Re: Maltodextrin and Absorption

T. Kenji Sugahara

2008-06-28

My source:

http://tinyurl.com/5cj2tp

$51.99 for a 50 pound sack of Star-Dri 100 Malto- DE of 10

Shipping $4.49

Pure Karbolyn is around $50 for 4.4 pounds. Haven't tried it but I'd
assume it'd work well. Probably something I'd use for races but not
for training.

I usually dump some malto in with my favorite electrolyte powder (Heed
or Cytomax depending on mood).

Works for me. But... always try your own and see what works.
Speaking from experience, try it on a training ride as you do not want
to go into "gastric distress" during a race.

T. Kenji Sugahara
Executive Director
Oregon Bicycle Racing Association
503-302-4935


David Oliphant

2008-06-28

Seth

(1) I have no 'dog in the fight'. Meaning I buy this stuff at retail. Who
out there has a dog in the fight that has commented? Do you currently sell,
distribute, or are sponsored by a nutritional product?

(2) Attached are the original sites for the clinical data with Vitargo.
http://www.vitargo.com/ You'll see that they were published in substantial
journals. Are they substantial enough for you? Maybe not, but again what
nutritional product are you currently using and what data do they have.
Right...nothing. Only Vitargo and Cytomax have any published clinical data.
Also, what product do you currently use, do you actually know what's in it?
Some don't and actually have false blood tests for banned substances!
Nutritional supplements are not monitored by the FDA and any of these
companies can claim ANYTHING without backing it up. I find it interesting
that the above companies actually have published data and others
don't....why....because they don't have to and again can make any claims
they want. Buyer beware....

(3) Let's dumb this thing down a little...

This particular carb molecule is simply larger than any carb type currently
being used in sports drinks. The molecular weight (MW) is 500,000-700,000 vs
maltodextrine 1000-10,000 and dextrose 180. Therefore, it is 70% quicker at
replenishing glycogen and 80% quicker passing through the stomach. The
published data they have supports this information. Simple. +++MW therefore
absorbed differently....that's it.

(4) My point....

I simply was introducing you to what I have found to be a very cool carb
source that has helped me with my training and racing. If your happy with
what ya got etc. That's cool. There are a lot of great products out there
that might work well for you. This might be another one to consider...being
that most of you probably have not heard of it because the various brands
aren't sold everywere.

That's it for me on this subject....

Best Regards,

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Seth Hosmer wrote:

> David - I think you are missing a step in your absorption schema outlined
> below. It has been a while since I studied GI Physiology, but I believe
> that all carbohydrates must be broken down before they are absorbed. So, if
> you have monosaccharides that are "engineered" into some sort of special
> macromolecule, that macromolecule must still be broken back down into
> individual monosaccharides in order to be absorbed in the small intestine
> (by the SGLUT-1 transporter). Said another way, carbs are carbs, and it
> usually doesn't make too much difference which one you use, regardless of
> the money spent on marketing to convince you otherwise.
>
> Most athletes will have no problem taking in between 30-60g CHO per hour of
> exercise, and this is the recommended amount.
>
> There are a few reasons people like maltodextrin, and these are the same
> reasons it is in most sports drinks: inexpensive, not overly sweet tasting,
> low osmolality, mixes readily, easy to digest.
>
> The bottom line, IMO, with sports nutrition is that you need to meet
> certain fueling and electrolyte criteria to be successful, and there are
> many ways to achieve this. The most important thing is to have a product
> that you like that doesn't cause GI distress and so you will use it
> regularly.
>
> So, that being said, the product that you are using seems to work great for
> you, so I'm glad you've found something that you like. However, I doubt
> that there is any true difference with absorption. I looked at the web site
> of the products you mentioned, and could not find any peer-reviewed articles
> published in scientific journals to support their claims...if you find any,
> I'd be interested in reading them.
>
> From my own experience in coaching over the years and with my own training
> and racing, there are lots of products that "work" you just need to find one
> that you like and will use. I personally like to rotate through products so
> I don't get bored with the taste, but Hammer HEED is good and I make a drink
> myself with malto, sugar (gasp!), salt, lite salt, lemon and lime juice that
> is excellent. If anybody wants the recipe, email or stop by the clinic and
> I am happy to pass it out.
>
> Also, looks like we have an adequate number of orders for malto so the
> order will probably go in shortly - if anybody else wants in, call or email
> me. The cost is a buck a pound, you can beat that.
>
> Seth Hosmer, DC CSCS
> Health & Performance Chiropractic
> www.hpchiro.com
>
>
>
> William
>
> Maltodextrin is cheap but an outdated carb type for many strength or
> endurance athletes....
>
> A few of us on the Therapeutic Associates Cycling Team in Portland
> experimented with and some are now using (loading, during, recovery
> exclusively) a homopolysaccharide (relatively complex carbohydrate). We've
> tried a product called GENR8 (only product with Vitargo) available at GNC
> and now we prefer a product called Pure Karbolyn which we buy at SNC
> (Sports
> Nutrition Center), Tigard. This 'type of carbohydrate' has been used for
> years by professional athletes around the world and actually has clinical
> data. So let me explain...stay with me on this....the current product we've
> been using is made up of many monosaccharides joined together by glycosidic
> bonds. These are very large bonds that are branched macromolecules. The
> "Molecular Mass" has been precisely manipulated to create absorption
> through
> the stomach at a rate much greater than maltodextrin, dextrose, breads,
> pasta, rice or any other carb product on the market and yet have relatively
> low glycemic level to maltodextrin. Because this carb type passes through
> the stomach very quickly, they act like a pump, pulling water and nutrients
> along with it. This high tech carbohydrate actually moves through the
> stomach 80% faster than dextrose or sugar. Also this carb type has a Higher
> Solution Osmolality (concentration) than Dextrose, Sucrose or other carb
> powder mixes on the market.
>
> William, what might it mean for you....50+ gms of tasty carbs in a 24 ounce
> water bottles that almost immediately shuttles the your muscles, liver,
> brain. Carbs no longer sit in your gut and make you fill full or bloated.
> No
> sugar. No more need for gels. No need for 6-8% solution mixtures because it
> doesn't matter anymore with a carb that is mainly absorbed in your small
> intestines at a faster, higher rate.
>
> As for me....I might sound like I 'm selling a product name...I'm not...I'm
> a recommending a better type of carbohydrate. No offense to anyone that
> sells these products but I have over $100++ of Gu powder, Gu Gel, Heed,
> Perpetuem, Cytomax, R4, Cytocarb that I have not used since February of
> this
> year in my garage and about ready to throw out...
>
> But, if ya like maltodextrin.....I wish ya the best....
>
> If you have any further questions contact me off-line.
>
> My two cents
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


