Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

Megan Chinburg

2012-08-21

Unsubscribe options:
http://obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women#subscribers

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Anita Dilles wrote:

> Please take me off this list as well. Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Anona Whitley wrote:
>
>> Please take me off this list. Thanks !
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook <
>> stacy@thoroughlymodern.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference
>>> between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under
>>> the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means
>>> women 19+, so just no juniors.
>>>
>>> 95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but
>>> sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about
>>> that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we
>>> want that to happen.
>>>
>>> I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even
>>> better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.
>>>
>>> Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in
>>> the first place).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stacy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OBRA_Women mailing list
>>> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
>>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA_Women mailing list
>> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>
>


Anita Dilles

2012-08-21

Please take me off this list as well. Thanks!

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Anona Whitley wrote:

> Please take me off this list. Thanks !
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook <
> stacy@thoroughlymodern.com> wrote:
>
>> I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference
>> between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under
>> the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means
>> women 19+, so just no juniors.
>>
>> 95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but
>> sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about
>> that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we
>> want that to happen.
>>
>> I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even
>> better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.
>>
>> Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in
>> the first place).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stacy
>> _______________________________________________
>> OBRA_Women mailing list
>> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
>> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>
>


Anona Whitley

2012-08-21

Please take me off this list. Thanks !

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook wrote:

> I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference
> between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under
> the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means
> women 19+, so just no juniors.
>
> 95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but
> sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about
> that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we
> want that to happen.
>
> I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even
> better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.
>
> Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the
> first place).
>
> Cheers,
> Stacy
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>


Sarah Tisdale

2012-08-21

So then "senior women" is the same as "open women" and they both mean "any
woman can race", right?

If there is only one women's field, it makes sense for it to be "senior
women" or "open women".

If there is a separate cat4/5 race, I would expect to see "cat1/2/3" and
not "senior women". I don't mind racing with Flo, but I'm not crazy about
a bunch of 4/5s showing up for a technical crit. ;-)

In the end, it is up to each promoter which fields they will run and which
fields they will score separately. If a promoter runs a "senior/open
women" field, we can *ask* them to score cat3s (and presumably also
cat4/5s) separately, but in the end it is their choice.

I do wonder whether some promoters incorrectly think "senior women" is the
same as "cat1/2/3"?

Sarah

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Candi Murray wrote:

> Juniors are allowed to ride up. So a junior could in fact ride in a Sr
> Women field.****
>
> Candi****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:
> obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org] *On Behalf Of *Stacy Westbrook
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 21, 2012 3:46 PM
> *To:* Jen Akeroyd
>
> *Cc:* obra_women@list.obra.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women****
>
> ** **
>
> It seems that many crits are Senior Women (eg. Tigard, Vancouver, Swan
> Island, Franz, Giro), not Senior 1/2/3, but it's a mixed bag. Mt. Tabor is
> Senior Women as well. Road races tend to be regular categories (4/5 or 3/4
> or 1/2/3) from what I can tell. Maybe it's a crit thing. ****
>
> ** **
>
> So it does seem that if it were Senior 1/2/3 women it would exclude any
> juniors who happen to be 1/2/3s. I'm not for that. Basically, it's
> confusing and shouldn't be!****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd like it to be clear and easy. Or maybe it doesn't matter, since we've
> gone all this time and nobody has brought it up. I'd love for 3s to get
> scored separately. I'd love to have a larger competitive field. I'd like
> world peace.****
>
> ** **
>
> I guess the more important thing is that ladies come out to race!****
>
> Stacy****
>
> On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jen Akeroyd wrote:****
>
> Interesting! This could certainly give women more options. However, has
> anyone ever seen a race that specifies Senior Women without also stating
> 1/2/3? I haven't. Even the Oregon Cup states "Senior Women 1/2/3".
>
> Is the idea to ask promoters to host Senior Women races without the 1/2/3
> or 1/2 or 3 categorization? Does that mean an 18 year old cat 1/2 would be
> excluded from such an event? I have seen an "Open Women" category in which
> 1/2/3/4s can race together.
>
> I will admit that I am a bit confused!:)
>
> Jen Akeroyd****
>
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> From: fleibowitz@oregonstate.edu
> To: obra_women@list.obra.org
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:08:55 -0700
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women****
>
> This is a slightly different angle on this, I supppose. I wonder how the
> Cat 1-3 women feel about us cat 4's when we enter a race under Senior women
> or Open women race. On the one hand, I think folks aren't crazy about us
> 4's racing over our heads. I wonder how the gals in the Giro di Portlandia
> would have felt if Cat4's had come out, too. On the other, the category as
> defined as 19+ allows us to enter. It was very nice how welcoming the
> ladies were at the Tigard Crit and while that was nice, I don't know
> whether that's something to generalize. ****
>
> ****
>
> Thoughts? ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org [obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org]
> On Behalf Of Vivian Satterfield [viviansatterfield@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:08 PM
> *To:* Stacy Westbrook
> *Cc:* obra_women@list.obra.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women****
>
> Interesting! I too was under the assumption that Senior Women = 1/2/3.
>
> I'd advocate for Cat 3s to be scored separately as well. It's a steep jump
> from 4 to 3, since essentially there are only two fields that women may
> race in. Having Cat 3s race with the 1/2s but being scored separately may
> encourage more women to come out and race (and ask for their upgrades!).**
> **
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook <
> stacy@thoroughlymodern.com> wrote:****
>
> I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference
> between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under
> the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means
> women 19+, so just no juniors.
>
> 95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but
> sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about
> that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we
> want that to happen.
>
> I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even
> better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.
>
> Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the
> first place).
>
> Cheers,
> Stacy
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women****
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________ OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women*
> ***
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> OBRA_Women mailing list****
>
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org****
>
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>
>


