more doping news

Jeff Tedder

2013-11-01

Yeh for Harry, standing up for us old sucka's......and I also agree.....

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Phinney"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

> On 10/31/2013 10:41 AM, Sebastian Lopez-Otero wrote:
>>
>> I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much
>> of a problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.
>>
>> s
>
> This is simply not true in the case that started this discussion. About
> 2 weeks before the out-of-competition test that caught Chris Shepard's
> EPO use he competed in the Silverton road race. If I recall correctly he
> placed around 12th. I know he placed behind both Dan Vrijmoet and me,
> and we were both over 50 years old at the time, and only placed 8th and
> 9th. I'm not saying he's not a good racer (he obviously is), but he's
> not head-and-shoulders above everybody in OBRA.
>
> Harry Phinney
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Harry Phinney

2013-11-01

On 10/31/2013 10:41 AM, Sebastian Lopez-Otero wrote:
>
> I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much
> of a problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.
>
> s

This is simply not true in the case that started this discussion. About
2 weeks before the out-of-competition test that caught Chris Shepard's
EPO use he competed in the Silverton road race. If I recall correctly he
placed around 12th. I know he placed behind both Dan Vrijmoet and me,
and we were both over 50 years old at the time, and only placed 8th and
9th. I'm not saying he's not a good racer (he obviously is), but he's
not head-and-shoulders above everybody in OBRA.

Harry Phinney


Mike Murray

2013-10-31

I think I can speak to the medical student aspect. Although taking
stimulants might make it easier for you to compete with other students it
will routinely end poorly.

Mike Murray

From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On
Behalf Of Sebastian Lopez-Otero
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:41
To: Dan Grabski
Cc: Scott Kocher; obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Once a cheater always a cheater? Mental defect? Character flaw? I suppose
you could argue that in the case of a Lance Armstrong given the tactics he
seemed to have used to sustain his cheating. But I have known some cyclists
in my time that "cheated" and they have turned out to be quite decent
people. A masters racer on Testosterone so that he can get top 10 in an OBRA
race is one thing but a 20 something doing EPO so he can compete at an
international level is another thing. Both, mind you are wrong and are
cheating ... by any definition. (Unless the masters racer can prove he had
low test and was just getting back to a normal level for his age). They are
a different set of pressures. I would argue that they are different people
and do not necessarily share the same "defect". Pick any career ... you are
young and this is what you do, your boss tells you to take this or do
something else. You are a medical student doing a brutal shift and competing
with other medical students. You have access to a drug which will keep you
sharp for longer, etc. etc. Pick any career and do the though experiment.
Perhaps you have know some of these 'cheaters' in your own careers.

I suppose I am just suggesting that most of these cyclists are not criminals
or evil.

I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much of a
problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.

s

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Dan Grabski wrote:

Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the
original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in
one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later,
then move on to something else."

Dan

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:

This statement is the problem with that opinion:

"Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think
about auto racing - where teams should be rewarded for using science and
bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."

Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules
to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high
percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take
salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro
Petacchi) to the breaking point.

And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many
cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't
think WADA is that good.

Craig

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:

Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on
doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up
and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to
make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.

On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:

This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how
many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward
damaging information and then they go like this:

"I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so
long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Stewart Campbell

2013-10-31

So, just to lighten the mood...my original thought on a Halloween costume was to dress up in my cycling gear, then get my wife (who is an RN) get me a bunch of IV tubes (no needles) and tape them all over my arms, then I would put on my old US Postal team cycling cap...and then guess who I'd be?

Ha Ha, everyone have a fun Halloween tonight...candy!!!!!

-Stewart

________________________________
From: Sebastian Lopez-Otero
To: Dan Grabski
Cc: Scott Kocher ; "obra@list.obra.org"
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Once a cheater always a cheater? Mental defect? Character flaw? I suppose you could argue that in the case of a Lance Armstrong given the tactics he seemed to have used to sustain his cheating. But I have known some cyclists in my time that "cheated" and they have turned out to be quite decent people. A masters racer on Testosterone so that he can get top 10 in an OBRA race is one thing but a 20 something doing EPO so he can compete at an international level is another thing. Both, mind you are wrong and are cheating ... by any definition. (Unless the masters racer can prove he had low test and was just getting back to a normal level for his age). They are a different set of pressures. I would argue that they are different people and do not necessarily share the same "defect". Pick any career ... you are young and this is what you do, your boss tells you to take this or do something else. You are a medical student doing a brutal shift and competing with
other medical students. You have access to a drug which will keep you sharp for longer, etc. etc. Pick any career and do the though experiment. Perhaps you have know some of these 'cheaters' in your own careers.

I suppose I am just suggesting that most of these cyclists are not criminals or evil. 

