RE: FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Colum

Tris-@aol.com

2004-08-31





--part1_9e.137f0e36.2e66bc1b_boundary

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



How very "American" to assume that they will, or rather must drive.   In our

wonderfully free society, there are several aspects which fail to remind us

that driving is in fact a privilege:   subsidized gas, subsidized roads, low

governmental requirements on miles per gallon, low registration fees, relatively

low auto costs.   Many of these "rights" represent a different philosophy than

other countries express through their treatment of driving.   I drive, you

drive, I assume most people on this list drive.   That does not mean that we pay

our fair share for doing so.   The costs we assume for driving do not cover

the costs of maintaining driveable roads, traffic enforcement, or facilities

for those who do not drive such as bike lanes, sidewalks, etc.   



As for where they will live, I believe we are seeing a reversal of our 50's

and 60's ethos that the ultimate goal was the suburban home.   Many people are

realizing that there are significant advantages to urban living, and choose to

live close to the city center.   That is a quality of life choice, for which

one pays a premium.   If you do not feel that is your life choice, then a

larger home further out may be in your future.   But to imply that we are running

out of space in this town for people is disingenuous.   Vertical development

allows greater population density but does not automatically equate to more

traffic unless those people choose to drive on a regular basis.   Most cities

undergo growth, it's how they manage that growth that determines future

liveability.



Cheers,

Ian Penner



In a message dated 8/31/04 9:18:29 PM, br-@politesociety.com writes:

 

"People move from there, to here "



If that keeps up, where will they live, work, & drive?



It would be great if we could freeze the population & economy. I really

wish it were possible?but it's just not realistic.?





--part1_9e.137f0e36.2e66bc1b_boundary

Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">How very "American" to assume that they will, or rather must drive.  In our wonderfully free society, there are several aspects which fail to remind us that driving is in fact a privilege:  subsidized gas, subsidized roads, low governmental requirements on miles per gallon, low registration fees, relatively low auto costs.  Many of these "rights" represent a different philosophy than other countries express through their treatment of driving.  I drive, you drive, I assume most people on this list drive.  That does not mean that we pay our fair share for doing so.  The costs we assume for driving do not cover the costs of maintaining driveable roads, traffic enforcement, or facilities for those who do not drive such as bike lanes, sidewalks, etc.  <BR>

<BR>

As for where they will live, I believe we are seeing a reversal of our 50's and 60's ethos that the ultimate goal was the suburban home.  Many people are realizing that there are significant advantages to urban living, and choose to live close to the city center.  That is a quality of life choice, for which one pays a premium.  If you do not feel that is your life choice, then a larger home further out may be in your future.  But to imply that we are running out of space in this town for people is disingenuous.  Vertical development allows greater population density but does not automatically equate to more traffic unless those people choose to drive on a regular basis.  Most cities undergo growth, it's how they manage that growth that determines future liveability.<BR>

<BR>

Cheers,<BR>

Ian Penner<BR>

<BR>

In a message dated 8/31/04 9:18:29 PM, br-@politesociety.com writes:<BR>

<BLOCKQUOTE CITE STYLE="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px" TYPE="CITE"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">"</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000080" FACE="Arial" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">People move from there, to here "</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000080" FACE="Arial" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"> If that keeps up, where will they live, work, & drive?</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000080" FACE="Arial" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"> It would be great if we could freeze the population & economy. I really wish it were possible?but it's just not realistic.?</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"></FONT></HTML>

--part1_9e.137f0e36.2e66bc1b_boundary--



Dan H

2004-08-31



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_008B_01C48FA2.7CE9FD80

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



"People move from there, to here "

If that keeps up, where will they live, work, & drive?

It would be great if we could freeze the population & economy. I really wish it were possible but it's just not realistic.



----- Original Message -----

From: THOMAS HOFFMAN

To: tris-@aol.com ; ob-@topica.com

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:08 PM

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Colum





When my Parents moved me to Oregon I loved it. I loved the fact that Oregonians Put quality of life and Nature so high on the list of things to never disrupt. I love the fact that Oregon finds ways to keep our road sides clean with bottle bills and recycling programs. That they work to control Urban Sprawl, while preserving farm land and Natural Spaces.



   



Can you imagine Portland's version of Urban Sprawl, i.e. Beaverton and Gresham stretching form Wilsonville to Salem? I say to all those that want to change those rules, go check out the planning in a city like Phoenix or San Jose or any others listed in this string. People move from there, to here for our quality of life. I wish they would leave the rules that made the former city such a stink hole back where they found them. Which is a long way of saying if you don't like the water, don't swim in our pool.



   



Tom



   



   





------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: tris-@aol.com [mailto:tris-@aol.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:15 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Colum



   





Sorry, I meant to send this out to the list, not as a personal email.









Perhaps you'd like to not lecture Doug, a European with significant Continental travel about these issues. And unless you bought your property significantly before the urban growth boundary went into effect, you knew the risks and are not now "being told what to do with your property". You went in knowing the rules and then thought you got to change them. Tough luck. People who buy houses next to PIR want to shut it down because of the noise. Too bad, you knew the score.



I agree, having lived in multiple American cities (Memphis/Boston/DC/SF/Silicon Valley/Portland) that sprawl is probably in the top three issues relating to quality of life. It does "force" you to drive more by making the barriers to other methods of transport higher, via increased distance, higher traffic loads, and infrequent bus service (everybody drives, so why does the bus need to go by every 15 min?). At least one large recent study links increased sprawl to increased obesity due to the inability to walk/bike to errands, entertainment, school, etc. Look at the population in "walkable" cities (and I mean IN the city) such as NYC/DC/Boston/SF/Portland and compare it to the average suburban population. Or just go to the airport and watch the planes come in from almost any sprawling Midwest city like Minneapolis. The average heft of the passengers is pretty sobering.



There's a reason that Portland aims for sustainable development. The majority of residents don't want to see it become the norm to drive 30 minutes to go to a big box store along wide faceless boulevards with cloned neighborhoods separated by the occasional Generica Strip Mall. The urban growth boundary may seem arbitrary to you, but many of us think it has a major role in keeping Portland more like Portland, and less like the Bay Area, Seattle, LA, Minneapolis, Kansas City, etc.



Cheers,

Ian Penner



In a message dated 8/31/04 2:50:18 PM, sn-@charter.net writes:



Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined to not drive?"



Have you been to some of Europe's bigger cities? They have traffic and pollution issues as well. Until urban planners stop designing cities to accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will not be great places to live. Cramming people into tighter spaces designed for cars is called New York City.

   

"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the steering wheel of your car."



There is nothing un American about not driving your car. There is however something un American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot do with their own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.





















