Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!

TJ Paskewich

2008-06-15

I have read many of the comments and here is what I have to say and then I am done with it.

1. Did he have the right to pull us over? Yes, we rolled the stop sign and deserved it.
2. Did he look out for our safety when he pulled us over? No, he pulled right in front of us and slammed on his brakes making at least three of us to swerve into the other lane to avoid him. Really poor judgement on his behalf not to mention he blocked traffic for cars and did nothing to get us off the road.
3. Was it nice of him to let us off with a warning? Yes. We broke the rules and he let us off.
4. Were they justified in blaming cyclists in general for causing an accident? No, we were not the ones who chose to create a hazard for cars if in fact this is what happened. Whoever is responsible should step up and take ownership, but we all know this will most likely not happen.
5. Were they justified in screaming at us for 15 minutes? No, I think it was fine to stop us and let us know what happened with a stern warning or a ticket, but yelling at someone is not the anwer.

I do not believe a letter to anyone is going to do a damn thing so let it rest, but we are all adults and what I say is not going to change your mind. You best look at how many times each of us has rolled a stop sign before getting into a pissing contest with the sheriff because they were doing their job. We may not like the way it was handled which is what this is all about, but the fact is we broke the rules and they let us off.

TJ

________________________________

From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org on behalf of Julie Wose / Thane Jennings
Sent: Sun 6/15/2008 10:06 AM
To: samireneaf@yahoo.com
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!

Sami, thank-you for your insightful dialog and I did ask for other people
to post their impressions. That said I disagree completely.

The way the officer behaved after he pulled us over was unacceptable, he
did not assure our safety or his. Before he launched into his diatribe he
should have made sure we and he were out of the road. Rarely have I seen
a law enforcement officer stand in the middle of the road. We pulled unto
to the shoulder, he stood in the road. The officer let his emotions get
in the way of doing his job.

Lecturing and yelling does not equal education. You would know this if
you were a parent. If you want your children to listen do not start
yelling at them, the minute you begin to lecture them is the minute they
stop listening.

If I ran the stop sign, give me a ticket. I am an adult and can accept
the consequences of my actions. However do not blame me or any other
cyclist for causing an accident just because I ride a bike. It is not a
crime to ride a bike.

If the Deschutes County Sheriff really wanted to educate cyclists he would
sit down with someone like Jeff Monson at commute options and set up a
communication and education program. Pulling over cyclists one at a time
or en masse is not a productive use of law enforcement dollars.

With gas prices headed to the $5 mark I think it would be prudent for law
enforcement in Deschutes County to make sure we have a safe environment
for cycling and driving. More people are going to bicycle and educating
new riders is key to their safety. Could we possibly partner with law
enforcement to make sure that cyclists are made aware of their
responsibilities as riders?

