CCX upgrades

Dan H

2006-11-11

MessageThe first mountain bike race I competed in was the '87 Mud Slinger. I don't recall if there was a NORBA yet but I was told I could use my USCF license. At registration when they saw I was Cat II on the road, they said I would have to be a pro. I said, "I don't wanna be a pro! I've never race a mountain bike before and Tinker is here!". The registering official just looked at me and said: "you're a pro".
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron and Dorothy Strasser
To: mike.murray@obra.org ; obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Folks,
my two cents worth,
My first year of mountain bike racing I was told to upgrade (from beginner to sport) about mid season. I had actually already made that decision and sent in my entry for the next race as a sport. I experienced immediate benefit on my first sport race as it showed me that not only could I do the tougher race, but also enjoy it. It also gave me a concept of what I would be going through the next season. I ended up having enough points from beginner to finish toward the top anyway, but was rewarded more by the confidence gained in racing sport the remainder of the season. I do understand folks in the crusade series wanting to finish up high in their cat. instead of moving up. The cross season is short compared to the mtb season. I am not sure what I feel is right, but my move up in mtb helped me. It made me a better rider... now I try to "maintain", which is the tough part.
ride fast and take lots of chances!
ron
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Murray
To: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George's idea has merit but the devil is in the details. Even though the rules allow for it, a rider would never be upgraded and excluded from a stage race because he went over the points limit in the first stages. On the other hand there are series events that span months. A rider that wins every race that he enters should probably not still be competing in the Cat 5 races at PIR while winning Cat 2 races at other venues. There are rare riders that start the season as Cat 5 and end as Cat 2.
Mike Murray

-----Original Message-----
From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of GEORGE SCHRECK
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 09:40 AM
To: djshanks@comcast.net
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

I have no problem with upgrading and I do not like sandbagging. My only point is that in a series where there are cumulative points, I do race for a placing in the series, regardless of the prizes, and by upgrading someone in the middle of a series, it prevents them from competing in the series. It also, makes the series results for the other competitors less meaningful as well.

It is like upgrading someone in the middle of a stage race or omnium. The series is like an omnium, and I think you ought to be able to complete it. You should be upgraded for all other races outside the series, however.

----Original Message----
From: djshanks@comcast.net
Date: 11/10/2006 8:13 AM
To: "GEORGE SCHRECK"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George,
Didn't one of your many emails earlier this year say that as we are amateur bike racers, we shouldn't really be racing for prizes or cash?

I always thought that you get better at a sport by competing against people at a higher level. Why remain as the big fish in a small pool?

Doug Shanks

-------------- Original message --------------
From: GEORGE SCHRECK

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade anyone in the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the series, but let them complete the series in the classification in which they started. Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points to contend in either class.

I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the annual meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations and suggestions which take little effort.

Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net wrote:
The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Ron and Dorothy Strasser

2006-11-11

MessageFolks,
my two cents worth,
My first year of mountain bike racing I was told to upgrade (from beginner to sport) about mid season. I had actually already made that decision and sent in my entry for the next race as a sport. I experienced immediate benefit on my first sport race as it showed me that not only could I do the tougher race, but also enjoy it. It also gave me a concept of what I would be going through the next season. I ended up having enough points from beginner to finish toward the top anyway, but was rewarded more by the confidence gained in racing sport the remainder of the season. I do understand folks in the crusade series wanting to finish up high in their cat. instead of moving up. The cross season is short compared to the mtb season. I am not sure what I feel is right, but my move up in mtb helped me. It made me a better rider... now I try to "maintain", which is the tough part.
ride fast and take lots of chances!
ron
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Murray
To: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George's idea has merit but the devil is in the details. Even though the rules allow for it, a rider would never be upgraded and excluded from a stage race because he went over the points limit in the first stages. On the other hand there are series events that span months. A rider that wins every race that he enters should probably not still be competing in the Cat 5 races at PIR while winning Cat 2 races at other venues. There are rare riders that start the season as Cat 5 and end as Cat 2.
Mike Murray

-----Original Message-----
From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of GEORGE SCHRECK
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 09:40 AM
To: djshanks@comcast.net
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

I have no problem with upgrading and I do not like sandbagging. My only point is that in a series where there are cumulative points, I do race for a placing in the series, regardless of the prizes, and by upgrading someone in the middle of a series, it prevents them from competing in the series. It also, makes the series results for the other competitors less meaningful as well.