I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much of a problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope. 

s

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Dan Grabski wrote:

Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later, then move on to something else."
>
>
>Dan
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:
>
>
>This statement is the problem with that opinion:
>>
>>
>>"Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."
>>
>>
>>Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point. 
>>
>>And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't think WADA is that good.
>>
>>Craig
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:
>>
>>Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
>>>http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
>>>He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
>>>Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
>>>On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:
>>>
>>>This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward damaging information and then they go like this:
>>>>
>>>>"I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>OBRA mailing list
>>>>obra@list.obra.org
>>>>http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>>Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OBRA mailing list
>>>obra@list.obra.org
>>>http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>>OBRA mailing list
>>obra@list.obra.org
>>http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>_______________________________________________
>OBRA mailing list
>obra@list.obra.org
>http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mike Murray

2013-10-31

Gladwell is correct in that Armstrong was better at doing something that it
appears everyone else was doing too but that does not make it right. If
everyone else is jumping off a cliff that doesn't make it the right thing to
do. Comparing doping to drinking coffee is like comparing shooting someone
with a pea shooter and shooting them with a shot gun. In general, with the
exception of EPO, the benefits are small if present at all but the risks are
large.

Mike Murray

From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On
Behalf Of John Gill
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 09:06
To: Scott Kocher
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on
doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up
and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to
make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.

On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:

This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how
many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward
damaging information and then they go like this:

"I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so
long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Joe Zauner

2013-10-31

If your taking exogenous testosterone and racing sanctioned events, you are wrong.

Low-T? I feel for you... in the same way I'd feel for any cyclist with a career ending injury.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:41 AM, "Sebastian Lopez-Otero" wrote:

> Once a cheater always a cheater? Mental defect? Character flaw? I suppose you could argue that in the case of a Lance Armstrong given the tactics he seemed to have used to sustain his cheating. But I have known some cyclists in my time that "cheated" and they have turned out to be quite decent people. A masters racer on Testosterone so that he can get top 10 in an OBRA race is one thing but a 20 something doing EPO so he can compete at an international level is another thing. Both, mind you are wrong and are cheating ... by any definition. (Unless the masters racer can prove he had low test and was just getting back to a normal level for his age). They are a different set of pressures. I would argue that they are different people and do not necessarily share the same "defect". Pick any career ... you are young and this is what you do, your boss tells you to take this or do something else. You are a medical student doing a brutal shift and competing with other medical students. You have access to a drug which will keep you sharp for longer, etc. etc. Pick any career and do the though experiment. Perhaps you have know some of these 'cheaters' in your own careers.
>
> I suppose I am just suggesting that most of these cyclists are not criminals or evil.
>
> I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much of a problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.
>
> s
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Dan Grabski wrote:
>> Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later, then move on to something else."
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:
>>
>>> This statement is the problem with that opinion:
>>>
>>> "Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."
>>>
>>> Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.
>>>
>>> And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't think WADA is that good.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:
>>>> Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
>>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
>>>> He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
>>>> Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:
>>>>> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward damaging information and then they go like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> "I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


rondot@spiritone.com

2013-10-31

To me this is rationalizing. I understand the pressures you are speaking of...but it does not make it right to try to justify if.
I do not think others are saying these are bad people. But people do bad things sometimes. I do not hold a grudge against people who have doped if they come and stay clean. But I do have a measured enthusiasm for their success after using these drugs.
Medical students doing a brutal shift.... should not be doing drugs or the brutal shift in my opinion (management issues). That is peoples lives (not a race placement). That should not be some sort of sick right of passage for med. students. The patients should be the focus, not what some med. student can “handle”. Men pissing on bushes!!!
If a person develops lower testosterone as they age, that is probably normal. The truth is in our time, normal is not normal any longer. This is the magic of better life through chemistry.
The Statins I take are helping me with my condition even though there are side effects. I have had two extensions to my life because of medical expertise. That is about staying alive, not about maintaining my manliness!
I know there are real syndromes that require people to take testosterone, steroids etc., but Dr’s who prescribe the stuff just for convenience of the patient who might be feeling a little less energetic etc. Sorry. I feel in the end the Dr. is not being honest with the patient, but just appeasing him / her.
I go back to my original idea that people need to accept aging. Our bodies change.
We, as a society are quite impatient, want everything and want it now.
You can still race a bike, have good and not so good days and do it without drugs that enhance your performance.
ron

From: Sebastian Lopez-Otero
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:41 AM
To: Dan Grabski
Cc: Scott Kocher ; obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Once a cheater always a cheater? Mental defect? Character flaw? I suppose you could argue that in the case of a Lance Armstrong given the tactics he seemed to have used to sustain his cheating. But I have known some cyclists in my time that "cheated" and they have turned out to be quite decent people. A masters racer on Testosterone so that he can get top 10 in an OBRA race is one thing but a 20 something doing EPO so he can compete at an international level is another thing. Both, mind you are wrong and are cheating ... by any definition. (Unless the masters racer can prove he had low test and was just getting back to a normal level for his age). They are a different set of pressures. I would argue that they are different people and do not necessarily share the same "defect". Pick any career ... you are young and this is what you do, your boss tells you to take this or do something else. You are a medical student doing a brutal shift and competing with other medical students. You have access to a drug which will keep you sharp for longer, etc. etc. Pick any career and do the though experiment. Perhaps you have know some of these 'cheaters' in your own careers.

