycle racing isn't always about who is the best all around rider. If

it was, there would be no categories at all. Just men vs men and women

vs women. Having specific age group allows you to test your self

against people your own approx age. What is so wrong with that? It's not

about some older guy wanting to see if he can beat a younger guy. If you

want to do that, race with the 1/2's......



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Schreck, George

2003-01-13

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2BB23.C2E4CFE0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Actually, I believe that the Oregon resident rule has been removed. You

just need to be an Obra member.



        George Schreck

         Phone: (503) 813-7211

          Fax: (503) 813-7190







-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:07 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





 I usually don't get into this but,......................

This is a rather silly argument.



Okay...While we are being illogical, I'd like to bring another

rule change to the table.



I say remove the Oregon resident prerequisite for being an Oregon

State champion. Come on down Washington racers; If you can beat

us, more power to you. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders

like that need that experience and competitive training.



Age and borders are absolute. So if we change one rule, we might as

well change both.



-Erik



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



==^================================================================

This email was sent to: george.-@pacificorp.com



EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/help/unsub.html.Z2Vvcmdl

Or send an email to: obra-uns-@topica.com



TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html

==^================================================================





------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.





==============================================================================







------_=_NextPart_001_01C2BB23.C2E4CFE0

Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">

<TITLE>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Actually, I believe that the Oregon resident rule has been removed.  You just need to be an Obra member.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>        George Schreck</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>         Phone: (503) 813-7211</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>          Fax: (503) 813-7190</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Erik Voldengen [<A HREF="mailto:eri-@fusium.com">mailto:eri-@fusium.com</A>]</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:07 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: ob-@topica.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>> I usually don't get into this but,......................</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> This is a rather silly argument. </FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Okay...While we are being illogical, I'd like to bring another</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>rule change to the table.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>I say remove the Oregon resident prerequisite for being an Oregon</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>State champion.  Come on down Washington racers; If you can beat</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>us, more power to you.  Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders </FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>like that need that experience and competitive training.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Age and borders are absolute.  So if we change one rule, we might as</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>well change both.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>-Erik</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT </P>









</BODY>

</HTML>

<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>

<br>

This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<br>

<br>

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.<br>

<br>

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.<br>

<br>

<br>

==============================================================================<br>

</P>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2BB23.C2E4CFE0--



yen-@aol.com

2003-01-11

While the goal may be consistancy, I vote for flexibility. If all the races

were on the same day then I think that everyone should race their age group.

But at State roads, the races are split over a couple weekends. That would

leave a fair number of rider with no option to race/train that weekend(yea I

know, I can go do the senior race...).

I also have a problem with Master Cat 3/4/5 only races for the same reason,

it excludes riders from an opportunity to do a race.

Steve Yenne



Troy Tucker

2003-01-11

I maybe a day behind on this but I think you should stay in your age group on

this championship race day.

Troy



Mike.Murray@obra.org

2003-01-11

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_0072_01BD164E.909FE4E0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



Senior races are open races, i.e. anyone of any age or gender that meets the ability criteria may ride them. Masters races and Junior races are age graded, i.e. you need to meet age criteria (and sometimes ability criteria) in order to compete. Women's races are limited to women only. There are no "Men's" races as women are allowed to compete in any race for which they meet the age and ability criteria.



Mike Murray

    -----Original Message-----

    From: Erik Long <elong-@hotmail.com>

    To: ob-@topica.com <ob-@topica.com>

    Date: Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:18 AM

    Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

    

    

    Maybe there should be an "Open" division rather than a Senior division.



    Food for thought,



    -Erik

    

    



    >From: srh-@webtv.net (Steven R Holland)

    >To: elong-@hotmail.com

    >Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

    >Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:33:37 -0800 (PST)

    >

    >Erik,

    >

    >FYI, the Olympics are an "open" competition....Bad example.

    >

    >STEVEN R HOLLAND

    >17203 SE 30th St.

    >VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

    >360-891-3924

    



----------------------------------------------------------------------------    

    MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com







------=_NextPart_000_0072_01BD164E.909FE4E0

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>



<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>

<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Senior races are open races, i.e. anyone of any

age or gender that meets the ability criteria may ride them.  Masters races

and Junior races are age graded, i.e. you need to meet age criteria (and

sometimes ability criteria) in order to compete.  Women's races are limited

to women only.  There are no "Men's" races as women are allowed

to compete in any race for which they meet the age and ability

criteria.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Mike Murray </FONT></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE

style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">

    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:

    </B>Erik Long <<A

    href="mailto:elong-@hotmail.com">elong-@hotmail.com</A>><BR><B>To:

    </B><A href="mailto:ob-@topica.com">ob-@topica.com</A> <<A

    href="mailto:ob-@topica.com">ob-@topica.com</A>><BR><B>Date:

    </B>Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:18 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>RE: [OBRA Chat]

    rule changes<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>

    <DIV>

    <DIV>

    <P>Maybe there should be an "Open" division rather than a Senior

    division.</P>

    <P>Food for thought,</P>

    <P>-Erik<BR><BR></P></DIV>

    <DIV></DIV>

    <DIV></DIV>>From: <A href="mailto:srh-@webtv.net">srh-@webtv.net</A>

    (Steven R Holland)

    <DIV></DIV>>To: elong-@hotmail.com

    <DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

    <DIV></DIV>>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:33:37 -0800 (PST)

    <DIV></DIV>>

    <DIV></DIV>>Erik,

    <DIV></DIV>>

    <DIV></DIV>>FYI, the Olympics are an "open" competition....Bad

    example.

    <DIV></DIV>>

    <DIV></DIV>>STEVEN R HOLLAND

    <DIV></DIV>>17203 SE 30th St.

    <DIV></DIV>>VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

    <DIV></DIV>>360-891-3924

    <DIV></DIV></DIV><BR clear=all>

    <HR>

    MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and <A

    href="http://g.msn.com/8HMIEN/2017">2 months FREE*</A> <PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>





</BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_0072_01BD164E.909FE4E0--



Mike.Murray@obra.org

2003-01-11

It is good to see this discussion but everyone should be aware of how the

rules are changed.

First the rule needs to be proposed in writing with the specific wording

proposed.

Then the club representatives vote at the annual meeting.

If you want the rules changed one way or another make sure you make your

opinions known to the person who will represent your club at the meeting.



Mike Murray



Erik Long

2003-01-11

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>

<P>Maybe there should be an "Open" division rather than a Senior division.</P>

<P>Food for thought,</P>

<P>-Erik<BR><BR></P></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>>From: srh-@webtv.net (Steven R Holland)

<DIV></DIV>>To: elong-@hotmail.com

<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:33:37 -0800 (PST)

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>Erik,

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>FYI, the Olympics are an "open" competition....Bad example.

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>STEVEN R HOLLAND

<DIV></DIV>>17203 SE 30th St.

