FW: RE NORBA

Mike Murray

2000-08-17

The first thing that you need to recognize is that most riders in Oregon

were OBRA members even when the races were organized through USCF. Another

point is that there is reciprocity in membership between the FIAC

organization which currently are OBRA, ABR, ACA and NCNCA. This means that

a membership in one of those organizations allows you to compete in the

other organization's races without purchasing another membership.



There are a couple of questions raised by your note:

- Is USAC making the sport of bicycle racing better? From my point of view

as a racer for nearly 30 years, event organizer and velodrome manager for 15

years or so was that they were really only taking money from me, returning

little and for the most part getting in the way of my efforts to improve

bike racing locally. Your opinion may vary.



- Is it reasonable that USAC take money from local racing in exchange for

few services and then use that money to support elite level cycling services

such as Olympic training camps? Personally I think that the money to

support elite level services should come from the money that USAC receives

from sponsors and the USOC. I think that the majority of money that they

raise locally should be returned in services to local programs. This way

the local programs can improve and grow the sport.



If USAC were to recognize points obtained in OBRA races for upgrading then

they would make it more likely rather than less likely that an OBRA rider

would attend a USAC event. At this point if you are considering going to a

USCF event both the need to purchase another membership and the inability to

ride in an appropriate category are both disincentives to attending the USAC

event.



Obviously the ideal situation would be if there were only one bike racing

organization and that the costs for membership were as low as possible and

the benefits were as high as possible. The alternative organizations began

to offer races when cost of USAC participation began to exceed the value of

the services provided. In the past USAC offered more services for less

money. At this point they offer little more than liability insurance.

Since it only takes about 1000 rider/days per year to make it more cost

effective to insure your event outside of USAC there are starting to be

several other organizations in addition to some individual race organizers

that are offering races independently from USAC.



Although many people have cast the OBRA/USAC schism as a political item it

is really an economic issue. For the races that I organized this year

avoiding USCF sanctioning saved over $3000. This is money that I can use

towards putting on a better event. If USAC is interested in getting back

this business they need to begin to offer some services that justify these

costs.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Paul Hammer [mailto:spine-@yahoo.com]

Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 5:36 PM

To: mmur-@teleport.com; ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: FW: [OBRA Chat] RE NORBA





so you are saying that i should spend $20 for obra

membership and $20 for ABR and another 30 or more for

USCF. That is getting a little out of hand. oh, and

on top of that in ohio we have a man doing his own

series where one has to join that membership. i am a

member in 4 racing organizations. i have spent a good

70 dollars on membership. USAC has made a wise

business choice. if they recognize points from obra

and the 80% (guessing) of riders that just race in

oregon don't have a membership in USAC. where do they

get there funds to hold olympic training camps...send

out news letters... better the sport of cycling.

again i stress this is friendly conversation. i

have promoted several races myself... helped organize

abr, NCCA committees... just to give myself some

credit of my ideas

obra is amazing. going to the crawfish race... i

was dumbfounded by the signs, fencing, communication

etc. my races have been done with carboard signs and

markers. that was excepted as very well done. that

was caused by lack of direct contact from USCF or USCA

with the event. they made sure an offical was there

and i did all that was to be done.

"again...well done to obra!"

paul hammer

--- Mike Murray <mmur-@teleport.com> wrote:

 Paul Hammer wrote:

"i strongly oppose of different organizations like

OBRA and ABR because of

the simple fact that if JR's and Senior men want to

advance at a national

level they must have points from USCF or NORBA.

They can't go to USCF and

say that they have so many points in ORBA and be

upgraded."



This is not an unsolvable problem and the solution

is in USAC's (USCF and

NORBA) hands. All they have to do is recognize

other organization's races

for upgrading purposes. It would be to their

advantage to do that since it

would serve the dual purpose of allowing them to

identify talented riders

and also to encourage participation in USAC events.

So far they have chosen

not to do this, to my mind a bad business maneuver.

