police question

.David.Auker.

2004-04-26



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C42B74.6696DC20

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



``



 Also note the recent case of State V. Potter, (117 Or App 333, 844 P2d. 234) which held that "vehicle" and "motor vehicle" are the same thing. The case isn't a great case b/c it increases confusion, but does make it clear that a bike= a car in terms of rights to the road. The case creates confusion now about those "no non-motorized vehicles" signs you see as you drive onto I-5, as crazy as it sounds (and I won't be doing it) it now seems legal to bike on all the roads in Oregon under this case!



``

I've ridden I-5 from Portland to Salem a couple of times. It's really, really f-a-s-t with a summer north wind. Not recommended for individuals concerned with auto/truck pollution, or possible injury from flying truck retreads, etc...



David



``

------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C42B74.6696DC20

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4>``</FONT></DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>>Also note the recent case of State V. Potter, (117 Or App 333, 844 P2d.

234) which held that "vehicle" and "motor vehicle" are the same thing. The case

isn't a great case b/c it increases confusion, but does make it clear that a

bike= a car in terms of rights to the road. The case creates confusion now about

those "no non-motorized vehicles" signs you see as you drive onto I-5, as crazy

as it sounds (and I won't be doing it) it now seems legal to bike on all the

roads in Oregon under this case!</DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4>``</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4>I've ridden I-5 from Portland to Salem a couple

of times.  It's really, really f-a-s-t with a summer north wind.  Not

recommended for individuals concerned with auto/truck pollution, or possible

injury from flying truck retreads, etc...</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4>David</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Garamond size=4>``</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C42B74.6696DC20--



markjgi-@yahoo.com

2004-04-26



--0-34643576-1082997296=:15533

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



Kevin,



Andrew is correct, ORS 814.430 is the law, begin further upstream, ORS 814.400 says all rules of the road that apply to automobiles apply to bicycles, except those which by their nature can not.



Also note the recent case of State V. Potter, (117 Or App 333, 844 P2d. 234) which held that "vehicle" and "motor vehicle" are the same thing. The case isn't a great case b/c it increases confusion, but does make it clear that a bike= a car in terms of rights to the road. The case creates confusion now about those "no non-motorized vehicles" signs you see as you drive onto I-5, as crazy as it sounds (and I won't be doing it) it now seems legal to bike on all the roads in Oregon under this case!



The "right" answer is that you are entitled to a full lane, and at the same time, must ride as far to the right as safely practicable.



You are a slow moving vehicle. Like a scooter or a tractor. Other faster vehicle drivers must share the road with you.



Did the officer give you a ticket, or was he just giving you a hard time?

I am happy to give you specific advice off list if you wish. I do bike law for a living.



Mark Ginsberg

(503) 542-3000





Andrew Beehler <andyc-@hotmail.com> wrote:







Kevin,



I would believe that you were in the right. As seen in section c, you

were staying as close to the shoulder of the road while avoiding " surface

hazards or other conditions that make continued operation along the right

curb or edge unsafe or to avoid unsafe operation in a lane on the roadway

that is too narrow for a bicycle and vehicle to travel safely side by side.

"



I found this Information on the BTA web site.

Andrew

814.430 Improper use of lanes; exceptions; penalty.





1.. A person commits the offense of improper use of lanes by a bicycle if

the person is operating a bicycle on a roadway at less than the normal speed

of traffic using the roadway at that time and place under the existing

conditions and the person does not ride as close as practicable to the right

curb or edge of the roadway.

2.. A person is not in violation of the offense under this section if the

person is not operating a bicycle as close as practicable to the right curb

or edge of the roadway under any of the following circumstances:

1.. When overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle that is

proceeding in the same direction.

2.. When preparing to execute a left turn.

3.. When reasonably necessary to avoid hazardous conditions including,

but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles,

bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards or other conditions that

make continued operation along the right curb or edge unsafe or to avoid

unsafe operation in a lane on the roadway that is too narrow for a bicycle

and vehicle to travel safely side by side. Nothing in this paragraph excuses

the operator of a bicycle from the requirements under ORS 811.425 or from

the penalties for failure to comply with those requirements.

4.. When operating within a city as near as practicable to the left curb

or edge of a roadway that is designated to allow traffic to move in only one

direction along the roadway. A bicycle that is operated under this paragraph

is subject to the same requirements and exceptions when operating along the

left curb or edge as are applicable when a bicycle is operating along the

right curb or edge of the roadway.

5.. When operating a bicycle alongside not more than one other bicycle

as long as the bicycles are both being operated within a single lane and in

a manner that does not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic.

6.. When operating on a bicycle lane or bicycle path.