To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.orgTo unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.comTo respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

------=_NextPart_000_008B_01C48FA2.7CE9FD80

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1 =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"><HEAD>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=GENERATOR><!--[if !mso]>

<STYLE>v\:* {

BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)

}

o\:* {

BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)

}

w\:* {

BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)

}

.shape {

BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)

}

</STYLE>

<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType name="place"

namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagType

name="State"

namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagType

name="City"

namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagType

name="PersonName"

namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"></o:SmartTagType><!--[if !mso]>

<STYLE>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }

</STYLE>

<![endif]-->

<STYLE>

<!--

/* Font Definitions */

@font-face

{font-family:Tahoma;

panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}

@font-face

{font-family:Geneva;

panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}

/* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

{margin:0in;

margin-bottom:.0001pt;

font-size:12.0pt;

font-family:"Times New Roman";}

a:link, span.MsoHyperlink

{color:blue;

text-decoration:underline;}

a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed

{color:blue;

text-decoration:underline;}

pre

{margin:0in;

margin-bottom:.0001pt;

font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:"Courier New";}

span.EmailStyle18

{mso-style-type:personal-reply;

font-family:Arial;

color:navy;}

@page Section1

{size:8.5in 11.0in;

margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}

div.Section1

{page:Section1;}

-->

</STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY lang=EN-US vLink=blue link=blue bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"<FONT color=#000080>People move from there, to

here "</FONT></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2>If that keeps up, where will they

live, work, & drive?</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2>It would be great if we could freeze

the population & economy. I really wish it were possible but it's just

not realistic.  </FONT></DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr

style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV

style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>

<A title=t.h-@verizon.net href="mailto:t.hoff-@verizon.net">THOMAS

HOFFMAN</A> </DIV>

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=t-@aol.com

href="mailto:tris-@aol.com">tris-@aol.com</A> ; <A title-@topica.com

href="mailto:ob-@topica.com">ob-@topica.com</A> </DIV>

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:08

PM</DIV>

<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell

the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Colum</DIV>

<DIV><BR></DIV>

<DIV class=Section1>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">When my Parents moved

me to <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Oregon</st1:place></st1:State>

I loved it. I loved the fact that Oregonians Put quality of life and Nature so

high on the list of things to never disrupt. I love the fact that <st1:State

w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Oregon</st1:place></st1:State> finds ways to

keep our road sides clean with bottle bills and recycling programs. That they

work to control Urban Sprawl, while preserving farm land and Natural Spaces.

<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Can you imagine

 <st1:City w:st="on">Portland</st1:City>?s version of Urban Sprawl, i.e.

Beaverton and Gresham stretching form Wilsonville to Salem? I say to all those

that want to change those rules, go check out the planning in a city like

<st1:City w:st="on">Phoenix</st1:City> or <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place

w:st="on">San Jose</st1:place></st1:City> or any others listed in this string.

People move from there, to here for our quality of life. I wish they would

leave the rules that made the former city such a stink hole back where they

found them. Which is a long way of saying if you don?t like the water, don?t

swim in our pool. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Tom

<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<DIV>

<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><FONT

face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">

<HR tabIndex=-1 align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>

</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<P class=MsoNormal><B><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">From:</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT

face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">

tris-@aol.com [mailto:tris-@aol.com] <BR><B><SPAN

style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:15

PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B>

ob-@topica.com<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re:

[OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken

Colum</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P></DIV>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Geneva color=black size=2><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Geneva"><BR>Sorry, I meant

to send this out to the list, not as a personal

email.<BR><BR><BR><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt"><FONT face=Geneva color=black

size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Geneva">Perhaps you'd like

to not lecture Doug, a European with significant Continental travel about

these issues.  And unless you bought your property significantly before

the urban growth boundary went into effect, you knew the risks and are not now

"being told what to do with your property".  You went in knowing the

rules and then thought you got to change them.  Tough luck.  People

who buy houses next to PIR want to shut it down because of the noise. 

Too bad, you knew the score.<BR><BR>I agree, having lived in multiple American

cities (Memphis/Boston/DC/SF/Silicon Valley/Portland) that sprawl is probably

in the top three issues relating to quality of life.  It does "force" you

to drive more by making the barriers to other methods of transport higher, via

increased distance, higher traffic loads, and infrequent bus service

(everybody drives, so why does the bus need to go by every 15 min?).  At

least one large recent study links increased sprawl to increased obesity due

to the inability to walk/bike to errands, entertainment, school, etc. 

Look at the population in "walkable" cities (and I mean IN the city) such as

NYC/DC/Boston/SF/Portland and compare it to the average suburban

population.  Or just go to the airport and watch the planes come in from

almost any sprawling <st1:City w:st="on">Midwest city</st1:City> like

<st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place

w:st="on">Minneapolis</st1:place></st1:City>.  The average heft of the

passengers is pretty sobering.<BR><BR>There's a reason that <st1:City

w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Portland</st1:place></st1:City> aims for

sustainable development.  The majority of residents don't want to see it

become the norm to drive 30 minutes to go to a big box store along wide

faceless boulevards with cloned neighborhoods separated by the occasional

Generica Strip Mall.  The urban growth boundary may seem arbitrary to

you, but many of us think it has a major role in keeping <st1:City

w:st="on">Portland</st1:City> more like <st1:City

w:st="on">Portland</st1:City>, and less like the Bay Area, <st1:City

w:st="on">Seattle</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">LA</st1:State>, <st1:place

w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Minneapolis</st1:City>, <st1:State

w:st="on">Kansas</st1:State></st1:place> City, etc.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR>Ian

Penner<BR><BR>In a message dated 8/31/04 2:50:18 PM, sn-@charter.net

writes:<BR><BR>Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an

ever increasing population into a confined area" people might be more

inclined to not drive?"<BR><BR></SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=black

size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Have you been to

some of <st1:place w:st="on">Europe</st1:place>'s bigger cities?  They

have traffic and pollution issues as well.  Until urban planners stop

designing cities to accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people,

cities will not be great places to live.  Cramming people into tighter

spaces designed for cars is called <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place

w:st="on">New York City</st1:place></st1:City>.</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Geneva

color=black size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Geneva"><BR> <BR>"Call

me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the

steering wheel of your car."<BR><BR></SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=black

size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">There is nothing un

American about not driving your car.  There is however something un

American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot do with their

own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.</SPAN></FONT><FONT

face=Geneva color=black size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Geneva"><BR><BR><BR><BR><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>

<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Geneva color=black size=2

FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Geneva"><BR><BR><BR></SPAN></FONT><FONT

face=Arial FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><SPAN

style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P><PRE><FONT face="Courier New" size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Courier New" size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Courier New" size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT <PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_008B_01C48FA2.7CE9FD80--



THOMAS HOFFMAN

2004-08-31



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C48F7D.24F4BF40

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



When my Parents moved me to Oregon I loved it. I loved the fact that

Oregonians Put quality of life and Nature so high on the list of things to

never disrupt. I love the fact that Oregon finds ways to keep our road sides

clean with bottle bills and recycling programs. That they work to control

Urban Sprawl, while preserving farm land and Natural Spaces.







Can you imagine Portland's version of Urban Sprawl, i.e. Beaverton and

Gresham stretching form Wilsonville to Salem? I say to all those that want

to change those rules, go check out the planning in a city like Phoenix or

San Jose or any others listed in this string. People move from there, to

here for our quality of life. I wish they would leave the rules that made

the former city such a stink hole back where they found them. Which is a

long way of saying if you don't like the water, don't swim in our pool.







