Candi Murray
To give a historical perspective ( since many of our riders have never had=
=20
a USAC license) I have copies an article that I wrote for the Bicycle Paper=
=20
in 1999. Since that time our membership has continued to climb from 1700=20
to almost 2100.
Candi
The Oregon Bicycle Racing Association (OBRA) was originally started in the=
=20
late 70s. Called Oregon Cycling Association (OCA), it was then the district=
=20
association of USCF clubs. The name was changed to the Oregon Bicycle=20
Racing Association several years later to avoid confusion with the=20
political group, the Oregon Citizen=92s Alliance which was getting much=20
negative media attention at the time. There was not much activity for the=
=20
first few years after OCA was formed. When Steve Scarich became the=20
District Representative he pushed to increase the strength of the=20
organization. Organization was improved and a system of collecting fees=20
from races was established. A few years later Mike Murray was elected to=20
the board. Mike wanted more racing in Oregon than was currently being done=
=20
so he turned the focus of the group toward making it easier and easier to=20
produce quality events. He bought traffic signs, photo finish equipment,=20
PA systems, CB radios and much more. Whenever OCA had money Mike spent=20
it. So instead of individual promoters having to rent and/or stockpile=20
equipment, this equipment became available to all events big and small.=20
Over the years we have added to the equipment and now have a large truck=20
that can be used to transport whatever is needed to a race. We developed a=
=20
automated phone line for race information and purchased an 800 number,=20
established a web presence and with the advent of the electronic age we=20
have been able to acquire 800 email address from our 1700 members and now=20
distribute race flyers, results and notices at the click of the=20
mouse. This year we also added a chat group that allows members to post=20
for sale items and have discussions.
Dissatisfaction with the United States Cycling Federation came on slowly=20
and climaxed in December of 1998 when they fired all the Regional=20
Representatives in favor of a plan to only utilize 10 people nationwide to=
=20
service the membership. At this same time alternatives to the insurance=20
provided by the national governing body became more readily available and=20
the question was asked, =91What are we getting back for the dollars that are=
=20
sent to Colorado Springs?=92 An annual membership ranged from $35 to $50=
and=20
then the charge for insurance was about twice what was available=20
commercially. OBRA figured that Oregon alone was sending about $200,000=20
annually to USAC in USCF and NORBA membership fees and race permits and=20
surcharges. In exchange we received little in the way of services and now=
=20
we were not even getting a local representative. The straw that broke the=
=20
back was when USAC doubled the permit fees for the weekend day series=20
races. To send a message to Colorado Springs the series promoters choose=20
to insure with an insurance plan purchased by OBRA and to forgo USCF=20
sanctioning. We sent letters to every USAC board, director and staff=20
member explaining why we were doing this and further explaining that it was=
=20
likely that all Oregon events would do this unless USAC made changes to=20
address our concerns over the diminishing level of service. We only=20
received one response. It became apparent that local racing was not what=20
the governing body was about. It is what OBRA is about, to promote and=20
increase the number of events and racers within the state. In the fall of=
=20
1998 there was a vote of member clubs that was unanimous that we would=20
offer the OBRA insurance plan to all events. This meant that virtually all=
=20
Oregon events were no longer associated with USAC. We have met with the=20
principle of USAC to see if we could work out our difference but to no=
avail.
OBRA has been successful beyond our imagination. Our membership swelled to=
=20
the highest levels ever when David Beede contacted us about branching out=20
into mountain bike racing. The dissatisfaction among NORBA members was=20
even greater than that from the road/track side. Last year we were able to=
=20
organize a race series amongst the mountain bike races and added them to=20
our already existing email network. This has given them a voice that they=
=20
have not experienced before.
Now other states have followed our lead. American Bicycle Racing (ABR) in=
=20
the Midwest, Bicycle Racing Association of Colorado (BRAC =96 which has now=
=20
changed its name to American Cycling Association) represent Colorado,=20
Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and parts of Texas and North California/Nevada=20
Cycling Association (NCNCA) have all formed a coalition of association-=20
Federation of Independent Cycling Associations (FIAC). We have started=20
incorporation proceedings and are working toward a shared rulebook and=20
rider reciprocity. No matter what happens, the OBRA membership has chosen=
=20
to concentrate on cycling within the state. Our 2000 calendar has over 200=
=20
says of racing, we offer free membership to juniors and strongly suggest=20
that the race organizers reduce entry fees for those under 18. Our Best=20
All round Competition has expanded to recognize the outstanding=20
performances in each discipline and new for 2000 we are hosting an Oregon=20
Cup of specific races. One thing to remember is that while we try to give=
=20
the impression of an organized workforce, volunteers do all of the=20
functions of OBRA; there are no paid positions. What makes it work is that=
=20
riders know that to get they must give back also.