I think that they only

real reason that they don't recognize the

alternative organization's

upgrades is because this allows them to cling to the

idea that they have a

monopoly on the market of providing bike races.

They are wrong.



Currently all of the alternative organization

recognize upgrades regardless

of the sanctioning organization, i.e. you CAN go to

OBRA or ABR with points

from USCF races and get upgraded. It just doesn't

work in reverse.



I have had several conversations with the USAC staff

on this subject. They

claim that their board members have prohibited them

from adopting a policy

of cooperating with the alternative organizations in

upgrading riders. As

the alternative organizations become more successful

USAC will need to

recognize the reality of the situation and change

this policy. In order to

facilitate this I would suggest that people contact

the USAC staff and board

members and let their opinions be known. To this

point USAC has elected to

ignore the membership's opinion on this and on many

other subjects.

However, if USAC is to continue to operate they will

need to change in this

regard.



Mike Murray



To respond to the whole group send to

ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to

ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

 T O P I C A The Email You Want.

http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite

Topics





__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.

http://im.yahoo.com/



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics



Paul Hammer

2000-08-16

so you are saying that i should spend $20 for obra

membership and $20 for ABR and another 30 or more for

USCF. That is getting a little out of hand. oh, and

on top of that in ohio we have a man doing his own

series where one has to join that membership. i am a

member in 4 racing organizations. i have spent a good

70 dollars on membership. USAC has made a wise

business choice. if they recognize points from obra

and the 80% (guessing) of riders that just race in

oregon don't have a membership in USAC. where do they

get there funds to hold olympic training camps...send

out news letters... better the sport of cycling.

again i stress this is friendly conversation. i

have promoted several races myself... helped organize

abr, NCCA committees... just to give myself some

credit of my ideas

obra is amazing. going to the crawfish race... i

was dumbfounded by the signs, fencing, communication

etc. my races have been done with carboard signs and

markers. that was excepted as very well done. that

was caused by lack of direct contact from USCF or USCA

with the event. they made sure an offical was there

and i did all that was to be done.

"again...well done to obra!"

paul hammer

--- Mike Murray <mmur-@teleport.com> wrote:

 Paul Hammer wrote:

"i strongly oppose of different organizations like

OBRA and ABR because of

the simple fact that if JR's and Senior men want to

advance at a national

level they must have points from USCF or NORBA.

They can't go to USCF and

say that they have so many points in ORBA and be

upgraded."



This is not an unsolvable problem and the solution

is in USAC's (USCF and

NORBA) hands. All they have to do is recognize

other organization's races

for upgrading purposes. It would be to their

advantage to do that since it

would serve the dual purpose of allowing them to

identify talented riders

and also to encourage participation in USAC events.

So far they have chosen

not to do this, to my mind a bad business maneuver.

I think that they only

real reason that they don't recognize the

alternative organization's

upgrades is because this allows them to cling to the

idea that they have a

monopoly on the market of providing bike races.

They are wrong.



Currently all of the alternative organization

recognize upgrades regardless

of the sanctioning organization, i.e. you CAN go to

OBRA or ABR with points

from USCF races and get upgraded. It just doesn't

work in reverse.



I have had several conversations with the USAC staff

on this subject. They

claim that their board members have prohibited them

from adopting a policy

of cooperating with the alternative organizations in

upgrading riders. As

the alternative organizations become more successful

USAC will need to

recognize the reality of the situation and change

this policy. In order to

facilitate this I would suggest that people contact

the USAC staff and board

members and let their opinions be known. To this

point USAC has elected to

ignore the membership's opinion on this and on many

other subjects.

However, if USAC is to continue to operate they will

need to change in this

regard.



Mike Murray



To respond to the whole group send to

ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to

ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

 T O P I C A The Email You Want.

http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite

Topics





__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.

http://im.yahoo.com/



Mike Murray

2000-08-15

Paul Hammer wrote:

"i strongly oppose of different organizations like OBRA and ABR because of

the simple fact that if JR's and Senior men want to advance at a national

level they must have points from USCF or NORBA. They can't go to USCF and

say that they have so many points in ORBA and be upgraded."