I suppose I am just suggesting that most of these cyclists are not criminals or evil.

I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much of a problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.

s

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Dan Grabski wrote:

Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later, then move on to something else."

Dan

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:

This statement is the problem with that opinion:

"Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."

Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.

And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't think WADA is that good.

Craig

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:

Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.

On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:

This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward damaging information and then they go like this:

"I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mike Rosenfeld

2013-10-31

I vote for new rules requiring everyone to weigh 200lbs, or more, to be
allowed to race. That will level the playing field. The Clyde's seem to
have more fun racing anyways.

Then the only EPO is Extra Pepperoni and Olives. (stole that from a
teammate...you know who you are).

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Lopez-Otero
wrote:

> Once a cheater always a cheater? Mental defect? Character flaw? I suppose
> you could argue that in the case of a Lance Armstrong given the tactics he
> seemed to have used to sustain his cheating. But I have known some cyclists
> in my time that "cheated" and they have turned out to be quite decent
> people. A masters racer on Testosterone so that he can get top 10 in an
> OBRA race is one thing but a 20 something doing EPO so he can compete at an
> international level is another thing. Both, mind you are wrong and are
> cheating ... by any definition. (Unless the masters racer can prove he had
> low test and was just getting back to a normal level for his age). They are
> a different set of pressures. I would argue that they are different people
> and do not necessarily share the same "defect". Pick any career ... you are
> young and this is what you do, your boss tells you to take this or do
> something else. You are a medical student doing a brutal shift and
> competing with other medical students. You have access to a drug which will
> keep you sharp for longer, etc. etc. Pick any career and do the though
> experiment. Perhaps you have know some of these 'cheaters' in your own
> careers.
>
> I suppose I am just suggesting that most of these cyclists are not
> criminals or evil.
>
> I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much of a
> problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.
>
> s
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Dan Grabski wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the
>> original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in
>> one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later,
>> then move on to something else."
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:
>>
>> This statement is the problem with that opinion:
>>
>> "Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think
>> about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and
>> *bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed*."
>>
>> Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the
>> rules to their breaking point," they're actually *breaking* them. The
>> very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they
>> can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask
>> Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.
>>
>> And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how
>> many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just
>> don't think WADA is that good.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:
>>
>>> Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective
>>> on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
>>> He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay
>>> up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating
>>> to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
>>> Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
>>> On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening
>>>> how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward
>>>> damaging information and then they go like this:
>>>>
>>>> "I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that
>>>> is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OBRA mailing list
>>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Sebastian Lopez-Otero

2013-10-31

Once a cheater always a cheater? Mental defect? Character flaw? I suppose
you could argue that in the case of a Lance Armstrong given the tactics he
seemed to have used to sustain his cheating. But I have known some cyclists
in my time that "cheated" and they have turned out to be quite decent
people. A masters racer on Testosterone so that he can get top 10 in an
OBRA race is one thing but a 20 something doing EPO so he can compete at an
international level is another thing. Both, mind you are wrong and are
cheating ... by any definition. (Unless the masters racer can prove he had
low test and was just getting back to a normal level for his age). They are
a different set of pressures. I would argue that they are different people
and do not necessarily share the same "defect". Pick any career ... you are
young and this is what you do, your boss tells you to take this or do
something else. You are a medical student doing a brutal shift and
competing with other medical students. You have access to a drug which will
keep you sharp for longer, etc. etc. Pick any career and do the though
experiment. Perhaps you have know some of these 'cheaters' in your own
careers.

I suppose I am just suggesting that most of these cyclists are not
criminals or evil.

I would also suggest that the riders in question would not have much of a
problem dispatching an OBRA field ... sans dope.

s

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Dan Grabski wrote:

> Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the
> original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in
> one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later,
> then move on to something else."
>
> Dan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:
>
> This statement is the problem with that opinion:
>
> "Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think
> about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and *bending
> the rules to their breaking point to succeed*."
>
> Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the
> rules to their breaking point," they're actually *breaking* them. The
> very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they
> can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask
> Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.
>
> And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how
> many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just
> don't think WADA is that good.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:
>
>> Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective
>> on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
>> http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
>> He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay
>> up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating
>> to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
>> Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
>> On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:
>>
>>> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening
>>> how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward
>>> damaging information and then they go like this:
>>>
>>> "I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that
>>> is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Dan Grabski

2013-10-31

Unfortunately the auto racing analogy doesn't work quite as well as the original author imagines. It is typically "break as many rules as we can in one area of the car until the tech inspectors figure it out weeks later, then move on to something else."