3.. The offense described in this section, improper use of lanes by a

bicycle, is a Class D traffic infraction. [1983 c.338 s.701; 1985 c.16

s.339]

----- Original Message -----

From: "kevin thompson"

To:

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 7:58 AM

Subject: [OBRA Chat] police question



I got pulled over this weekend riding my bike. I was on the road that

climbs up from the junction just west of Estacada heading to Sandy

(224?). The police man claimed that I was impeading the flow of

traffic. What are the laws regarding bikes on roads that don't have a

designated bike lane? There was a white line and dirt and I am sure

that I was about a foot (give or take 1 foot) to the left of the white

line.



Police Bait





Mark J. GinsbergAttorney At Law1001 SW 5th Ave., Ste. 1900Portland, OR 97204(503) 542-3000Fax (503) 295-3720 markjgi-@yahoo.com









---------------------------------

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25?

--0-34643576-1082997296=:15533

Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii



<DIV>Kevin, </DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>Andrew is correct, ORS 814.430 is the law,  begin further upstream, ORS 814.400 says all rules of the road that apply to automobiles apply to bicycles, except those which by their nature can not.</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>Also note the recent case of State V. Potter, (117 Or App 333, 844 P2d. 234) which held that "vehicle" and "motor vehicle" are the same thing. The case isn't a great case b/c it increases confusion, but does make it clear that a bike= a car in terms of rights to the road. The case creates confusion now about those "no non-motorized vehicles" signs you see as you drive onto I-5, as crazy as it sounds (and I won't be doing it) it now seems legal to bike on all the roads in Oregon under this case!</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>The "right" answer is that you are entitled to a full lane, and at the same time, must ride as far to the right as safely practicable.</DIV>

<DIV><BR>You are a slow moving vehicle. Like a scooter or a tractor. Other faster vehicle drivers must share the road with you.</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>Did the officer give you a ticket, or was he just giving you a hard time?</DIV>

<DIV>I am happy to give you specific advice off list if you wish. I do bike law for a living.</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>Mark Ginsberg</DIV>

<DIV>(503) 542-3000</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV><B><I>Andrew Beehler <andyc-@hotmail.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR><BR><BR>Kevin,<BR><BR>I would believe that you were in the right. As seen in section c, you<BR>were staying as close to the shoulder of the road while avoiding " surface<BR>hazards or other conditions that make continued operation along the right<BR>curb or edge unsafe or to avoid unsafe operation in a lane on the roadway<BR>that is too narrow for a bicycle and vehicle to travel safely side by side.<BR>"<BR><BR>I found this Information on the BTA web site.<BR>Andrew<BR>814.430 Improper use of lanes; exceptions; penalty.<BR><BR><BR>1.. A person commits the offense of improper use of lanes by a bicycle if<BR>the person is operating a bicycle on a roadway at less than the normal speed<BR>of traffic using the roadway at that time and place under the existing<BR>conditions and the person does not ride as close as practicable to the right<BR>curb or edge of the roadway.<BR>2.. A person

is not in violation of the offense under this section if the<BR>person is not operating a bicycle as close as practicable to the right curb<BR>or edge of the roadway under any of the following circumstances:<BR>1.. When overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle that is<BR>proceeding in the same direction.<BR>2.. When preparing to execute a left turn.<BR>3.. When reasonably necessary to avoid hazardous conditions including,<BR>but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles,<BR>bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards or other conditions that<BR>make continued operation along the right curb or edge unsafe or to avoid<BR>unsafe operation in a lane on the roadway that is too narrow for a bicycle<BR>and vehicle to travel safely side by side. Nothing in this paragraph excuses<BR>the operator of a bicycle from the requirements under ORS 811.425 or from<BR>the penalties for failure to comply with those requirements.<BR>4.. When operating within a city

as near as practicable to the left curb<BR>or edge of a roadway that is designated to allow traffic to move in only one<BR>direction along the roadway. A bicycle that is operated under this paragraph<BR>is subject to the same requirements and exceptions when operating along the<BR>left curb or edge as are applicable when a bicycle is operating along the<BR>right curb or edge of the roadway.<BR>5.. When operating a bicycle alongside not more than one other bicycle<BR>as long as the bicycles are both being operated within a single lane and in<BR>a manner that does not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic.<BR>6.. When operating on a bicycle lane or bicycle path.<BR>3.. The offense described in this section, improper use of lanes by a<BR>bicycle, is a Class D traffic infraction. [1983 c.338 s.701; 1985 c.16<BR>s.339]<BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: "kevin thompson" <THOM-@LOSWEGO.K12.OR.US><BR>To: <OB-@TOPICA.COM><BR>Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 7:58