<DIV></DIV>>VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

<DIV></DIV>>360-891-3924

<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMIEN/2017">2 months FREE*</a>





</html>



Obi1-@aol.com

2003-01-10



--part1_12d.1fc86d8c.2b51262b_boundary

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit





As far as (state/country) comp. borders go, doesn't it seem ridiculous that a

German win a US National champion? I hate to play the devils advocate, but

USCF does have a few things figured out. Maybe we should take note



Alex Johnson







--part1_12d.1fc86d8c.2b51262b_boundary

Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>

As far as (state/country) comp. borders go, doesn't it seem ridiculous that a German win a US National champion? I hate to play the devils advocate, but USCF does have a few things figured out. Maybe we should take note<BR>

<BR>

Alex Johnson</FONT>





</HTML>



--part1_12d.1fc86d8c.2b51262b_boundary--



Jerald M Powell

2003-01-10

--============_-1169865901==_ma============

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"



Whoa guys, the testosterone is getting a bit thick here... Masters

classes are age graded competition. While there's a certain logic to

Bill's argument, there's already a solution... Race the Senior open

championship race. Everybody's there and everybody's eligible. The

idea that older riders ought to be able to ride "up" a class ignores

the concept that the class is a class of age peers. The proposed

rule change is no more than a subterfuge for "shopping" for a

category that might be easier (yes bill, sometimes the younger guys

are easier, even sometimes for me). The solution is pretty obvious,

go to the next level, for age graded competition, that's regional or

national championships. As some of you have found out Master's Nats,

and Master's Worlds is a whole 'nother ball game. The competition

gets harder over 50.



Might I suggest another issue the "older" riders may have with the

suggested policy? If the self-styled "better" rider is allowed to opt

out of his age graded peerage, he devalues their race, and generally

devalues the riders in it as well.



Jerry





At 4:15 PM -0800 1/10/03, Cass, Bill wrote:

 I usually don't get into this but,......................This is a rather

silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no problem with

someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling. If I am that

worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older wants to race

in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they win a

championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules that keep

groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek or Hank

Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could whine all the

way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race hard

shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can think of a single

speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on the Senior

II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors because they

might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders like that need

that experience and competitive training. It is about raising the level of

competition not taking away a precious medal because someone older than you

is faster. Let them race.



Bill Cass







 ----------

From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

Reply To: cmur-@obra.org

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing body (you know the

evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group.

The

interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit

since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride down last year

at

the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the

feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

Is that any help?

Candi







-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Since the masters categories are defined by age,

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...





 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



--

Jerald M. Powell, AICP

Community Planning

1445 SW Harrison Street

Portland, OR 97201



Tel: 503 222 7173

Fax: 503 222 6026

cell: 503 799 7823



email: jpow-@spiritone.com





--============_-1169865901==_ma============

Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"



<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--

blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { margin-top: 0 ; margin-bottom: 0 }

--></style><title>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</title></head><body>

<div>Whoa guys, the testosterone is getting a bit thick here...

Masters classes are<b> age graded</b> competition.  While there's

a certain logic to Bill's argument, there's already a solution...<b>

Race the Senior open championship race.</b>  Everybody's there

and everybody's eligible.  The idea that older riders ought to be

able to ride "up" a class ignores the concept that the class

is a class of age peers.  The proposed rule change is no more

than a subterfuge for "shopping" for a category that might

be easier (yes bill, sometimes the younger guys are easier, even

sometimes for me).  The solution is pretty obvious, go to the

next level, for age graded competition, that's regional or national

championships. As some of you have found out Master's Nats, and

Master's Worlds is a whole 'nother ball game.  The competition

gets<i> harder</i> over 50.</div>

<div><br></div>

<div>Might I suggest another issue the "older" riders may

have with the suggested policy? If the self-styled "better"

rider is allowed to opt out of his age graded peerage, he devalues

their race, and generally devalues the riders in it as well.</div>

<div><br></div>

<div>Jerry</div>

<div><br></div>

<div><br></div>

<div>At 4:15 PM -0800 1/10/03, Cass, Bill wrote:</div>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>I usually don't get into this

but,......................This is a rather<br>

silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no problem

with<br>

someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling. If I am

that<br>

worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older wants to

race<br>

in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they win

a<br>

championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules that

keep<br>

groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek or

Hank<br>

Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could whine

all the<br>

way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race

hard<br>

shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can think of a

single<br>

speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on the

Senior<br>

II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors

because they<br>

might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders like

that need<br>

that experience and competitive training. It is about raising the

level of<br>

competition not taking away a precious medal because someone older

than you<br>

is faster. Let them race.<br>

<br>

Bill Cass<br>

</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite><br>

<br>

 ----------<br>

From:<x-tab>     </x-tab>Candi Murray/Oregon

Bicycle Racing Assn<br>

 Reply To:<x-tab>     

</x-tab>cmur-@obra.org<br>

 Sent:<x-tab> </x-tab>Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM<br>

To:<x-tab>   </x-tab>obra<br>

Subject:<x-tab>  </x-tab>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes<br>

<br>

Well yeah if you read it literally.  But the governing body

(you know the<br>

 evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age

group.<br>

 The<br>

interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a

deficit<br>

 since they were older.  We let some of the older guys ride

down last year</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>> at</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>> the state road race and had some

complaints, so we are trying to get the</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>> feel from the other riders and make

the rule clearer.</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>> Is that any help?</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>> Candi</blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>></blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>></blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>></blockquote>

<blockquote type="cite" cite>> -----Original Message-----<br>

 From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]<br>

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM<br>

To: cmur-@obra.org; obra<br>

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes<br>

<br>

<br>

Since the masters categories are defined by age,<br>

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...<br>

<br>

<br>

 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if

consistent for<br>

  masters to ride down an age group at the championships. 

So a 40-49 man<br>

  could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.<br>

<br>

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.<br>

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com<br>

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.<br>

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com<br>

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com<br>

<br>

 
<div><br></div>



<div><font color="#000000"><b>-- <br>

Jerald M. Powell, AICP</b></font></div>

<div><font color="#000000"><i>Community Planning</i></font></div>

<div><font color="#000000">1445 SW Harrison Street</font></div>

<div><font color="#000000">Portland, OR  97201</font></div>

<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>

<div><font color="#000000">Tel:  503 222 7173</font></div>

<div><font color="#000000">Fax:  503 222 6026</font></div>

<div><font color="#000000">cell: 503 799 7823</font></div>

<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div>

<div><font color="#000000">email: jpow-@spiritone.com</font></div>







</body>

</html>

--============_-1169865901==_ma============--



Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

2003-01-10





Then you better return them all because you don't live in the 'state'

Candi

-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:29 PM

To: cmur-@obra.org

Cc: obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Interesting.....I just looked at one of my medals and it says "State

Championships' ??????



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



Jamie Mikami

2003-01-10

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_0203_01C2B8D6.F4838F90

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



So I think what we are all saying is that we should change the OBRA championships to a 30+, 40+, 50+ etc instead of a 30-39 format.