Tom











_____



From: tris-@aol.com [mailto:tris-@aol.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:15 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to

weaken Colum









Sorry, I meant to send this out to the list, not as a personal email.









Perhaps you'd like to not lecture Doug, a European with significant

Continental travel about these issues. And unless you bought your property

significantly before the urban growth boundary went into effect, you knew

the risks and are not now "being told what to do with your property". You

went in knowing the rules and then thought you got to change them. Tough

luck. People who buy houses next to PIR want to shut it down because of the

noise. Too bad, you knew the score.



I agree, having lived in multiple American cities

(Memphis/Boston/DC/SF/Silicon Valley/Portland) that sprawl is probably in

the top three issues relating to quality of life. It does "force" you to

drive more by making the barriers to other methods of transport higher, via

increased distance, higher traffic loads, and infrequent bus service

(everybody drives, so why does the bus need to go by every 15 min?). At

least one large recent study links increased sprawl to increased obesity due

to the inability to walk/bike to errands, entertainment, school, etc. Look

at the population in "walkable" cities (and I mean IN the city) such as

NYC/DC/Boston/SF/Portland and compare it to the average suburban population.

Or just go to the airport and watch the planes come in from almost any

sprawling Midwest city like Minneapolis. The average heft of the passengers

is pretty sobering.



There's a reason that Portland aims for sustainable development. The

majority of residents don't want to see it become the norm to drive 30

minutes to go to a big box store along wide faceless boulevards with cloned

neighborhoods separated by the occasional Generica Strip Mall. The urban

growth boundary may seem arbitrary to you, but many of us think it has a

major role in keeping Portland more like Portland, and less like the Bay

Area, Seattle, LA, Minneapolis, Kansas City, etc.



Cheers,

Ian Penner



In a message dated 8/31/04 2:50:18 PM, sn-@charter.net writes:



Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever

increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined to

not drive?"



Have you been to some of Europe's bigger cities? They have traffic and

pollution issues as well. Until urban planners stop designing cities to

accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will not be

great places to live. Cramming people into tighter spaces designed for cars

is called New York City.



"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind

the steering wheel of your car."



There is nothing un American about not driving your car. There is however

something un American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot

do with their own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.





















To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C48F7D.24F4BF40

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">



<head>

<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">

<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">

<!--[if !mso]>

<style>

v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

</style>

<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType

namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="place"/>

<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"

name="State"/>

<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"

name="City"/>

<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"

name="PersonName"/>

<!--[if !mso]>

<style>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }

</style>

<![endif]-->

<style>

<!--

/* Font Definitions */

@font-face

{font-family:Tahoma;

panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}

@font-face

{font-family:Geneva;

panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}

/* Style Definitions */

p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal

{margin:0in;

margin-bottom:.0001pt;

font-size:12.0pt;

font-family:"Times New Roman";}

a:link, span.MsoHyperlink

{color:blue;

text-decoration:underline;}

a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed

{color:blue;

text-decoration:underline;}

pre

{margin:0in;

margin-bottom:.0001pt;

font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:"Courier New";}

span.EmailStyle18

{mso-style-type:personal-reply;

font-family:Arial;

color:navy;}

@page Section1

{size:8.5in 11.0in;

margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}

div.Section1

{page:Section1;}

-->

</style>



</head>



<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue>



<div class=Section1>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>When my Parents moved me to <st1:State

w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Oregon</st1:place></st1:State> I loved it. I

loved the fact that Oregonians Put quality of life and Nature so high on the list

of things to never disrupt. I love the fact that <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place

w:st="on">Oregon</st1:place></st1:State> finds ways to keep our road sides

clean with bottle bills and recycling programs. That they work to control Urban

Sprawl, while preserving farm land and Natural Spaces. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Can you imagine  <st1:City w:st="on">Portland</st1:City>’s

version of Urban Sprawl, i.e. Beaverton and Gresham stretching form Wilsonville

to Salem? I say to all those that want to change those rules, go check out the planning

in a city like <st1:City w:st="on">Phoenix</st1:City> or <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place

w:st="on">San Jose</st1:place></st1:City> or any others listed in this string.

People move from there, to here for our quality of life. I wish they would

leave the rules that made the former city such a stink hole back where they

found them. Which is a long way of saying if you don’t like the water, don’t

swim in our pool. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Tom <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>



<div>



<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3

face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>



<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>



</span></font></div>



<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2

face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> tris-@aol.com

[mailto:tris-@aol.com] <br>

<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, August 31, 2004

3:15 PM<br>

<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> ob-@topica.com<br>

<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [OBRA Chat] FW:

George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Colum</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>



</div>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:

12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Geneva><span style='font-size:

10.0pt;font-family:Geneva;color:black'><br>

Sorry, I meant to send this out to the list, not as a personal email.<br>

<br>

<br>

<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=2 color=black

face=Geneva FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Geneva;

color:black'>Perhaps you'd like to not lecture Doug, a European with

significant Continental travel about these issues.  And unless you bought

your property significantly before the urban growth boundary went into effect,

you knew the risks and are not now "being told what to do with your

property".  You went in knowing the rules and then thought you got to

change them.  Tough luck.  People who buy houses next to PIR want to

shut it down because of the noise.  Too bad, you knew the score.<br>

<br>

I agree, having lived in multiple American cities (Memphis/Boston/DC/SF/Silicon

Valley/Portland) that sprawl is probably in the top three issues relating to

quality of life.  It does "force" you to drive more by making

the barriers to other methods of transport higher, via increased distance,

higher traffic loads, and infrequent bus service (everybody drives, so why does

the bus need to go by every 15 min?).  At least one large recent study

links increased sprawl to increased obesity due to the inability to walk/bike

to errands, entertainment, school, etc.  Look at the population in

"walkable" cities (and I mean IN the city) such as

NYC/DC/Boston/SF/Portland and compare it to the average suburban

population.  Or just go to the airport and watch the planes come in from

almost any sprawling <st1:City w:st="on">Midwest city</st1:City> like <st1:City

w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Minneapolis</st1:place></st1:City>.  The

average heft of the passengers is pretty sobering.<br>

<br>

There's a reason that <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Portland</st1:place></st1:City>

aims for sustainable development.  The majority of residents don't want to

see it become the norm to drive 30 minutes to go to a big box store along wide

faceless boulevards with cloned neighborhoods separated by the occasional

Generica Strip Mall.  The urban growth boundary may seem arbitrary to you,

but many of us think it has a major role in keeping <st1:City w:st="on">Portland</st1:City>

more like <st1:City w:st="on">Portland</st1:City>, and less like the Bay Area, <st1:City

w:st="on">Seattle</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">LA</st1:State>, <st1:place

w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Minneapolis</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">Kansas</st1:State></st1:place>

City, etc.<br>

<br>

Cheers,<br>

Ian Penner<br>

<br>

In a message dated 8/31/04 2:50:18 PM, sn-@charter.net writes:<br>

<br>

Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever

increasing population into a confined area" people might be more

inclined to not drive?"<br>

<br>

</span></font><font size=2 color=black face=Arial FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span

style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:black'>Have you been to some of

