george.-@pacificorp.comRE: Road rage list

Cp53-@aol.com

2004-10-01





--part1_30.61d6177b.2e8f5be1_boundary

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Drivers are privilige to EXACTLY the same laws and resources as we are. If

and when they've had enough (and I'll let them decide when trhat is), they can

band together in the car worshgipping email group ajnd talk anbout it just

like we all have been for the past week.

It probably won't happen anytime soon. Judging by most of the crap I hear

from people directed at me from cars while I'm riding, the majority of the

people speaking about it don't know what the rules are, don't know exactly what

either party should be doing according to the law.

If the motorist has a problem with the way I'm riding and my 18lb bike and my

190lb body is going to threaten the life of somebody in a 3000+ lb car, I'll

let them have the same liberty I have and call the police and report me just

like I did to him.

It's not like they're being treated unfairly.

But that's just my opinion.

chris



--part1_30.61d6177b.2e8f5be1_boundary

Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Drivers are privilige to EXACTLY the same laws and resources as we are.  If and when they've had enough (and I'll let them decide when trhat is), they can band together in the car worshgipping email group ajnd talk anbout it just like we all have been for the past week.<BR>

It probably won't happen anytime soon.  Judging by most of the crap I hear from people directed at me from cars while I'm riding, the majority of the people speaking about it don't know what the rules are, don't know exactly what either party should be doing according to the law.<BR>

If the motorist has a problem with the way I'm riding and my 18lb bike and my 190lb body is going to threaten the life of somebody in a 3000+ lb car, I'll let them have the same liberty I have and call the police and report me just like I did to him.<BR>

It's not like they're being treated unfairly.<BR>

But that's just my opinion.<BR>

chris</FONT></HTML>



--part1_30.61d6177b.2e8f5be1_boundary--



Schreck, George

2004-10-01



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C4A7F2.90D9714B

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=us-ascii

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



As a general rule, the person claiming libel does not have to prove

anything. It is up to the person defending against the libel claim to

prove the statement is true. If you alleged that a person tried to run

you off the road and posted it with his name a license number, he could

sue you for libel by claiming that it was not him or her, and that you

damaged their reputation. At that point, you may need some proof that

it is the correct person, and, of course, you could be wrong.



I fail to understand what you hope to accomplish with the website. At

the end of the day, the only thing that makes a difference is legal

consequences, which occur only by filing a complaint. I do not

understand what the resistance is to filing a complaint. There is

nothing that can be accomplished through self help, and it may expose

the cyclist to additional problems. Just exercise you legal rights both

on the road and in the legal arena, and please follow the rules of the

road.



As for the insurance companies, the have an inherent bias to find the

bicyclist to be in the wrong, and the claims adjusters do not understand

cycling issues as a rule. Se how much they understand the next time you

call regarding a stolen bicycle and tell them the price.



________________________________



From: Steve-@clark.wa.gov [mailto:Steve-@clark.wa.gov]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:53 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





Not only that, but, it would be an open forum type of posting since,

presumably, the only reason for rejecting an incident would be the lack

of information such as date, vehicle type, location.



-----Original Message-----

From: Mike Murray [mailto:mike.m-@obra.org]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:41 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage

list





I think George meant to say that a person can claim that the

information is inaccurate and therefore claim libel but whether they

would prevail is a matter of whether the inaccuracy could be proven.



Wouldn't a successful libel claim also require demonstrating

both inaccuracy and malice as well as damages and a connection between

the libel and the damages? If there is only a listing but no sending of

the information to insurance companies, employers, etc. then there would

be essentially be no damages. Demonstrating malice would also be

difficult. Lastly, who would be exposed to potential actions? I

recognize that in the US anybody can sue anybody at any time for nearly

anything but it seems like the potential targets of such an action; the

poster, the developer of the application and possible OBRA, would all be

unattractive targets for such an action since there is no insurance

coverage against libel claims and, for the most part, relatively small

amount of attachable assets.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George

[mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 08:36 AM

To: da-@danfeiner.com; ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





A person on the list can always claim libel if the

information is inaccurate. The problem will be proving that the

information is accurate as it will be the word of the driver against the

bicyclist. the person who made the posting and anyone who exercises any

editorial discretion can be liable. the good news is that the drivers

would tend to not access the site or know it exists. There should be

the opportunity for rebuttal, however. This is not my specialty, and I

would suggest that you consult someone with some expertise in the area.