I am all for that as long as we try to avoid letting non counting people race. I remember the state road race a few years back and it was 30-44 with 5 year age groups. So being in the 30-34 group I chased down every singe attack in the 35-44 groups that did not contain a teammate. Does this make me a bad rider? I dont care ... I was following the rules which stated we could do that, but lets just say it did not make the break riders very happy every time. Would I do it again, sure I would. I follow the rules to the best of my benefit ... its a race, the point is to win within the rules. And if you can help your teammates win, some riders will take that option. Did it make the race unfair for the other groups, sure, but life is not fair.



So I would like to add a clause that protects riders from what I did, basically protect me from me. So in addition to the rule change of making it 30+, etc. I propose we add something along the lines of ...



For OBRA championships all riders that start a championship race at the same time are eligible for medals in that race.   Only medal eligible riders are allowed to start any Championship race.



I am not sure how this might affect the smaller junior or women's races, but racing for medals with multiple groups at the same time, or having non-eligible riders in the groups is just wrong in my opinion.



Maybe we could add to the above rule. Any championship race with under 5 riders maybe combined with another race and the riders may compete for a separate set of medals at the discretion of the chief referee and the riders. In this case riders should be identified so that it is easy for the riders to figure out who is in what race.



Just my two cents.



Jamie

----- Original Message -----

From: Erik Long

To: ob-@topica.com

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:20 PM

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Kudos to Bill,



You've nailed the spirit of competition with the accuracy of a laser site.



I'd like to add: Keeping a perfectly safe, experienced rider from competing at a level that they are more than capable of (and taking away their eligibility for medals) is more than ridiculous. It's selfish. It's--dare I say it--age discrimination. We're not talking about letting the seniors race with the juniors, here. We're talking about Old Men being allowed to compete against Men who are less-old if they feel like it. Hell, let them race with the Seniors if they want to, I'm up to it (speaking as a Senior). How fair would it have been for the Olympic comitee to tell Kent Bostick that he wouldn't be allowed to ride the '96 Olympic trials because he was too old(at 42)? The man is damn near fifty and I'd be willing to bet that he'd still give any Oregon Senior a run for his money at the state championship.



Let them race, let them place.



-Erik







>From: "Cass, Bill"

>Reply-To: Bill.-@nike.com

>To: obra , "'cmur-@obra.org'"

>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:15:45 -0800

>

>I usually don't get into this but,......................This is a rather

>silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no problem with

>someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling. If I am that

>worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older wants to race

>in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they win a

>championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules that keep

>groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek or Hank

>Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could whine all the

>way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race hard

>shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can think of a single

>speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on the Senior

>II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors because they

>might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders like that need

>that experience and competitive training. It is about raising the level of

>competition not taking away a precious medal because someone older than you

>is faster. Let them race.

>

>Bill Cass

>

>

>

> > ----------

> > From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

> > Reply To: cmur-@obra.org

> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

> > To: obra

> > Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

> >

> > Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing body (you know the

> > evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group.

> > The

> > interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit

> > since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride down last year

> > at

> > the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the

> > feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

> > Is that any help?

> > Candi

> >

> >

> >

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

> > To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

> > Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

> >

> >

> > Since the masters categories are defined by age,

> > that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...

> >

> >

> > > Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

> > > masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

> > > could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.

> >

> > To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

> > To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

> > To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

>





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to







------=_NextPart_000_0203_01C2B8D6.F4838F90

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So I think what we are all saying is that we should

change the OBRA championships to a 30+, 40+, 50+ etc instead of a 30-39

format.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I am all for that as long as we try to avoid

letting non counting people race.  I remember the state road race a few

years back and it was 30-44 with 5 year age groups.  So being in the 30-34

group I chased down every singe attack in the 35-44 groups that did not contain

a teammate.  Does this make me a bad rider?  I dont care ... I was

following the rules which stated we could do that, but lets just say it did not

make the break riders very happy every time.  Would I do it again,

sure I would.  I follow the rules to the best of my benefit ... its a race,

the point is to win within the rules.  And if you can help your teammates

win, some riders will take that option.  Did it make the race unfair for

the other groups, sure, but life is not fair.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So I would like to add a clause that protects

riders from what I did, basically protect me from me.  So in addition to

the rule change of making it 30+, etc.  I propose we add something along

the lines of ...</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For OBRA championships all riders that start a

championship race at the same time are eligible for medals in that

race.   Only medal eligible riders are allowed to start any

Championship race.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I am not sure how this might affect the smaller

junior or women's races, but racing for medals with multiple groups at the same

time, or having non-eligible riders in the groups is just wrong in my

opinion.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Maybe we could add to the above rule.  Any

championship race with under 5 riders maybe combined with another race

and the riders may compete for a separate set of medals at the

discretion of the chief referee and the riders.  In this case riders should

be identified so that it is easy for the riders to figure out who is in what

race.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>  </FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just my two cents.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jamie</FONT></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr

style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>

<DIV

style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>

<A title=el-@hotmail.com href="mailto:elong-@hotmail.com">Erik

Long</A> </DIV>

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title-@topica.com

href="mailto:ob-@topica.com">ob-@topica.com</A> </DIV>

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 10, 2003 5:20

PM</DIV>

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [OBRA Chat] rule

changes</DIV>

<DIV><BR></DIV>

<DIV>

<DIV>

<P>Kudos to Bill,</P>

<P>You've nailed the spirit of competition with the accuracy of a laser

site.  </P>

<P>I'd like to add:  Keeping a perfectly safe, experienced rider from

competing at a level that they are more than capable of (and taking away

their eligibility for medals) is more than ridiculous.  It's

selfish.  It's--dare I say it--age discrimination.  We're not

talking about letting the seniors race with the juniors, here.  We're

talking about Old Men being allowed to compete against Men who are less-old if

they feel like it.  Hell, let them race with the Seniors if they want to,

I'm up to it (speaking as a Senior).  How fair would it have been for the

Olympic comitee to tell Kent Bostick that he wouldn't be allowed to ride the

'96 Olympic trials because he was too old(at 42)?  The man is damn near

fifty and I'd be willing to bet that he'd still give any Oregon Senior a run

for his money at the state championship.</P>

<P>Let them race, let them place.</P>

<P>-Erik<BR><BR></P></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>>From: "Cass, Bill" <BILL.-@NIKE.COM>

<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: Bill.-@nike.com

<DIV></DIV>>To: obra <OB-@TOPICA.COM>, "'cmur-@obra.org'"

<CMUR-@OBRA.ORG>

<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:15:45 -0800

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>I usually don't get into this but,......................This is

a rather

<DIV></DIV>>silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no

problem with

<DIV></DIV>>someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling.

If I am that

<DIV></DIV>>worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older

wants to race

<DIV></DIV>>in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they

win a

<DIV></DIV>>championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules

that keep

<DIV></DIV>>groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek

or Hank

<DIV></DIV>>Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could

whine all the

<DIV></DIV>>way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race

hard

<DIV></DIV>>shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can

think of a single

<DIV></DIV>>speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on

the Senior

<DIV></DIV>>II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors

because they

<DIV></DIV>>might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders

like that need

<DIV></DIV>>that experience and competitive training. It is about raising

the level of

<DIV></DIV>>competition not taking away a precious medal because someone

older than you

<DIV></DIV>>is faster. Let them race.