AM<BR>Subject: [OBRA Chat] police question<BR><BR>I got pulled over this weekend riding my bike. I was on the road that<BR>climbs up from the junction just west of Estacada heading to Sandy<BR>(224?). The police man claimed that I was impeading the flow of<BR>traffic. What are the laws regarding bikes on roads that don't have a<BR>designated bike lane? There was a white line and dirt and I am sure<BR>that I was about a foot (give or take 1 foot) to the left of the white<BR>line.<BR><BR>Police Bait<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><DIV>

<DIV>

<DIV>

<ADDRESS>Mark J. Ginsberg</ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS>Attorney At Law</ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS>1001 SW 5th Ave., Ste. 1900</ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS>Portland, OR 97204</ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS>(503) 542-3000</ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS>Fax (503) 295-3720 </ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS><A href="mailto:markjgi-@yahoo.com">markjgi-@yahoo.com</A></ADDRESS>

<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS></DIV></DIV></DIV><p>

<hr size=1><font face=arial size=-1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>

Yahoo! Photos: <a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=23765/*http://photos.yahoo.c

om/ph/print_splash">High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25?</a>

--0-34643576-1082997296=:15533--



Andrew Beehler

2004-04-26



Kevin,



    I would believe that you were in the right. As seen in section c, you

were staying as close to the shoulder of the road while avoiding " surface

hazards or other conditions that make continued operation along the right

curb or edge unsafe or to avoid unsafe operation in a lane on the roadway

that is too narrow for a bicycle and vehicle to travel safely side by side.

"



I found this Information on the BTA web site.

    Andrew

814.430 Improper use of lanes; exceptions; penalty.





1.. A person commits the offense of improper use of lanes by a bicycle if

the person is operating a bicycle on a roadway at less than the normal speed

of traffic using the roadway at that time and place under the existing

conditions and the person does not ride as close as practicable to the right

curb or edge of the roadway.

2.. A person is not in violation of the offense under this section if the

person is not operating a bicycle as close as practicable to the right curb

or edge of the roadway under any of the following circumstances:

    1.. When overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle that is

proceeding in the same direction.

    2.. When preparing to execute a left turn.

    3.. When reasonably necessary to avoid hazardous conditions including,

but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles,

bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards or other conditions that

make continued operation along the right curb or edge unsafe or to avoid

unsafe operation in a lane on the roadway that is too narrow for a bicycle

and vehicle to travel safely side by side. Nothing in this paragraph excuses

the operator of a bicycle from the requirements under ORS 811.425 or from

the penalties for failure to comply with those requirements.

    4.. When operating within a city as near as practicable to the left curb

or edge of a roadway that is designated to allow traffic to move in only one

direction along the roadway. A bicycle that is operated under this paragraph

is subject to the same requirements and exceptions when operating along the

left curb or edge as are applicable when a bicycle is operating along the

right curb or edge of the roadway.

    5.. When operating a bicycle alongside not more than one other bicycle

as long as the bicycles are both being operated within a single lane and in

a manner that does not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic.

    6.. When operating on a bicycle lane or bicycle path.

3.. The offense described in this section, improper use of lanes by a

bicycle, is a Class D traffic infraction. [1983 c.338 s.701; 1985 c.16

s.339]

----- Original Message -----

From: "kevin thompson" <thom-@loswego.k12.or.us>

To: <ob-@topica.com>

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 7:58 AM

Subject: [OBRA Chat] police question





===========================================================

Give Your Team Access to Their PCs from Anywhere. Increase

productivity with a secure remote-access solution from

GoToMyPC Pro. Stay in touch with your office. FREE TRIAL:

http://click.topica.com/caab6awaVxiDpbmSx5oa/ ExpertCity

===========================================================



I got pulled over this weekend riding my bike. I was on the road that

climbs up from the junction just west of Estacada heading to Sandy

(224?). The police man claimed that I was impeading the flow of

traffic. What are the laws regarding bikes on roads that don't have a

designated bike lane? There was a white line and dirt and I am sure

that I was about a foot (give or take 1 foot) to the left of the white

line.



Police Bait



===========================================================

Need to find the right school to fit your needs

CollegeInformation.info has already found it. Get educated

on your future - degrees, financial aid and more!

http://click.topica.com/caab8LbaVxiDpbmSx5of/ College Info

===========================================================





To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



kevin thompson

2004-04-26



I got pulled over this weekend riding my bike. I was on the road that

climbs up from the junction just west of Estacada heading to Sandy

(224?). The police man claimed that I was impeading the flow of

traffic. What are the laws regarding bikes on roads that don't have a

designated bike lane? There was a white line and dirt and I am sure

that I was about a foot (give or take 1 foot) to the left of the white

line.



Police Bait