David Oliphant

2008-06-28

Seth

(1) I have no 'dog in the fight'. Meaning I buy this stuff at retail. Who
out there has a dog in the fight that has commented? Do you currently sell,
distribute, or are sponsored by a nutritional product?

(2) Attached are the original sites for the clinical data with Vitargo.
http://www.vitargo.com/ You'll see that they were published in substantial
journals. Are they substantial enough for you? Maybe not, but again what
nutritional product are you currently using and what data do they have.
Right...nothing. Only Vitargo and Cytomax have any published clinical data.
Also, what product do you currently use, do you actually know what's in it?
Some don't and actually have false blood tests for banned
substances! Nutritional supplements are not monitored by the FDA and any of
these companies can claim ANYTHING without backing it up. I find it
interesting that the above companies actually have published data and others
don't....why....because they don't have to and again can make any claims
they want. Buyer beware....

(3) Let's dumb this thing down a little...

This particular carb molecule is simply larger than any carb type currently
being used in sports drinks. The molecular weight (MW) is 500,000-700,000 vs
maltodextrine 1000-10,000 and dextrose 180. Therefore, it is 70% quicker at
replenishing glycogen and 80% quicker passing through the stomach. The
published data they have supports this information. Simple. +++MW therefore
absorbed differently....that's it.

(4) My point....

I simply was introducing you to what I have found to be a very cool carb
source that has helped me with my training and racing. If your happy with
what ya got etc. That's cool. There are a lot of great products out there
that might work well for you. This might be another one to consider...being
that most of you probably have not heard of it because the
various brands aren't sold everywere.

Best Regards,

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Quenton Conant wrote:

> Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure many will), but I've always been
> under the impression that carbohydrates are absorbed through the intestines
> and not the stomach. So wouldn't the limiting factor for how fast the
> stomach empties be what's in it before the drink?
>
> Also, I believe that the Maltodextrin we generally get for cycling has a DE
> of 15-18, which means that it's absorbed considerably faster than dextrose
> or sucrose, or a combination of the two.
>
> I haven't had much time to poke around online, but I don't really see any
> references to any clinical studies that show exactly how they where
> comparing things to make their claims.
>
>
> What I did see just struck me as a bunch of creative marketing hype.
>
> Again, maybe I'm wrong. I don't know.
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Quenton Conant

2008-06-27

Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure many will), but I've always been under the impression that carbohydrates are absorbed through the intestines and not the stomach. So wouldn't the limiting factor for how fast the stomach empties be what's in it before the drink?