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>Bill Cass

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>> > ----------

<DIV></DIV>> > From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

<DIV></DIV>> > Reply To: cmur-@obra.org

<DIV></DIV>> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

<DIV></DIV>> > To: obra

<DIV></DIV>> > Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing

body (you know the

<DIV></DIV>> > evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down

an age group.

<DIV></DIV>> > The

<DIV></DIV>> > interpretation was that they had been that age and now

were at a deficit

<DIV></DIV>> > since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride

down last year

<DIV></DIV>> > at

<DIV></DIV>> > the state road race and had some complaints, so we are

trying to get the

<DIV></DIV>> > feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

<DIV></DIV>> > Is that any help?

<DIV></DIV>> > Candi

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > -----Original Message-----

<DIV></DIV>> > From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

<DIV></DIV>> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

<DIV></DIV>> > To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

<DIV></DIV>> > Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > Since the masters categories are defined by age,

<DIV></DIV>> > that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > > Currently we have one suggested rule change to make

if consistent for

<DIV></DIV>> > > masters to ride down an age group at the

championships. So a 40-49 man

<DIV></DIV>> > > could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

<DIV></DIV>> > To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

<DIV></DIV>> > To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

<DIV></DIV>>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

<DIV></DIV>>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV></DIV><BR clear=all>

<HR>

MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. <A

href="http://g.msn.com/8HMJEN/2022">Get 2 months FREE*.</A> <PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>





</BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_0203_01C2B8D6.F4838F90--



Steven R Holland

2003-01-10



--WebTV-Mail-6713-540

Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Interesting.....I just looked at one of my medals and it says "State

Championships' ??????



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924









--WebTV-Mail-6713-540

Content-Disposition: Inline

Content-Type: Message/RFC822

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Received: from smtpinvite-2001-2.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.202)

by storefull-2194.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 10

Jan 2003 17:25:15 -0800 (PST)

Received: from out003.tpca.net (out003.tpca.net [66.180.244.23]) by

smtpinvite-2001-2.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with

SMTP id 745B8FE15 for <srh-@webtv.net>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:24:59

-0800 (PST)

To: obra <ob-@topica.com>

From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn <cmur-@obra.org>

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:23:02 -0800

Message-ID: <1432684588-1463792382-1042248304@topica.com>

Errors-To: <blst-errors.700001901.0-@boing.topica.com>

Reply-To: cmur-@obra.org

X-Topica-Id: <1042248303.inmta002.18711.1037310>

List-Help: <http://topica.com/lists/obra/>

List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:obra-uns-@topica.com>

X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring

X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated

X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)

X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)

X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this

X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas

X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant

X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this

X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>;.

Received: (qmail 18853 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2003 01:25:02 -0000

Received: (qmail 18848 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2003 01:25:02 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc01.attbi.com) (204.127.202.61) by 0

with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 01:25:02 -0000

Received: from Computer2 (12-224-164-108.client.attbi.com[12.224.164.108])

by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with SMTP id <20030111012501001008onnme>;

Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:25:01 +0000

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)

Importance: Normal

X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

In-Reply-To: <1755625473-14637-@topica.com>





that rule does not exist. The championships are an OBRA championship. A

rider qualifies for a medal regardless of where he lives, if he has an

annual OBRA membership

Candi





-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:07 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





 I usually don't get into this but,......................

This is a rather silly argument.



Okay...While we are being illogical, I'd like to bring another

rule change to the table.



I say remove the Oregon resident prerequisite for being an Oregon

State champion. Come on down Washington racers; If you can beat

us, more power to you. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders

like that need that experience and competitive training.



Age and borders are absolute. So if we change one rule, we might as

well change both.



-Erik



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com













--WebTV-Mail-6713-540--



Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

2003-01-10



that rule does not exist. The championships are an OBRA championship. A

rider qualifies for a medal regardless of where he lives, if he has an

annual OBRA membership

Candi





-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:07 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





 I usually don't get into this but,......................

This is a rather silly argument.



Okay...While we are being illogical, I'd like to bring another

rule change to the table.



I say remove the Oregon resident prerequisite for being an Oregon

State champion. Come on down Washington racers; If you can beat

us, more power to you. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders

like that need that experience and competitive training.



Age and borders are absolute. So if we change one rule, we might as

well change both.



-Erik



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Cass, Bill

2003-01-10

This is what happens when you don't like what someone says, you broaden the

argument to the ridiculous. We live in this state. That is why we have an

address in this state and why we can become STATE CHAMPION. You have to

train hard though. You usually find someone else who wants to win that title

too.





Bill





bill cass

designer

acg footwear

503-532-0239



 ----------

From: Erik Voldengen

Reply To: eri-@fusium.com

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:06 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



 I usually don't get into this but,......................

This is a rather silly argument.



Okay...While we are being illogical, I'd like to bring another

rule change to the table.



I say remove the Oregon resident prerequisite for being an Oregon

State champion. Come on down Washington racers; If you can beat

us, more power to you. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders

like that need that experience and competitive training.



Age and borders are absolute. So if we change one rule, we might as

well change both.



-Erik



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

2003-01-10

1 club 1 vote for the representatives that come to the obra meeting







-----Original Message-----

From: David Ripp [mailto:port-@worldaccessnet.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:51 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Tim, Steve, Gary, and Eric.



How's that, there's 5-votes..



Dave Ripp

port-@wa-net.com



----- Original Message -----

From: "Tim Schauer" <TSch-@mackaysposito.com>

To: <Gary.Co-@nike.com>; <srh-@webtv.net>; <eri-@fusium.com>

Cc: <cmur-@obra.org>; "obra" <ob-@topica.com>

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:14 PM

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I do agree with Steve, Gary, and Eric.



It's bad enough when I get beat by guys in my own age group...



But getting beat by guys older than my age group, who just keep getting

better with age? Now that might be more fun than I can take! (Humor is

intended here...)