<st1:place w:st="on">Europe</st1:place>'s bigger cities?  They have

traffic and pollution issues as well.  Until urban planners stop designing

cities to accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will

not be great places to live.  Cramming people into tighter spaces designed

for cars is called <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">New York City</st1:place></st1:City>.</span></font><font

size=2 color=black face=Geneva FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span style='font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:Geneva;color:black'><br>

 <br>

"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind

the steering wheel of your car."<br>

<br>

</span></font><font size=2 color=black face=Arial FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span

style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:black'>There is nothing un

American about not driving your car.  There is however something un

American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot do with their

own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.</span></font><font

size=2 color=black face=Geneva FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span style='font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:Geneva;color:black'><br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Geneva FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span

style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Geneva;color:black'><br>

<br>

<br>

</span></font><font face=Arial FAMILY=SANSSERIF><span style='font-family:Arial'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<pre><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.<o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre><font

size=2 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org<o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre><font

size=2 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com<o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre><font



</body>



</html>



------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C48F7D.24F4BF40--



Milan Seethoff

2004-08-31



--0-235678098-1093992025=:10091

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



I agree with Mathew and the preference isn't with the person, its with the values. I was surprised and disappointed a few months ago when an email emerged from the 'chat' group that called on the cycling community as a voice for rolling back environmental legislation in the name of a few more miles of single track. I don't have the time to explain here what a farce this concept is. The current administration is holding hands with the timber industry and if we allow them to reduce protections they aren't going to show up with their mountain bikes on top of their SUVs or their cross-bikes slung over their shoulders. They are going to show up with industrialized logging machinery and there won't be any trees left to ride through, over, under or around when they leave. Do I need to quote science here to appeal to everyone on the most base, flat, unemotional level? There is very, very little untouched native forest left in this state ( or globally for that matter ) and we are blessed to

have any. You could be a resident of Iowa, its not much like riding the Little North Fork of the Santiam River, is it.

This expands the commentary beyond the Gorge issue but there is no separation fundamentally.



regards,

Milan Seethoff





Matthew Wolpert <matthew.-@gmail.com> wrote:

I disagree that the aforementioned email is not relevant here. Land

use planning is directly relevant to bicycling in Oregon. Without the

"political" decision to conserve our land, many places that are

currently enjoyable to ride in would be significantly less so.



I have been on many peaceful rides that began near downtown Portland

but quickly become scenic rural areas. If it weren't for Oregon's

limiting of urban sprawal, I'd be forced to spend more time biking

through and past subdivisions and shopping malls.



Sometimes it seems like people here don't realize how nice the Urban

Growth Boundary makes it for us bicyclists. Where I grew up, every

year the sprawal creeps a few more miles outward, devouring once

peaceful farmland and diminishing the bicycling experience.



Respectfully,

Matthew







On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:08:53 -0500, Adams, Mike wrote:

 Not another non bicycle\political forum. Yuk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike Adams



-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:11 AM

To: Gardner, Andrew (Stoel); Winslow, Mike; Werner, Bruce; Tucker, Roy;

Obra Chat

Subject: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to

weaken Columbia



-----Original Message-----

From: Oregon Conservation Network [mailto:oc-@olcv.org]

Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:10 PM

To: Schreck, George

Subject: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Columbia

Gorge Protections



Dear George Schreck,



Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections



Take Action to follow up on an egregious Anti-Gorge Senate

Hearing



On August 18th, foes of Columbia River Gorge protections, led by

Senator Gary George, held a so-called Senate "hearing" which

provided a platform for activists opposed to Columbia Gorge

protections to criticize the National Scenic Area Act and the

Columbia River Gorge Commission, as well as Oregon's land use

laws in general.



Groups opposed to land use planning and Gorge protection, like

Oregonians in Action (OIA) and Columbia Gorge United (CGU),

played a significant role in bringing this hearing to fruition.

The entire hearing was heavily slanted toward weakening Gorge

protections because these groups have worked closely with

committee chair Senator George.



These groups are out of step with most Oregonians. In fact, most

Oregonians overwhelmingly believe in protecting the Gorge, so it

is very important that we get our voices into the record.



It is clear that Senators George (R- Newberg), Bill Fisher (R-

Roseburg), and Ted Ferrioli (R- John Day) held the hearing to

lay the groundwork for legislation that will weaken Gorge

protections during the 2005 Oregon legislative session -

probably in the form of de-funding the Gorge Commission or other

efforts to weaken Oregon's land use laws. We must not let this

happen!



We urge you to send a letter to the Senate Natural Resources

Interim Committee by September 17, 2004. Your letter will then

be included as public testimony in the hearing record.



Follow the links below to send a letter...



You can take action on this alert either via email (please see

directions below) or via the web at:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d



Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/forward/su7b2pjxn76d



We encourage you to take action by September 17, 2004



Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections



INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:

If you have access to a web browser, you can take action on this

alert by going to the following URL:



http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d



INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:

Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email program.



You MUST Reply with "TakeAction" in the subject.



Your letter will be addressed and sent to:

Senator Gary George



----THIS LETTER WILL BE SENT IN YOUR NAME----

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],



Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony on

the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area and the Gorge

Commission. Please add these comments to the official record and

include them in the findings of fact.



The Columbia River Gorge is a natural scenic wonder that must be

protected for future generations to experience. The National

Scenic Area Act protects the Gorge from over development and

also helps support the Gorge economy. Since the Gorge Act was

passed in 1986, the federal government has provided $62 million

to purchase land from willing sellers and $36 million for

economic and recreational development. The Gorge Act also

protects property rights by ensuring that every land owner has

an economic use for their property.



The Gorge Commission is the agency most responsible for ensuring

that the Columbia Gorge is protected. The Oregon Legislature

must provide necessary funding for the Gorge Commission to

carryout its duty to protect the Columbia River Gorge. The

Legislature should also advocate for more federal funding to

purchase key lands from willing sellers, compensate the counties

for lost property tax revenue and to stimulate economic

development in urban areas of the Gorge.



Thank you for including these comments in the official record

and in the findings of fact.



----END OF LETTER TO BE SENT----



Sincerely,

George Schreck



cc:

Interim Committee Administrator Ray Kelly

Senator Bill Fisher

Senator Frank Shields

Senator Joan Dukes

Senator Rick Metsger

Senator Roger Beyer

Senator Ted Ferrioli



--------------------------------------------------



If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for

Oregon Conservation Network at:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/join.html?r=2paV1xE11BukE



--------------------------------------------------



This message was sent to george.-@pacificorp.com. To modify your

email

communication preferences or update your personal profile, visit

your subscription management page at:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/smp.tcl?nkey=su7b2pjxn76d



To stop ALL email from Oregon Conservation Network, reply via

email with "remove" in the subject line, or use the following

link:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=c

enter&nkey=su7b2pjxn76d



***********************************

Powered by GetActive Software, Inc.

Relationship Management for Member Organizations (tm)

http://www.getactive.com

***********************************



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.