This is not an unsolvable problem and the solution is in USAC's (USCF and

NORBA) hands. All they have to do is recognize other organization's races

for upgrading purposes. It would be to their advantage to do that since it

would serve the dual purpose of allowing them to identify talented riders

and also to encourage participation in USAC events. So far they have chosen

not to do this, to my mind a bad business maneuver. I think that they only

real reason that they don't recognize the alternative organization's

upgrades is because this allows them to cling to the idea that they have a

monopoly on the market of providing bike races. They are wrong.



Currently all of the alternative organization recognize upgrades regardless

of the sanctioning organization, i.e. you CAN go to OBRA or ABR with points

from USCF races and get upgraded. It just doesn't work in reverse.



I have had several conversations with the USAC staff on this subject. They

claim that their board members have prohibited them from adopting a policy

of cooperating with the alternative organizations in upgrading riders. As

the alternative organizations become more successful USAC will need to

recognize the reality of the situation and change this policy. In order to

facilitate this I would suggest that people contact the USAC staff and board

members and let their opinions be known. To this point USAC has elected to

ignore the membership's opinion on this and on many other subjects.

However, if USAC is to continue to operate they will need to change in this

regard.



Mike Murray



crobin-@cs.com

2000-08-15

Just thought I'd mention that the 2000 Gorge Games DH and DS at Mt Hood Skibowl (Government Camp, OR),was a UCI sanctioned World Cup Event!



Carl Robinson



dion_-@MENTORG.COM wrote:

 

If I understand, you're saying that people won't be able to compete at

the national level, because they will have to score all their NORBA/USCF

upgrade points outside Oregon?



This is true for NORBA but it is not OBRA's fault. ?Per the NORBA bylaws

"Expert riders may be eligible to upgrade to Semi-Pro (men) or Pro

(women) after finishing in the top five in three NORBA National

Championship Series (NCS) events or Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI)

World Cup events on the NORBA calendar." ?Since there are no NCS or UCI

events in Oregon (not in the last five years as I recall) an upcoming

MTB racer would have to go out of state in any case to become a

semi-pro. ?For this situation to change, someone has to start promoting

NCS or UCI events in Oregon; good luck.



The situation may be more difficult for the USCF, where new riders must

begin as cat 5 and work their way up. ?However, our "big" stage races

are USCF (Cascade, Willamette) as are most of the Washington races

(Enumclaw) that are about the same distance from Portland.

Interestingly, a look at the rule book does not specify whether the

events must be USCF events. ?I suggest getting to know the district rep

personally (whoops, they're in Spokane, thanks USA Cycling), but I don't

have much advice to offer someone who wants to be a USCF Cat 1.



I think the bigger question you might want to research on your own is

how much support USA Cycling will hand out to JRs and Seniors wanting to

advance at a national level.



-Dion



Paul Hammer wrote:

 

?I just moved here from indiana and we sort of have

the same thing happening with "ABR" (american bicycle

racing). ?It is a great organization that cuts through

the red tape of USCF and USAC. ?They put on great

races... but not like around here. ?The events here,

road and mt. are well done as is the membership and

everything. ?i have sent messages to Mr Fischer and

thanked him for his great work. ?however i strongly

oppose of different organizations like OBRA and ABR

because of the simple fact that if JR's and Senior men

want to advance at a national level they must have

points from USCF or NORBA. ?They can't go to USCF and

say that they have so many points in ORBA and be

upgraded.

? Again, OBRA is an outstanding organization but no

amount of support will get young riders anywhere. ?as

a 20 year old trying to upgrade, i speak from imediate

experience.

Paul Hammer



--- jim_fi-@hp.com wrote:

 --- Support Our Soccer Sponsor

---------------------------

BigSoccer.com. ?Share the Passion!