Candi Murray

2012-08-21

Juniors are allowed to ride up. So a junior could in fact ride in a Sr Women field.

Candi

From: obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Stacy Westbrook
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 3:46 PM
To: Jen Akeroyd
Cc: obra_women@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

It seems that many crits are Senior Women (eg. Tigard, Vancouver, Swan Island, Franz, Giro), not Senior 1/2/3, but it's a mixed bag. Mt. Tabor is Senior Women as well. Road races tend to be regular categories (4/5 or 3/4 or 1/2/3) from what I can tell. Maybe it's a crit thing.

So it does seem that if it were Senior 1/2/3 women it would exclude any juniors who happen to be 1/2/3s. I'm not for that. Basically, it's confusing and shouldn't be!

I'd like it to be clear and easy. Or maybe it doesn't matter, since we've gone all this time and nobody has brought it up. I'd love for 3s to get scored separately. I'd love to have a larger competitive field. I'd like world peace.

I guess the more important thing is that ladies come out to race!

Stacy

On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jen Akeroyd wrote:

Interesting! This could certainly give women more options. However, has anyone ever seen a race that specifies Senior Women without also stating 1/2/3? I haven't. Even the Oregon Cup states "Senior Women 1/2/3".

Is the idea to ask promoters to host Senior Women races without the 1/2/3 or 1/2 or 3 categorization? Does that mean an 18 year old cat 1/2 would be excluded from such an event? I have seen an "Open Women" category in which 1/2/3/4s can race together.

I will admit that I am a bit confused!:)

Jen Akeroyd

_____

From: fleibowitz@oregonstate.edu
To: obra_women@list.obra.org
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:08:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

This is a slightly different angle on this, I supppose. I wonder how the Cat 1-3 women feel about us cat 4's when we enter a race under Senior women or Open women race. On the one hand, I think folks aren't crazy about us 4's racing over our heads. I wonder how the gals in the Giro di Portlandia would have felt if Cat4's had come out, too. On the other, the category as defined as 19+ allows us to enter. It was very nice how welcoming the ladies were at the Tigard Crit and while that was nice, I don't know whether that's something to generalize.

Thoughts?

_____

From: obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org [obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Vivian Satterfield [viviansatterfield@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:08 PM
To: Stacy Westbrook
Cc: obra_women@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

Interesting! I too was under the assumption that Senior Women = 1/2/3.

I'd advocate for Cat 3s to be scored separately as well. It's a steep jump from 4 to 3, since essentially there are only two fields that women may race in. Having Cat 3s race with the 1/2s but being scored separately may encourage more women to come out and race (and ask for their upgrades!).