Dan

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:20, craig austin wrote:

> This statement is the problem with that opinion:
>
> "Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think about auto racing ― where teams should be rewarded for using science and bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."
>
> Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.
>
> And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't think WADA is that good.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:
>> Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
>> http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
>> He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
>> Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:
>>> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward damaging information and then they go like this:
>>>
>>> "I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA mailing list
>>> obra@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


rondot@spiritone.com

2013-10-31

All bike racers should be required to take 60 mg of Statin each night as this would level the playing field. No more of these upper etc. Lets also either dump the finish camera or get one of our OBRA members to retrofit it with technology that will record ANY PED in a racer each time through. This will prevent EPO hand-ups which I understand the OBRA officials have not been able to as easily identify as Beer, Bacon, Dollar Bills and Doughnut hand-ups. Not sure why....the hand or fanny is pointing up.
Truth is humans are capable of “rationalizing almost any”.....no actually “all” behavior that benefits them. People will cheat and continue to do so.
I will take my Statin at night and drink my cup of coffee on race day. And I might add as I age, I will be a slower racer. You may think you can defeat Father Time, but it is not going to happen.
ron

From: craig austin
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:20 AM
To: John Gill
Cc: Scott Kocher ; obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

This statement is the problem with that opinion:

"Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."

Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.

And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't think WADA is that good.

Craig

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:

Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.

On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:

This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward damaging information and then they go like this:

"I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mat Braun

2013-10-31

Does USA Cycling support USADA or WADA financially? Does OBRA?

Thanks,

-mat,

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Eric wrote:

> ** **
>
> WADA has an incredibly difficult job, compounded by the cost of tests. We
> need to support them and try to get them to be able to do a better job.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> What is “bending?” Is that like riding really low on a velodrome or
> drafting a vehicle? What about a rider with a mechanical who drafts
> vehicles in the caravan to get back to the peloton? Tolerated, but is it
> “bending” the rules?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] *On
> Behalf Of *craig ****austin****
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:21 AM
> *To:* John Gill
> *Cc:* Scott Kocher; obra@list.obra.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news****
>
> ** **
>
> This statement is the problem with that opinion:****
>
> ** **
>
> "Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think
> about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science and *bending
> the rules to their breaking point to succeed*."****
>
> ** **
>
> Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the
> rules to their breaking point," they're actually *breaking* them. The
> very high percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they
> can take salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask
> Allessandro Petacchi) to the breaking point.
>
> And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how
> many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just
> don't think WADA is that good.****
>
>
> Craig****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


WADA has an incredibly difficult job, compounded by the cost of tests. We
need to support them and try to get them to be able to do a better job.

What is "bending?" Is that like riding really low on a velodrome or
drafting a vehicle? What about a rider with a mechanical who drafts
vehicles in the caravan to get back to the peloton? Tolerated, but is it
"bending" the rules?

_____

From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On
Behalf Of craig austin
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:21 AM
To: John Gill
Cc: Scott Kocher; obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

This statement is the problem with that opinion:

"Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think
about auto racing - where teams should be rewarded for using science and
bending the rules to their breaking point to succeed."

Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules
to their breaking point," they're actually breaking them. The very high
percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take
salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro
Petacchi) to the breaking point.

And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how many
cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just don't
think WADA is that good.

Craig


craig austin

2013-10-31

This statement is the problem with that opinion:

"Gladwell argued that we should think about cycling the same way we think
about auto racing — where teams should be rewarded for using science
and *bending
the rules to their breaking point to succeed*."

Lance (and all the many others busted for doping) aren't "bending the rules
to their breaking point," they're actually *breaking* them. The very high
percentage of the pro peloton who have TUEs for asthma so they can take
salbutamol? That's bending the rules, sometimes (just ask Allessandro
Petacchi) to the breaking point.

And I'm with Scott K on the whole confession thing. Hard to believe how
many cyclists were caught the one and only time they ever doped. I just
don't think WADA is that good.

Craig

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM, John Gill wrote:

> Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective
> on doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
> http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
> He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up
> and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to
> make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
> Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
> On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:
>
>> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how
>> many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward
>> damaging information and then they go like this:
>>
>> "I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is
>> so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


John Gill

2013-10-31

Not agreeing with this necessarily, but it is an interesting perspective on
doping from someone who is known for thinking things through.
http://www.businessinsider.com/malcolm-gladwell-lance-armstrong-2012-10
He also has compared racers' doping to students drinking coffee to stay up
and study longer...not stealing the test answers. They aren't cheating to
make it easier...but to be able to do more hard things for longer.
Just A perspective that I found thought-provoking and wanted to share.
On Oct 31, 2013 8:34 AM, "Scott Kocher" wrote:

> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how
> many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward
> damaging information and then they go like this:
>
> "I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is
> so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Scott Kocher

2013-10-31

This is not directed at anyone in particular, but it is disheartening how many doping confessions don't happen until someone else puts forward damaging information and then they go like this:

"I'm really sorry I doped, and I haven't doped since [insert year that is so long ago that the statute of limitations has just expired]."