Better than news. Better than mailing lists.

Find out what over 100,000 soccer fans already know!

http://click.topica.com/aaaavLbz8QVebAd5Mra/BigSoccer

 
----------------------------------------------------------

 



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

T O P I C A ?The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics



Dion Dock

2000-08-15

If I understand, you're saying that people won't be able to compete at

the national level, because they will have to score all their NORBA/USCF

upgrade points outside Oregon?



This is true for NORBA but it is not OBRA's fault. Per the NORBA bylaws

"Expert riders may be eligible to upgrade to Semi-Pro (men) or Pro

(women) after finishing in the top five in three NORBA National

Championship Series (NCS) events or Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI)

World Cup events on the NORBA calendar." Since there are no NCS or UCI

events in Oregon (not in the last five years as I recall) an upcoming

MTB racer would have to go out of state in any case to become a

semi-pro. For this situation to change, someone has to start promoting

NCS or UCI events in Oregon; good luck.



The situation may be more difficult for the USCF, where new riders must

begin as cat 5 and work their way up. However, our "big" stage races

are USCF (Cascade, Willamette) as are most of the Washington races

(Enumclaw) that are about the same distance from Portland.

Interestingly, a look at the rule book does not specify whether the

events must be USCF events. I suggest getting to know the district rep

personally (whoops, they're in Spokane, thanks USA Cycling), but I don't

have much advice to offer someone who wants to be a USCF Cat 1.



I think the bigger question you might want to research on your own is

how much support USA Cycling will hand out to JRs and Seniors wanting to

advance at a national level.



-Dion



Paul Hammer wrote:

 

I just moved here from indiana and we sort of have

the same thing happening with "ABR" (american bicycle

racing). It is a great organization that cuts through

the red tape of USCF and USAC. They put on great

races... but not like around here. The events here,

road and mt. are well done as is the membership and

everything. i have sent messages to Mr Fischer and

thanked him for his great work. however i strongly

oppose of different organizations like OBRA and ABR

because of the simple fact that if JR's and Senior men

want to advance at a national level they must have

points from USCF or NORBA. They can't go to USCF and

say that they have so many points in ORBA and be

upgraded.

   Again, OBRA is an outstanding organization but no

amount of support will get young riders anywhere. as

a 20 year old trying to upgrade, i speak from imediate

experience.

Paul Hammer



--- jim_fi-@hp.com wrote:

 --- Support Our Soccer Sponsor

---------------------------

BigSoccer.com. Share the Passion!

Better than news. Better than mailing lists.

Find out what over 100,000 soccer fans already know!

http://click.topica.com/aaaavLbz8QVebAd5Mra/BigSoccer

 
----------------------------------------------------------

 



Paul Hammer

2000-08-14

I just moved here from indiana and we sort of have

the same thing happening with "ABR" (american bicycle

racing). It is a great organization that cuts through

the red tape of USCF and USAC. They put on great

races... but not like around here. The events here,

road and mt. are well done as is the membership and

everything. i have sent messages to Mr Fischer and

thanked him for his great work. however i strongly

oppose of different organizations like OBRA and ABR

because of the simple fact that if JR's and Senior men

want to advance at a national level they must have

points from USCF or NORBA. They can't go to USCF and

say that they have so many points in ORBA and be

upgraded.

Again, OBRA is an outstanding organization but no

amount of support will get young riders anywhere. as

a 20 year old trying to upgrade, i speak from imediate

experience.

Paul Hammer



--- jim_fi-@hp.com wrote:

 --- Support Our Soccer Sponsor

---------------------------

BigSoccer.com. Share the Passion!

Better than news. Better than mailing lists.

Find out what over 100,000 soccer fans already know!

http://click.topica.com/aaaavLbz8QVebAd5Mra/BigSoccer

 
----------------------------------------------------------

 

Walt,



Thanks for the feedback. All the responses I have

received have been to the

same effect; let's stay with OBRA. Mike Murray

definitely makes a strong case.

