Mike Murray
His sole USAC result is a 27th in a Cat 5 crit in 2011. It is possible,
however, that other results were removed after the suspension however the
one listed result is past the date where he was to have results removed so
I doubt it. It is of note that his sanction was the result of
investigation of illicit PEA distribution and not the result of testing.
Looks like the whole deal for him was all risk, little reward and he lost.
For what it's worth, there was an earlier suspension of a guy with
somewhat better results but still not exactly a noted athlete:
http://www.usada.org/carter-luck-accepts-doping-sanction/
Also a non-analytical positive.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Richardson [mailto:MikeR0629@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:25
To: Mike Murray
Cc: remailer OBRA
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Kyle Schmidt Accepts Doping Sanction | USADA
More results show up if you look for runs and triathlon. I wonder if he
didn't minimize USAC races on perception they drug test more. Still no
Lance by his times but looks like a reasonably fast age-group triathlete.
Even one 1st in a small-town run.
Still shows your earlier point that drugs don't make a mediocre athlete a
champion.
Mike R.
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Mike Murray via OBRA
wrote:
>
> Not a lot of results for this masters age doper:
>
> http://www.usada.org/kyle-schmidt-accepts-doping-sanction/
>
>
> Mike Murray
> Sent from mobile device
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org