johnfforbes@comcast.net
Dan, you needn't incite him simply due to his oversight in confusing site
and sight. It is, after all, a slight mistake.
Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless
-----Original message-----
From: Dan H
To: Jon Nigbor
Cc: "obra@list.obra.org"
Sent: Mon, Aug 22, 2011 16:10:47 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Car vs Rider, again
You said there were witnesses who saw him so obviously he was "sighted".
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:26 PM, "Jon Nigbor"
wrote:
> I was broadsided 2/28/08 on a sunny morning simply because the driver
failed to look right and see me. The driver admitted guilt, there were
several witnesses who confirmed his guilt, yet he was not sighted. I
couldn't walk for 10 days, broke an arm, fractured my back, etc.. I even
called the cop afterwards and asked why the driver wasn't sighted and his
answer was clearly prejudiced against me as a cyclist.
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Gregg Magnus"
> Date: Sun, Aug 21, 2011 9:04 am
> Subject: [OBRA Chat] Car vs Rider, again
> To: , "Dad"
> Cc:
>
>
>
> Brian I don't know you but I do know from your ranting email that you have
no clue how law enforcement, courts and the entire legal system works, so I
reccomend that in the future before you make your self look like a jerk you
educate yourself first.
>
> For those of you that don't know me my name is Gregg Magnus. I have grown
up in the OBRA community since I was a child and love this sport and
apparently I just found out I am a "dumb" Beaverton Police Officer.
>
> I was working yesterday when Clark was hit, I wasn't at the scene but I
have been following this closely with the officers who are handling it.
>
> Brian here is a little education for you, so hopefully you can learn
something about how these processes work.
>
> First at crashes or other calls where there are signifiant injuries many
times no charges are filed right away, a thorough investigation must be
conducted first to determine if a crime has been committed and what level of
crime to charge.
> Second, flight risk is evaluated can a complete investigation be done
before an arrest? Worked out with a experts in the area of question,
District Attorneys, etc. Do we have to worry about threat to the victim or
others?
>
> I don't know if criminal charges or a traffic citation will be filed on
the driver at this point. I can assure you that this is being throughly
investigated and because its a car vs cyclists its not being overlooked.
>
> I guess I will close with this, Brian or anyone else if you have a concern
about how things are handled in Beaverton please look me up I can certainly
look into anything, as far as any general law enforcement questions I am
more than willing to help out and try to get the answers or get you
connected with who should have the answers.
>
> Gregg Magnus
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:12:32 -0700
> From: buskirk199@gmail.com
> To: ronm@hevanet.com
> CC: obra@list.obra.org
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Car vs Rider, again
>
> This is ridicules!!! she was not charged!!! wow cops are dumb. If a
motorist has sun in their face and hits another car then they will get
charged but, if the sun is in their eyes and hits and cyclist they don't get
charged.. wow this is really messed up! We need to take a stand and let
people know we count too and they should look out for cyclist.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Ron Magnus wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Another car vs rider crash this morning. Some of you know Clark, keep hi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org