SHOW ME THE MONKEY $$$ !!!!

Friton, Mike

2001-08-23

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C12C0E.240A3EA0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



What ever happened to the good old days of amateur sports?? Do younger

athletes loose their national team eligibility for winning money as in other

sports??



rgs, Mike



-----Original Message-----

From: Duncan, Todd [mailto:todd_d-@mentorg.com]

Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:38 PM

To: ob-@topica.com

Subject: [OBRA Chat] SHOW ME THE MONKEY $$$ !!!!





============================================================



Sponsored by Thawte



============================================================



** FREE Apache SSL Guide from Thawte **         



Planning Web Server Security? Find out how to implement SSL!



http://click.topica.com/caaac4NaVxiDpa2jfjxb/Verisign

<http://click.topica.com/caaac4NaVxiDpa2jfjxb/Verisign>



============================================================



I agree with Mike on this.

One point to ponder however:

As noted by a fellow cyclist and financially savvy individual... "so, in

effect, aren't the 8(+/-) individuals who ride actually paying themselves?"



Todd Duncan



============================================================



I certainly don't want to discourage Beth, or anyone, for that matter, from

putting money into bike racing but I think that the focus on prize lists is

inappropriate. There is little demonstration that the size of the prize

list has any effect on participation or performance, as has been shown by

events like PIR. Cycling is nearly the only sport that would even consider

giving cash prizes to beginning competitors.



Race organizers have limited amounts of organizational energy. Often most

of that energy is spent on trying to develop a large prize list. Worse yet,

many race organizers create their prize lists by redistributing the entry

fees. Wouldn't it be much better if the race organizers concentrated energy

on other items, like publicizing their events to potential competitors and

to the general public, better communications, results publication, better

caravan organization, adding other amenities, etc? Wouldn't most people

prefer a lower entry fee over a larger prize list?



Mike Murray





============================================================



Coffee, pastry, orange juice, and developerWorks.



Fuel for a developer's day.



Get the developerWorks newsletter.



http://click.topica.com/caaacCLaVxiDpa2jfjxg/developerWorks

<http://click.topica.com/caaacCLaVxiDpa2jfjxg/developerWorks>



============================================================

To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.



To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com



To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com







------_=_NextPart_001_01C12C0E.240A3EA0

Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<TITLE></TITLE>



<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>

<BODY>





<DIV><SPAN class=547504719-23082001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>What

ever happened to the good old days of amateur sports??  Do younger athletes

loose their national team eligibility for winning</FONT></SPAN><SPAN

class=547504719-23082001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2> money as in

other sports??</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<DIV><SPAN class=547504719-23082001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>

<DIV><SPAN class=547504719-23082001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff

size=2>rgs,  Mike</FONT></SPAN></DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">

<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma

size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Duncan, Todd

[mailto:todd_d-@mentorg.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 23, 2001

12:38 PM<BR><B>To:</B> ob-@topica.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [OBRA Chat] SHOW ME

THE MONKEY $$$ !!!!<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><PRE>============================================================

Sponsored by Thawte

============================================================

** FREE Apache SSL Guide from Thawte **         

Planning Web Server Security? Find out how to implement SSL!

<A href="http://click.topica.com/caaac4NaVxiDpa2jfjxb/Verisign">http://click.topica.com/caaac4NaVxiDpa2jfjxb/Verisign</A>

============================================================</PRE>

<P><FONT size=2>I agree with Mike on this.<BR>One point to ponder

however:<BR>As noted by a fellow cyclist and financially savvy individual...

