National/International bike racing

splin-@aol.com

2000-02-19

In a message dated 02/16/2000 9:06:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,

Walp-@cse.ogi.edu writes:



 One idea I have about this is for OBRA to field a team at national

calendar events (either USAC or FIAC). This way the best riders in

this region can represent OBRA in bigger races. If those bigger races

are part of the feeder system and selection process for the pro teams

then everyone can see the whole pipeline... the pro teams can take

it from there.



I couldn't agree more with Jon!!



Even if USAC were recognizing OBRA races, our riders would need to be

traveling a lot more than most do now to ever attract the attention of the

big teams. The riders from Oregon who have had success at the elite levels of

the sport have not gotten there racing in Oregon. Todd Littlehales and Stacy

Peters are the current Oregon riders willing to go out on the road to become

successful at the next level and both have results to show for it.



In thirty years of involvement in bicycle racing the only riders I have ever

seen get to the National team or professional ranks by racing primarily at

home were the Colorado class of the late 70s and early 80s (Davis Phinney,

Ron Kiefel, Alexi Grewal, Bob Cook and Tom Sain) who benefited from the

showcase provided by the Red Zinger/Coors Classic and the new Olympic

Training Center that focused all of the country's cycling attention on

Colorado. A unique time and place that will never be recreated.



For several years I have traveled to officiate at the Redlands SR every March

and have been dismayed at the lack of riders from Oregon & Washington who

make the relatively short trip to race there.



Redlands, because it is the first big race on the calendar, is an ideal stage

for up and coming riders to show themselves to the elite national amateur and

professional teams that are at Redlands as part of their early season

training.



Many of the riders I have seen at Redlands riding for regionally based teams

one year have found their way onto the big teams in following years. People

like Trent Klasna and Ernie Lechuga who came to Redlands every year and

always rode aggressively, joining the suicide early breaks, not to win the

races, but to show their strength and willingness to give it all in hopes of

attracting the attention of the bigger teams. They didn't ride safely (and

anonymously) in the pack hoping to pick up some scraps of prizes at the end

of the stage. They chose to attract attention to themselves by attacking at

every opportunity, making people notice their presence.



Much of the genesis of John Wordin's team came from regional composite teams

that he put together to race at Redlands in the early and mid 90s.



Last year's surprise rider of the year, Antonio Cruz was racing all year on a

small Northern Cal regional team. But, he wasn't staying in California hoping

to get good enough to race with the big boys. No, he was at the races --

Redlands, Sea Otter, Cascade, Red Zinger, and finally Downers Grove. Most of

those races he was a team of one, or if he had a team, it was one or two

others from L'Equipe Cheval. At several of the races requiring team entry

they wound up with composite riders added from the local area to give them a

complete team. Antonio was going for all the primes in the crits and forcing

people to notice him in the final sprints, all the time getting better

because he was not quite beating the best... Until he became a National

Champion.



I guess what I am saying is that USAC/OBRA sanctioning wars are largely

irrelevant for riders wanting to race at elite levels. They need to travel if

they really want to race at that level, not just have a number on their

license for the ego value.



While I am making everyone angry, I should also say that there is nothing in

Oregon stopping a promoter from sanctioning their race through USAC if they

are truly concerned about having opportunities for riders to upgrade through

the USAC system. (Bonnie)



Splinter



Marc San Soucie

2000-02-16

Mike Murray wrote:



 Certainly a system of progression from local racing to regional racing to

national racing makes sense. Currently there is no such system. What we

have instead is the rider categorization system and ranking of events based

on the size of prize lists and/or listing on the national calendar.



Is the UCI points system a useful model?



Marc San Soucie



Michael Hoyt

2000-02-16

How about the Federation of Exasperated Cyclists At Large (FECAL), because

that's what the US cycling scene is turning into.



Respectfully,



Michael Hoyt



Mike Murray wrote:



 Some answers:



FIAC - Federation of Independent Associations for Cycling - This is actually

a bit of an in-joke. This was the acronym vacated by the UCI.



Current membership is:

-OBRA

-American Cycling Association (ACA), formerly Bicycle Racing Association of

Colorado (BRAC), currently sanctioning races in Colorado, Wyoming, Arizona,

Washington, etc.

-Northern California-Nevada Cycling Association (NCNCA) sanctioning races in

California

-American Bicycle Racing (ABR), sanctioning races primarily in the Mid- West

-WSBA has participated but they do not currently have an independent

sanctioning program



Candi, John Forbes and I attended the initial meeting where the organization

was formed. Candi and I are also going to attend a meeting next week where

we will talk about the possibility of developing regional or national

championships outside of USAC, among other things. If anyone else wants to

participate in some fashion that would be great! Just contact me and let me

know what you are willing to do.