I think the Sherrif and his men did the exact right thing: They took an
> opportunity to educate us. The impression I got from the lecture was that
> motorists were seeing bikes all over the road all day -- it was a 65 mile
> ride with probably over 60 riders, of all types. And we had just all blown
> a stop, failing to yield and acting pretty entitled.
>
> The officer who was called for 'back up' (he was a sr. officer, and Dozier
> was just needing to ask his superior for guidance) said he had interviewed
> 6 separate witnesses (all motorists) at the accident scene, and all said
> the car was swerving to avoid killing a cyclist. (The facts on this were
> unclear, but it sounded like the cyclist turned left in front of the
> oncoming vehicle -- but who knows, because the cyclist did not stop.)
>
> The cyclists who rendered aid (they had turned back to help out) saw some
> cyclists riding away from the accident, and wondered why they had not
> stopped. I suggest that whomever was a witness in the closest proximity
> to the wreck -- and there were as many as 3 -- should call the sherrif's
> office and take responsibility, and clear up the record. The truth will
> help. Those who left the scene, if they truly did, are really
> irresponsible, in my book.
>
> Those of us who were stopped (at least an hour later, and probably 30
> miles away) mostly had broken the traffic law at the intersection. I was
> the only one who made a full stop, but I still didn't yield to the car
> stopped to my right at the four way. So we could all have been ticketed,
> but we were not. They were extremely lenient with us.
>
> The frustrating thing is that we are giving ourselves a bad reputation on
> the roads in the following ways:
>
> Failing to yield, stop and be cognizant of traffic laws.
>
> Failing to do what the officers asked, which is educate our fellow riders
> that breaking the law makes us look like jerks, and it ultimately makes us
> more vulnerable.
>
> I know cyclists usually get the shaft in traffic situations. However, if
> we obeyed the law, rode predicably and took the lane only when needed (and
> that is often) we could improve things a lot for all riders. That was the
> only point the guy made in his lecture, and that there are consequences
> for group riders who spaz out in traffic. He did not say Hutch's would be
> or could be sued. He said the shop / ride organizer was "Potentially
> liable." But I don't think that is true in any case. For example, if you
> hold an event at Les Scwab amhitheater, and people drive drunk and crash,
> do they sue the concert promoter? A good lawyer could clear Hutch's. And
> it would really help if any other cyclist witnesses (a Mr. Rogers
> perhaps?) would come forward.
>
>
> --- On Sun, 6/15/08, Randy Dreiling wrote:
>
>> From: Randy Dreiling
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!
>> To: RCJohnson1@attglobal.net, "Julie Wose / Thane Jennings"
>>
>> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
>> Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008, 1:54 AM
>> I would contact the county commissioners
>> Find out which ones are pro outdoor rec first and have
>> them lean on the sheriff and be sure to point out some
>> riders helped at the wreck.
>>
>> As an elected official(In Oakridge) of a tourism/ outdoor
>> rec town we as elected officials take this stuff seriously.
>> I remember one year a good old boy was screwing around with
>> racers during the Oakridge FTF and the police went and found
>> him and cited him, because they didn't want bike riders
>> to feel unwelcome in Oakridge or to feel like the police
>> didn't respect them.
>> Then again who knows how they feel over there.
>>
>> Take care
>>
>> Randy Dreiling
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Rick C Johnson
>> To: Julie Wose / Thane Jennings
>> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
>> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 9:50:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates
>> Bikes!
>>
>> I was in that second group that was stopped and heard the
>> lecture. All I
>> will say at the moment is to correct the record on this one
>> issue: The
>> Sheriff did not accuse a Hutch's rider of causing the
>> accident. He
>> stated the Hutch's Bicycles was responsible because
>> they sponsored the
>> ride.
>>
>> Rick
>> Hutch's Bend
>>
>> Julie Wose / Thane Jennings wrote:
>>
>> >Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith
>> Rock and back from
>> >Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was
>> relatively uneventful
>> >until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled
>> over in Redmond for
>> >rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full
>> stop but this went
>> >unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his
>> siren and then
>> >pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes.
>> Traffic was
>> >completely blocked in one direction. The deputy
>> proceeded to scream and
>> >yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but
>> on causing an
>> >accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also
>> called for back-up
>> >because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his
>> contention that someone
>> >on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to
>> swerve and hit someone
>> >else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group
>> caused or even saw
>> >an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who
>> were behind our group
>> >had stopped for several flats and they came across the
>> aftermath of the
>> >auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the
>> flats is an EMT who
>> >works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the
>> victims of the auto
>> >accident. This is in direct contradiction to the
>> Sargent who lectured us
>> >about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist
>> had stopped, this
>> >is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render
>> assistance. Every cyclist
>> >who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the
>> county sheriffs and
>> >warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes
>> County and that
>> >Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it
>> was one of the riders on
>> >their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We
>> were told that the
>> >sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists
>> and that the sheriff
>> >would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to
>> pass this
>> >information on to our fellow cyclists.
>> >
>> >I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County
>> Sheriff and demanding
>> >an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy
>> Dozer personnally
>> >threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was
>> completely
>> >unproffessional. No one in our group caused an
>> accident yet we were
>> >blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would
>> appreciate hearing
>> >from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide
>> their version of the
>> >days events and I would encourage other cyclists who
>> were pulled over to
>> >write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set
>> the story straight,
>> >we did not cause this auto accident!
>> >
>> >Thane Jennings
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OBRA mailing list
>> >obra@list.obra.org
>> >http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> >Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

