Randy
Let what go?
My right to speak
Don't think I'll be doing that
Thanks for the offer
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:59 AM, "Gary Malcolm" wrote:
>
> Randy, Russ and Rizzow et al.,
>
> Tickets are handed to people who violate traffic ordinances. When they
> pay the fine, they and society are then even, it's all over guys. Let it
> go.
>
> (with extra TROLL)
>
> Why must supposedly free people be continuously bombarded by snoops,
> busy bodies, yentas, buttinskies, and otherwise pleasant people who just
> have to have everything just so. This is not Germany (hmmm, not going
> there). If you want to live by "their" rules - go ahead -
> congratulations! I did that for just as long as I wore a team jersey.
> Thank God that's over and now I can ride like a free cyclist with the
> yoke removed from my neck.
>
> I accept the consequences of ignoring car rules - the great car owner
> ruling class can freely run me down, fine me hundreds of dollars and
> generally hate me because of my fine muscled legs. Who cares? Not me.
> Will they run your 4 year old daughter down out of frustration because
> they couldn't catch me as I turned the wrong way down that one way
> street, swerving through traffic? Hey, take that up with the strangely
> angry, homicidal gas burners. NOT my issue. Oh, also I don't care about
> your insurance rates - as money always seems to be key core issue in
> this silliness - take it up with your legislators on the industry
> payrolls.
>
> Mostly your notes remind me of coworkers who insist that open toed
> sandals can only be worn at work between June and August. They also know
> the page number in the employee manual which they will remind you of on
> their precisely 15 minute long 10 o'clock break.
>
> One more thing, people sometimes pee and often on trees and other
> plants. In fact, peeing in a sparkling ceramic bowl of potable water
> could be considered the strange behavior... Anyway, this is not yet a
> sex crime + it's good fertilizer! Really it's OK, honest try it - it's
> quite relieving.
>
>
>
> God that felt good, it's been simmering for months.
>
> **Public tar and feathering to commence in 4,2,3,1...**
>
> Happy Cycling,
>
> Gary Malcolm
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Dreiling
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:04 AM
> To: Russ Rainforth; dacrizzow
> Cc: obra@list.obra.org
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] An open letter to my fellow cyclists
>
>
>
> I went down Eugene and had dinner at the Steelhead Brewery. Myself and
> my friends whom are all cyclist watch the 4 way stop there for 10
> minutes...NOT A SINGLE person stop. Not one NONE of the bike riders
> stopped at the stop signs!
> We were all very disappointed. None of the riders were in race kits,
> most were people with out helmets in street clothes, but still it is no
> wonder people get upset with bike riders at times.
>
> Randy Dreiling
> Owner - Oregon Adventures www.oregon-adventures.com Promoter - Mt Bike
> Oregon www.mtbikeoregon.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Russ Rainforth
> To: dacrizzow
> Cc: "obra@list.obra.org"
> Sent: Wed, June 8, 2011 7:51:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] An open letter to my fellow cyclists
>
> That may be the best post you've sent out, 'Crizz...!
> I completely agree- those Road ID spots from Mionske were fabulous and
> I'd love
> to see them absolutely everywhere...
>
> And that blogpost/letter was spot-on! I too get pretty frustrated by the
>
> near-ubiquitous running of lights & stop signs.
>
> Russ R
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:14 PM, dacrizzow wrote:
>
>> that was an honest, well written article. of course when she called
> out to the
>> other bikers that the light was red she was greeted with some mixed
> responses.
>> the people doing this stuff aren't going to change because someone on
> the street
>> is trying to "educate" them. for the most part i think everyone who
> comes to
>> this message board probably rides within the law and with common sense.
> but
>> given that most of us are probably riding 150-200 miles a week there's
> also a
>> good chance we step out of line sometimes. no one is an angel.
> educating new/
>> younger riders is one thing but i think the best we can do is lead by
> example. i
>> mean at one time it was considered somewhat lame to recycle, right? now
> you see
>> people of all types standing around all the different trashcans in
> restuarants
>> trying to figure out what goes where. the in fighting with all the
> cyclists can
>> be a little trivial (IMHO) when there's drunk, hostile, distracted
> drivers out
>> there going unchecked. i know my biking b
> eh
>> avior has changed in my almost two decades of cycling. and from what i
> can tell
>> so has the general cycling publics. calling out guys at stop lights (i
> don't
>> think) is going to work and telling it all to this site is like
> preaching to the
>> choir. i did however appreciate the PSA's w/ bob moinske during the
> giro
>> coverage. stuff like that should be ALL OVER the tv. and during normal
>> programing. some of it was really good stuff. the infamous dacrizzow
> signing
>> off.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> ********************************
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> ********************************
>
> This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
> may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
> privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone at (541)343-5641 and
> (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
> immediately if this is an electronic communication.
>
> Thank you.
> ********************************
>
>