-Tim Schauer



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Erik Long

2003-01-10

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>

<P>Kudos to Bill,</P>

<P>You've nailed the spirit of competition with the accuracy of a laser site.  </P>

<P>I'd like to add:  Keeping a perfectly safe, experienced rider from competing at a level that they are more than capable of (and taking away their eligibility for medals) is more than ridiculous.  It's selfish.  It's--dare I say it--age discrimination.  We're not talking about letting the seniors race with the juniors, here.  We're talking about Old Men being allowed to compete against Men who are less-old if they feel like it.  Hell, let them race with the Seniors if they want to, I'm up to it (speaking as a Senior).  How fair would it have been for the Olympic comitee to tell Kent Bostick that he wouldn't be allowed to ride the '96 Olympic trials because he was too old(at 42)?  The man is damn near fifty and I'd be willing to bet that he'd still give any Oregon Senior a run for his money at the state championship.</P>

<P>Let them race, let them place.</P>

<P>-Erik<BR><BR></P></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>>From: "Cass, Bill" <BILL.-@NIKE.COM>

<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: Bill.-@nike.com

<DIV></DIV>>To: obra <OB-@TOPICA.COM>, "'cmur-@obra.org'" <CMUR-@OBRA.ORG>

<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:15:45 -0800

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>I usually don't get into this but,......................This is a rather

<DIV></DIV>>silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no problem with

<DIV></DIV>>someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling. If I am that

<DIV></DIV>>worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older wants to race

<DIV></DIV>>in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they win a

<DIV></DIV>>championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules that keep

<DIV></DIV>>groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek or Hank

<DIV></DIV>>Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could whine all the

<DIV></DIV>>way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race hard

<DIV></DIV>>shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can think of a single

<DIV></DIV>>speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on the Senior

<DIV></DIV>>II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors because they

<DIV></DIV>>might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders like that need

<DIV></DIV>>that experience and competitive training. It is about raising the level of

<DIV></DIV>>competition not taking away a precious medal because someone older than you

<DIV></DIV>>is faster. Let them race.

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>Bill Cass

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>> > ----------

<DIV></DIV>> > From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

<DIV></DIV>> > Reply To: cmur-@obra.org

<DIV></DIV>> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

<DIV></DIV>> > To: obra

<DIV></DIV>> > Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing body (you know the

<DIV></DIV>> > evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group.

<DIV></DIV>> > The

<DIV></DIV>> > interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit

<DIV></DIV>> > since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride down last year

<DIV></DIV>> > at

<DIV></DIV>> > the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the

<DIV></DIV>> > feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

<DIV></DIV>> > Is that any help?

<DIV></DIV>> > Candi

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > -----Original Message-----

<DIV></DIV>> > From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

<DIV></DIV>> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

<DIV></DIV>> > To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

<DIV></DIV>> > Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > Since the masters categories are defined by age,

<DIV></DIV>> > that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > > Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

<DIV></DIV>> > > masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

<DIV></DIV>> > > could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> > To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

<DIV></DIV>> > To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

<DIV></DIV>> > To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>> >

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV>>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

<DIV></DIV>>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

<DIV></DIV>>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

<DIV></DIV>>

<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMJEN/2022">Get 2 months FREE*.</a>





</html>



Steven R Holland

2003-01-10

Well, It's like I said to Candy " if you allow masters to race down in

age you might as well change the categories to 30+, 40+ and so on. Is

that what we want? For that matter you might as well just have 30+

only!!! Why do you think at the State TT the 1/2 field is usually the

smallest group???? Racers want clearly defined age groups. My team puts

on the State TT, if we offered one masters category [30+] I guarantee

you we would have the worst attendance ever....



Bicycle racing isn't always about who is the best all around rider. If

it was, there would be no categories at all. Just men vs men and women

vs women. Having specific age group allows you to test your self

against people your own approx age. What is so wrong with that? It's not

about some older guy wanting to see if he can beat a younger guy. If you

want to do that, race with the 1/2's......



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



Erik Voldengen

2003-01-10

 I usually don't get into this but,......................

This is a rather silly argument.



Okay...While we are being illogical, I'd like to bring another

rule change to the table.



I say remove the Oregon resident prerequisite for being an Oregon

State champion. Come on down Washington racers; If you can beat

us, more power to you. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders

like that need that experience and competitive training.



Age and borders are absolute. So if we change one rule, we might as

well change both.



-Erik



Pat Sagers

2003-01-10

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



----=_NextPart_ST_17_00_22_Friday_January_10_2003_11243

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"



My question would be what the complaining was about. Were there legitimate

arguments or was it about ego and bragging rights?

As an older gentleman, I would want the ability to compete where my skill

and strength has led me. But maybe the reasons for the rules should be

displayed again, as I'm not too sure what they are.



Pat Sagers

Systems Engineer

Orcom Solution, Inc.

(541)389-0120 x1554



-----Original Message-----

From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn [mailto:cmur-@obra.org]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:55 PM

To: obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing body (you know the

evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group. The

interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit

since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride down last year at

the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the

feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

Is that any help?

Candi







-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Since the masters categories are defined by age,

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...





 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



==^================================================================

This email was sent to: pat_s-@orcom.com



EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/help/unsub.html.cGF0X3Nh

Or send an email to: obra-uns-@topica.com



TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html

==^================================================================





NOTICE: This communication may contain proprietary or other confidential

business information of Orcom Solutions, Inc. If you are not the intended

recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error,

please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you

received. In addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate,

or otherwise use the information. Thank you.











----=_NextPart_ST_17_00_22_Friday_January_10_2003_11243

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2655.35">

<TITLE>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>My question would be what the complaining was about.  Were there legitimate arguments or was it about ego and bragging rights?</FONT></P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>As an older gentleman, I would want the ability to compete where my skill and strength has led me.  But maybe the reasons for the rules should be displayed again, as I'm not too sure what they are.</FONT></P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Pat Sagers</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Systems Engineer</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Orcom Solution, Inc.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(541)389-0120 x1554</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn [<A HREF="mailto:cmur-@obra.org">mailto:cmur-@obra.org</A>]</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:55 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Well yeah if you read it literally.  But the governing body (you know the</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group.  The</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>since they were older.  We let some of the older guys ride down last year at</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Is that any help?</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Candi</FONT>

</P>

<BR>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Erik Voldengen [<A HREF="mailto:eri-@fusium.com">mailto:eri-@fusium.com</A>]</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Since the masters categories are defined by age,</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...</FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> masters to ride down an age group at the championships.  So a 40-49 man</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>NOTICE:  This communication may contain proprietary or other confidential business information of Orcom Solutions, Inc.  If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information.  Thank you.  </FONT></P>

<BR>









</BODY>

</HTML>



----=_NextPart_ST_17_00_22_Friday_January_10_2003_11243--



Cass, Bill

2003-01-10

I usually don't get into this but,......................This is a rather

silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no problem with

someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling. If I am that

worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older wants to race

in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they win a

championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules that keep

groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek or Hank

Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could whine all the

way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race hard

shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can think of a single

speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on the Senior

II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors because they

might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders like that need

that experience and competitive training. It is about raising the level of

competition not taking away a precious medal because someone older than you

is faster. Let them race.



Bill Cass





bill cass

designer

acg footwear

503-532-0239



 ----------

From: Schreck, George

Reply To: george.-@PacifiCorp.com

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:37 PM

To: Gary.Co-@nike.com; 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.





-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [ mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From:   Steven R Holland [ mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent:   Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To:     eri-@fusium.com

Cc:     cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject:        RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com







To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------

----



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee,

is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,

distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is

prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this

email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy

all copies.