Joe Zauner

2013-10-31

+another1

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:50 PM, "Brady Brady" wrote:

> +1.
>
> On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:12 PM, "Evan Plews" wrote:
>
> This is not a personal thing but as one who has had the privilege (curse) of racing against many cheaters, i wonder how/why this is considered old news?
>
> Cheating is not a drug, it is a mental condition. Furthermore, who is to say there isn't a lasting benefit from using PEDs? We all know that body builders ball players wrestlers etc alter their bodies forever so why wouldn't training on with a supercharged oxygen uptake or recovery system not forever benefit an athlete?
>
> I suppose the pervasive naivete is most concerning... You know there will be cheaters lining up this weekend. Maybe just a quick puff on an inhaler or a line on the inside of a cone here or there. Its all the same--these folks are sick.
>
> Kudos to Jon for keeping us informed. Clearly this isn't "old" news since at least one of these riders is still competing.
>
> BTW Rasmussen fingering a certain notorious group of mountain bike racers is no surprise but there are at least one our two names missing from this story.
>
> Truth follows us relentlessly so sooner or later it will catch up.
>
> Evan Plews
> www.evanplews.com
> 503-949-4879
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: tjpaskewich@gmail.com
> Sent: October 30, 2013 6:08 PM
> To: "Jon Myers"
> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news
>
> Jon,
>
> Normally I stay away from these threads, but I don't know you, but I do know Shep. Most open guy I have met about anything including his past transgressions. Who really cares if it was 2003 or 2005, it was a long time ago.
>
> The guy made a mistake, admitted as such, paid his debt and moved on with his life. So should everybody else.
>
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>>
>> The 2005 article says he said he only cheated that year. Today's Rassmussen article appears to say that he was using in 2003. Someone is not telling the truth. It would be nice to know who is telling the truth, particularly when many people have been racing in the same OBRA category at the same races as the person in question for many years. -Jon
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


E.Kytola

2013-10-31

Serving out a suspension handed out by a sports governing body and making amends to all the clean riders that were cheated are not the same.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 30, 2013, at 6:06 PM, "tjpaskewich@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> Normally I stay away from these threads, but I don't know you, but I do know Shep. Most open guy I have met about anything including his past transgressions. Who really cares if it was 2003 or 2005, it was a long time ago.
>
> The guy made a mistake, admitted as such, paid his debt and moved on with his life. So should everybody else.
>
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>>
>> The 2005 article says he said he only cheated that year. Today's Rassmussen article appears to say that he was using in 2003. Someone is not telling the truth. It would be nice to know who is telling the truth, particularly when many people have been racing in the same OBRA category at the same races as the person in question for many years. -Jon
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Brady Brady

2013-10-31

+1.

On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:12 PM, "Evan Plews" wrote:

This is not a personal thing but as one who has had the privilege (curse) of racing against many cheaters, i wonder how/why this is considered old news?

Cheating is not a drug, it is a mental condition. Furthermore, who is to say there isn't a lasting benefit from using PEDs? We all know that body builders ball players wrestlers etc alter their bodies forever so why wouldn't training on with a supercharged oxygen uptake or recovery system not forever benefit an athlete?

I suppose the pervasive naivete is most concerning... You know there will be cheaters lining up this weekend. Maybe just a quick puff on an inhaler or a line on the inside of a cone here or there. Its all the same--these folks are sick.

Kudos to Jon for keeping us informed. Clearly this isn't "old" news since at least one of these riders is still competing.

BTW Rasmussen fingering a certain notorious group of mountain bike racers is no surprise but there are at least one our two names missing from this story.

Truth follows us relentlessly so sooner or later it will catch up.

Evan Plews
www.evanplews.com
503-949-4879

--- Original Message ---

From: tjpaskewich@gmail.com
Sent: October 30, 2013 6:08 PM
To: "Jon Myers"
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Jon,

Normally I stay away from these threads, but I don't know you, but I do know Shep. Most open guy I have met about anything including his past transgressions. Who really cares if it was 2003 or 2005, it was a long time ago.

The guy made a mistake, admitted as such, paid his debt and moved on with his life. So should everybody else.

> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>
> The 2005 article says he said he only cheated that year. Today's Rassmussen article appears to say that he was using in 2003. Someone is not telling the truth. It would be nice to know who is telling the truth, particularly when many people have been racing in the same OBRA category at the same races as the person in question for many years. -Jon
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Evan Plews

2013-10-31

This is not a personal thing but as one who has had the privilege (curse) of racing against many cheaters, i wonder how/why this is considered old news?

Cheating is not a drug, it is a mental condition. Furthermore, who is to say there isn't a lasting benefit from using PEDs? We all know that body builders ball players wrestlers etc alter their bodies forever so why wouldn't training on with a supercharged oxygen uptake or recovery system not forever benefit an athlete?

I suppose the pervasive naivete is most concerning... You know there will be cheaters lining up this weekend. Maybe just a quick puff on an inhaler or a line on the inside of a cone here or there. Its all the same--these folks are sick.

Kudos to Jon for keeping us informed. Clearly this isn't "old" news since at least one of these riders is still competing.

BTW Rasmussen fingering a certain notorious group of mountain bike racers is no surprise but there are at least one our two names missing from this story.

Truth follows us relentlessly so sooner or later it will catch up.

Evan Plews
www.evanplews.com
503-949-4879

--- Original Message ---

From: tjpaskewich@gmail.com
Sent: October 30, 2013 6:08 PM
To: "Jon Myers"
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Jon,

Normally I stay away from these threads, but I don't know you, but I do know Shep. Most open guy I have met about anything including his past transgressions. Who really cares if it was 2003 or 2005, it was a long time ago.