"so, in effect, aren't the 8<FONT size=1>(+/-)</FONT> individuals who

ride actually paying themselves?"</FONT></P>

<P><FONT size=2>Todd Duncan</FONT></P>

<P><FONT

size=2>============================================================<BR><BR>I

certainly don't want to discourage Beth, or anyone, for that matter,

from<BR>putting money into bike racing but I think that the focus on prize

lists is<BR>inappropriate.  There is little demonstration that the size

of the prize<BR>list has any effect on participation or performance, as has

been shown by<BR>events like PIR.  Cycling is nearly the only sport that

would even consider<BR>giving cash prizes to beginning

competitors.<BR><BR>Race organizers have limited amounts of organizational

energy.  Often most<BR>of that energy is spent on trying to develop a

large prize list.  Worse yet,<BR>many race organizers create their prize

lists by redistributing the entry<BR>fees.  Wouldn't it be much better if

the race organizers concentrated energy<BR>on other items, like publicizing

their events to potential competitors and<BR>to the general public, better

communications, results publication, better<BR>caravan organization, adding

other amenities, etc?  Wouldn't most people<BR>prefer a lower entry fee

over a larger prize list?<BR><BR>Mike Murray<BR></P></FONT><PRE>============================================================

Coffee, pastry, orange juice, and developerWorks.

Fuel for a developer's day.

Get the developerWorks newsletter.

<A href="http://click.topica.com/caaacCLaVxiDpa2jfjxg/developerWorks">http://click.topica.com/caaacCLaVxiDpa2jfjxg/developerWorks</A>

============================================================</PRE><PRE>To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com.

To respond to the list manager send to ob-@teleport.com

To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>







</BODY></HTML>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C12C0E.240A3EA0--



Duncan, Todd

2001-08-23

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C12C0B.27F22E90

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"



I agree with Mike on this.

One point to ponder however:

As noted by a fellow cyclist and financially savvy individual... "so, in effect, aren't the 8(+/-) individuals who ride actually paying themselves?"



Todd Duncan



============================================================



I certainly don't want to discourage Beth, or anyone, for that matter, from

putting money into bike racing but I think that the focus on prize lists is

inappropriate. There is little demonstration that the size of the prize

list has any effect on participation or performance, as has been shown by

events like PIR. Cycling is nearly the only sport that would even consider

giving cash prizes to beginning competitors.



Race organizers have limited amounts of organizational energy. Often most

of that energy is spent on trying to develop a large prize list. Worse yet,

many race organizers create their prize lists by redistributing the entry

fees. Wouldn't it be much better if the race organizers concentrated energy

on other items, like publicizing their events to potential competitors and

to the general public, better communications, results publication, better

caravan organization, adding other amenities, etc? Wouldn't most people

prefer a lower entry fee over a larger prize list?



Mike Murray









------_=_NextPart_001_01C12C0B.27F22E90

Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<TITLE></TITLE>



<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4207.2601" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>

<BODY>





<P><FONT size=2>I agree with Mike on this.<BR>One point to ponder however:<BR>As

noted by a fellow cyclist and financially savvy individual... "so, in effect,

aren't the 8<FONT size=1>(+/-)</FONT> individuals who ride actually paying

themselves?"</FONT></P>

<P><FONT size=2>Todd Duncan</FONT></P>

<P><FONT

size=2>============================================================<BR><BR>I

certainly don't want to discourage Beth, or anyone, for that matter,

from<BR>putting money into bike racing but I think that the focus on prize lists

is<BR>inappropriate.  There is little demonstration that the size of the

prize<BR>list has any effect on participation or performance, as has been shown

by<BR>events like PIR.  Cycling is nearly the only sport that would even

consider<BR>giving cash prizes to beginning competitors.<BR><BR>Race organizers

have limited amounts of organizational energy.  Often most<BR>of that

energy is spent on trying to develop a large prize list.  Worse

yet,<BR>many race organizers create their prize lists by redistributing the

entry<BR>fees.  Wouldn't it be much better if the race organizers

concentrated energy<BR>on other items, like publicizing their events to

potential competitors and<BR>to the general public, better communications,

results publication, better<BR>caravan organization, adding other amenities,

etc?  Wouldn't most people<BR>prefer a lower entry fee over a larger prize

list?<BR><BR>Mike Murray<BR></P></FONT>







</BODY></HTML>



------_=_NextPart_001_01C12C0B.27F22E90--