==============================================================================



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com







--0-235678098-1093992025=:10091

Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii



<DIV>

<DIV>I agree with Mathew and the preference isn't with the person, its with the values. I was surprised and disappointed a few months ago when an email emerged from the 'chat' group that called on the cycling community as a voice for rolling back environmental legislation in the name of a few more miles of single track. I don't have the time to explain here what a farce this concept is. The current administration is holding hands with the timber industry and if we allow them to reduce protections they aren't going to show up with their mountain bikes on top of their SUVs or their cross-bikes slung over their shoulders. They are going to show up with industrialized logging machinery and there won't be any trees left to ride through, over, under or around when they leave. Do I need to quote science here to appeal to everyone on the most base, flat, unemotional level? There is very, very little untouched native forest left in this state ( or globally

for that matter ) and we are blessed to have any. You could be a resident of Iowa, its not much like riding the Little North Fork of the Santiam River, is it. </DIV>

<DIV>This expands the commentary beyond the Gorge issue but there is no separation fundamentally.</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV>regards,</DIV>

<DIV>Milan Seethoff</DIV>

<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Matthew Wolpert <matthew.-@gmail.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">I disagree that the aforementioned email is not relevant here. Land<BR>use planning is directly relevant to bicycling in Oregon. Without the<BR>"political" decision to conserve our land, many places that are<BR>currently enjoyable to ride in would be significantly less so.<BR><BR>I have been on many peaceful rides that began near downtown Portland<BR>but quickly become scenic rural areas. If it weren't for Oregon's<BR>limiting of urban sprawal, I'd be forced to spend more time biking<BR>through and past subdivisions and shopping malls.<BR><BR>Sometimes it seems like people here don't realize how nice the Urban<BR>Growth Boundary makes it for us bicyclists. Where I grew up, every<BR>year the sprawal creeps a few more miles outward, devouring once<BR>peaceful farmland and diminishing the bicycling experience.<BR><BR>Respectfully,<BR>Matthew <BR><BR><BR><BR>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:08:53

-0500, Adams, Mike <MAD-@HUTTIG.COM>wrote:<BR>> Not another non bicycle\political forum. Yuk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<BR>> Mike Adams<BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]<BR>> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:11 AM<BR>> To: Gardner, Andrew (Stoel); Winslow, Mike; Werner, Bruce; Tucker, Roy;<BR>> Obra Chat<BR>> Subject: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to<BR>> weaken Columbia<BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Oregon Conservation Network [mailto:oc-@olcv.org]<BR>> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:10 PM<BR>> To: Schreck, George<BR>> Subject: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Columbia<BR>> Gorge Protections<BR>> <BR>> Dear George Schreck,<BR>> <BR>> Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections<BR>> <BR>> Take Action to follow up on an egregious Anti-Gorge Senate<BR>>

Hearing<BR>> <BR>> On August 18th, foes of Columbia River Gorge protections, led by<BR>> Senator Gary George, held a so-called Senate "hearing" which<BR>> provided a platform for activists opposed to Columbia Gorge<BR>> protections to criticize the National Scenic Area Act and the<BR>> Columbia River Gorge Commission, as well as Oregon's land use<BR>> laws in general.<BR>> <BR>> Groups opposed to land use planning and Gorge protection, like<BR>> Oregonians in Action (OIA) and Columbia Gorge United (CGU),<BR>> played a significant role in bringing this hearing to fruition.<BR>> The entire hearing was heavily slanted toward weakening Gorge<BR>> protections because these groups have worked closely with<BR>> committee chair Senator George.<BR>> <BR>> These groups are out of step with most Oregonians. In fact, most<BR>> Oregonians overwhelmingly believe in protecting the Gorge, so it<BR>> is very important that we get our voices into

the record.<BR>> <BR>> It is clear that Senators George (R- Newberg), Bill Fisher (R-<BR>> Roseburg), and Ted Ferrioli (R- John Day) held the hearing to<BR>> lay the groundwork for legislation that will weaken Gorge<BR>> protections during the 2005 Oregon legislative session -<BR>> probably in the form of de-funding the Gorge Commission or other<BR>> efforts to weaken Oregon's land use laws. We must not let this<BR>> happen!<BR>> <BR>> We urge you to send a letter to the Senate Natural Resources<BR>> Interim Committee by September 17, 2004. Your letter will then<BR>> be included as public testimony in the hearing record.<BR>> <BR>> Follow the links below to send a letter...<BR>> <BR>> You can take action on this alert either via email (please see<BR>> directions below) or via the web at:<BR>> http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d<BR>> <BR>> Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.<BR>>

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/forward/su7b2pjxn76d<BR>> <BR>> We encourage you to take action by September 17, 2004<BR>> <BR>> Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections<BR>> <BR>> INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:<BR>> If you have access to a web browser, you can take action on this<BR>> alert by going to the following URL:<BR>> <BR>> http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d<BR>> <BR>> INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:<BR>> Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email program.<BR>> <BR>> You MUST Reply with "TakeAction" in the subject.<BR>> <BR>> Your letter will be addressed and sent to:<BR>> Senator Gary George<BR>> <BR>> ----THIS LETTER WILL BE SENT IN YOUR NAME----<BR>> Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],<BR>> <BR>> Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony on<BR>> the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area and the

Gorge<BR>> Commission. Please add these comments to the official record and<BR>> include them in the findings of fact.<BR>> <BR>> The Columbia River Gorge is a natural scenic wonder that must be<BR>> protected for future generations to experience. The National<BR>> Scenic Area Act protects the Gorge from over development and<BR>> also helps support the Gorge economy. Since the Gorge Act was<BR>> passed in 1986, the federal government has provided $62 million<BR>> to purchase land from willing sellers and $36 million for<BR>> economic and recreational development. The Gorge Act also<BR>> protects property rights by ensuring that every land owner has<BR>> an economic use for their property.<BR>> <BR>> The Gorge Commission is the agency most responsible for ensuring<BR>> that the Columbia Gorge is protected. The Oregon Legislature<BR>> must provide necessary funding for the Gorge Commission to<BR>> carryout its duty to protect the

Columbia River Gorge. The<BR>> Legislature should also advocate for more federal funding to<BR>> purchase key lands from willing sellers, compensate the counties<BR>> for lost property tax revenue and to stimulate economic<BR>> development in urban areas of the Gorge.<BR>> <BR>> Thank you for including these comments in the official record<BR>> and in the findings of fact.<BR>> <BR>> ----END OF LETTER TO BE SENT----<BR>> <BR>> Sincerely,<BR>> George Schreck<BR>> <BR>> cc:<BR>> Interim Committee Administrator Ray Kelly<BR>> Senator Bill Fisher<BR>> Senator Frank Shields<BR>> Senator Joan Dukes<BR>> Senator Rick Metsger<BR>> Senator Roger Beyer<BR>> Senator Ted Ferrioli<BR>> <BR>> --------------------------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for<BR>> Oregon Conservation Network at:<BR>> <BR>>

http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/join.html?r=2paV1xE11BukE<BR>> <BR>> --------------------------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> This message was sent to george.-@pacificorp.com. To modify your<BR>> email<BR>> communication preferences or update your personal profile, visit<BR>> your subscription management page at:<BR>> <BR>> http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/smp.tcl?nkey=su7b2pjxn76d<BR>> <BR>> To stop ALL email from Oregon Conservation Network, reply via<BR>> email with "remove" in the subject line, or use the following<BR>> link:<BR>> <BR>> http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=c<BR>> enter&nkey=su7b2pjxn76d<BR>> <BR>> ***********************************<BR>> Powered by GetActive Software, Inc.<BR>> Relationship Management for Member Organizations (tm)<BR>> http://www.getactive.com<BR>> ***********************************<BR>> <BR>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<BR>> <BR>> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.<BR>> <BR>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.<BR>> <BR>> ==============================================================================<BR>> <BR>> To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.<BR>> To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org<BR>> To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com<BR>> <BR>> To respond to the whole group send to

--0-235678098-1093992025=:10091--



Tris-@aol.com

2004-08-31





--part1_154.3e150856.2e665251_boundary

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit





Sorry, I meant to send this out to the list, not as a personal email.