************************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has
been swept for the presence of computer viruses.

www.JELD-WENCommunities.com
www.eagle-crest.com
www.runningy.com
www.silvermt.com
www.brasada.com
www.ridgewaterproperties.com
************************************************************************


Julie Wose / Thane Jennings

2008-06-15

Sami, thank-you for your insightful dialog and I did ask for other people
to post their impressions. That said I disagree completely.

The way the officer behaved after he pulled us over was unacceptable, he
did not assure our safety or his. Before he launched into his diatribe he
should have made sure we and he were out of the road. Rarely have I seen
a law enforcement officer stand in the middle of the road. We pulled unto
to the shoulder, he stood in the road. The officer let his emotions get
in the way of doing his job.

Lecturing and yelling does not equal education. You would know this if
you were a parent. If you want your children to listen do not start
yelling at them, the minute you begin to lecture them is the minute they
stop listening.

If I ran the stop sign, give me a ticket. I am an adult and can accept
the consequences of my actions. However do not blame me or any other
cyclist for causing an accident just because I ride a bike. It is not a
crime to ride a bike.

If the Deschutes County Sheriff really wanted to educate cyclists he would
sit down with someone like Jeff Monson at commute options and set up a
communication and education program. Pulling over cyclists one at a time
or en masse is not a productive use of law enforcement dollars.

With gas prices headed to the $5 mark I think it would be prudent for law
enforcement in Deschutes County to make sure we have a safe environment
for cycling and driving. More people are going to bicycle and educating
new riders is key to their safety. Could we possibly partner with law
enforcement to make sure that cyclists are made aware of their
responsibilities as riders?