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook wrote:

I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means women 19+, so just no juniors.

95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we want that to happen.

I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.

Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the first place).

Cheers,
Stacy
_______________________________________________
OBRA_Women mailing list
OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women

_______________________________________________ OBRA_Women mailing list OBRA_Women@list.obra.org http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women

_______________________________________________

OBRA_Women mailing list

OBRA_Women@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women


Stacy Westbrook

2012-08-21

It seems that many crits are Senior Women (eg. Tigard, Vancouver, Swan Island, Franz, Giro), not Senior 1/2/3, but it's a mixed bag. Mt. Tabor is Senior Women as well. Road races tend to be regular categories (4/5 or 3/4 or 1/2/3) from what I can tell. Maybe it's a crit thing.

So it does seem that if it were Senior 1/2/3 women it would exclude any juniors who happen to be 1/2/3s. I'm not for that. Basically, it's confusing and shouldn't be!

I'd like it to be clear and easy. Or maybe it doesn't matter, since we've gone all this time and nobody has brought it up. I'd love for 3s to get scored separately. I'd love to have a larger competitive field. I'd like world peace.

I guess the more important thing is that ladies come out to race!
Stacy

On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jen Akeroyd wrote:

> Interesting! This could certainly give women more options. However, has anyone ever seen a race that specifies Senior Women without also stating 1/2/3? I haven't. Even the Oregon Cup states "Senior Women 1/2/3".
>
> Is the idea to ask promoters to host Senior Women races without the 1/2/3 or 1/2 or 3 categorization? Does that mean an 18 year old cat 1/2 would be excluded from such an event? I have seen an "Open Women" category in which 1/2/3/4s can race together.
>
> I will admit that I am a bit confused!:)
>
> Jen Akeroyd
>
>
> From: fleibowitz@oregonstate.edu (mailto:fleibowitz@oregonstate.edu)
> To: obra_women@list.obra.org (mailto:obra_women@list.obra.org)
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:08:55 -0700
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women
>
> This is a slightly different angle on this, I supppose. I wonder how the Cat 1-3 women feel about us cat 4's when we enter a race under Senior women or Open women race. On the one hand, I think folks aren't crazy about us 4's racing over our heads. I wonder how the gals in the Giro di Portlandia would have felt if Cat4's had come out, too. On the other, the category as defined as 19+ allows us to enter. It was very nice how welcoming the ladies were at the Tigard Crit and while that was nice, I don't know whether that's something to generalize.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
> From: obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org (mailto:obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org) [obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org (mailto:obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org)] On Behalf Of Vivian Satterfield [viviansatterfield@gmail.com (mailto:viviansatterfield@gmail.com)]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:08 PM
> To: Stacy Westbrook
> Cc: obra_women@list.obra.org (mailto:obra_women@list.obra.org)
> Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women
>
> Interesting! I too was under the assumption that Senior Women = 1/2/3.
>
> I'd advocate for Cat 3s to be scored separately as well. It's a steep jump from 4 to 3, since essentially there are only two fields that women may race in. Having Cat 3s race with the 1/2s but being scored separately may encourage more women to come out and race (and ask for their upgrades!).
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook wrote:
> > I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means women 19+, so just no juniors.
> >
> > 95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we want that to happen.
> >
> > I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.
> >
> > Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the first place).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stacy
> > _______________________________________________
> > OBRA_Women mailing list
> > OBRA_Women@list.obra.org (mailto:OBRA_Women@list.obra.org)
> > http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>
>
> _______________________________________________ OBRA_Women mailing list OBRA_Women@list.obra.org http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org (mailto:OBRA_Women@list.obra.org)
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>
>


Jen Akeroyd

2012-08-21

Interesting! This could certainly give women more options. However, has anyone ever seen a race that specifies Senior Women without also stating 1/2/3? I haven't. Even the Oregon Cup states "Senior Women 1/2/3".

Is the idea to ask promoters to host Senior Women races without the 1/2/3 or 1/2 or 3 categorization? Does that mean an 18 year old cat 1/2 would be excluded from such an event? I have seen an "Open Women" category in which 1/2/3/4s can race together.