________________________________



From: Dan Feiner [mailto:da-@danfeiner.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 8:22 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





Here's one for the civil lawyers in the group: Does

anyone have any concerns about libel or slander liability? If whatever

entity creates the list exercises any type of editorial control over

what is posted, would it share in the liability, if any? Would the

accused drivers have the opportunity to post responses? My memory is

that the liklihood of liability increases as editorial control does and

decreases when an open forum is created. Consultation with a

communications lawyer might be worth the time and expense if this

concept moves towards reality. Dan

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com





------------------------------------------------------------------------

------



This email is confidential and may be legally

privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this

email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an

authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it,

is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received

this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and

destroy all copies.





========================================================================

======





To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.



==============================================================================



------_=_NextPart_001_01C4A7F2.90D9714B

Content-Type: text/html;

charset=us-ascii

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML xmlns:o =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">

<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4943.400" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=933590020-01102004><FONT face=Arial

color=#0000ff size=2>As a general rule, the person claiming libel does not have

to prove anything.  It is up to the person defending against the libel

claim to prove the statement is true.  If you alleged that a person tried

to run you off the road and posted it with his name a license number, he could

sue you for libel by claiming that it was not him or her, and that you damaged

their reputation.  At that point, you may need some proof that it is the

correct person, and, of course, you could be wrong.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=933590020-01102004><FONT face=Arial

color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>

<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=933590020-01102004><FONT face=Arial

color=#0000ff size=2>I fail to understand what you hope to accomplish with the

website. At the end of the day, the only thing that makes a difference is legal

consequences, which occur only by filing a complaint.  I do not understand

what the resistance is to filing a complaint.  There is nothing that can be

accomplished through self help, and it may expose the cyclist to additional

problems.  Just exercise you legal rights both on the road and in the legal

arena, and please follow the rules of the road.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=933590020-01102004><FONT face=Arial

color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>

<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=933590020-01102004><FONT face=Arial

color=#0000ff size=2>As for the insurance companies, the have an inherent bias

to find the bicyclist to be in the wrong, and the claims adjusters do not

understand cycling issues as a rule.  Se how much they understand the next

time you call regarding a stolen bicycle and tell them the

price.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>

<HR tabIndex=-1>

<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Steve-@clark.wa.gov

[mailto:Steve-@clark.wa.gov] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01, 2004 9:53

AM<BR><B>To:</B> ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:

george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV><SPAN class=354434816-01102004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Not

only that, but, it would be an open forum type of posting since, presumably, the

only reason for rejecting an incident would be the lack of information such as

date, vehicle type, location.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT

face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Mike Murray

[mailto:mike.m-@obra.org] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01, 2004 9:41

AM<BR><B>To:</B> ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B>

george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage

list<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=996322816-01102004>I

think George meant to say that a person can claim that the information is

inaccurate and therefore claim libel but whether they would prevail is a

matter of whether the inaccuracy could be proven.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN

class=996322816-01102004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN

class=996322816-01102004>Wouldn't a successful libel claim also require

demonstrating both inaccuracy and malice as well as damages and a connection

between the libel and the damages?  If there is only a listing but no

sending of the information to insurance companies, employers, etc. then there

would be essentially be no damages.  Demonstrating malice would also be

difficult.  Lastly, who would be exposed to potential actions?  I

recognize that in the US anybody can sue anybody at any time for nearly

anything but it seems like the potential targets of such an action; the

poster, the developer of the application and possible OBRA, would all be

unattractive targets for such an action since there is no insurance coverage

against libel claims and, for the most part, relatively small amount of

attachable assets.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT size=2>Mike Murray </FONT></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

    <DIV></DIV>

    <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT

    face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Schreck,

    George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday,

    October 01, 2004 08:36 AM<BR><B>To:</B> da-@danfeiner.com;

    ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage

    list<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>

    <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=705223015-01102004><FONT face=Arial

    color=#0000ff size=2>A person on the list can always claim libel if the

    information is inaccurate.  The problem will be proving that the

    information is accurate as it will be the word of the driver against the

    bicyclist.  the person who made the posting and anyone who exercises

    any editorial discretion can be liable.  the good news is that the

    drivers would tend to not access the site or know it exists.  There

    should be the opportunity for  rebuttal, however.  This is not my

    specialty, and I would suggest that you consult someone with some expertise

    in the area.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>

    <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>

    <HR tabIndex=-1>

    <FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Dan Feiner [mailto:da-@danfeiner.com]

    <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01, 2004 8:22 AM<BR><B>To:</B>

    ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [OBRA Chat] Road rage

    list<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>

    <DIV></DIV>

    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Here's one for the civil lawyers in the

    group:  Does anyone have any concerns about libel or slander

    liability?  If whatever entity creates the list exercises any type of

    editorial control over what is posted, would it share in the liability, if

    any?  Would the accused drivers have the opportunity to post

    responses?  My memory is that the liklihood of liability increases as

    editorial control does and decreases when an open forum is created. 

    Consultation with a communications lawyer might be worth the time and

    expense if this concept moves towards reality.  Dan</FONT></DIV><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE>

    <P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>This

    email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<BR><BR>It is intended

    solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless

    expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

    unauthorized.<BR><BR>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

    copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is

    prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this

    email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy

    all

    copies.<BR><BR>==============================================================================<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BODY></HTML>



<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>

<br>

This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<br>

<br>

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is unauthorized.<br>

<br>

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.<br>

<br>

==============================================================================<br>

</P>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C4A7F2.90D9714B--



Craig Austin

2004-10-01



"I don't know. If the driver has the opportunity to enter a reply, it could

get outa hand couldn't it?

It should be for just the facts."



That's a very telling statement. And we know that only the cyclist has "the

facts." No reason to let the accused have any say in his defense.



This has been an interesting thread to watch. There are legitimate concerns

over aggressive drivers, and we've all been frightened, threatened, or worse

while riding our bikes. But what I haven't seen yet is any balance in this

debate. Nowhere have I seen anyone say that drivers might be more friendly

toward cyclists if we obeyed traffic laws ourselves. Nearly every one of us

runs stop signs, red lights, rides on sidewalks, and generally treats the

open road like a bike path. Our bikes lack reflectors or lights because they

aren't cool or weigh too much. If I offend the 1% of you who always obey all

traffic laws on your bikes, I apologize.



My wife was an insurance claims adjuster for over a dozen years, handling

bodily injury claims. As her husband and kids ride very often, she's also

quite concerned with cycling safety and always gives the cyclist the benefit

of the doubt when a car is involved. Yet in her experience, in over 90

percent of the auto/bike accidents that involved a police investigation, the

cyclist was at fault. Sure, many involved kids dashing into the street, but

many also involved commuters riding between two lanes of traffic downtown,

failure to signal, and especially, failure to stop or even slow down at red

lights and stop signs. I know, I know; our failure to yield doesn't usually

cause potentially fatal injury, whereas the driver's inattention or bad

driving usually does. That doesn't make our actions okay.



Where's the website for drivers to report this behaviour by cyclists? Of

course, we would have no ability to respond and defend ourselves, because it

would be a DRIVER's site only.



Just my opinion.

Craig Austin



-----Original Message-----

From: Cp53-@aol.com [mailto:Cp53-@aol.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:07 PM

To: Steve-@clark.wa.gov; ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





I don't know. If the driver has the opportunity to enter a reply, it could

get outa hand couldn't it?

It should be for just the facts.



To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



Cp53-@aol.com

2004-10-01



I don't know. If the driver has the opportunity to enter a reply, it could get outa hand couldn't it?

It should be for just the facts.



Steve-@clark.wa.gov

2004-10-01



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C4A7D7.22348FB6

Content-Type: text/plain



Not only that, but, it would be an open forum type of posting since,

presumably, the only reason for rejecting an incident would be the lack of

information such as date, vehicle type, location.



-----Original Message-----

From: Mike Murray [mailto:mike.m-@obra.org]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:41 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





I think George meant to say that a person can claim that the information is

inaccurate and therefore claim libel but whether they would prevail is a

matter of whether the inaccuracy could be proven.



Wouldn't a successful libel claim also require demonstrating both inaccuracy

and malice as well as damages and a connection between the libel and the

damages? If there is only a listing but no sending of the information to

insurance companies, employers, etc. then there would be essentially be no

damages. Demonstrating malice would also be difficult. Lastly, who would

be exposed to potential actions? I recognize that in the US anybody can sue

anybody at any time for nearly anything but it seems like the potential

targets of such an action; the poster, the developer of the application and

possible OBRA, would all be unattractive targets for such an action since

there is no insurance coverage against libel claims and, for the most part,

relatively small amount of attachable assets.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 08:36 AM

To: da-@danfeiner.com; ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





A person on the list can always claim libel if the information is

inaccurate. The problem will be proving that the information is accurate as

it will be the word of the driver against the bicyclist. the person who

made the posting and anyone who exercises any editorial discretion can be

liable. the good news is that the drivers would tend to not access the site

or know it exists. There should be the opportunity for rebuttal, however.

This is not my specialty, and I would suggest that you consult someone with

some expertise in the area.



_____



From: Dan Feiner [mailto:da-@danfeiner.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 8:22 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





Here's one for the civil lawyers in the group: Does anyone have any

concerns about libel or slander liability? If whatever entity creates the

list exercises any type of editorial control over what is posted, would it

share in the liability, if any? Would the accused drivers have the

opportunity to post responses? My memory is that the liklihood of liability

increases as editorial control does and decreases when an open forum is

created. Consultation with a communications lawyer might be worth the time

and expense if this concept moves towards reality. Dan

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution

or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please

contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.



============================================================================

==





To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com





------_=_NextPart_001_01C4A7D7.22348FB6

Content-Type: text/html



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML xmlns:o =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">

<TITLE>Message</TITLE>



<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><SPAN class=354434816-01102004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Not

only that, but, it would be an open forum type of posting since, presumably, the

only reason for rejecting an incident would be the lack of information such as

date, vehicle type, location.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT

face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Mike Murray

[mailto:mike.m-@obra.org] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01, 2004 9:41

AM<BR><B>To:</B> ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B>

george.-@pacificorp.comRE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage

list<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=996322816-01102004>I

think George meant to say that a person can claim that the information is

inaccurate and therefore claim libel but whether they would prevail is a

matter of whether the inaccuracy could be proven.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN

class=996322816-01102004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN

class=996322816-01102004>Wouldn't a successful libel claim also require

demonstrating both inaccuracy and malice as well as damages and a connection

between the libel and the damages?  If there is only a listing but no

sending of the information to insurance companies, employers, etc. then there

would be essentially be no damages.  Demonstrating malice would also be

difficult.  Lastly, who would be exposed to potential actions?  I

recognize that in the US anybody can sue anybody at any time for nearly

anything but it seems like the potential targets of such an action; the

poster, the developer of the application and possible OBRA, would all be

unattractive targets for such an action since there is no insurance coverage

against libel claims and, for the most part, relatively small amount of

attachable assets.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT size=2>Mike Murray </FONT></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

    <DIV></DIV>

    <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT

    face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Schreck,

    George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday,

    October 01, 2004 08:36 AM<BR><B>To:</B> da-@danfeiner.com;

    ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage

    list<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>

    <DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=705223015-01102004><FONT face=Arial

    color=#0000ff size=2>A person on the list can always claim libel if the

    information is inaccurate.  The problem will be proving that the

    information is accurate as it will be the word of the driver against the

    bicyclist.  the person who made the posting and anyone who exercises

    any editorial discretion can be liable.  the good news is that the

    drivers would tend to not access the site or know it exists.  There

    should be the opportunity for  rebuttal, however.  This is not my

    specialty, and I would suggest that you consult someone with some expertise

    in the area.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>

    <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>

    <HR tabIndex=-1>

    <FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Dan Feiner [mailto:da-@danfeiner.com]

    <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01, 2004 8:22 AM<BR><B>To:</B>

    ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [OBRA Chat] Road rage

    list<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>

    <DIV></DIV>

    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Here's one for the civil lawyers in the

    group:  Does anyone have any concerns about libel or slander

    liability?  If whatever entity creates the list exercises any type of

    editorial control over what is posted, would it share in the liability, if

    any?  Would the accused drivers have the opportunity to post

    responses?  My memory is that the liklihood of liability increases as

    editorial control does and decreases when an open forum is created. 

    Consultation with a communications lawyer might be worth the time and

    expense if this concept moves towards reality.  Dan</FONT></DIV><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE>

    <P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>This

    email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<BR><BR>It is intended

    solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless

    expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

    unauthorized.<BR><BR>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

    copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is

    prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this

    email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy

    all

    copies.<BR><BR>==============================================================================<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C4A7D7.22348FB6--



Mike Murray

2004-10-01



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4A79A.D1C690B0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="us-ascii"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



I think George meant to say that a person can claim that the information is

inaccurate and therefore claim libel but whether they would prevail is a

matter of whether the inaccuracy could be proven.



Wouldn't a successful libel claim also require demonstrating both inaccuracy

and malice as well as damages and a connection between the libel and the

damages? If there is only a listing but no sending of the information to

insurance companies, employers, etc. then there would be essentially be no

damages. Demonstrating malice would also be difficult. Lastly, who would

be exposed to potential actions? I recognize that in the US anybody can sue

anybody at any time for nearly anything but it seems like the potential

targets of such an action; the poster, the developer of the application and

possible OBRA, would all be unattractive targets for such an action since

there is no insurance coverage against libel claims and, for the most part,

relatively small amount of attachable assets.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Schreck, George [mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 08:36 AM

To: da-@danfeiner.com; ob-@topica.com

Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





A person on the list can always claim libel if the information is

inaccurate. The problem will be proving that the information is accurate as

it will be the word of the driver against the bicyclist. the person who

made the posting and anyone who exercises any editorial discretion can be

liable. the good news is that the drivers would tend to not access the site

or know it exists. There should be the opportunity for rebuttal, however.

This is not my specialty, and I would suggest that you consult someone with

some expertise in the area.



_____



From: Dan Feiner [mailto:da-@danfeiner.com]

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 8:22 AM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] Road rage list





Here's one for the civil lawyers in the group: Does anyone have any

concerns about libel or slander liability? If whatever entity creates the

list exercises any type of editorial control over what is posted, would it

share in the liability, if any? Would the accused drivers have the

opportunity to post responses? My memory is that the liklihood of liability

increases as editorial control does and decreases when an open forum is

created. Consultation with a communications lawyer might be worth the time

and expense if this concept moves towards reality. Dan

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--



This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.



It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone

else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

unauthorized.



If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution

or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please

contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.



============================================================================

==







------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4A79A.D1C690B0

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="us-ascii"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML xmlns:o =

"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">

<TITLE>Message</TITLE>



<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=GENERATOR>

<STYLE></STYLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=996322816-01102004>I

think George meant to say that a person can claim that the information is

inaccurate and therefore claim libel but whether they would prevail is a matter

of whether the inaccuracy could be proven.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN

class=996322816-01102004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN

class=996322816-01102004>Wouldn't a successful libel claim also require

demonstrating both inaccuracy and malice as well as damages and a connection

between the libel and the damages?  If there is only a listing but no

sending of the information to insurance companies, employers, etc. then there

would be essentially be no damages.  Demonstrating malice would also be

difficult.  Lastly, who would be exposed to potential actions?  I

recognize that in the US anybody can sue anybody at any time for nearly anything

but it seems like the potential targets of such an action; the poster, the

developer of the application and possible OBRA, would all be unattractive

targets for such an action since there is no insurance coverage against libel

claims and, for the most part, relatively small amount of attachable

assets.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>

<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>

<DIV><FONT size=2>Mike Murray </FONT></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT

face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Schreck, George

[mailto:george.-@pacificorp.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01,

2004 08:36 AM<BR><B>To:</B> da-@danfeiner.com;

ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [OBRA Chat] Road rage

list<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>

<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=705223015-01102004><FONT face=Arial

color=#0000ff size=2>A person on the list can always claim libel if the

information is inaccurate.  The problem will be proving that the

information is accurate as it will be the word of the driver against the

bicyclist.  the person who made the posting and anyone who exercises any

editorial discretion can be liable.  the good news is that the

drivers would tend to not access the site or know it exists.  There

should be the opportunity for  rebuttal, however.  This is not my

specialty, and I would suggest that you consult someone with some expertise in

the area.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>

<HR tabIndex=-1>

<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Dan Feiner [mailto:da-@danfeiner.com]

<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 01, 2004 8:22 AM<BR><B>To:</B>

ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [OBRA Chat] Road rage

list<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>

<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Here's one for the civil lawyers in the

group:  Does anyone have any concerns about libel or slander

liability?  If whatever entity creates the list exercises any type of

editorial control over what is posted, would it share in the liability, if

any?  Would the accused drivers have the opportunity to post

responses?  My memory is that the liklihood of liability increases as

editorial control does and decreases when an open forum is created. 

Consultation with a communications lawyer might be worth the time and expense

if this concept moves towards reality.  Dan</FONT></DIV><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE>

<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>This

email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<BR><BR>It is intended

solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless

expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is

unauthorized.<BR><BR>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is

prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this

email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all

copies.<BR><BR>==============================================================================<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>



------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4A79A.D1C690B0--