It is like upgrading someone in the middle of a stage race or omnium. The series is like an omnium, and I think you ought to be able to complete it. You should be upgraded for all other races outside the series, however.

----Original Message----
From: djshanks@comcast.net
Date: 11/10/2006 8:13 AM
To: "GEORGE SCHRECK"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George,
Didn't one of your many emails earlier this year say that as we are amateur bike racers, we shouldn't really be racing for prizes or cash?

I always thought that you get better at a sport by competing against people at a higher level. Why remain as the big fish in a small pool?

Doug Shanks

-------------- Original message --------------
From: GEORGE SCHRECK

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade anyone in the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the series, but let them complete the series in the classification in which they started. Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points to contend in either class.

I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the annual meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations and suggestions which take little effort.

Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net wrote:
The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mike Murray

2006-11-10

George's idea has merit but the devil is in the details. Even though the
rules allow for it, a rider would never be upgraded and excluded from a
stage race because he went over the points limit in the first stages. On
the other hand there are series events that span months. A rider that wins
every race that he enters should probably not still be competing in the Cat
5 races at PIR while winning Cat 2 races at other venues. There are rare
riders that start the season as Cat 5 and end as Cat 2.

Mike Murray

-----Original Message-----
From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On
Behalf Of GEORGE SCHRECK
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 09:40 AM
To: djshanks@comcast.net
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

I have no problem with upgrading and I do not like sandbagging. My only
point is that in a series where there are cumulative points, I do race for a
placing in the series, regardless of the prizes, and by upgrading someone in
the middle of a series, it prevents them from competing in the series. It
also, makes the series results for the other competitors less meaningful as
well.

It is like upgrading someone in the middle of a stage race or omnium. The
series is like an omnium, and I think you ought to be able to complete it.
You should be upgraded for all other races outside the series, however.

----Original Message----
From: djshanks@comcast.net
Date: 11/10/2006 8:13 AM
To: "GEORGE SCHRECK"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George,
Didn't one of your many emails earlier this year say that as we are amateur
bike racers, we shouldn't really be racing for prizes or cash?

I always thought that you get better at a sport by competing against people
at a higher level. Why remain as the big fish in a small pool?

Doug Shanks

-------------- Original message --------------
From: GEORGE SCHRECK

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade anyone in
the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the series, but let
them complete the series in the classification in which they started.
Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points to contend in
either class.

I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the annual
meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations and
suggestions which take little effort.

Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net > wrote:

The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Eric Kytola

2006-11-10

a few years back i was winning mountain bike sport races pretty
regularly. i was told by the officials that i was going to get upgraded
after my next top 3 finish. i saved my next race for the state champs,
that meant i missed a handful of races. so iraced the state champs as a
sport.

if you are doing well, upgrading shouldn't be a surprise.

if you want to do well in a certain series, meter your results.


getting upgraded mid series...isn't fair...?
it isn't anymore fair to lose to sandbaggers, right?

________________________________

From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On
Behalf Of GEORGE SCHRECK
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:40 AM
To: djshanks@comcast.net
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

I have no problem with upgrading and I do not like sandbagging. My only
point is that in a series where there are cumulative points, I do race
for a placing in the series, regardless of the prizes, and by upgrading
someone in the middle of a series, it prevents them from competing in
the series. It also, makes the series results for the other competitors
less meaningful as well.

It is like upgrading someone in the middle of a stage race or omnium.
The series is like an omnium, and I think you ought to be able to
complete it. You should be upgraded for all other races outside the
series, however.

----Original Message----
From: djshanks@comcast.net
Date: 11/10/2006 8:13 AM
To: "GEORGE SCHRECK"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George,
Didn't one of your many emails earlier this year say that as we are
amateur bike racers, we shouldn't really be racing for prizes or cash?

I always thought that you get better at a sport by competing against
people at a higher level. Why remain as the big fish in a small pool?

Doug Shanks

-------------- Original message --------------
From: GEORGE SCHRECK

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade
anyone in the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the
series, but let them complete the series in the classification in which
they started. Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points
to contend in either class.