I think the Sherrif and his men did the exact right thing: They took an
> opportunity to educate us. The impression I got from the lecture was that
> motorists were seeing bikes all over the road all day -- it was a 65 mile
> ride with probably over 60 riders, of all types. And we had just all blown
> a stop, failing to yield and acting pretty entitled.
>
> The officer who was called for 'back up' (he was a sr. officer, and Dozier
> was just needing to ask his superior for guidance) said he had interviewed
> 6 separate witnesses (all motorists) at the accident scene, and all said
> the car was swerving to avoid killing a cyclist. (The facts on this were
> unclear, but it sounded like the cyclist turned left in front of the
> oncoming vehicle -- but who knows, because the cyclist did not stop.)
>
> The cyclists who rendered aid (they had turned back to help out) saw some
> cyclists riding away from the accident, and wondered why they had not
> stopped. I suggest that whomever was a witness in the closest proximity
> to the wreck -- and there were as many as 3 -- should call the sherrif's
> office and take responsibility, and clear up the record. The truth will
> help. Those who left the scene, if they truly did, are really
> irresponsible, in my book.
>
> Those of us who were stopped (at least an hour later, and probably 30
> miles away) mostly had broken the traffic law at the intersection. I was
> the only one who made a full stop, but I still didn't yield to the car
> stopped to my right at the four way. So we could all have been ticketed,
> but we were not. They were extremely lenient with us.
>
> The frustrating thing is that we are giving ourselves a bad reputation on
> the roads in the following ways:
>
> Failing to yield, stop and be cognizant of traffic laws.
>
> Failing to do what the officers asked, which is educate our fellow riders
> that breaking the law makes us look like jerks, and it ultimately makes us
> more vulnerable.
>
> I know cyclists usually get the shaft in traffic situations. However, if
> we obeyed the law, rode predicably and took the lane only when needed (and
> that is often) we could improve things a lot for all riders. That was the
> only point the guy made in his lecture, and that there are consequences
> for group riders who spaz out in traffic. He did not say Hutch's would be
> or could be sued. He said the shop / ride organizer was "Potentially
> liable." But I don't think that is true in any case. For example, if you
> hold an event at Les Scwab amhitheater, and people drive drunk and crash,
> do they sue the concert promoter? A good lawyer could clear Hutch's. And
> it would really help if any other cyclist witnesses (a Mr. Rogers
> perhaps?) would come forward.
>
>
> --- On Sun, 6/15/08, Randy Dreiling wrote:
>
>> From: Randy Dreiling
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!
>> To: RCJohnson1@attglobal.net, "Julie Wose / Thane Jennings"
>>
>> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
>> Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008, 1:54 AM
>> I would contact the county commissioners
>> Find out which ones are pro outdoor rec first and have
>> them lean on the sheriff and be sure to point out some
>> riders helped at the wreck.
>>
>> As an elected official(In Oakridge) of a tourism/ outdoor
>> rec town we as elected officials take this stuff seriously.
>> I remember one year a good old boy was screwing around with
>> racers during the Oakridge FTF and the police went and found
>> him and cited him, because they didn't want bike riders
>> to feel unwelcome in Oakridge or to feel like the police
>> didn't respect them.
>> Then again who knows how they feel over there.
>>
>> Take care
>>
>> Randy Dreiling
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Rick C Johnson
>> To: Julie Wose / Thane Jennings
>> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
>> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 9:50:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates
>> Bikes!
>>
>> I was in that second group that was stopped and heard the
>> lecture. All I
>> will say at the moment is to correct the record on this one
>> issue: The
>> Sheriff did not accuse a Hutch's rider of causing the
>> accident. He
>> stated the Hutch's Bicycles was responsible because
>> they sponsored the
>> ride.
>>
>> Rick
>> Hutch's Bend
>>
>> Julie Wose / Thane Jennings wrote:
>>
>> >Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith
>> Rock and back from
>> >Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was
>> relatively uneventful
>> >until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled
>> over in Redmond for
>> >rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full
>> stop but this went
>> >unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his
>> siren and then
>> >pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes.
>> Traffic was
>> >completely blocked in one direction. The deputy
>> proceeded to scream and
>> >yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but
>> on causing an
>> >accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also
>> called for back-up
>> >because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his
>> contention that someone
>> >on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to
>> swerve and hit someone
>> >else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group
>> caused or even saw
>> >an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who
>> were behind our group
>> >had stopped for several flats and they came across the
>> aftermath of the
>> >auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the
>> flats is an EMT who
>> >works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the
>> victims of the auto
>> >accident. This is in direct contradiction to the
>> Sargent who lectured us
>> >about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist
>> had stopped, this
>> >is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render
>> assistance. Every cyclist
>> >who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the
>> county sheriffs and
>> >warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes
>> County and that
>> >Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it
>> was one of the riders on
>> >their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We
>> were told that the
>> >sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists
>> and that the sheriff
>> >would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to
>> pass this
>> >information on to our fellow cyclists.
>> >
>> >I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County
>> Sheriff and demanding
>> >an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy
>> Dozer personnally
>> >threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was
>> completely
>> >unproffessional. No one in our group caused an
>> accident yet we were
>> >blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would
>> appreciate hearing
>> >from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide
>> their version of the
>> >days events and I would encourage other cyclists who
>> were pulled over to
>> >write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set
>> the story straight,
>> >we did not cause this auto accident!
>> >
>> >Thane Jennings
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OBRA mailing list
>> >obra@list.obra.org
>> >http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> >Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Sami Fournier

2008-06-15

I think the Sherrif and his men did the exact right thing: They took an opportunity to educate us. The impression I got from the lecture was that motorists were seeing bikes all over the road all day -- it was a 65 mile ride with probably over 60 riders, of all types. And we had just all blown a stop, failing to yield and acting pretty entitled.

