Sarah Tisdale
Here's an idea: Race the smaller CX races!
CX Crusade is fantastic and does a great job with huge numbers, but the
smaller races are a breath of fresh air after the somewhat oppressive crush
(parking, starts, passing, ...) of the Crusade "scene".
With the GPMC series, there's now an extra "series" element to the smaller
races.
Sarah
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:33 AM, wrote:
> John Wilson wins the BEST IDEA award, because in the end he is right. If
> it can be done for a few races..............it can be done for all the
> races.
> I could care less what group I race with because passing or being passed it
> part of the fun for me, but for those who have all these concerns about
> call-ups, fast starts etc..................just put the kids in their own
> race and lets NOT hear any more "crap" about having to race with mixed with
> other cats. If we are that serious....we should be racing just the A race
> or over in Europe!
> Cranky old man...........ron
>
> -----Original Message----- From: John Wilson
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 8:21 PM
>
> To: obra@list.obra.org
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fw: Cyclocross Starts!
>
> Here is a novel idea: Make a Junior only race slot mid day, say 12 Noon. No
> adults on the course. Juniors only. This is what Washington does (has a
> Junior only time slot). To do this promoters will have two challenges to
> work out.
>
> 1. Need to find a way to give the scorers/chief Ref a break somehow
> (normally scorers/ref take a lunch break during the kiddie cross).
> 2. Find a way to do your Kiddie Cross race in parallel to the Junior race.
> Some separate course that does not interfere with the regular course.
>
> This would be the best for the Juniors I think. Not to mention great for
> the
> development of our beloved sport. All Juniors, 10-18, Men and Women on the
> course at once. Wouldn't it be wonderful if this got so large we had to
> figure out how to break it up!!!!
>
> By the way, the Juniors are some of the most gracious racers I have ever
> seen. They give plenty of room, show great sportsmanship, respect, and pass
> with care when they catch younger junior racers.
>
> John Wilson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.**obra.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Trevor Schauer
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 6:29 PM
> To: 'Tim Schauer'; 'Killian Bailey'
> Cc: obra@list.obra.org; 'Jeff Parker'
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fw: Cyclocross Starts!
>
> My point of view-somebody is going to be unhappy with the situation
> no matter what it turns out to be. For me, as one of the 'faster' juniors
> (2
> Crusade wins last year) I spend nearly all of my race attempting to pass
> riders from both Masters categories. Often times, my race can be decided
> by
> who moves better through traffic, and who gets stuck behind some of the
> Masters, which is sometimes a matter of luck. Starting the Junior Men in
> front of the 50+ last year helped immensely in terms of sorting out who
> really is the fastest rider on any course-but then the 50+ers are stuck in
> the same predicament. It's true, many of the Juniors are much slower, and
> the Junior A/B category makes sense for race start times, but how would you
> sort that out? A qualifier? A couple of trial races? No option that comes
> to
> mind makes much sense to me.
> Starting us with the beginners is an even greater nightmare. Putting
> inexperienced (and I realize that this can be applied loosely) racers along
> with younger kids in their first season comprises a recipe for disaster. In
> addition, many Juniors have parents who race in the upper categories later
> in the day, and this inconveniences many families who would, in turn, have
> little choice but to stay at the venue for more of the day. And yes,
> today,
> the front 5 Junior Men caught and passed every last one of the Beginner
> Men,
> Beginner Women, B Women, Master B Women, and 45+ women within 35 minutes of
> race time, and everyone started 45-90 seconds in front of us, with an
> enormous amount of traffic to sort through.
> Still, what possible solution is there to this problem? The most
> logical thing seems to be to keep things as they are, starting behind the
> 50+, and make do with it as is, since adding the Juniors to any other start
> time would basically then make that race the largest of the day, and thus
> result in different unhappy people.
>
> Trevor Schauer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.**obra.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Tim Schauer
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 5:28 PM
> To: Killian Bailey
> Cc: obra@list.obra.org; Jeff Parker
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Fw: Cyclocross Starts!
>
> Those first 5 juniors today past all riders in the fields in front of them.
>
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> On Aug 28, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Killian Bailey
> wrote:
>
> Just split the Juniors into "fast," and "less fast." "Fast" juniors
>>
> starting today behind 4 fields, including beginner men and beginner women
> was a nightmare.
>
>>
>> > Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:58:55 -0700
>> > From: jsp737@gmail.com
>> > To: obra@list.obra.org
>> > Subject: [OBRA Chat] Fw: Cyclocross Starts!
>> >
>> > I think Steve is on to something here. The reality is the 50+ group and
>>
> Master B groups are pretty fast, at least the top guys are. I don't so much
> mind running with the juniors, but I do mind when they start in front of
> the
> 50+ group. The majority of the junior group can't stay in front long enough
> for us old guys to get sorted out and single file. We usually start
> catching
> them within 1/2 a lap or so. If they just started the juniors last, then it
> would probably be 1-2 laps before they started getting lapped, and by then
> everyone would be pretty sorted out. I realize this would be a disadvantage
> for the fast, older juniors who would catch the slowest old guys, but
> seniority should have some privilege shouldn't it? We only have a few years
> left to race and they have decades to go.
>
>> > ______________________________**_________________
>> > OBRA mailing list
>> > obra@list.obra.org
>> > http://list.obra.org/mailman/**listinfo/obra
>> > Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> OBRA mailing list
>> obra@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/**listinfo/obra
>> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/**listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/**listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/**listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> ______________________________**_________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/**listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>