==========================================================================

====



Cass, Bill

2003-01-10

I usually don't get into this but,......................This is a rather

silly argument. Being in the younger age bracket, I have no problem with

someone from an older agegroup handing me my butt in a sling. If I am that

worried getting whooped I should train more. If someone older wants to race

in a younger, more competitive category....Have at it. If they win a

championship....More power to them. These are the silly rules that keep

groups from being more competitive and faster. If Chuck Jarabek or Hank

Pfiefle showed up and wanted to race against us again we could whine all the

way to second place. Someone who trains hard and wants to race hard

shouldn't be restricted by being too old to compete. I can think of a single

speed guru in Oregon that is still in the habit of taking on the Senior

II's. It is like telling a junior they cannot race with seniors because they

might beat them. Once you get beyond our Oregon shores riders like that need

that experience and competitive training. It is about raising the level of

competition not taking away a precious medal because someone older than you

is faster. Let them race.



Bill Cass







 ----------

From: Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

Reply To: cmur-@obra.org

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing body (you know the

evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group.

The

interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit

since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride down last year

at

the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the

feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

Is that any help?

Candi







-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Since the masters categories are defined by age,

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...





 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Tim Schauer

2003-01-10

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B909.BBF7CD3E

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



I would offer that all riders are able to ride at their own level of ability....in their appropriate Category, such as 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 categories, where age is not a factor, but ability is. Masters age categories allow for another way to sort the competition....by age, not by ability.



-Tim



-----Original Message-----

From: Peter Drake [mailto:wind-@hevanet.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:22 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] Rule changes





"Age and treachery will always defeat youth and vigor"



Well, at least sometimes. Seriously, I think the proposed change provides a good option for people to race at their own level of ability. Someone in an older age group can hold a national record for a younger age group, so why not allow riders to compete in a younger group?



Peter "kiddie kilo" Drake

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com







------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B909.BBF7CD3E

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">





<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><SPAN class=046333400-11012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I

would offer that all riders are able to ride at their own level of ability....in

their appropriate Category, such as 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 categories, where age is

not a factor, but ability is. Masters age categories allow for another way to

sort the competition....by age, not by ability.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<DIV><SPAN class=046333400-11012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>

<DIV><SPAN class=046333400-11012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>-Tim

</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma

size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Peter Drake

[mailto:wind-@hevanet.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 10, 2003 3:22

PM<BR><B>To:</B> ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [OBRA Chat] Rule

changes<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"Age and treachery will always defeat youth and

vigor"</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well, at least sometimes.  Seriously, I

think the proposed change provides a good option for people to race at their

own level of ability.  Someone in an older age group can hold a national

record for a younger age group, so why not allow riders to compete in a

younger group?</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Peter "kiddie kilo" Drake</FONT></DIV><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>





</BODY></HTML>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B909.BBF7CD3E--



Peter Drake

2003-01-10

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_00D2_01C2B8C4.7832EF60

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



"Age and treachery will always defeat youth and vigor"



Well, at least sometimes. Seriously, I think the proposed change provides a good option for people to race at their own level of ability. Someone in an older age group can hold a national record for a younger age group, so why not allow riders to compete in a younger group?



Peter "kiddie kilo" Drake







------=_NextPart_000_00D2_01C2B8C4.7832EF60

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"Age and treachery will always defeat youth and

vigor"</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well, at least sometimes.  Seriously, I

think the proposed change provides a good option for people to race at their own

level of ability.  Someone in an older age group can hold a national record

for a younger age group, so why not allow riders to compete in a younger

group?</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Peter "kiddie kilo"

Drake</FONT></DIV>





</BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_00D2_01C2B8C4.7832EF60--



David Auker

2003-01-10

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C2B8C7.12E363D0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



My hat is off to someone wanting to race in possibly more competition than less. It's refreshing!



I say, let the older with some extra oats go hunt with the younger. Verily.



There seems protocol for this anyway:

 ...the governing body (you know the evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group. The interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit since they were older.<



By the way, what is the rule for non-championship events?



David A.



 

Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



Candi







------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C2B8C7.12E363D0

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond>My hat is off to someone wanting to race in possibly

more competition than less.  It's refreshing!  </FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond>I say, let the older with some extra oats go hunt with

the younger.  Verily.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond>There seems protocol for this anyway: </FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond>>...the governing body (you know the evil empire)

has in the past let older masters ride down an age group.  The

interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit since

they were older.<  </FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond>By the way, what is the rule for

<EM>non-championship</EM> events?<BR></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond>David A.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT face=Garamond>> <BR>> Currently we have one

suggested rule change to make if consistent for<BR>> masters to ride down an

age group at the championships.  So a 40-49 man<BR>> could ride in the

30-39 championships and place.<BR>> <BR>>

Candi<BR></FONT> </FONT></DIV>





</BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C2B8C7.12E363D0--



Steven R Holland

2003-01-10



--WebTV-Mail-8117-221

Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



I ment to say "not" a good solution....



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924









--WebTV-Mail-8117-221

Content-Disposition: Inline

Content-Type: Message/RFC822

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Received: from smtpinvite-2001-1.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.201)

by storefull-2197.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 10

Jan 2003 16:10:13 -0800 (PST)

Received: from out003.tpca.net (out003.tpca.net [66.180.244.23]) by

smtpinvite-2001-1.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with

SMTP id 7D994FE20 for <srh-@webtv.net>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:10:10

-0800 (PST)

To: "Schreck, George" <George.-@PacifiCorp.com>

Cc: Gary.Co-@nike.com, eri-@fusium.com, cmur-@obra.org, obra <ob-@topica.com>

From: Steven R Holland <srh-@webtv.net>

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:09:44 -0800 (PST)

Message-ID: <2011916709-1463792638-1042243794@topica.com>

Errors-To: <blst-errors.700001901.0-@boing.topica.com>

Reply-To: srh-@webtv.net

X-Topica-Id: <1042243787.inmta007.25624.1006968>

List-Help: <http://topica.com/lists/obra/>

List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:obra-uns-@topica.com>

X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring

X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated

X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)

X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)

X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this

X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas

X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant

X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this

X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>;.

Received: (qmail 12524 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2003 00:09:46 -0000

Received: (qmail 12519 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2003 00:09:45 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO smtpout-2001-3.public.lawson.webtv.net) (209.240.212.83)

by 0 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 00:09:45 -0000

Received: from storefull-2195.public.lawson.webtv.net (storefull-2195.public.lawson.webtv.net

[209.240.213.69]) by smtpout-2001-3.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws)

with ESMTP id 27E80C1C1; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:09:44 -0800 (PST)

Received: (from production@localhost) by

storefull-2195.public.lawson.webtv.net (8.8.8-wtv-f/mt.gso.26Feb98)

id QAA24196; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:09:45 -0800 (PST)

X-WebTV-Signature: 1

ETAtAhUAuaKd1xZt3yueyiqssf1GbE3hLVACFB2E9KBQpvlVlKOUJ1oPZ83DTez7

In-Reply-To: "Schreck, George" <George.-@PacifiCorp.com>'s message of Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:37:13 -0800

Content-Disposition: Inline

Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary=WebTV-Mail-22434-346

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)





--WebTV-Mail-22434-346

Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Sorry George [ my own team mate] I think that would be a good solution.