The few features we need which NORBA is offering

(which have never been

delivered to Oregon), such as promoter and officials

training and materials, are

things we could do at home. Given the amount of

revenue we could generate by

matching NORBA's fee system, we could do a wide

variety of support activities

for racers, promoters and officials. However, I'm

not proposing we change the

fee structure to add things nobody is really crying

out for. I'm just saying

that NORBA, with all it's revenue generation, still

cannot do what we could

given the same cash flow.



With a few items added to the menu for OBRA

services, I think the mountain bike

community could get a better handle on the few

issues outstanding in Oregon and

continue to provide the level of racing and support

people want.



I applaud your offer to become a mountain bike

official. I was actually

proposing that every promoter become an official and

work one other event during

the season. The event you work would be drawn at

random and some other promoter

would come work your event. All officials would be

trained the same way at the

same time, so there should be some continuity. This

is what I've suggested to

the SoBe series folks.



Regards and thanks for the involvement and

dedication.



Jim Fischer





-----Original Message-----

From: Walt Luelling [mailto:luel-@cdsnet.net]

Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 8:17 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] RE NORBA





--- Support Our Soccer Sponsor

---------------------------

BigSoccer.com. Share the Passion!

Better than news. Better than mailing lists.

Find out what over 100,000 soccer fans already know!

http://click.topica.com/aaaavLbz8QVebAd5Mra/BigSoccer

 
----------------------------------------------------------

 

Here is my 2 cents worth on the NORBA situation:

[On soap-box mode]



Under OBRA the mountain biking scene in Oregon is

healthier, and the event

schedule is fuller than it ever was under NORBA.



While NORBA's good intentions are laudable (if they

are real), the fact

remains that NORBA is owned outright by USAC, and

that is where the real

decisions are made, and where the policies

established. While USAC wants

our money each year, they have amply demonstrated

that they really could

not give a rip less about you and I!



The bottom line is that most of us belong to OBRA

because cycling is fun,

and we enjoy it. Most of us will never compete

professionally at the

national or international level, and virtually none

of us will ever compete

in the Olympics, and those two areas are all that

matter to USAC.



It does not make sense to say that we should abandon

the OBRA model just

because it will not work at the national level.

Whether it would work or

not at the national level, it certainly is working

at the state level, and

that is where the vast majority of us are cycling.



Worrying about what happens to OBRA should the

Murrays "bail out" is also a

waste of time. That may happen someday, and if it

does, others of us will

just have to step up and take over part of that

work. But by their own

admission this problem is not even on the horizon.

They may outlast all of us!!



There is also the problem of how we support the

young up-and-coming riders

who may be able to turn professional, and/or have a

chance to compete for

the Olympics. Such Oregon riders should be supported

by us directly. We do

it with personal checks and/or by adding a few

dollars per year to the OBRA

license. Such a method is cheaper for each of us

than the USAC method

because the recipient gets every dollar contributed,

instead of pennies on

the dollar that we contribute.



What must happen in mountain biking is that more of

us must get involved at

the OBRA administration level, so the Jim Fischer

and Randy Dreiling won't

burn-out from trying to do it all.



In the "put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is" mode, I

will volunteer my time,

and travel at my own expense to be an OBRA rep at

mountain bike races. If

three or four others will volunteer to do the same,

none of us would be

unreasonably burdened. Come on, I know there are

others of you out there

who could do this also! Let's get involved and make

it work!



OBRA is working well for Oregon mountain bikers, and

we should continue to

support it!



[Off soap-box mode]



Regards,

Walt Luelling

Klamath Falls

luel-@cdsnet.net

800-593-5953 ext. 100 (Days)

541-883-1058 (Evenings)



To respond to the whole group send to

ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to

ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

 T O P I C A The Email You Want.

http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite

Topics



To respond to the whole group send to

ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to

ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

 T O P I C A The Email You Want.

http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite

Topics





__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Mail ? Free email you can access from anywhere!

http://mail.yahoo.com/



jim_fi-@hp.com

2000-08-11

Walt,



Thanks for the feedback. All the responses I have received have been to the

same effect; let's stay with OBRA. Mike Murray definitely makes a strong case.