I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the
annual meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations
and suggestions which take little effort.

Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades
early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before
the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for
doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing
only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below.
However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been
called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net
wrote:

The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association


_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


GEORGE SCHRECK

2006-11-10

It does make a difference if you are competing for a series. It has never happened to me and most likely never will (unless somehow I get downgraded), but i have know people to whom it has happened. It was frustrating to be trying to do well in a series, and then be put in a new class where you lose your series points, and have missed races in the new class which prevents you from doing well there.

After all, many people race with a goal to do well. If the only point was just to just ride fast, we could just do club rides.

----Original Message----
From: dirtsurf@clearwire.net
Date: 11/10/2006 8:22 AM
To:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX upgrades

P {
PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}

Evey upgrade I have done has been on my own, I would love to be told I need to move up. In my head that would mean I am too good for that class. Who wants to race with those lesser beings. That would be as good as winning the overall, and then I get to prep for next year as well. great!!
It might actually be more difficult if I were upgraded after the year was over because then you start the new season with a new category you have never raced in. But really the timing of the upgrade is un-important, move up!

----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Burton
To: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:01 AM
Subject: [OBRA Chat] CCX upgrades

I agree with Jonathan,
Upgrades this late in the season, right before the last race, don't seem quite right.
Doesn't this take out some of the incentive to race as well as you can?
I'm still not clear on the criteria for an upgrade.
If these riders have not dominated their series, or won races by large margins, should they be upgraded?


-Dan Burton

Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search Try it now!

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


GEORGE SCHRECK

2006-11-10

I do not think it is fair in the middle of a series as it eliminates the rider's ability to compete for the overall. It is like upgrading someone in the middle of an omnium. If the series is an overall competition, then they should be able to complete it.

----Original Message----
From: cmurray@obra.org
Date: 11/10/2006 8:16 AM
To:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

It is not really an open discussion. You earn the points you move up. No matter where in the season or series you are. This is the most fair method. You treat all riders exactly the same at the same time.
Candi


GEORGE SCHRECK

2006-11-10

I have no problem with upgrading and I do not like sandbagging. My only point is that in a series where there are cumulative points, I do race for a placing in the series, regardless of the prizes, and by upgrading someone in the middle of a series, it prevents them from competing in the series. It also, makes the series results for the other competitors less meaningful as well.

It is like upgrading someone in the middle of a stage race or omnium. The series is like an omnium, and I think you ought to be able to complete it. You should be upgraded for all other races outside the series, however.

----Original Message----
From: djshanks@comcast.net
Date: 11/10/2006 8:13 AM
To: "GEORGE SCHRECK"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

George,
Didn't one of your many emails earlier this year say that as we are amateur bike racers, we shouldn't really be racing for prizes or cash?

I always thought that you get better at a sport by competing against people at a higher level. Why remain as the big fish in a small pool?

Doug Shanks

-------------- Original message --------------
From: GEORGE SCHRECK

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade anyone in the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the series, but let them complete the series in the classification in which they started. Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points to contend in either class.

I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the annual meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations and suggestions which take little effort.

Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net wrote:
The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


david baker

2006-11-10

Evey upgrade I have done has been on my own, I would love to be told I need to move up. In my head that would mean I am too good for that class. Who wants to race with those lesser beings. That would be as good as winning the overall, and then I get to prep for next year as well. great!!
It might actually be more difficult if I were upgraded after the year was over because then you start the new season with a new category you have never raced in. But really the timing of the upgrade is un-important, move up!
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Burton
To: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:01 AM
Subject: [OBRA Chat] CCX upgrades

I agree with Jonathan,
Upgrades this late in the season, right before the last race, don't seem quite right.
Doesn't this take out some of the incentive to race as well as you can?
I'm still not clear on the criteria for an upgrade.
If these riders have not dominated their series, or won races by large margins, should they be upgraded?


-Dan Burton

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search Try it now!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Candi Murray

2006-11-10

It is not really an open discussion. You earn the points you move up. No
matter where in the season or series you are. This is the most fair method.
You treat all riders exactly the same at the same time.