I will admit that I am a bit confused!:)

Jen Akeroyd


From: fleibowitz@oregonstate.edu
To: obra_women@list.obra.org
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:08:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

This is a slightly different angle on this, I supppose. I wonder how the Cat 1-3 women feel about us cat 4's when we enter a race under Senior women or Open women race. On the one hand, I think folks aren't crazy about us 4's racing over our heads. I wonder
how the gals in the Giro di Portlandia would have felt if Cat4's had come out, too. On the other, the category as defined as 19+ allows us to enter. It was very nice how welcoming the ladies were at the Tigard Crit and while that was nice, I don't know whether
that's something to generalize.

Thoughts?



From: obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org [obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Vivian Satterfield [viviansatterfield@gmail.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:08 PM

To: Stacy Westbrook

Cc: obra_women@list.obra.org

Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

Interesting! I too was under the assumption that Senior Women = 1/2/3.

I'd advocate for Cat 3s to be scored separately as well. It's a steep jump from 4 to 3, since essentially there are only two fields that women may race in. Having Cat 3s race with the 1/2s but being scored separately may encourage more women to come out and
race (and ask for their upgrades!).

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook
wrote:

I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means women 19+, so just no juniors.

95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we want that to happen.

I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.

Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the first place).

Cheers,

Stacy

_______________________________________________

OBRA_Women mailing list

OBRA_Women@list.obra.org

http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women

_______________________________________________
OBRA_Women mailing list
OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women


Leibowitz, Flo

2012-08-21

This is a slightly different angle on this, I supppose. I wonder how the Cat 1-3 women feel about us cat 4's when we enter a race under Senior women or Open women race. On the one hand, I think folks aren't crazy about us 4's racing over our heads. I wonder how the gals in the Giro di Portlandia would have felt if Cat4's had come out, too. On the other, the category as defined as 19+ allows us to enter. It was very nice how welcoming the ladies were at the Tigard Crit and while that was nice, I don't know whether that's something to generalize.

Thoughts?

________________________________
From: obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org [obra_women-bounces@list.obra.org] On Behalf Of Vivian Satterfield [viviansatterfield@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:08 PM
To: Stacy Westbrook
Cc: obra_women@list.obra.org
Subject: Re: [OBRA Women] Senior Women v. 1/2/3 Women

Interesting! I too was under the assumption that Senior Women = 1/2/3.

I'd advocate for Cat 3s to be scored separately as well. It's a steep jump from 4 to 3, since essentially there are only two fields that women may race in. Having Cat 3s race with the 1/2s but being scored separately may encourage more women to come out and race (and ask for their upgrades!).

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook > wrote:
I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means women 19+, so just no juniors.

95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we want that to happen.

I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.

Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the first place).

Cheers,
Stacy
_______________________________________________
OBRA_Women mailing list
OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women


Vivian Satterfield

2012-08-21

Interesting! I too was under the assumption that Senior Women = 1/2/3.

I'd advocate for Cat 3s to be scored separately as well. It's a steep jump
from 4 to 3, since essentially there are only two fields that women may
race in. Having Cat 3s race with the 1/2s but being scored separately may
encourage more women to come out and race (and ask for their upgrades!).

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Stacy Westbrook <
stacy@thoroughlymodern.com> wrote:

> I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference
> between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under
> the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means
> women 19+, so just no juniors.
>
> 95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but
> sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about
> that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we
> want that to happen.
>
> I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even
> better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.
>
> Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the
> first place).
>
> Cheers,
> Stacy
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA_Women mailing list
> OBRA_Women@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra_women
>


Stacy Westbrook

2012-08-21

I just had an illuminating exchange with Kenji about the difference between Senior Women category races and 1/2/3 Women races. I'd been under the (false) impression that Senior Women = 1/2/3. Not so! In fact it means women 19+, so just no juniors.

95% of the time only 1/2/3 women sign up for Senior Women races, but sometimes get a handful of others and I was curious how folks feel about that. It's up to us to ask promoters to make the categories different if we want that to happen.

I know I'd like to see races for next season change to 1/2/3 Women. Even better, I'd love to see Cat 3 scored separately when possible.

Thoughts? It's up to us to ask for changes (and to show up to races in the first place).

Cheers,
Stacy