Currently there are no formal lines of communication between the various

local or regional organizations other than the FIAC connection. There are

many states that have no organization. There are several states that have a

organization of some sort but continues to have only USAC events. There are

also several race organizers that put on bike races without the assistance

of any organization. This is particularly true in mountain bike racing.



Certainly a system of progression from local racing to regional racing to

national racing makes sense. Currently there is no such system. What we

have instead is the rider categorization system and ranking of events based

on the size of prize lists and/or listing on the national calendar.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Scott Powell [mailto:aka_s-@hotmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 4:41 PM

To: Walp-@cse.ogi.edu; mmur-@teleport.com; ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: National/International bike racing



I hate to send out these mass messages, but there is a time for everything .

. .



Jonathan raises some very intriguing ideas, and I agree with his theory.



Let me confess my naivety, however (and perhaps I am not alone).



There is a general feeling of abandonment by USAC - it's a feeling we in

Oregon share with riders and directors of all levels across the country, up

to and including the aforementioned Mr. Wordin. In response to that

abandonment, OBRA has joined up with a number of other states to form a

loose alliance - FAIC, right?



Have I got it right so far?



So, we have a state-based OBRA, who has aligned with a handful of other

states (how many others have joined?). I hope I'm still on the right track.



Mike has explained that there is talk among the aligned states to possibly

hold regional and national events. I am all for Jonathan's idea of trying

to progress local riders up through the system. I think it could look

something like this:



1) Rider does well at local races;

2) Therefore, rider is selected to represent the locality at a regional

level event;

3) If the rider does well at a regional-level event (or a number of events),

the rider is selected to represent the region at a national event.

4) All along the way, the rider can see that there is an actual step-ladder

which they can climb.

5) Eventually, if the rider has succeeded all along the way, perhaps the

rider is given an opportunity to race pro (assuming that pro directors

choose to attend the regional and national events - a pretty safe

assumption, I would think, if there were such a system of races in place).



Here is the trick: How do we put together a step-ladder of local, regional,

and national events?



This is where my naivety really gets me. I don't even know who in Oregon is

in contact with who from Washington and California. I don't know if there

are any formal connections or lines of communication.



My ultimate point is this: It seems a lot of us in Oregon would like to see

a new local/regional/national chain of races formed without the assistance

of USAC. In order to do that, I would think we need to do the following:



1) Have some meetings to get our ideas together on paper (I'll even offer to

provide meeting space);

2) Designate someone to communicate those ideas to the other independent

regional bike racing communities;

3) Work with our fellow independents to ultimately form a new

local/regional/national chain.



Mike, maybe you can help us out here - Is this possible? If so, how can we,

the greater OBRA community, help? Certainly, it is impossible to expect you

and Candy to do this. The community needs to step up to the plate here.

But, can you help us get started?



Scott "maybe I'm thinking too big" Powell

Team O.

______________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



_____________________________________________________________

Who will win the Oscars? Spout off on our Entertainment list!

http://www.topica.com/lists/showbiztalk



Mike Murray

2000-02-16

Some answers:



FIAC - Federation of Independent Associations for Cycling - This is actually

a bit of an in-joke. This was the acronym vacated by the UCI.



Current membership is:

-OBRA

-American Cycling Association (ACA), formerly Bicycle Racing Association of

Colorado (BRAC), currently sanctioning races in Colorado, Wyoming, Arizona,

Washington, etc.

-Northern California-Nevada Cycling Association (NCNCA) sanctioning races in

California

-American Bicycle Racing (ABR), sanctioning races primarily in the Mid- West

-WSBA has participated but they do not currently have an independent

sanctioning program



Candi, John Forbes and I attended the initial meeting where the organization

was formed. Candi and I are also going to attend a meeting next week where

we will talk about the possibility of developing regional or national

championships outside of USAC, among other things. If anyone else wants to

participate in some fashion that would be great! Just contact me and let me

know what you are willing to do.



Currently there are no formal lines of communication between the various

local or regional organizations other than the FIAC connection. There are

many states that have no organization. There are several states that have a

organization of some sort but continues to have only USAC events. There are

also several race organizers that put on bike races without the assistance

of any organization. This is particularly true in mountain bike racing.