 Perhaps you'd like to not lecture Doug, a European with significant

Continental travel about these issues.? And unless you bought your property

significantly before the urban growth boundary went into effect, you knew the risks

and are not now "being told what to do with your property".? You went in

knowing the rules and then thought you got to change them.? Tough luck.? People

who buy houses next to PIR want to shut it down because of the noise.? Too bad,

you knew the score.



I agree, having lived in multiple American cities

(Memphis/Boston/DC/SF/Silicon Valley/Portland) that sprawl is probably in the top three issues relating

to quality of life.? It does "force" you to drive more by making the

barriers to other methods of transport higher, via increased distance, higher

traffic loads, and infrequent bus service (everybody drives, so why does the bus

need to go by every 15 min?).? At least one large recent study links increased

sprawl to increased obesity due to the inability to walk/bike to errands,

entertainment, school, etc.? Look at the population in "walkable" cities (and I

mean IN the city) such as NYC/DC/Boston/SF/Portland and compare it to the

average suburban population.? Or just go to the airport and watch the planes

come in from almost any sprawling Midwest city like Minneapolis.? The average

heft of the passengers is pretty sobering.



There's a reason that Portland aims for sustainable development.? The

majority of residents don't want to see it become the norm to drive 30 minutes to

go to a big box store along wide faceless boulevards with cloned neighborhoods

separated by the occasional Generica Strip Mall.? The urban growth boundary

may seem arbitrary to you, but many of us think it has a major role in

keeping Portland more like Portland, and less like the Bay Area, Seattle, LA,

Minneapolis, Kansas City, etc.



Cheers,

Ian Penner



In a message dated 8/31/04 2:50:18 PM, sn-@charter.net writes:



Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever

increasing population into a?confined area" people might be more inclined to not

drive?"



Have you been to some of Europe's bigger cities?? They have traffic and

pollution issues as well.? Until urban planners stop designing cities to

accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will not be great

places to live.? Cramming people into tighter spaces designed for cars is called

New York City.

?

"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind

the steering wheel of your car."



There is nothing un American about not driving your car.? There is however

something un American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot do

with their own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.





--part1_154.3e150856.2e665251_boundary

Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

Sorry, I meant to send this out to the list, not as a personal email.<BR>

<BR>

<BLOCKQUOTE CITE STYLE="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px" TYPE="CITE"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">Perhaps you'd like to not lecture Doug, a European with significant Continental travel about these issues.? And unless you bought your property significantly before the urban growth boundary went into effect, you knew the risks and are not now "being told what to do with your property".? You went in knowing the rules and then thought you got to change them.? Tough luck.? People who buy houses next to PIR want to shut it down because of the noise.? Too bad, you knew the score.<BR>

<BR>

I agree, having lived in multiple American cities (Memphis/Boston/DC/SF/Silicon Valley/Portland) that sprawl is probably in the top three issues relating to quality of life.? It does "force" you to drive more by making the barriers to other methods of transport higher, via increased distance, higher traffic loads, and infrequent bus service (everybody drives, so why does the bus need to go by every 15 min?).? At least one large recent study links increased sprawl to increased obesity due to the inability to walk/bike to errands, entertainment, school, etc.? Look at the population in "walkable" cities (and I mean IN the city) such as NYC/DC/Boston/SF/Portland and compare it to the average suburban population.? Or just go to the airport and watch the planes come in from almost any sprawling Midwest city like Minneapolis.? The average heft of the passengers is pretty sobering.<BR>

<BR>

There's a reason that Portland aims for sustainable development.? The majority of residents don't want to see it become the norm to drive 30 minutes to go to a big box store along wide faceless boulevards with cloned neighborhoods separated by the occasional Generica Strip Mall.? The urban growth boundary may seem arbitrary to you, but many of us think it has a major role in keeping Portland more like Portland, and less like the Bay Area, Seattle, LA, Minneapolis, Kansas City, etc.<BR>

<BR>

Cheers,<BR>

Ian Penner<BR>

<BR>

In a message dated 8/31/04 2:50:18 PM, sn-@charter.net writes:<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever increasing population into a?confined area" people might be more inclined to not drive?"<BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">Have you been to some of Europe's bigger cities?? They have traffic and pollution issues as well.? Until urban planners stop designing cities to accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will not be great places to live.? Cramming people into tighter spaces designed for cars is called New York City.</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

?<BR>

"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the steering wheel of your car."<BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">There is nothing un American about not driving your car.? There is however something un American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot do with their own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

<BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

<BR>

</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>

<BR>

</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"></FONT></HTML>

--part1_154.3e150856.2e665251_boundary--



Dan H

2004-08-31



"It seems to work pretty well in Europe."

The fact that owning, registering, maintaining and getting a license for a

car in Europe is way more expensive and harder to do has a lot to do with

that.

Be carefull what you wish for.



----- Original Message -----

From: djsh-@comcast.net

To: ob-@topica.com

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:35 PM

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to

weaken Colum





Long time listener, 1st time writer...

Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever increasing population

into a confined area" people might be more inclined to not drive? Call me un

American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the steering

wheel of your car.

It seems to work pretty well in Europe.

Doug Shanks



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Peter Murphy

2004-08-31



The government tells you want you can and cannot do to your land all the

time....It is called zoning regulations and building codes...



I've been to Paris and have driven through it. The traffic was bad. But it

wasn't that bad until there was a transit strike, then all hell broke loose.

Or rather jammed in. The pollution also partially stems from the lax

emmission controls.



Have driven in NYC during the Thanksgiving holidays. Not bad, kind of fun.

The worse drive is driving the Long Island Expressway trying to get to the

suburbs.



Pete Murphy





 From: snjr <sn-@charter.net>

Reply-To: sn-@charter.net

To: djsh-@comcast.net, ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not

to weaken Colum

Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:47:04 -0700



Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever

increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined

to not drive?"



Have you been to some of Europe's bigger cities? They have traffic and

pollution issues as well. Until urban planners stop designing cities to

accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will not be

great places to live. Cramming people into tighter spaces designed for

cars is called New York City.



"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind

the steering wheel of your car."



There is nothing un American about not driving your car. There is however

something un American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot

do with their own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com





This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01C48F69.619E2A30

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined to not drive?"