Candi


masessa@charter.net

2006-11-10

The way I read the email was that "they have enough points to upgrade" not that they are being upgraded. Past posts regarding this seemed more direct and people were told they were being upgraded. Am I wrong or are they being forced to upgrade?
Dave M

---- Daniel Burton wrote:
> I agree with Jonathan,
> Upgrades this late in the season, right before the last race, don't seem quite right.
> Doesn't this take out some of the incentive to race as well as you can?
> I'm still not clear on the criteria for an upgrade.
> If these riders have not dominated their series, or won races by large margins, should they be upgraded?
>
>
> -Dan Burton
> _________________________________________________________________
> Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search: Try it now!
> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=weather&FORM=WLMTAG


djshanks@comcast.net

2006-11-10

George,
Didn't one of your many emails earlier this year say that as we are amateur bike racers, we shouldn't really be racing for prizes or cash?

I always thought that you get better at a sport by competing against people at a higher level. Why remain as the big fish in a small pool?

Doug Shanks

-------------- Original message --------------
From: GEORGE SCHRECK

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade anyone in the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the series, but let them complete the series in the classification in which they started. Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points to contend in either class.
I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the annual meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations and suggestions which take little effort.
Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net wrote:
The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Daniel Burton

2006-11-10

I agree with Jonathan,
Upgrades this late in the season, right before the last race, don't seem quite right.
Doesn't this take out some of the incentive to race as well as you can?
I'm still not clear on the criteria for an upgrade.
If these riders have not dominated their series, or won races by large margins, should they be upgraded?


-Dan Burton
_________________________________________________________________
Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search: Try it now!
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=weather&FORM=WLMTAG


GEORGE SCHRECK

2006-11-09

Actually, I think there should be a rule that you do not upgrade anyone in the middle of a series. Upgrade them for races outside the series, but let them complete the series in the classification in which they started. Otherwise they are penalized by not having enough points to contend in either class.

I know Mike Murray will respond with "Then propose a rule at the annual meeting," but I am too lazy. I would rather make observations and suggestions which take little effort.

Oops, time for a nap.

----Original Message----
From: jvbiker@gmail.com
Date: 11/09/2006 4:06 PM
To: "comotionclassic@comcast.net"
Cc:
Subj: Re: [OBRA Chat] CCX Upgrades

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV


On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net wrote:
The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Jonathan Vinson

2006-11-09

Comment.
I'm no fan of sandbagging, and I agree with the forced upgrades early in
the season, but it seems unfair to upgrade folks right before the last
crusade race/state champs. It probably ruins their chances for doing
well in the series. This is a general comment about the timing only; I've
not reviewed the race records of any of the riders below. However, if
they were egregiously sandbagging, I figure they'd have been called out
by now.
Cheers,
JV

On 11/9/06, comotionclassic@comcast.net wrote:
>
> The following riders have the points to upgrade.
> Scott Carlile - up to Men A
> Tim Joslin - up to Men B
> Veronica Vega - up to Women A
> Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
> Alex Accetta - up to Masters B
>
> Questions, Comments?
> Sal Collura
> Oregon Bicycle Racing Association
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


comotionclassic@comcast.net

2006-11-09

The following riders have the points to upgrade.
Scott Carlile - up to Men A
Tim Joslin - up to Men B
Veronica Vega - up to Women A
Aaron Leritz - up to Masters A
Alex Accetta - up to Masters B

Questions, Comments?
Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association


comotionclassic@comcast.net

2006-10-06

The following riders need to upgrade:
To A - Quinn Keogh, Greg Adams, Matt Wills
To Wom B - Renee Scott
To Wom A - Kristina Hargie
To Mast A - Joe Fricke, Aaron Levitz

Sal Collura
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association


cmur-@obra.org

2005-10-27



I have had some email bounces, if you know the following people could

you pass along this message



Allison Schlich

Christine MacKenzie

Bill Zale

Bob Jacobs



"One more top 5 placing and you need to move up a category for ccx."



Candi Murray



Candi Murray

2001-10-29

I have been asked to upgrade some riders in cyclocross. A guideline for

upgrading is top 3 in 3 race or top 5 in 5. If you are in doubt then you

should probably move up.



Candi



PS Does anyone know an email address for Kirk Slack?