The officer who was called for 'back up' (he was a sr. officer, and Dozier was just needing to ask his superior for guidance) said he had interviewed 6 separate witnesses (all motorists) at the accident scene, and all said the car was swerving to avoid killing a cyclist. (The facts on this were unclear, but it sounded like the cyclist turned left in front of the oncoming vehicle -- but who knows, because the cyclist did not stop.)

The cyclists who rendered aid (they had turned back to help out) saw some cyclists riding away from the accident, and wondered why they had not stopped. I suggest that whomever was a witness in the closest proximity to the wreck -- and there were as many as 3 -- should call the sherrif's office and take responsibility, and clear up the record. The truth will help. Those who left the scene, if they truly did, are really irresponsible, in my book.

Those of us who were stopped (at least an hour later, and probably 30 miles away) mostly had broken the traffic law at the intersection. I was the only one who made a full stop, but I still didn't yield to the car stopped to my right at the four way. So we could all have been ticketed, but we were not. They were extremely lenient with us.

The frustrating thing is that we are giving ourselves a bad reputation on the roads in the following ways:

Failing to yield, stop and be cognizant of traffic laws.

Failing to do what the officers asked, which is educate our fellow riders that breaking the law makes us look like jerks, and it ultimately makes us more vulnerable.

I know cyclists usually get the shaft in traffic situations. However, if we obeyed the law, rode predicably and took the lane only when needed (and that is often) we could improve things a lot for all riders. That was the only point the guy made in his lecture, and that there are consequences for group riders who spaz out in traffic. He did not say Hutch's would be or could be sued. He said the shop / ride organizer was "Potentially liable." But I don't think that is true in any case. For example, if you hold an event at Les Scwab amhitheater, and people drive drunk and crash, do they sue the concert promoter? A good lawyer could clear Hutch's. And it would really help if any other cyclist witnesses (a Mr. Rogers perhaps?) would come forward.

--- On Sun, 6/15/08, Randy Dreiling wrote:

> From: Randy Dreiling
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!
> To: RCJohnson1@attglobal.net, "Julie Wose / Thane Jennings"
> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
> Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008, 1:54 AM
> I would contact the county commissioners
> Find out which ones are pro outdoor rec first and have
> them lean on the sheriff and be sure to point out some
> riders helped at the wreck.
>
> As an elected official(In Oakridge) of a tourism/ outdoor
> rec town we as elected officials take this stuff seriously.
> I remember one year a good old boy was screwing around with
> racers during the Oakridge FTF and the police went and found
> him and cited him, because they didn't want bike riders
> to feel unwelcome in Oakridge or to feel like the police
> didn't respect them.
> Then again who knows how they feel over there.
>
> Take care
>
> Randy Dreiling
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Rick C Johnson
> To: Julie Wose / Thane Jennings
> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 9:50:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates
> Bikes!
>
> I was in that second group that was stopped and heard the
> lecture. All I
> will say at the moment is to correct the record on this one
> issue: The
> Sheriff did not accuse a Hutch's rider of causing the
> accident. He
> stated the Hutch's Bicycles was responsible because
> they sponsored the
> ride.
>
> Rick
> Hutch's Bend
>
> Julie Wose / Thane Jennings wrote:
>
> >Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith
> Rock and back from
> >Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was
> relatively uneventful
> >until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled
> over in Redmond for
> >rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full
> stop but this went
> >unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his
> siren and then
> >pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes.
> Traffic was
> >completely blocked in one direction. The deputy
> proceeded to scream and
> >yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but
> on causing an
> >accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also
> called for back-up
> >because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his
> contention that someone
> >on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to
> swerve and hit someone
> >else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group
> caused or even saw
> >an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who
> were behind our group
> >had stopped for several flats and they came across the
> aftermath of the
> >auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the
> flats is an EMT who
> >works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the
> victims of the auto
> >accident. This is in direct contradiction to the
> Sargent who lectured us
> >about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist
> had stopped, this
> >is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render
> assistance. Every cyclist
> >who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the
> county sheriffs and
> >warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes
> County and that
> >Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it
> was one of the riders on
> >their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We
> were told that the
> >sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists
> and that the sheriff
> >would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to
> pass this
> >information on to our fellow cyclists.
> >
> >I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County
> Sheriff and demanding
> >an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy
> Dozer personnally
> >threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was
> completely
> >unproffessional. No one in our group caused an
> accident yet we were
> >blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would
> appreciate hearing
> >from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide
> their version of the
> >days events and I would encourage other cyclists who
> were pulled over to
> >write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set
> the story straight,
> >we did not cause this auto accident!
> >
> >Thane Jennings
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OBRA mailing list
> >obra@list.obra.org
> >http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> >Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Eric Chu