Certainly a system of progression from local racing to regional racing to

national racing makes sense. Currently there is no such system. What we

have instead is the rider categorization system and ranking of events based

on the size of prize lists and/or listing on the national calendar.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: Scott Powell [mailto:aka_s-@hotmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 4:41 PM

To: Walp-@cse.ogi.edu; mmur-@teleport.com; ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: National/International bike racing





I hate to send out these mass messages, but there is a time for everything .

. .





Jonathan raises some very intriguing ideas, and I agree with his theory.



Let me confess my naivety, however (and perhaps I am not alone).



There is a general feeling of abandonment by USAC - it's a feeling we in

Oregon share with riders and directors of all levels across the country, up

to and including the aforementioned Mr. Wordin. In response to that

abandonment, OBRA has joined up with a number of other states to form a

loose alliance - FAIC, right?



Have I got it right so far?



So, we have a state-based OBRA, who has aligned with a handful of other

states (how many others have joined?). I hope I'm still on the right track.



Mike has explained that there is talk among the aligned states to possibly

hold regional and national events. I am all for Jonathan's idea of trying

to progress local riders up through the system. I think it could look

something like this:



1) Rider does well at local races;

2) Therefore, rider is selected to represent the locality at a regional

level event;

3) If the rider does well at a regional-level event (or a number of events),

the rider is selected to represent the region at a national event.

4) All along the way, the rider can see that there is an actual step-ladder

which they can climb.

5) Eventually, if the rider has succeeded all along the way, perhaps the

rider is given an opportunity to race pro (assuming that pro directors

choose to attend the regional and national events - a pretty safe

assumption, I would think, if there were such a system of races in place).



Here is the trick: How do we put together a step-ladder of local, regional,

and national events?



This is where my naivety really gets me. I don't even know who in Oregon is

in contact with who from Washington and California. I don't know if there

are any formal connections or lines of communication.



My ultimate point is this: It seems a lot of us in Oregon would like to see

a new local/regional/national chain of races formed without the assistance

of USAC. In order to do that, I would think we need to do the following:



1) Have some meetings to get our ideas together on paper (I'll even offer to

provide meeting space);

2) Designate someone to communicate those ideas to the other independent

regional bike racing communities;

3) Work with our fellow independents to ultimately form a new

local/regional/national chain.



Mike, maybe you can help us out here - Is this possible? If so, how can we,

the greater OBRA community, help? Certainly, it is impossible to expect you

and Candy to do this. The community needs to step up to the plate here.

But, can you help us get started?



Scott "maybe I'm thinking too big" Powell

Team O.

______________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Mike Murray

2000-02-16

For many years USCF did essentially the same thing by qualifying riders for

the various national championships through the state championships. This

was done away with several years ago over the protestations of the state

reps (and basically everyone else with a brain). I think that the driving

force behind this was the coaching staff's need to justify their existence

by insuring that their riders were the selected riders for higher level

events. It was bad business for a rider that did not have coaching staff

connections to come out of nowhere and place at nationals. This has now

progressed a step further since national championships don't qualify a rider

for anything more than an "atta boy". If you look at this year's selection

process for the Olympics you will see that it is essentially impossible for

a rider to qualify on the basis of the Olympic Trials. USAC is holding

trials as a formality only.



ATRA (American Track Racing Association) tried to re-institute a performance

based criteria for eligibility for nationals by establishing Regional

Qualifier competitions. This has not been very successful, however, since

Regional Qualifiers are not well attended for several reasons:

-Nationals competition means less and less as above.

-The large number of pre-qualified riders that did not need to compete in

Regionals.

-There was no funding for Regionals and hence no prize list, promotion, etc.

-The general feeling that since rules and guidelines are often ignored it

would be easy for a talented rider to still get to ride at Natz without

having to qualify.



It is way past time that we return to a system where riders should get

recognition based on performance, not on coaching staff connections. It is

also time that coaching is moved away from providing service only to the

already established elite and instead be available to up and coming riders

on a local and regional basis.



Mike Murray



-----Original Message-----

From: John Bravard [mailto:jbra-@pacifier.com]

Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 10:03 AM

To: Jon Walpole

Cc: ob-@topica.com

Subject: Re: National/International bike racing









What Jon describes here should sound very familiar to anyone who ever

played Little League, Colt, or Pony League baseball. Teams play a number

of "regular season" games in an area. At the end of this season, one or

more teams are chosen from the better players of the league teams, and

these "All-star" players go on to play tournaments against other teams in

the state. Last time I checked, baseball was doing pretty good in this

country. Perhaps emulating this system is worth a try.



