Fw: Club Vote - Public Uriantion

Steve Brown

2006-06-22

Very well stated.

Steve Brown
On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:52 PM, smclaughry wrote:

> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Candi Murray
> To: smclaughry
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 3:31:11 PM
> Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Club Vote - Public Uriantion
>
>
> I think you sound like the voice of reason. I have had a particulary
> bad
> week dealing with the minuiate of bad riders, bad race organizers etc.
> I
> would really like you to post your note to the entire list.
> Candi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: smclaughry [mailto:smclaughry@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 3:06 PM
> To: cmurray@obra.org
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Club Vote - Public Uriantion
>
> Hi Candi,
>
> I hesitate to even address this subject, but I wonder what you think
> about
> the following logic:
>
> If we add a rule this week that specifically addresses public
> urination,
> then next week, somebody in a Guinness jersey is going to attempt a
> public
> defecation, and then claim that "Hey, there's no rule against it".
>
> I would argue that there is, in fact, a rule against all such behavior:
> "13.2 - Misconduct may be punished at the discretion of the Chief
> Referee.
> The forms of misconduct include, but are not limited to:
> - Unsportsmanlike conduct ... (etc)"
>
> First of all, there's the clause that says "not limited to" which
> implies
> that there are other forms of misconduct, subject to the common sense
> of the
> Chief Referee. But more to the point, I don't think it's too much of a
> stretch to say that "Unsportsmanlike conduct" can be broadly
> interpreted to
> mean "Uncivilized conduct." I may be a bit old-fashioned in this, but
> I was
> taught that in order to be a sportsman, you must first be a gentleman.
> (Sorry for the gender bias here, it's just easier to explain this
> way.) I
> think this definition is also historically consistent with the
> development
> of the concept of sportsmanship.
>
> So I would recommend against adding a new rule, but I would also
> strongly
> recommend a suspension of "this week's culprit", and if he wants to
> protest,
> make him do so in a public forum.
>
> -stephen mclaughry
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Candi Murray
> To: obra@list.obra.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:09:35 PM
> Subject: [OBRA Chat] Club Vote - Public Uriantion
>
>
> OBRA rules are usually altered or added at the annual meeting we hold
> in
> January. I would like to offer a new one that will need a vote of each
> official club representative to be added immediately.
>
> It has been pointed out by this week's culprit that there is no actual
> rule
> in the OBRA rules that addresses public urination (I would have
> thought that
> exposing your gentials in public was enough. There is also no rule
> about
> beastiality, pedophilia etc but I hope we can leave those out of this
> discussion). I therefore propose this rule to be added. I could use
> help
> with the actual wording so that the "on the bike" nature calls are not
> included.
>
> "Any rider not utilizing the provided restrooms at an event will be
> subject
> to suspension.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
Steve Brown
Steve Brown Company Inc.
6435 SW Parkhill Drive
Portland, Oregon 97239
503.293.1683
503.293.6009f
503.781.3631c
sbrown@stevebrowncompany.com


Erik Voldengen

2006-06-22

Well said.

>
> So I would recommend against adding a new rule
>


smclaughry

2006-06-22

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Candi Murray
To: smclaughry
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 3:31:11 PM
Subject: RE: [OBRA Chat] Club Vote - Public Uriantion

I think you sound like the voice of reason. I have had a particulary bad
week dealing with the minuiate of bad riders, bad race organizers etc. I
would really like you to post your note to the entire list.
Candi

-----Original Message-----
From: smclaughry [mailto:smclaughry@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 3:06 PM
To: cmurray@obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Club Vote - Public Uriantion

Hi Candi,

I hesitate to even address this subject, but I wonder what you think about
the following logic:

If we add a rule this week that specifically addresses public urination,
then next week, somebody in a Guinness jersey is going to attempt a public
defecation, and then claim that "Hey, there's no rule against it".

I would argue that there is, in fact, a rule against all such behavior:
"13.2 - Misconduct may be punished at the discretion of the Chief Referee.
The forms of misconduct include, but are not limited to:
- Unsportsmanlike conduct ... (etc)"

First of all, there's the clause that says "not limited to" which implies
that there are other forms of misconduct, subject to the common sense of the
Chief Referee. But more to the point, I don't think it's too much of a
stretch to say that "Unsportsmanlike conduct" can be broadly interpreted to
mean "Uncivilized conduct." I may be a bit old-fashioned in this, but I was
taught that in order to be a sportsman, you must first be a gentleman.
(Sorry for the gender bias here, it's just easier to explain this way.) I
think this definition is also historically consistent with the development
of the concept of sportsmanship.

So I would recommend against adding a new rule, but I would also strongly
recommend a suspension of "this week's culprit", and if he wants to protest,
make him do so in a public forum.

-stephen mclaughry

----- Original Message ----
From: Candi Murray
To: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:09:35 PM
Subject: [OBRA Chat] Club Vote - Public Uriantion

OBRA rules are usually altered or added at the annual meeting we hold in
January. I would like to offer a new one that will need a vote of each
official club representative to be added immediately.

It has been pointed out by this week's culprit that there is no actual rule
in the OBRA rules that addresses public urination (I would have thought that
exposing your gentials in public was enough. There is also no rule about
beastiality, pedophilia etc but I hope we can leave those out of this
discussion). I therefore propose this rule to be added. I could use help
with the actual wording so that the "on the bike" nature calls are not
included.

"Any rider not utilizing the provided restrooms at an event will be subject
to suspension.

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org