The guy made a mistake, admitted as such, paid his debt and moved on with his life. So should everybody else.

> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>
> The 2005 article says he said he only cheated that year. Today's Rassmussen article appears to say that he was using in 2003. Someone is not telling the truth. It would be nice to know who is telling the truth, particularly when many people have been racing in the same OBRA category at the same races as the person in question for many years. -Jon
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


tjpaskewich@gmail.com

2013-10-31

Jon,

Normally I stay away from these threads, but I don't know you, but I do know Shep. Most open guy I have met about anything including his past transgressions. Who really cares if it was 2003 or 2005, it was a long time ago.

The guy made a mistake, admitted as such, paid his debt and moved on with his life. So should everybody else.

> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>
> The 2005 article says he said he only cheated that year. Today's Rassmussen article appears to say that he was using in 2003. Someone is not telling the truth. It would be nice to know who is telling the truth, particularly when many people have been racing in the same OBRA category at the same races as the person in question for many years. -Jon
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Jon Myers

2013-10-31

The 2005 article says he said he only cheated that year. Today's Rassmussen article appears to say that he was using in 2003. Someone is not telling the truth. It would be nice to know who is telling the truth, particularly when many people have been racing in the same OBRA category at the same races as the person in question for many years. -Jon


Mike Murray

2013-10-31

I am just happy when he can wear his number correctly, which has been an issue for him.

Mike Murray

From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Melanie Rathe
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 17:07
To: matt Savage
Cc: Jon Myers; obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] more doping news

Sounds like this is the first Jon has heard about Shep. Old news to the rest of us...Shep paid his debt and has moved on!

Sent from my iPhone Mel

On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:41 PM, matt Savage wrote:

Man, kick a guy when he's down... I think most of us are pretty aware of the mistakes Sheppard made in the past. It's well documented and he served his sentence. I'm not quite sure I understand the tone or intent of your email.

-Matt

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jon Myers wrote:

As someone that has raced in the open, pro, and A categories of MTB and Cross in Oregon for many years I found it a bit troubling to see the latest doping allegations and confessions in cyclingnews.com. The articles mention someone that has done a lot of racing in Oregon over the last five years and done very well. Based on the articles published over the years, not everyone can be telling the truth. -Jon

>From 2005 cyclingnews.com: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/sheppard-admits-doping-violation

“Chris Sheppard, the Canadian national mountain bike representative given a two-year suspension after he was found to have evidence of recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) in his system, has admitted that after 17 years of racing clean, he "gave in during hard times".

Sheppard stated via his lawyers that, "Point blank I wish to acknowledge I cheated; I'm not trying to raise sympathy, nor have people feel sorry for me. Cycling is a tough sport and after years of racing clean and pointing the finger, I gave in during hard times. I wanted what was taken away from me - years of hard work culminating in a solid season that ended with an accident and my spiral into depression."”

>From Cyclingnews.com today: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-rasmussen-claims-he-taught-hesjedal-how-to-take-epo

“Rasmussen never saw Hesjedal use EPO or any other banned substances but reveals details of his alleged stay at the Dane's house.

"It soon became evident that the three Canadian mountain bikers Seamus McGrath, Chris Sheppard and Ryder Hesjedal, had seen the light: A good result in the World Cup (2003) would send them to the Olympics in Athens in 2004,” Politiken reports that Rasmussen writes in his book.

“They moved into my basement in August, before I went to the Vuelta a España, and after I had ridden the Championship of Zurich. They stayed for a fortnight. I trained with them in the Dolomites and taught them how to do vitamin injections and how to take EPO and Synacthen.”

Rasmussen claims the riders left with haematocrit values of over 48%, close to the limit of 50% and achieved excellent results.

“Chris Sheppard was sixteenth at the World Championships, Seamus McGrath was sixth or eight, before he went out, and Ryder Hesjedal finished second. Hesjedal would have won Olympic gold if he hadn’t punctured just before the finish. In 2012, after a number of good years on the road, he won the Giro d'Italia.”

Rasmussen claims they celebrated the season and paid back Rasmussen for his help by taking him out for dinner in Italy, with Sheppard picking up the bill.”

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Erik Voldengen

2013-10-31

Yeah, old news. Nothing wrong going on now, unless you count not pinning
your number on right?

- Erik

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Melanie Rathe wrote:

> Sounds like this is the first Jon has heard about Shep. Old news to the
> rest of us...Shep paid his debt and has moved on!
>
> Sent from my iPhone Mel
>
> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:41 PM, matt Savage wrote:
>
> Man, kick a guy when he's down... I think most of us are pretty aware of
> the mistakes Sheppard made in the past. It's well documented and he served
> his sentence. I'm not quite sure I understand the tone or intent of your
> email.
>
> -Matt
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>
>> As someone that has raced in the open, pro, and A categories of MTB and
>> Cross in Oregon for many years I found it a bit troubling to see the latest
>> doping allegations and confessions in cyclingnews.com. The articles
>> mention someone that has done a lot of racing in Oregon over the last five
>> years and done very well. Based on the articles published over the years,
>> not everyone can be telling the truth. -Jon
>>
>> From 2005 cyclingnews.com:
>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/sheppard-admits-doping-violation
>>
>> “Chris Sheppard, the Canadian national mountain bike representative given
>> a two-year suspension after he was found to have evidence of recombinant
>> erythropoietin (rEPO) in his system, has admitted that after 17 years of
>> racing clean, he "gave in during hard times".
>>
>> Sheppard stated via his lawyers that, "Point blank I wish to acknowledge
>> I cheated; I'm not trying to raise sympathy, nor have people feel sorry for
>> me. Cycling is a tough sport and after years of racing clean and pointing
>> the finger, I gave in during hard times. I wanted what was taken away from
>> me - years of hard work culminating in a solid season that ended with an
>> accident and my spiral into depression."”
>>
>>
>>
>> From Cyclingnews.com today:
>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-rasmussen-claims-he-taught-hesjedal-how-to-take-epo
>>
>>
>> “Rasmussen never saw Hesjedal use EPO or any other banned substances but
>> reveals details of his alleged stay at the Dane's house.
>>
>> "It soon became evident that the three Canadian mountain bikers Seamus
>> McGrath, Chris Sheppard and Ryder Hesjedal, had seen the light: A good
>> result in the World Cup (2003) would send them to the Olympics in Athens in
>> 2004,” Politiken reports that Rasmussen writes in his book.
>>
>> “They moved into my basement in August, before I went to the Vuelta a
>> España, and after I had ridden the Championship of Zurich. They stayed for
>> a fortnight. I trained with them in the Dolomites and taught them how to do
>> vitamin injections and how to take EPO and Synacthen.”
>>
>> Rasmussen claims the riders left with haematocrit values of over 48%,
>> close to the limit of 50% and achieved excellent results.
>>
>> “Chris Sheppard was sixteenth at the World Championships, Seamus McGrath
>> was sixth or eight, before he went out, and Ryder Hesjedal finished second.
>> Hesjedal would have won Olympic gold if he hadn’t punctured just before the
>> finish. In 2012, after a number of good years on the road, he won the Giro
>> d'Italia.”
>>
>> Rasmussen claims they celebrated the season and paid back Rasmussen for
>> his help by taking him out for dinner in Italy, with Sheppard picking up
>> the bill.”
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Melanie Rathe

2013-10-31

Sounds like this is the first Jon has heard about Shep. Old news to the rest of us...Shep paid his debt and has moved on!

Sent from my iPhone Mel

> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:41 PM, matt Savage wrote:
>
> Man, kick a guy when he's down... I think most of us are pretty aware of the mistakes Sheppard made in the past. It's well documented and he served his sentence. I'm not quite sure I understand the tone or intent of your email.
>
> -Matt
>
>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
>> As someone that has raced in the open, pro, and A categories of MTB and Cross in Oregon for many years I found it a bit troubling to see the latest doping allegations and confessions in cyclingnews.com. The articles mention someone that has done a lot of racing in Oregon over the last five years and done very well. Based on the articles published over the years, not everyone can be telling the truth. -Jon
>>
>> From 2005 cyclingnews.com: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/sheppard-admits-doping-violation
>>
>> “Chris Sheppard, the Canadian national mountain bike representative given a two-year suspension after he was found to have evidence of recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) in his system, has admitted that after 17 years of racing clean, he "gave in during hard times".
>>
>> Sheppard stated via his lawyers that, "Point blank I wish to acknowledge I cheated; I'm not trying to raise sympathy, nor have people feel sorry for me. Cycling is a tough sport and after years of racing clean and pointing the finger, I gave in during hard times. I wanted what was taken away from me - years of hard work culminating in a solid season that ended with an accident and my spiral into depression."”
>>
>>
>>
>> From Cyclingnews.com today: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-rasmussen-claims-he-taught-hesjedal-how-to-take-epo
>>
>>
>> “Rasmussen never saw Hesjedal use EPO or any other banned substances but reveals details of his alleged stay at the Dane's house.
>>
>> "It soon became evident that the three Canadian mountain bikers Seamus McGrath, Chris Sheppard and Ryder Hesjedal, had seen the light: A good result in the World Cup (2003) would send them to the Olympics in Athens in 2004,” Politiken reports that Rasmussen writes in his book.
>>
>> “They moved into my basement in August, before I went to the Vuelta a España, and after I had ridden the Championship of Zurich. They stayed for a fortnight. I trained with them in the Dolomites and taught them how to do vitamin injections and how to take EPO and Synacthen.”
>>
>> Rasmussen claims the riders left with haematocrit values of over 48%, close to the limit of 50% and achieved excellent results.
>>
>> “Chris Sheppard was sixteenth at the World Championships, Seamus McGrath was sixth or eight, before he went out, and Ryder Hesjedal finished second. Hesjedal would have won Olympic gold if he hadn’t punctured just before the finish. In 2012, after a number of good years on the road, he won the Giro d'Italia.”
>>
>> Rasmussen claims they celebrated the season and paid back Rasmussen for his help by taking him out for dinner in Italy, with Sheppard picking up the bill.”
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


matt Savage

2013-10-30

Man, kick a guy when he's down... I think most of us are pretty aware of
the mistakes Sheppard made in the past. It's well documented and he served
his sentence. I'm not quite sure I understand the tone or intent of your
email.