Also, I believe that the Maltodextrin we generally get for cycling has a DE of 15-18, which means that it's absorbed considerably faster than dextrose or sucrose, or a combination of the two.

I haven't had much time to poke around online, but I don't really see any references to any clinical studies that show exactly how they where comparing things to make their claims.

What I did see just struck me as a bunch of creative marketing hype.

Again, maybe I'm wrong. I don't know.


Adam Blanchard

2008-06-27

..sorry if this is a duplicate post, the first one failed because of
my pdf attachment...

Seth,
You are correct with your absorption schema, and have the same
concerns that I had with these companies 'claims'. To be clear,
however, these companies are not claiming that their product is
absorbed more quickly in the small intestine. They are claiming that
they have a higher rate of gastric emptying due to their high MW, and
that during intense exercise this can be the rate-limiting step for
many people. See the LINKED article at the bottom.

I have used the GENR8 product with vitargo and liked it a lot. That
said, I continue to use maltodextrin and sucrose mixtures because I
like the taste and they are relatively cheap.

http://www.vitargo.com/PDF/VitargoMaltMaxEnd07.pdf

Adam

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Seth Hosmer wrote:
> David - I think you are missing a step in your absorption schema outlined below. It has been a while since I studied GI Physiology, but I believe that all carbohydrates must be broken down before they are absorbed. So, if you have monosaccharides that are "engineered" into some sort of special macromolecule, that macromolecule must still be broken back down into individual monosaccharides in order to be absorbed in the small intestine (by the SGLUT-1 transporter). Said another way, carbs are carbs, and it usually doesn't make too much difference which one you use, regardless of the money spent on marketing to convince you otherwise.
>
> Most athletes will have no problem taking in between 30-60g CHO per hour of exercise, and this is the recommended amount.
>
> There are a few reasons people like maltodextrin, and these are the same reasons it is in most sports drinks: inexpensive, not overly sweet tasting, low osmolality, mixes readily, easy to digest.
>
> The bottom line, IMO, with sports nutrition is that you need to meet certain fueling and electrolyte criteria to be successful, and there are many ways to achieve this. The most important thing is to have a product that you like that doesn't cause GI distress and so you will use it regularly.
>
> So, that being said, the product that you are using seems to work great for you, so I'm glad you've found something that you like. However, I doubt that there is any true difference with absorption. I looked at the web site of the products you mentioned, and could not find any peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals to support their claims...if you find any, I'd be interested in reading them.
>
> From my own experience in coaching over the years and with my own training and racing, there are lots of products that "work" you just need to find one that you like and will use. I personally like to rotate through products so I don't get bored with the taste, but Hammer HEED is good and I make a drink myself with malto, sugar (gasp!), salt, lite salt, lemon and lime juice that is excellent. If anybody wants the recipe, email or stop by the clinic and I am happy to pass it out.
>
> Also, looks like we have an adequate number of orders for malto so the order will probably go in shortly - if anybody else wants in, call or email me. The cost is a buck a pound, you can beat that.
>
> Seth Hosmer, DC CSCS
> Health & Performance Chiropractic
> www.hpchiro.com
>
>
>
> William
>
> Maltodextrin is cheap but an outdated carb type for many strength or
> endurance athletes....
>
> A few of us on the Therapeutic Associates Cycling Team in Portland
> experimented with and some are now using (loading, during, recovery
> exclusively) a homopolysaccharide (relatively complex carbohydrate). We've
> tried a product called GENR8 (only product with Vitargo) available at GNC
> and now we prefer a product called Pure Karbolyn which we buy at SNC (Sports
> Nutrition Center), Tigard. This 'type of carbohydrate' has been used for
> years by professional athletes around the world and actually has clinical
> data. So let me explain...stay with me on this....the current product we've
> been using is made up of many monosaccharides joined together by glycosidic
> bonds. These are very large bonds that are branched macromolecules. The
> "Molecular Mass" has been precisely manipulated to create absorption through
> the stomach at a rate much greater than maltodextrin, dextrose, breads,
> pasta, rice or any other carb product on the market and yet have relatively
> low glycemic level to maltodextrin. Because this carb type passes through
> the stomach very quickly, they act like a pump, pulling water and nutrients
> along with it. This high tech carbohydrate actually moves through the
> stomach 80% faster than dextrose or sugar. Also this carb type has a Higher
> Solution Osmolality (concentration) than Dextrose, Sucrose or other carb
> powder mixes on the market.
>
> William, what might it mean for you....50+ gms of tasty carbs in a 24 ounce
> water bottles that almost immediately shuttles the your muscles, liver,
> brain. Carbs no longer sit in your gut and make you fill full or bloated. No
> sugar. No more need for gels. No need for 6-8% solution mixtures because it
> doesn't matter anymore with a carb that is mainly absorbed in your small
> intestines at a faster, higher rate.
>
> As for me....I might sound like I 'm selling a product name...I'm not...I'm
> a recommending a better type of carbohydrate. No offense to anyone that
> sells these products but I have over $100++ of Gu powder, Gu Gel, Heed,
> Perpetuem, Cytomax, R4, Cytocarb that I have not used since February of this
> year in my garage and about ready to throw out...
>
> But, if ya like maltodextrin.....I wish ya the best....
>
> If you have any further questions contact me off-line.
>
> My two cents
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>