2008-06-14

I would encourage anyone who witnessed the actual accident or the
confrontation with the Deschutes County Sheriff's dept. to take some
notes now and write everything down before memory fades. It doesn't
hurt to date it also.

Any information anyone has regarding the actual accident , what
happened after, or any harassment by law enforcement should be
documented as much as possible.

If you have information regarding the accident that was overlooked or
dismissed by law enforcement, contact the owner of Hutch's and give
him your information and support. Any information about anti-cyclist
bias on the part of law enforcement will be useful as well, should
they look for a way to blame cyclists or Hutch's.

Hutch's Bicycles in Bend has a long history of being involved in the
community and organizing popular and safe events and they deserve our
support.

eric
-----------
bikemecca.com


Randy Dreiling

2008-06-14

I would contact the county commissioners
Find out which ones are pro outdoor rec first and have them lean on the sheriff and be sure to point out some riders helped at the wreck.

As an elected official(In Oakridge) of a tourism/ outdoor rec town we as elected officials take this stuff seriously.
I remember one year a good old boy was screwing around with racers during the Oakridge FTF and the police went and found him and cited him, because they didn't want bike riders to feel unwelcome in Oakridge or to feel like the police didn't respect them.
Then again who knows how they feel over there.

Take care

Randy Dreiling

----- Original Message ----
From: Rick C Johnson
To: Julie Wose / Thane Jennings
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 9:50:49 PM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!

I was in that second group that was stopped and heard the lecture. All I
will say at the moment is to correct the record on this one issue: The
Sheriff did not accuse a Hutch's rider of causing the accident. He
stated the Hutch's Bicycles was responsible because they sponsored the
ride.

Rick
Hutch's Bend

Julie Wose / Thane Jennings wrote:

>Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith Rock and back from
>Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was relatively uneventful
>until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled over in Redmond for
>rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full stop but this went
>unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his siren and then
>pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes. Traffic was
>completely blocked in one direction. The deputy proceeded to scream and
>yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but on causing an
>accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also called for back-up
>because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his contention that someone
>on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to swerve and hit someone
>else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group caused or even saw
>an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who were behind our group
>had stopped for several flats and they came across the aftermath of the
>auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the flats is an EMT who
>works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the victims of the auto
>accident. This is in direct contradiction to the Sargent who lectured us
>about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist had stopped, this
>is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render assistance. Every cyclist
>who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the county sheriffs and
>warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes County and that
>Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it was one of the riders on
>their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We were told that the
>sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists and that the sheriff
>would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to pass this
>information on to our fellow cyclists.
>
>I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County Sheriff and demanding
>an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy Dozer personnally
>threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was completely
>unproffessional. No one in our group caused an accident yet we were
>blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would appreciate hearing
>from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide their version of the
>days events and I would encourage other cyclists who were pulled over to
>write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set the story straight,
>we did not cause this auto accident!
>
>Thane Jennings
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OBRA mailing list
>obra@list.obra.org
>http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Mark Reinecke