It is never good to have someone in a race, as important as the State

Championship, that could "alter" the out come when they are not eligible

them self. That "totally" changes the dynamic of the race.....



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



==^================================================================

This email was sent to: srh-@webtv.net



EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/help/unsub.html.c3JoMTQ4

Or send an email to: obra-uns-@topica.com



TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html

==^================================================================





--WebTV-Mail-22434-346

Content-Disposition: Inline

Content-Type: Message/RFC822

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Received: from smtpin-2106.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.116) by

storefull-2197.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 10 Jan

2003 15:37:21 -0800 (PST)

Received: from service2.pacificorp.com (service2.pacificorp.com

[131.219.5.2]) by smtpin-2106.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws)

with ESMTP id 69692FE63 for <srh-@webtv.net>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003

15:37:19 -0800 (PST)

Received: from pdxmms01.pacificorp.com (pdxmms01 [131.219.239.165]) by

service2.pacificorp.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id

h0ANaAU04833; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:36:10 -0800 (PST)

Received: from 131.219.239.49 by pdxmms01.pacificorp.com with ESMTP (MMS

SMTP Relay (MMS v5.0)); Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:41:35 -0800

X-Server-Uuid: F7E6B7FD-E7F1-4C27-B07F-40F03E9AD25E

Received: by pdxexc01.pacificorp.com with Internet Mail Service (

5.5.2656.59) id <VZ7S6CZ1>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:37:15 -0800

Message-ID: <78A50065F4A6D311AB5E00805FFED148172DDAB4@pdxexu02.pacificorp.com>

From: "Schreck, George" <George.-@PacifiCorp.com>

To: Gary.Co-@nike.com, "'srh-@webtv.net'" <srh-@webtv.net>, eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org, obra <ob-@topica.com>

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:37:13 -0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)

X-WSS-ID: 120185A5377600-02-01

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990"



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



==^================================================================

This email was sent to: george.-@pacificorp.com



EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/help/unsub.html.Z2Vvcmdl

Or send an email to: obra-uns-@topica.com



TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html

==^================================================================









------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.





==============================================================================



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990

Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =

charset=3Diso-8859-1">

<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">

<TITLE>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> I think they should be able to ride down, but not b=

e=

eligible for medals.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [<A =

HREF=3D"mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com">mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com</A>]=

</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I agree with Steve....</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> -----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From:   Steven R Holland [<A =

HREF=3D"mailto:srh-@webtv.net">mailto:srh-@webtv.net</A>] </FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent:   Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To:     eri-@fusium.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc:     cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject:        RE: =

[OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> << Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes =

  I agree w/Erik........</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>STEVEN R HOLLAND</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>17203 SE 30th St.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>360-891-3924</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the whole group send to =

ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the list manager send to =

ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the whole group send to =

ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the list manager send to =

ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT =

</P>

<BR>

<BR>



</BODY>

</HTML>

<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------=

------<br>

<br>

This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<br>

<br>

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone =

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, i=

s=

unauthorized.<br>

<br>

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distributio=

n=

or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be=

=

unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please=

=

contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.<br>

<br>

<br>

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D<br>

</P>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990--





--WebTV-Mail-22434-346--





--WebTV-Mail-8117-221--



Steven R Holland

2003-01-10



--WebTV-Mail-22434-346

Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Sorry George [ my own team mate] I think that would be a good solution.



It is never good to have someone in a race, as important as the State

Championship, that could "alter" the out come when they are not eligible

them self. That "totally" changes the dynamic of the race.....



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924









--WebTV-Mail-22434-346

Content-Disposition: Inline

Content-Type: Message/RFC822

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Received: from smtpin-2106.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.116) by

storefull-2197.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 10 Jan

2003 15:37:21 -0800 (PST)

Received: from service2.pacificorp.com (service2.pacificorp.com

[131.219.5.2]) by smtpin-2106.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws)

with ESMTP id 69692FE63 for <srh-@webtv.net>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003

15:37:19 -0800 (PST)

Received: from pdxmms01.pacificorp.com (pdxmms01 [131.219.239.165]) by

service2.pacificorp.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id

h0ANaAU04833; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:36:10 -0800 (PST)

Received: from 131.219.239.49 by pdxmms01.pacificorp.com with ESMTP (MMS

SMTP Relay (MMS v5.0)); Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:41:35 -0800

X-Server-Uuid: F7E6B7FD-E7F1-4C27-B07F-40F03E9AD25E

Received: by pdxexc01.pacificorp.com with Internet Mail Service (

5.5.2656.59) id <VZ7S6CZ1>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:37:15 -0800

Message-ID: <78A50065F4A6D311AB5E00805FFED148172DDAB4@pdxexu02.pacificorp.com>

From: "Schreck, George" <George.-@PacifiCorp.com>

To: Gary.Co-@nike.com, "'srh-@webtv.net'" <srh-@webtv.net>, eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org, obra <ob-@topica.com>

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:37:13 -0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)

X-WSS-ID: 120185A5377600-02-01

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990"



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



==^================================================================

This email was sent to: george.-@pacificorp.com



EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/help/unsub.html.Z2Vvcmdl

Or send an email to: obra-uns-@topica.com



TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html

==^================================================================









------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.





==============================================================================



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990

Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =

charset=3Diso-8859-1">

<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">

<TITLE>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> I think they should be able to ride down, but not b=

e=

eligible for medals.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [<A =

HREF=3D"mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com">mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com</A>]=

</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I agree with Steve....</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> -----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From:   Steven R Holland [<A =

HREF=3D"mailto:srh-@webtv.net">mailto:srh-@webtv.net</A>] </FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent:   Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To:     eri-@fusium.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc:     cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject:        RE: =

[OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> << Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes =

  I agree w/Erik........</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>STEVEN R HOLLAND</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>17203 SE 30th St.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>360-891-3924</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the whole group send to =

ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the list manager send to =

ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the whole group send to =

ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To respond to the list manager send to =

ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT =

</P>

<BR>

<BR>



</BODY>

</HTML>

<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------=

------<br>

<br>

This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<br>

<br>

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone =

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, i=

s=

unauthorized.<br>

<br>

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distributio=

n=

or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be=

=

unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please=

=

contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.<br>

<br>

<br>

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D<br>

</P>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990--





--WebTV-Mail-22434-346--



David Ripp

2003-01-10

I agree with Tim, Steve, Gary, and Eric.



How's that, there's 5-votes..



Dave Ripp

port-@wa-net.com



----- Original Message -----

From: "Tim Schauer" <TSch-@mackaysposito.com>

To: <Gary.Co-@nike.com>; <srh-@webtv.net>; <eri-@fusium.com>

Cc: <cmur-@obra.org>; "obra" <ob-@topica.com>

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:14 PM

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I do agree with Steve, Gary, and Eric.