Seth Hosmer

2008-06-27

David - I think you are missing a step in your absorption schema outlined below. It has been a while since I studied GI Physiology, but I believe that all carbohydrates must be broken down before they are absorbed. So, if you have monosaccharides that are "engineered" into some sort of special macromolecule, that macromolecule must still be broken back down into individual monosaccharides in order to be absorbed in the small intestine (by the SGLUT-1 transporter). Said another way, carbs are carbs, and it usually doesn't make too much difference which one you use, regardless of the money spent on marketing to convince you otherwise.

Most athletes will have no problem taking in between 30-60g CHO per hour of exercise, and this is the recommended amount.

There are a few reasons people like maltodextrin, and these are the same reasons it is in most sports drinks: inexpensive, not overly sweet tasting, low osmolality, mixes readily, easy to digest.

The bottom line, IMO, with sports nutrition is that you need to meet certain fueling and electrolyte criteria to be successful, and there are many ways to achieve this. The most important thing is to have a product that you like that doesn't cause GI distress and so you will use it regularly.

So, that being said, the product that you are using seems to work great for you, so I'm glad you've found something that you like. However, I doubt that there is any true difference with absorption. I looked at the web site of the products you mentioned, and could not find any peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals to support their claims...if you find any, I'd be interested in reading them.

From my own experience in coaching over the years and with my own training and racing, there are lots of products that "work" you just need to find one that you like and will use. I personally like to rotate through products so I don't get bored with the taste, but Hammer HEED is good and I make a drink myself with malto, sugar (gasp!), salt, lite salt, lemon and lime juice that is excellent. If anybody wants the recipe, email or stop by the clinic and I am happy to pass it out.

Also, looks like we have an adequate number of orders for malto so the order will probably go in shortly - if anybody else wants in, call or email me. The cost is a buck a pound, you can beat that.

Seth Hosmer, DC CSCS
Health & Performance Chiropractic
www.hpchiro.com

William

Maltodextrin is cheap but an outdated carb type for many strength or
endurance athletes....

A few of us on the Therapeutic Associates Cycling Team in Portland
experimented with and some are now using (loading, during, recovery
exclusively) a homopolysaccharide (relatively complex carbohydrate). We've
tried a product called GENR8 (only product with Vitargo) available at GNC
and now we prefer a product called Pure Karbolyn which we buy at SNC (Sports
Nutrition Center), Tigard. This 'type of carbohydrate' has been used for
years by professional athletes around the world and actually has clinical
data. So let me explain...stay with me on this....the current product we've
been using is made up of many monosaccharides joined together by glycosidic
bonds. These are very large bonds that are branched macromolecules. The
"Molecular Mass" has been precisely manipulated to create absorption through
the stomach at a rate much greater than maltodextrin, dextrose, breads,
pasta, rice or any other carb product on the market and yet have relatively
low glycemic level to maltodextrin. Because this carb type passes through
the stomach very quickly, they act like a pump, pulling water and nutrients
along with it. This high tech carbohydrate actually moves through the
stomach 80% faster than dextrose or sugar. Also this carb type has a Higher
Solution Osmolality (concentration) than Dextrose, Sucrose or other carb
powder mixes on the market.

William, what might it mean for you....50+ gms of tasty carbs in a 24 ounce
water bottles that almost immediately shuttles the your muscles, liver,
brain. Carbs no longer sit in your gut and make you fill full or bloated. No
sugar. No more need for gels. No need for 6-8% solution mixtures because it
doesn't matter anymore with a carb that is mainly absorbed in your small
intestines at a faster, higher rate.

As for me....I might sound like I 'm selling a product name...I'm not...I'm
a recommending a better type of carbohydrate. No offense to anyone that
sells these products but I have over $100++ of Gu powder, Gu Gel, Heed,
Perpetuem, Cytomax, R4, Cytocarb that I have not used since February of this
year in my garage and about ready to throw out...

But, if ya like maltodextrin.....I wish ya the best....

If you have any further questions contact me off-line.

My two cents

David