Have you been to some of Europe's bigger cities? They have traffic and pollution issues as well. Until urban planners stop designing cities to accommodate cars, and design them to accommodate people, cities will not be great places to live. Cramming people into tighter spaces designed for cars is called New York City.



"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the steering wheel of your car."



There is nothing un American about not driving your car. There is however something un American about telling other Americans what they can or cannot do with their own property in an attempt to appease a minority of people.

------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01C48F69.619E2A30

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV>Doug wrote: "Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever

increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined

to not drive?"</DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Have you been to some of Europe's bigger

cities?  They have traffic and pollution issues as well.  Until urban

planners stop designing cities to accommodate cars, and design them to

accommodate people, cities will not be great places to live.  Cramming

people into tighter spaces designed for cars is called New York

City.</FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV>"Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind

the steering wheel of your car."</DIV>

<DIV> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>There is nothing un American about not driving your

car.  There is however something un American about telling other Americans

what they can or cannot do with their own property in an attempt to appease a

minority of people.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01C48F69.619E2A30--



djsh-@comcast.net

2004-08-31





--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_24830_1093988147_0

Content-Type: text/plain

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



Long time listener, 1st time writer...

Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined to not drive? Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the steering wheel of your car.

It seems to work pretty well in Europe.

Doug Shanks



-------------- Original message --------------



 Matt wrote:

 "political" decision to conserve our land, many places that are

currently enjoyable to ride in would be significantly less so.



You mean like the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument where you can only

enter on foot now and will be fined if you ride your mountain bike?



 If it weren't for Oregon's limiting of urban sprawal, I'd be forced to

spend more time biking

 through and past subdivisions and shopping malls.



So, your desire to have peaceful rides is more important than another

person's property rights? FORCED? Does someone MAKE you ride through

subdvisions? Why don't you hop on the mass transit until you get on the

outskirts of town and then ride?



 Sometimes it seems like people here don't realize how nice the Urban

Growth Boundary makes it for us bicyclists.



Yeah, I love it. The more we push an ever increasing population into a

confined area, we get more traffic, pollution, and disease. I love coughing

for hours after a nice ride through an urban area.



 year the sprawal creeps a few more miles outward, devouring once

peaceful farmland and diminishing the bicycling experience.



That "peaceful farmland" is supposed to be a business if you are not aware

of that. Unfortunately, most farms are very unprofitable, except perhaps

wineries and that is not a proven commodity for Oregon yet. Limited urban

growth boundaries are taking away people's rights to do with their land as

they wish (within reason). I am certain a family holding acreage, (some of

which has been in families for generations) and can ONLY FARM IT, are not

too concerned about your interests in the "bicycling experience." It is

more likely they are killing themselves trying to keep the County from

foreclosing due to ever increasing property taxes while faced with ever

decreasing farm income.



Before you talk about how great stripping people of their property rights is

for your interests, perhaps you should think of the impact it has on the

property owners, unless of course you want to buy the land yourself.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_24830_1093988147_0

Content-Type: text/html

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<html><body>

<P>Long time listener, 1st time writer...</P>

<P>Maybe I've got it all wrong but, if you "push an ever increasing population into a confined area" people might be more inclined to not drive? Call me un American but, there are lots of alternatives to sitting behind the steering wheel of your car. </P>

<P>It seems to work pretty well in Europe.</P>

<P>Doug Shanks<BR></P>



--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_24830_1093988147_0--





Matt wrote:

 "political" decision to conserve our land, many places that are

currently enjoyable to ride in would be significantly less so.



You mean like the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument where you can only

enter on foot now and will be fined if you ride your mountain bike?



 If it weren't for Oregon's limiting of urban sprawal, I'd be forced to

spend more time biking

 through and past subdivisions and shopping malls.



So, your desire to have peaceful rides is more important than another

person's property rights? FORCED? Does someone MAKE you ride through

subdvisions? Why don't you hop on the mass transit until you get on the

outskirts of town and then ride?



 Sometimes it seems like people here don't realize how nice the Urban

Growth Boundary makes it for us bicyclists.



Yeah, I love it. The more we push an ever increasing population into a

confined area, we get more traffic, pollution, and disease. I love coughing

for hours after a nice ride through an urban area.



 year the sprawal creeps a few more miles outward, devouring once

peaceful farmland and diminishing the bicycling experience.



That "peaceful farmland" is supposed to be a business if you are not aware

of that. Unfortunately, most farms are very unprofitable, except perhaps

wineries and that is not a proven commodity for Oregon yet. Limited urban

growth boundaries are taking away people's rights to do with their land as

they wish (within reason). I am certain a family holding acreage, (some of

which has been in families for generations) and can ONLY FARM IT, are not

too concerned about your interests in the "bicycling experience." It is

more likely they are killing themselves trying to keep the County from

foreclosing due to ever increasing property taxes while faced with ever

decreasing farm income.



Before you talk about how great stripping people of their property rights is

for your interests, perhaps you should think of the impact it has on the

property owners, unless of course you want to buy the land yourself.



Matthew Wolpert

2004-08-31



I disagree that the aforementioned email is not relevant here. Land

use planning is directly relevant to bicycling in Oregon. Without the

"political" decision to conserve our land, many places that are

currently enjoyable to ride in would be significantly less so.



I have been on many peaceful rides that began near downtown Portland

but quickly become scenic rural areas. If it weren't for Oregon's

limiting of urban sprawal, I'd be forced to spend more time biking

through and past subdivisions and shopping malls.



Sometimes it seems like people here don't realize how nice the Urban

Growth Boundary makes it for us bicyclists. Where I grew up, every

year the sprawal creeps a few more miles outward, devouring once

peaceful farmland and diminishing the bicycling experience.



Respectfully,

Matthew







On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:08:53 -0500, Adams, Mike <mad-@huttig.com> wrote:

 Not another non bicycle\political forum. Yuk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike Adams



-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:11 AM

To: Gardner, Andrew (Stoel); Winslow, Mike; Werner, Bruce; Tucker, Roy;

Obra Chat

Subject: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to

weaken Columbia



-----Original Message-----

From: Oregon Conservation Network [mailto:oc-@olcv.org]

Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:10 PM

To: Schreck, George

Subject: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Columbia

Gorge Protections



Dear George Schreck,



Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections



Take Action to follow up on an egregious Anti-Gorge Senate

Hearing



On August 18th, foes of Columbia River Gorge protections, led by

Senator Gary George, held a so-called Senate "hearing" which

provided a platform for activists opposed to Columbia Gorge

protections to criticize the National Scenic Area Act and the

Columbia River Gorge Commission, as well as Oregon's land use

laws in general.



Groups opposed to land use planning and Gorge protection, like

Oregonians in Action (OIA) and Columbia Gorge United (CGU),

played a significant role in bringing this hearing to fruition.

The entire hearing was heavily slanted toward weakening Gorge

protections because these groups have worked closely with

committee chair Senator George.



These groups are out of step with most Oregonians. In fact, most

Oregonians overwhelmingly believe in protecting the Gorge, so it

is very important that we get our voices into the record.