The few features we need which NORBA is offering (which have never been

delivered to Oregon), such as promoter and officials training and materials, are

things we could do at home. Given the amount of revenue we could generate by

matching NORBA's fee system, we could do a wide variety of support activities

for racers, promoters and officials. However, I'm not proposing we change the

fee structure to add things nobody is really crying out for. I'm just saying

that NORBA, with all it's revenue generation, still cannot do what we could

given the same cash flow.



With a few items added to the menu for OBRA services, I think the mountain bike

community could get a better handle on the few issues outstanding in Oregon and

continue to provide the level of racing and support people want.



I applaud your offer to become a mountain bike official. I was actually

proposing that every promoter become an official and work one other event during

the season. The event you work would be drawn at random and some other promoter

would come work your event. All officials would be trained the same way at the

same time, so there should be some continuity. This is what I've suggested to

the SoBe series folks.



Regards and thanks for the involvement and dedication.



Jim Fischer





-----Original Message-----

From: Walt Luelling [mailto:luel-@cdsnet.net]

Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 8:17 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] RE NORBA





--- Support Our Soccer Sponsor ---------------------------

BigSoccer.com. Share the Passion!

Better than news. Better than mailing lists.

Find out what over 100,000 soccer fans already know!

http://click.topica.com/aaaavLbz8QVebAd5Mra/BigSoccer

----------------------------------------------------------



Here is my 2 cents worth on the NORBA situation: [On soap-box mode]



Under OBRA the mountain biking scene in Oregon is healthier, and the event

schedule is fuller than it ever was under NORBA.



While NORBA's good intentions are laudable (if they are real), the fact

remains that NORBA is owned outright by USAC, and that is where the real

decisions are made, and where the policies established. While USAC wants

our money each year, they have amply demonstrated that they really could

not give a rip less about you and I!



The bottom line is that most of us belong to OBRA because cycling is fun,

and we enjoy it. Most of us will never compete professionally at the

national or international level, and virtually none of us will ever compete

in the Olympics, and those two areas are all that matter to USAC.



It does not make sense to say that we should abandon the OBRA model just

because it will not work at the national level. Whether it would work or

not at the national level, it certainly is working at the state level, and

that is where the vast majority of us are cycling.



Worrying about what happens to OBRA should the Murrays "bail out" is also a

waste of time. That may happen someday, and if it does, others of us will

just have to step up and take over part of that work. But by their own

admission this problem is not even on the horizon. They may outlast all of us!!



There is also the problem of how we support the young up-and-coming riders

who may be able to turn professional, and/or have a chance to compete for

the Olympics. Such Oregon riders should be supported by us directly. We do

it with personal checks and/or by adding a few dollars per year to the OBRA

license. Such a method is cheaper for each of us than the USAC method

because the recipient gets every dollar contributed, instead of pennies on

the dollar that we contribute.



What must happen in mountain biking is that more of us must get involved at

the OBRA administration level, so the Jim Fischer and Randy Dreiling won't

burn-out from trying to do it all.



In the "put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is" mode, I will volunteer my time,

and travel at my own expense to be an OBRA rep at mountain bike races. If

three or four others will volunteer to do the same, none of us would be

unreasonably burdened. Come on, I know there are others of you out there

who could do this also! Let's get involved and make it work!



OBRA is working well for Oregon mountain bikers, and we should continue to

support it!



[Off soap-box mode]



Regards,

Walt Luelling

Klamath Falls

luel-@cdsnet.net

800-593-5953 ext. 100 (Days)

541-883-1058 (Evenings)



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

___________________________________________________________

T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16

Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics