FW: AASHTO To Weaken USDOT Bike Policy

Ron and Dorothy Strasser

2011-04-15

I agree. It is important for people to comment. Huge step backwards! Our voices need to be heard or we accept what others deem necessary for our mode of transport. We are talking making riding and walking more safe for all levels of people who use these modes of transport........including kids going to school, people going to work and the store as well as training rides and trips across the country. These activities (walking and riding) help us control the amount of oil we import, are healthy modes of transport and doggone it make us feel good. Safety for people, less need for oil imports and jobs building infrastructure for non-motorized transport. Go figure!
Only takes a few minutes.
ron
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Mobley
To: Long, Steve
Cc: obra@list.obra.org
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] FW: AASHTO To Weaken USDOT Bike Policy

Wow, that is surprising to see from AASHTO. Sounds like a big step back! I clicked on the "take action" link and submitted comments, with some edits to the standard form letter. I would encourage others to do the same...

-Todd

--
Todd E. Mobley, PE, PTOE
Principal
Lancaster Engineering
(503) 248-0313 phone
(503) 248-9251 fax

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Long, Steve wrote:

I didn’t see this on the OBRA list so I thought I’d forward it on.

From: League of American Bicyclists [mailto:bikeleague@bikeleague.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:36 PM
To: Long, Steve
Subject: AASHTO To Weaken USDOT Bike Policy

AASHTO wants to weaken US DOT bicycle accommodation policy

Take Action!

Contact Your State Department of Transportation


On Friday, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) released a letter and supplemental document, which asked the US Department of Transportation to weaken their guidance on accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians. The supplemental document, submitted as part of a formal review of regulations, asks that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) withdraw their guidance on the meaning of “due consideration” of bicyclists and pedestrians to make it easier for states to ignore the needs of non-motorized travelers. AASHTO prefers the weaker “consider where appropriate” to allow states to avoid having to justify failure to accommodate bicycling and walking.

This request is misguided. At a time when cities are building entire bicycling networks for the cost of one mile of urban four-lane freeway, bike projects are putting people to work, and benefiting business, this is not the time to move backwards. When more and more states – 23 and counting – are embracing Complete Streets policies, AASHTO should be a leading voice in shaping holistic and comprehensive transportation systems, not resisting them. In fact, AASHTO’s own 12 year-old Bicycle Guide, due to be up dated this year, says that bicyclists and pedestrians can be expected on any roadway they are legally allowed to operate and therefore should be accommodated.


If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to public disclosure under state law.

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Todd Mobley

2011-04-15

Wow, that is surprising to see from AASHTO. Sounds like a big step back! I
clicked on the "take action" link and submitted comments, with some edits to
the standard form letter. I would encourage others to do the same...

-Todd

--
Todd E. Mobley, PE, PTOE
Principal
Lancaster Engineering
(503) 248-0313 phone
(503) 248-9251 fax

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Long, Steve wrote:

> I didn’t see this on the OBRA list so I thought I’d forward it on.
>
>
>
> *From:* League of American Bicyclists [mailto:bikeleague@bikeleague.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:36 PM
> *To:* Long, Steve
> *Subject:* AASHTO To Weaken USDOT Bike Policy
>
>
>
> *AASHTO wants to weaken US DOT bicycle accommodation policy*
>
>
>
> *Take Action!
> *
>
> Contact Your State Department of Transportation
>
>
>
> On Friday, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
> Officials (AASHTO)
> released a letterand supplemental
> document ,
> which asked the US Department of Transportation to weaken their guidanceon accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians. The supplemental document,
> submitted as part of a formal review of regulations,
> asks that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) withdraw their guidance
> on the meaning of “due consideration” of bicyclists and pedestrians to make
> it easier for states to ignore the needs of non-motorized travelers. AASHTO
> prefers the weaker “consider where appropriate” to allow states to avoid
> having to justify failure to accommodate bicycling and walking.
>
>
>
> This request is misguided. At a time when cities are building entire
> bicycling networksfor the cost of one mile of urban four-lane freeway, bike projects are putting
> people to work,
> and benefiting
> business ,
> this is not the time to move backwards. When more and more states – 23 and
> counting –
> are embracing Complete Streets policies, AASHTO should be a leading voice in
> shaping holistic and comprehensive transportation systems, not resisting
> them. In fact, AASHTO’s own 12 year-old Bicycle Guide,
> due to be up dated this year, says that bicyclists and pedestrians can be
> expected on any roadway they are legally allowed to operate and therefore
> should be accommodated.
>
>
>
> If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to
> public disclosure under state law.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>


Long, Steve

2011-04-14

I didn't see this on the OBRA list so I thought I'd forward it on.

From: League of American Bicyclists [mailto:bikeleague@bikeleague.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:36 PM
To: Long, Steve
Subject: AASHTO To Weaken USDOT Bike Policy

AASHTO wants to weaken US DOT bicycle accommodation policy

Take Action!

Contact Your State Department of Transportation

On Friday, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO
)
released a letter
and
supplemental document
, which
asked the US Department of Transportation to weaken their guidance
on
accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians. The supplemental document,
submitted as part of a formal review of regulations
, asks
that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) withdraw their guidance
on the meaning of "due consideration" of bicyclists and pedestrians to
make it easier for states to ignore the needs of non-motorized
travelers. AASHTO prefers the weaker "consider where appropriate" to
allow states to avoid having to justify failure to accommodate bicycling
and walking.

This request is misguided. At a time when cities are building entire
bicycling networks
for the
cost of one mile of urban four-lane freeway, bike projects are putting
people to work
, and
benefiting
business
, this is
not the time to move backwards. When more and more states - 23 and
counting
- are embracing Complete Streets policies, AASHTO should be a leading
voice in shaping holistic and comprehensive transportation systems, not
resisting them. In fact, AASHTO's own 12 year-old Bicycle Guide
, due to
be up dated this year, says that bicyclists and pedestrians can be
expected on any roadway they are legally allowed to operate and
therefore should be accommodated.

If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here
.

This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to public disclosure under state law.