-Matt

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jon Myers wrote:

> As someone that has raced in the open, pro, and A categories of MTB and
> Cross in Oregon for many years I found it a bit troubling to see the latest
> doping allegations and confessions in cyclingnews.com. The articles
> mention someone that has done a lot of racing in Oregon over the last five
> years and done very well. Based on the articles published over the years,
> not everyone can be telling the truth. -Jon
>
> From 2005 cyclingnews.com:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/sheppard-admits-doping-violation
>
> “Chris Sheppard, the Canadian national mountain bike representative given
> a two-year suspension after he was found to have evidence of recombinant
> erythropoietin (rEPO) in his system, has admitted that after 17 years of
> racing clean, he "gave in during hard times".
>
> Sheppard stated via his lawyers that, "Point blank I wish to acknowledge I
> cheated; I'm not trying to raise sympathy, nor have people feel sorry for
> me. Cycling is a tough sport and after years of racing clean and pointing
> the finger, I gave in during hard times. I wanted what was taken away from
> me - years of hard work culminating in a solid season that ended with an
> accident and my spiral into depression."”
>
>
>
> From Cyclingnews.com today:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-rasmussen-claims-he-taught-hesjedal-how-to-take-epo
>
>
> “Rasmussen never saw Hesjedal use EPO or any other banned substances but
> reveals details of his alleged stay at the Dane's house.
>
> "It soon became evident that the three Canadian mountain bikers Seamus
> McGrath, Chris Sheppard and Ryder Hesjedal, had seen the light: A good
> result in the World Cup (2003) would send them to the Olympics in Athens in
> 2004,” Politiken reports that Rasmussen writes in his book.
>
> “They moved into my basement in August, before I went to the Vuelta a
> España, and after I had ridden the Championship of Zurich. They stayed for
> a fortnight. I trained with them in the Dolomites and taught them how to do
> vitamin injections and how to take EPO and Synacthen.”
>
> Rasmussen claims the riders left with haematocrit values of over 48%,
> close to the limit of 50% and achieved excellent results.
>
> “Chris Sheppard was sixteenth at the World Championships, Seamus McGrath
> was sixth or eight, before he went out, and Ryder Hesjedal finished second.
> Hesjedal would have won Olympic gold if he hadn’t punctured just before the
> finish. In 2012, after a number of good years on the road, he won the Giro
> d'Italia.”
>
> Rasmussen claims they celebrated the season and paid back Rasmussen for
> his help by taking him out for dinner in Italy, with Sheppard picking up
> the bill.”
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Jon Myers

2013-10-30

As someone that has raced in the open, pro, and A categories of MTB and Cross in Oregon for many years I found it a bit troubling to see the latest doping allegations and confessions in cyclingnews.com. The articles mention someone that has done a lot of racing in Oregon over the last five years and done very well. Based on the articles published over the years, not everyone can be telling the truth. -Jon

>From 2005 cyclingnews.com: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/sheppard-admits-doping-violation

���Chris Sheppard, the Canadian national mountain bike representative given a two-year suspension after he was found to have evidence of recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) in his system, has admitted that after 17 years of racing clean, he "gave in during hard times".

Sheppard stated via his lawyers that, "Point blank I wish to acknowledge I cheated; I'm not trying to raise sympathy, nor have people feel sorry for me. Cycling is a tough sport and after years of racing clean and pointing the finger, I gave in during hard times. I wanted what was taken away from me - years of hard work culminating in a solid season that ended with an accident and my spiral into depression."���

>From Cyclingnews.com today: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-rasmussen-claims-he-taught-hesjedal-how-to-take-epo

���Rasmussen never saw Hesjedal use EPO or any other banned substances but reveals details of his alleged stay at the Dane's house.

"It soon became evident that the three Canadian mountain bikers Seamus McGrath, Chris Sheppard and Ryder Hesjedal, had seen the light: A good result in the World Cup (2003) would send them to the Olympics in Athens in 2004,��� Politiken reports that Rasmussen writes in his book.

���They moved into my basement in August, before I went to the Vuelta a Espa��a, and after I had ridden the Championship of Zurich. They stayed for a fortnight. I trained with them in the Dolomites and taught them how to do vitamin injections and how to take EPO and Synacthen.���

Rasmussen claims the riders left with haematocrit values of over 48%, close to the limit of 50% and achieved excellent results.

���Chris Sheppard was sixteenth at the World Championships, Seamus McGrath was sixth or eight, before he went out, and Ryder Hesjedal finished second. Hesjedal would have won Olympic gold if he hadn���t punctured just before the finish. In 2012, after a number of good years on the road, he won the Giro d'Italia.���

Rasmussen claims they celebrated the season and paid back Rasmussen for his help by taking him out for dinner in Italy, with Sheppard picking up the bill.���