It's bad enough when I get beat by guys in my own age group...



But getting beat by guys older than my age group, who just keep getting

better with age? Now that might be more fun than I can take! (Humor is

intended here...)



-Tim Schauer



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Steve-@clark.wa.gov

2003-01-10

What's the reasoning behind not metal eligible?



-----Original Message-----

From: Jon Kraft [mailto:Jon-@colmac.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:42 PM

To: 'george.-@pacificorp.com'; Gary.Co-@nike.com;

'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





That I agree with. Ride down, not medal eligible.





Jon E. Kraft

Racer/Commuter/Cyclist

North River Racing

Southwest Washington's Cycling team!

Visit our website: www.wordsports.com/nrr.htm





"I do not ride six hours a day for the pleasure, I ride for the pain. It is

through the pain that you grow the most."



Lance Armstrong



       --- __o

   -- -- _ \ \_~

        (_)/ (_)









-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:37 PM

To: Gary.Co-@nike.com; 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes







I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [ mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com

<mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com> ]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From:   Steven R Holland [ mailto:srh-@webtv.net <mailto:srh-@webtv.net>

]

Sent:   Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To:     eri-@fusium.com

Cc:     cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject:        RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com











To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution

or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please

contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.





============================================================================

==



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Jon Kraft

2003-01-10

That I agree with. Ride down, not medal eligible.





Jon E. Kraft

Racer/Commuter/Cyclist

North River Racing

Southwest Washington's Cycling team!

Visit our website: www.wordsports.com/nrr.htm





"I do not ride six hours a day for the pleasure, I ride for the pain. It is

through the pain that you grow the most."



Lance Armstrong



       --- __o

   -- -- _ \ \_~

        (_)/ (_)









-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:37 PM

To: Gary.Co-@nike.com; 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes







I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [ mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com

<mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com> ]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From:   Steven R Holland [ mailto:srh-@webtv.net <mailto:srh-@webtv.net>

]

Sent:   Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To:     eri-@fusium.com

Cc:     cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject:        RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com











To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution

or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please

contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.





============================================================================

==



Schreck, George

2003-01-10

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



==^================================================================

This email was sent to: george.-@pacificorp.com



EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/help/unsub.html.Z2Vvcmdl

Or send an email to: obra-uns-@topica.com



TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html

==^================================================================









------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.





==============================================================================







------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990

Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">

<TITLE>RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=2> I think they should be able to ride down, but not be eligible for medals.</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [<A HREF="mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com">mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com</A>]</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>

<BR>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>I agree with Steve....</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2> -----Original Message-----</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From:   Steven R Holland [<A HREF="mailto:srh-@webtv.net">mailto:srh-@webtv.net</A>] </FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent:   Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To:     eri-@fusium.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc:     cmur-@obra.org; obra</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject:        RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2> << Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>STEVEN R HOLLAND</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>17203 SE 30th St.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>360-891-3924</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</FONT>

</P>



<P><FONT </P>

<BR>

<BR>









</BODY>

</HTML>

<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>

<br>

This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<br>

<br>

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.<br>

<br>

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.<br>

<br>

<br>

==============================================================================<br>

</P>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B901.33BBD990--



Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

2003-01-10

Well yeah if you read it literally. But the governing body (you know the

evil empire) has in the past let older masters ride down an age group. The

interpretation was that they had been that age and now were at a deficit

since they were older. We let some of the older guys ride down last year at

the state road race and had some complaints, so we are trying to get the

feel from the other riders and make the rule clearer.

Is that any help?

Candi







-----Original Message-----

From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:eri-@fusium.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:49 PM

To: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





Since the masters categories are defined by age,

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...





 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



Tim Schauer

2003-01-10

I do agree with Steve, Gary, and Eric.



It's bad enough when I get beat by guys in my own age group...



But getting beat by guys older than my age group, who just keep getting better with age? Now that might be more fun than I can take! (Humor is intended here...)



-Tim Schauer



-----Original Message-----

From: Cornilles, Gary (LMCO) [mailto:Gary.Co-@nike.com]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:03 PM

To: 'srh-@webtv.net'; eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes





I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Cornilles, Gary (LMCO)

2003-01-10

I agree with Steve....



Wouldn't that be the same as a 30+ category?



-----Original Message-----

From: Steven R Holland [mailto:srh-@webtv.net]

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:54 PM

To: eri-@fusium.com

Cc: cmur-@obra.org; obra

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes



<< Message: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes >> I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Steven R Holland

2003-01-10



--WebTV-Mail-16343-349

Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



I agree w/Erik........



STEVEN R HOLLAND

17203 SE 30th St.

VANCOUVER,WA 98683-2300

360-891-3924









--WebTV-Mail-16343-349

Content-Disposition: Inline

Content-Type: Message/RFC822

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit



Received: from smtpinvite-2001-1.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.201)

by storefull-2194.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 10

Jan 2003 14:50:34 -0800 (PST)

Received: from out004.tpca.net (out004.tpca.net [66.180.244.24]) by

smtpinvite-2001-1.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with

SMTP id 09515FE16 for <srh-@webtv.net>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:50:31

-0800 (PST)

To: cmur-@obra.org, obra <ob-@topica.com>

From: Erik Voldengen <eri-@fusium.com>

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] rule changes

Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:49:10 -0800

Message-ID: <1519738241-1463792638-1042238994@topica.com>

Errors-To: <blst-errors.700001901.0-@boing.topica.com>

Reply-To: eri-@fusium.com

X-Topica-Id: <1042238993.inmta002.18711.1033191>

List-Help: <http://topica.com/lists/obra/>

List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:obra-uns-@topica.com>

X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring

X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated

X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)

X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)

X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this

X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas

X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant

X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this

X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>;.

Received: (qmail 18791 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2003 22:49:52 -0000

Received: (qmail 18786 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jan 2003 22:49:52 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO fusium.com) (208.187.226.100) by 0 with SMTP;

10 Jan 2003 22:49:52 -0000

Received: from burns [12.241.200.31] by fusium.com [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.1.R)

for <ob-@topica.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:01:50 -0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)

X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Importance: Normal

In-Reply-To: <782024940-146379-@topica.com>

X-MDRemoteIP: 12.241.200.31

X-Return-Path: eri-@fusium.com

X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ob-@topica.com



Since the masters categories are defined by age,

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...





 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com







--WebTV-Mail-16343-349--



Erik Voldengen

2003-01-10

Since the masters categories are defined by age,

that suggested rule change makes little sense to me...





 Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



Candi Murray/Oregon Bicycle Racing Assn

2003-01-10





Every year at the annual OBRA meeting we invite members to suggest rule

changes or possible changes to the BAR program. If you have been ruminating

about a proposed change this is your time to write it down so it can be

presented to the club members for votes.



Currently we have one suggested rule change to make if consistent for

masters to ride down an age group at the championships. So a 40-49 man

could ride in the 30-39 championships and place.



Candi