John



On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jon Walpole wrote:



 





Did anyone read the recent articles in VeloNews about

John Wordin and the Mercury pro team? I found it interesting

that he complained bitterly about the lack of support he had

received from USAC. In fact he claimed that the success of his

team had been achieved despite USAC and that there was no

feeder system to identify good young riders. He talked about

how he had personally found riders like Floyd Landis and

shaped them into pros without any help from USAC. I'm sure the

other pro teams feel the same way.



This seems like an opportunity to me, perhaps not directly at

the OBRA level, but definitely at the FIAC level. In addition to

establishing FIAC national calendar events, perhaps including

championship events, FIAC could establish a direct relationship

with the pro teams. I bet the folks who run the pro teams have

lots of ideas about how such a system might work, and it would be

great for young riders to be able to see a continuous path from

where they are now to the pro level, even if it was a long and

difficult one. In my opinion, this is an area in which USAC has

failed miserably for years, and recently it has become even worse.



One comment I have about feeder systems is this: no matter

what level a rider is at he/she should always know what the next

level is and what must be done to get there. Category systems

implement this at a local level and I think the current OBRA system

is fine for the cat 5 to cat 2 levels. Once you get to the point

where you are winning the OBRA cat 1/2 races though there is a problem.

It is not clear what the next level is, or how you can achieve it, i.e.,

there is a discontinuity in the pipeline.



One idea I have about this is for OBRA to field a team at national

calendar events (either USAC or FIAC). This way the best riders in

this region can represent OBRA in bigger races. If those bigger races

are part of the feeder system and selection process for the pro teams

then everyone can see the whole pipeline. ... the pro teams can take

it from there.



I think this is more or less what happens in Europe. In Britain, at

least, we had club teams, then representative teams at the district,

region, and national level. Each representative team had a selection

team observing riders at the level below, and a set of target events

at the level above. All the riders knew what they had to do to succeed,

and your success mostly just depended on how fast you were (that was

my problem :-). This kind of system is cheaper to run over there because

the distances are shorter to get to the big races. However, I think

its even more necessary over here for the same reason. I also believe

we can do it here in Oregon because we have a far better regional

organization than anything I saw in Europe, and we have more money and

enthusiasm.



-- Jon







_____________________________________________________________

Who will win the Oscars? Spout off on our Entertainment list!

http://www.topica.com/lists/showbiztalk







_____________________________________________________________

Who will win the Oscars? Spout off on our Entertainment list!

http://www.topica.com/lists/showbiztalk



Scott Powell

2000-02-16

I hate to send out these mass messages, but there is a time for everything .

. .





Jonathan raises some very intriguing ideas, and I agree with his theory.



Let me confess my naivety, however (and perhaps I am not alone).



There is a general feeling of abandonment by USAC - it's a feeling we in

Oregon share with riders and directors of all levels across the country, up

to and including the aforementioned Mr. Wordin. In response to that

abandonment, OBRA has joined up with a number of other states to form a

loose alliance - FAIC, right?



Have I got it right so far?



So, we have a state-based OBRA, who has aligned with a handful of other

states (how many others have joined?). I hope I'm still on the right track.



Mike has explained that there is talk among the aligned states to possibly

hold regional and national events. I am all for Jonathan's idea of trying

to progress local riders up through the system. I think it could look

something like this:



1) Rider does well at local races;

2) Therefore, rider is selected to represent the locality at a regional

level event;

3) If the rider does well at a regional-level event (or a number of events),

the rider is selected to represent the region at a national event.

4) All along the way, the rider can see that there is an actual step-ladder

which they can climb.

5) Eventually, if the rider has succeeded all along the way, perhaps the

rider is given an opportunity to race pro (assuming that pro directors

choose to attend the regional and national events - a pretty safe

assumption, I would think, if there were such a system of races in place).



Here is the trick: How do we put together a step-ladder of local, regional,

and national events?



This is where my naivety really gets me. I don't even know who in Oregon is

in contact with who from Washington and California. I don't know if there

are any formal connections or lines of communication.



My ultimate point is this: It seems a lot of us in Oregon would like to see

a new local/regional/national chain of races formed without the assistance

of USAC. In order to do that, I would think we need to do the following:



1) Have some meetings to get our ideas together on paper (I'll even offer to

provide meeting space);

2) Designate someone to communicate those ideas to the other independent

regional bike racing communities;

3) Work with our fellow independents to ultimately form a new

local/regional/national chain.