2008-06-14

I am also hesitant to comment at all right now but I am compelled on
one specific
point to provide my recollection of the what the Deputy said. Like
Thane, I was
upset about some of the things the Deputy said but I think it takes
things out
of context to say that he said that no cyclists stopped when several
of us did.
I recall him saying that all of the witnesses they interviewed said
that a bike turned
left off highway 126. An oncoming car slowed down and a vehicle
behind that
vehicle ran into the slowing vehicle causing both to go off the
highway. He did say
that the witnesses said that none of the cyclists stopped and
continued on the route.
But I believe he was referring to the cyclist or cyclists that the
witnesses apparently
saw at the intersection at the time of the accident, not those of us
who showed up
minutes later.

Mark Reinecke
On Jun 14, 2008, at 9:50 PM, Rick C Johnson wrote:

> I was in that second group that was stopped and heard the lecture.
> All I
> will say at the moment is to correct the record on this one issue: The
> Sheriff did not accuse a Hutch's rider of causing the accident. He
> stated the Hutch's Bicycles was responsible because they sponsored the
> ride.
>
> Rick
> Hutch's Bend
>
> Julie Wose / Thane Jennings wrote:
>
>> Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith Rock and
>> back from
>> Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was relatively
>> uneventful
>> until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled over in
>> Redmond for
>> rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full stop but
>> this went
>> unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his siren and then
>> pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes. Traffic was
>> completely blocked in one direction. The deputy proceeded to
>> scream and
>> yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but on causing an
>> accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also called for
>> back-up
>> because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his contention that
>> someone
>> on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to swerve and hit
>> someone
>> else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group caused or
>> even saw
>> an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who were behind
>> our group
>> had stopped for several flats and they came across the aftermath
>> of the
>> auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the flats is an
>> EMT who
>> works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the victims of the
>> auto
>> accident. This is in direct contradiction to the Sargent who
>> lectured us
>> about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist had
>> stopped, this
>> is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render assistance. Every
>> cyclist
>> who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the county
>> sheriffs and
>> warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes County and that
>> Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it was one of the
>> riders on
>> their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We were told
>> that the
>> sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists and that the
>> sheriff
>> would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to pass this
>> information on to our fellow cyclists.
>>
>> I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County Sheriff and
>> demanding
>> an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy Dozer personnally
>> threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was completely
>> unproffessional. No one in our group caused an accident yet we were
>> blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would appreciate
>> hearing
>> from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide their
>> version of the
>> days events and I would encourage other cyclists who were pulled
>> over to
>> write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set the story
>> straight,
>> we did not cause this auto accident!
>>
>> Thane Jennings
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Rick C Johnson

2008-06-14

I was in that second group that was stopped and heard the lecture. All I
will say at the moment is to correct the record on this one issue: The
Sheriff did not accuse a Hutch's rider of causing the accident. He
stated the Hutch's Bicycles was responsible because they sponsored the
ride.

Rick
Hutch's Bend

Julie Wose / Thane Jennings wrote:

>Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith Rock and back from
>Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was relatively uneventful
>until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled over in Redmond for
>rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full stop but this went
>unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his siren and then
>pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes. Traffic was
>completely blocked in one direction. The deputy proceeded to scream and
>yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but on causing an
>accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also called for back-up
>because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his contention that someone
>on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to swerve and hit someone
>else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group caused or even saw
>an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who were behind our group
>had stopped for several flats and they came across the aftermath of the
>auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the flats is an EMT who
>works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the victims of the auto
>accident. This is in direct contradiction to the Sargent who lectured us
>about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist had stopped, this
>is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render assistance. Every cyclist
>who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the county sheriffs and
>warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes County and that
>Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it was one of the riders on
>their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We were told that the
>sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists and that the sheriff
>would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to pass this
>information on to our fellow cyclists.
>
>I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County Sheriff and demanding
>an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy Dozer personnally
>threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was completely
>unproffessional. No one in our group caused an accident yet we were
>blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would appreciate hearing
>from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide their version of the
>days events and I would encourage other cyclists who were pulled over to
>write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set the story straight,
>we did not cause this auto accident!
>
>Thane Jennings
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OBRA mailing list
>obra@list.obra.org
>http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>