It is clear that Senators George (R- Newberg), Bill Fisher (R-

Roseburg), and Ted Ferrioli (R- John Day) held the hearing to

lay the groundwork for legislation that will weaken Gorge

protections during the 2005 Oregon legislative session -

probably in the form of de-funding the Gorge Commission or other

efforts to weaken Oregon's land use laws. We must not let this

happen!



We urge you to send a letter to the Senate Natural Resources

Interim Committee by September 17, 2004. Your letter will then

be included as public testimony in the hearing record.



Follow the links below to send a letter...



You can take action on this alert either via email (please see

directions below) or via the web at:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d



Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/forward/su7b2pjxn76d



We encourage you to take action by September 17, 2004



Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections



INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:

If you have access to a web browser, you can take action on this

alert by going to the following URL:



http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d



INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:

Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email program.



You MUST Reply with "TakeAction" in the subject.



Your letter will be addressed and sent to:

Senator Gary George



----THIS LETTER WILL BE SENT IN YOUR NAME----

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],



Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony on

the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area and the Gorge

Commission. Please add these comments to the official record and

include them in the findings of fact.



The Columbia River Gorge is a natural scenic wonder that must be

protected for future generations to experience. The National

Scenic Area Act protects the Gorge from over development and

also helps support the Gorge economy. Since the Gorge Act was

passed in 1986, the federal government has provided $62 million

to purchase land from willing sellers and $36 million for

economic and recreational development. The Gorge Act also

protects property rights by ensuring that every land owner has

an economic use for their property.



The Gorge Commission is the agency most responsible for ensuring

that the Columbia Gorge is protected. The Oregon Legislature

must provide necessary funding for the Gorge Commission to

carryout its duty to protect the Columbia River Gorge. The

Legislature should also advocate for more federal funding to

purchase key lands from willing sellers, compensate the counties

for lost property tax revenue and to stimulate economic

development in urban areas of the Gorge.



Thank you for including these comments in the official record

and in the findings of fact.



----END OF LETTER TO BE SENT----



Sincerely,

George Schreck



cc:

Interim Committee Administrator Ray Kelly

Senator Bill Fisher

Senator Frank Shields

Senator Joan Dukes

Senator Rick Metsger

Senator Roger Beyer

Senator Ted Ferrioli



--------------------------------------------------



If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for

Oregon Conservation Network at:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/join.html?r=2paV1xE11BukE



--------------------------------------------------



This message was sent to george.-@pacificorp.com. To modify your

email

communication preferences or update your personal profile, visit

your subscription management page at:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/smp.tcl?nkey=su7b2pjxn76d



To stop ALL email from Oregon Conservation Network, reply via

email with "remove" in the subject line, or use the following

link:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=c

enter&nkey=su7b2pjxn76d



***********************************

Powered by GetActive Software, Inc.

Relationship Management for Member Organizations (tm)

http://www.getactive.com

***********************************



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.



==============================================================================



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Adams, Mike

2004-08-31



Not another non bicycle\political forum. Yuk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike Adams



-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:11 AM

To: Gardner, Andrew (Stoel); Winslow, Mike; Werner, Bruce; Tucker, Roy;

Obra Chat

Subject: [OBRA Chat] FW: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to

weaken Columbia









-----Original Message-----

From: Oregon Conservation Network [mailto:oc-@olcv.org]

Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:10 PM

To: Schreck, George

Subject: George, Tell the Oregon Senate Committee not to weaken Columbia

Gorge Protections



Dear George Schreck,



Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections



Take Action to follow up on an egregious Anti-Gorge Senate

Hearing



On August 18th, foes of Columbia River Gorge protections, led by

Senator Gary George, held a so-called Senate "hearing" which

provided a platform for activists opposed to Columbia Gorge

protections to criticize the National Scenic Area Act and the

Columbia River Gorge Commission, as well as Oregon's land use

laws in general.



Groups opposed to land use planning and Gorge protection, like

Oregonians in Action (OIA) and Columbia Gorge United (CGU),

played a significant role in bringing this hearing to fruition.

The entire hearing was heavily slanted toward weakening Gorge

protections because these groups have worked closely with

committee chair Senator George.



These groups are out of step with most Oregonians. In fact, most

Oregonians overwhelmingly believe in protecting the Gorge, so it

is very important that we get our voices into the record.



It is clear that Senators George (R- Newberg), Bill Fisher (R-

Roseburg), and Ted Ferrioli (R- John Day) held the hearing to

lay the groundwork for legislation that will weaken Gorge

protections during the 2005 Oregon legislative session -

probably in the form of de-funding the Gorge Commission or other

efforts to weaken Oregon's land use laws. We must not let this

happen!



We urge you to send a letter to the Senate Natural Resources

Interim Committee by September 17, 2004. Your letter will then

be included as public testimony in the hearing record.



Follow the links below to send a letter...



You can take action on this alert either via email (please see

directions below) or via the web at:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d



Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/forward/su7b2pjxn76d



We encourage you to take action by September 17, 2004



Stop Anti-Gorge Legislators from Weakening Gorge Protections



INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:

If you have access to a web browser, you can take action on this

alert by going to the following URL:



http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/gorge/su7b2pjxn76d



INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:

Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email program.



You MUST Reply with "TakeAction" in the subject.



Your letter will be addressed and sent to:

Senator Gary George



----THIS LETTER WILL BE SENT IN YOUR NAME----

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],



Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony on

the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area and the Gorge

Commission. Please add these comments to the official record and

include them in the findings of fact.



The Columbia River Gorge is a natural scenic wonder that must be

protected for future generations to experience. The National

Scenic Area Act protects the Gorge from over development and

also helps support the Gorge economy. Since the Gorge Act was

passed in 1986, the federal government has provided $62 million

to purchase land from willing sellers and $36 million for

economic and recreational development. The Gorge Act also

protects property rights by ensuring that every land owner has

an economic use for their property.



The Gorge Commission is the agency most responsible for ensuring

that the Columbia Gorge is protected. The Oregon Legislature

must provide necessary funding for the Gorge Commission to

carryout its duty to protect the Columbia River Gorge. The

Legislature should also advocate for more federal funding to

purchase key lands from willing sellers, compensate the counties

for lost property tax revenue and to stimulate economic

development in urban areas of the Gorge.



Thank you for including these comments in the official record

and in the findings of fact.



----END OF LETTER TO BE SENT----



Sincerely,

George Schreck



cc:

Interim Committee Administrator Ray Kelly

Senator Bill Fisher

Senator Frank Shields

Senator Joan Dukes

Senator Rick Metsger

Senator Roger Beyer

Senator Ted Ferrioli



--------------------------------------------------



If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for

Oregon Conservation Network at:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/join.html?r=2paV1xE11BukE



--------------------------------------------------



This message was sent to george.-@pacificorp.com. To modify your

email

communication preferences or update your personal profile, visit

your subscription management page at:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/smp.tcl?nkey=su7b2pjxn76d



To stop ALL email from Oregon Conservation Network, reply via

email with "remove" in the subject line, or use the following

link:



http://actionnetwork.org/OCN_Email_Action/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=c

enter&nkey=su7b2pjxn76d



***********************************

Powered by GetActive Software, Inc.

Relationship Management for Member Organizations (tm)

http://www.getactive.com

***********************************













------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.



==============================================================================



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com