Mike, maybe you can help us out here - Is this possible? If so, how can we,

the greater OBRA community, help? Certainly, it is impossible to expect you

and Candy to do this. The community needs to step up to the plate here.

But, can you help us get started?



Scott "maybe I'm thinking too big" Powell

Team O.

______________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



John Bravard

2000-02-16

What Jon describes here should sound very familiar to anyone who ever

played Little League, Colt, or Pony League baseball. Teams play a number

of "regular season" games in an area. At the end of this season, one or

more teams are chosen from the better players of the league teams, and

these "All-star" players go on to play tournaments against other teams in

the state. Last time I checked, baseball was doing pretty good in this

country. Perhaps emulating this system is worth a try.



John



On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jon Walpole wrote:



 





Did anyone read the recent articles in VeloNews about

John Wordin and the Mercury pro team? I found it interesting

that he complained bitterly about the lack of support he had

received from USAC. In fact he claimed that the success of his

team had been achieved despite USAC and that there was no

feeder system to identify good young riders. He talked about

how he had personally found riders like Floyd Landis and

shaped them into pros without any help from USAC. I'm sure the

other pro teams feel the same way.



This seems like an opportunity to me, perhaps not directly at

the OBRA level, but definitely at the FIAC level. In addition to

establishing FIAC national calendar events, perhaps including

championship events, FIAC could establish a direct relationship

with the pro teams. I bet the folks who run the pro teams have

lots of ideas about how such a system might work, and it would be

great for young riders to be able to see a continuous path from

where they are now to the pro level, even if it was a long and

difficult one. In my opinion, this is an area in which USAC has

failed miserably for years, and recently it has become even worse.



One comment I have about feeder systems is this: no matter

what level a rider is at he/she should always know what the next

level is and what must be done to get there. Category systems

implement this at a local level and I think the current OBRA system

is fine for the cat 5 to cat 2 levels. Once you get to the point

where you are winning the OBRA cat 1/2 races though there is a problem.

It is not clear what the next level is, or how you can achieve it, i.e.,

there is a discontinuity in the pipeline.



One idea I have about this is for OBRA to field a team at national

calendar events (either USAC or FIAC). This way the best riders in

this region can represent OBRA in bigger races. If those bigger races

are part of the feeder system and selection process for the pro teams

then everyone can see the whole pipeline. ... the pro teams can take

it from there.



I think this is more or less what happens in Europe. In Britain, at

least, we had club teams, then representative teams at the district,

region, and national level. Each representative team had a selection

team observing riders at the level below, and a set of target events

at the level above. All the riders knew what they had to do to succeed,

and your success mostly just depended on how fast you were (that was

my problem :-). This kind of system is cheaper to run over there because

the distances are shorter to get to the big races. However, I think

its even more necessary over here for the same reason. I also believe

we can do it here in Oregon because we have a far better regional

organization than anything I saw in Europe, and we have more money and

enthusiasm.



-- Jon







_____________________________________________________________

Who will win the Oscars? Spout off on our Entertainment list!

http://www.topica.com/lists/showbiztalk



Jon Walpole

2000-02-16

Did anyone read the recent articles in VeloNews about

John Wordin and the Mercury pro team? I found it interesting

that he complained bitterly about the lack of support he had

received from USAC. In fact he claimed that the success of his

team had been achieved despite USAC and that there was no

feeder system to identify good young riders. He talked about

how he had personally found riders like Floyd Landis and

shaped them into pros without any help from USAC. I'm sure the

other pro teams feel the same way.



This seems like an opportunity to me, perhaps not directly at

the OBRA level, but definitely at the FIAC level. In addition to

establishing FIAC national calendar events, perhaps including

championship events, FIAC could establish a direct relationship

with the pro teams. I bet the folks who run the pro teams have

lots of ideas about how such a system might work, and it would be

great for young riders to be able to see a continuous path from

where they are now to the pro level, even if it was a long and

difficult one. In my opinion, this is an area in which USAC has

failed miserably for years, and recently it has become even worse.



One comment I have about feeder systems is this: no matter

what level a rider is at he/she should always know what the next

level is and what must be done to get there. Category systems

implement this at a local level and I think the current OBRA system

is fine for the cat 5 to cat 2 levels. Once you get to the point

where you are winning the OBRA cat 1/2 races though there is a problem.

It is not clear what the next level is, or how you can achieve it, i.e.,

there is a discontinuity in the pipeline.