George de Randich

2008-06-14

Sounds like that police officer wanyed to make his quota of moving
violations!
George de Randich

-------Original Message-------

From: Julie Wose / Thane Jennings
Date: 6/14/2008 7:53:17 PM
To: obra@list.obra.org
Subject: [OBRA Chat] Deschutes County Sheriff Hates Bikes!

Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith Rock and back from
Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was relatively uneventful
until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled over in Redmond for
rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full stop but this went
unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his siren and then
pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes. Traffic was
completely blocked in one direction. The deputy proceeded to scream and
yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but on causing an
accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also called for back-up
because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his contention that someone
on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to swerve and hit someone
else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group caused or even saw
an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who were behind our group
had stopped for several flats and they came across the aftermath of the
auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the flats is an EMT who
works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the victims of the auto
accident. This is in direct contradiction to the Sargent who lectured us
about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist had stopped, this
is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render assistance. Every cyclist
who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the county sheriffs and
warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes County and that
Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it was one of the riders on
their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We were told that the
sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists and that the sheriff
would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to pass this
information on to our fellow cyclists.

I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County Sheriff and demanding
an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy Dozer personnally
threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was completely
unproffessional. No one in our group caused an accident yet we were
blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would appreciate hearing
from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide their version of the
days events and I would encourage other cyclists who were pulled over to
write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set the story straight,
we did not cause this auto accident!

Thane Jennings


_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Julie Wose / Thane Jennings

2008-06-14

Today was the annual Double Dawg Tandem ride to Smith Rock and back from
Bend sponsored by Hutch's of Bend. The ride was relatively uneventful
until the way back. Approximately 15 of us were pulled over in Redmond for
rolling a stop sign. One in our group came to a full stop but this went
unoticed by the sheriff deputy. The sheriff used his siren and then
pulled in front of the group and slammed on his brakes. Traffic was
completely blocked in one direction. The deputy proceeded to scream and
yell and lecture us, not on running the stop sign but on causing an
accident that had happened earlier in the day. He also called for back-up
because we were such an unruly bunch. It was his contention that someone
on the ride pulled in front of a car causing him to swerve and hit someone
else head-on. As far as I can tell no one in our group caused or even saw
an accident. A number of the folks on the ride who were behind our group
had stopped for several flats and they came across the aftermath of the
auto accident. One of the folks who stopped for the flats is an EMT who
works for Lifeflight, he rendered first aid to the victims of the auto
accident. This is in direct contradiction to the Sargent who lectured us
about causing the accident, he claimed that no cyclist had stopped, this
is untrue, a whole group had stopped to render assistance. Every cyclist
who happened to ride by our group was stopped by the county sheriffs and
warned that they were watching cyclists in Deschutes County and that
Hutch's Bicycles was going to be sued because it was one of the riders on
their sponsored ride that had caused the accident. We were told that the
sheriff was fed up with the bad behaviour of cyclists and that the sheriff
would not tolerate it in the future and that we were to pass this
information on to our fellow cyclists.

I plan on writing a letter to the Deschutes County Sheriff and demanding
an explanation. I don't like the way the Deputy Dozer personnally
threatened everyone in our group, his behaviour was completely
unproffessional. No one in our group caused an accident yet we were
blamed by someone who clearly hates cyclists. I would appreciate hearing
from anyone else who was on the ride who can provide their version of the
days events and I would encourage other cyclists who were pulled over to
write to the Deschutes County Sheriffs office and set the story straight,
we did not cause this auto accident!

Thane Jennings