OBRA insurance

mike.m-@obra.org

2003-05-05



I was recently contacted by a race organizer who had a rider injured at

their event and the rider had asked them about how to collect money from the

OBRA insurance to cover his medical expenses. This made me think that it is

time that I explain again how the OBRA insurance works.



OBRA purchases liability insurance. This is not medical insurance. The

insurance is not there to cover your medical losses. You need to have

personal medical insurance to cover those.



It would be great if OBRA could provide substantial medical coverage for

injuries sustained at races but the problem is that it would be very costly

to do that and it is not actually all that fair to expect a race organizer

to cover the cost of providing your health care. Basically it would be

similar to thinking that Fred Meyers should cover the cost of taking care of

your heart attack just because it happened while you were at their store.



The OBRA liability insurance covers the costs of defending and settling

claims of negligence against race organizers, officials, volunteers,

sponsors, land owners, etc. This insurance is not to protect you but rather

to protect the people associated with the race from claims made by you. It

is essential that there is liability insurance, not only to protect the

people associated with the race but because the land owners or road use

authorities will nearly always require that there be liability insurance or

they will not allow the race to happen.



In order to purchase liability insurance the company that sells this

requires that there be a medical rider in place. This medical rider is

purchased from a separate company. Basically this is what is know as "trip

and fall" coverage. The idea is that if a person has a portion of their

medical costs covered it is less likely that they will make a liability

claim. In order to keep costs down (i.e. entry fees down) we try to make

the medical rider as minimal as the liability insurance company will accept.

This means that the medical rider will be secondary (all other payers will

need to pay first), there will be a high deductible and a low limit.



The problem is that there are more people accessing the medical rider. This

is, in part, because there are more people who do not have their own medical

insurance. In fact, all the losses through the OBRA insurance plan have

been through the medical rider. There have been no liability claims. For

the last few years the amount paid out in claims under the medical rider is

likely higher then the amount paid in in premiums. Clearly, insurance

companies will not put up with this for long before they either raise

premiums or, more likely, stop issuing this type of policy.



It is essential that as many people as possible have their own medical

insurance plans. Many healthy people, like OBRA members, neglect to

purchase any because the think it is unlikely that they will need it. This

is very foolish since even minor and common medical problems are very

expensive. A majority of bankruptcies are related to medical bills. Going

without health insurance is far more risky than driving without car

insurance but far more people will do it. Racing bikes just adds more risk.

If you do not have a health insurance plan then you need to purchase one.

It does not have to provide much coverage for the medical cost you usually

pay but it should cover large losses. Get the highest deductible that you

can handle without going broke. Like most insurance, it should not be a

good deal. If you get more back in claims that you paid in premiums that

means that something bad happed to you.



Feel free to contact me should you have any questions regarding the OBRA

liability insurance policy.



Mike Murray



mike.m-@obra.org

2002-07-29

I have received several questions regarding OBRA's liability insurance

prompted by the article on the VeloNews web page. Interestingly, I spoke to

the reporter and told him that although USAC seems to have a problem with

their liability insurance we do not. Reading the article it seems that he

decided to downplay this in favor of the scare tactic of insinuating that

the "alternative" organizations may have problems. I have discussed the

subject with our insurance agent. He saw that there were problems coming

with insurance through Harbour and he switched us to a different carrier as

of July 1, well before USAC even knew they had a problem. Also, in contrast

to USAC, we will not be experiencing a rate increase. Please feel free to

contact me should you have any questions on this subject.



Mike Murray