One idea I have about this is for OBRA to field a team at national

calendar events (either USAC or FIAC). This way the best riders in

this region can represent OBRA in bigger races. If those bigger races

are part of the feeder system and selection process for the pro teams

then everyone can see the whole pipeline. ... the pro teams can take

it from there.



I think this is more or less what happens in Europe. In Britain, at

least, we had club teams, then representative teams at the district,

region, and national level. Each representative team had a selection

team observing riders at the level below, and a set of target events

at the level above. All the riders knew what they had to do to succeed,

and your success mostly just depended on how fast you were (that was

my problem :-). This kind of system is cheaper to run over there because

the distances are shorter to get to the big races. However, I think

its even more necessary over here for the same reason. I also believe

we can do it here in Oregon because we have a far better regional

organization than anything I saw in Europe, and we have more money and

enthusiasm.



-- Jon



Jon Walpole

2000-02-15



 Mike Murray wrote:



 USAC has a mandate to develop elite level talent. Although I think

that we would all like to see that mission succeed, OBRA does not have

a similar mandate.



I think OBRA and the Murrays are wonderful, so don't yell at me.

However, I think there is a serious problem to be addressed regarding

how promising young riders from Oregon can progress to an elite level.

Even though this is not currently part of OBRA's mandate, as Mike points

out, I for one think that it should be. In fact, I think it is a very

important missing component of what is otherwise a great system.



The recent split with USAC has exacerbated this problem by making it

virtually impossible for riders to upgrade and progress beyond the

limits of the Oregon system. This is a huge disincentive for anyone

with talent. I agree that its USAC's fault, but that doesn't mean that

we shouldn't take it seriously. Thats why I wrote a public message

to USAC some months ago pleading with them to recognise OBRA events.

Of course, they have refused this reasonable request, and so we are

now stuck in the middle of an ugly power struggle.



In an earlier mail this morning, Nick Perera asked who was more important,

the 1% elite level riders or the other 99%. That really disheartened me,

because over the years I have wanted to work with the 20-30% of the young

Oregon peleton who might eventually have a chance of becoming part of the

1% elite. These are the young people we are claiming don't matter any more.



This situation is not the Murray's fault, but it is a serious problem,

and I think it is our problem -- i.e. the problem of the Oregon bicycle

racing community. Lets have some constructive discussion on how to solve

it rather than fighting among ourselves.



-- Jon



Mike Murray

2000-02-15

Dave and Bonnie Martin have made one valid point. USAC has a very poor

system for identifying up and coming elite level talent. OBRA's program

that facilitates putting on events without USAC sanction has made this bad

system even worse.



A significant point however is that this is USAC's problem. USAC has a

mandate to develop elite level talent. Although I think that we would all

like to see that mission succeed, OBRA does not have a similar mandate.

OBRA exists to facilitate racing in Oregon only.



To this point USAC has not been willing to participate with OBRA in any

program to identify talented riders. OBRA has specifically requested that

USAC use OBRA events that meet USAC's criteria for upgrading purposes. USAC

has refused to do this. This is entirely USAC's problem. It is also

interesting since USAC has historically been very capricious with applying

there own criteria with regards to upgrading. We all know of individuals

that have upgraded despite not meeting the published criteria or who have

failed to upgrade after meeting the criteria several times over.



The failure of USAC to play on this subjects is one of the reasons that the

Federation of Independent Associations for Cycling (FIAC) was formed. This

organization is an agreement between the non-USAC bike racing groups to

facilitate cooperation between these groups. There has been some discussion

about FIAC holding regional or national championships. It is unclear at

this point whether this will happen.



It bothers me that you see images of bike racing everywhere. TV and other

media have frequent images of bike racing. The Tour de France wins by

Lemond and Armstrong have contributed to making US bike racing more visible

then ever. In contrast to when I started, people that are not involved at

all with bike racing now have some understanding of the subject.



Despite all this the objective measures of the health of bike racing nation

wide are declining. Numbers of events are down dramatically. Numbers of

licensees are, at best, not growing. This has been an ongoing problem for

several years. One of the reasons that OBRA decided to start an independent

program was to try to insulate Oregon form this downward trend as much as

possible. This has been somewhat successful as evidenced by increasing

numbers of OBRA members and racing days in Oregon.



Eventually, however, the problems that bike racing has nationally will come

back to effect us here in Oregon. It is my hope that either:

- USAC recognizes that it is not supporting the development of bike racing

on many fronts and changes its practices to address that or

- FIAC, or some other organization, succeeds and produces a system that is

more responsive to members and facilitates growing the sport.



Mike Murray