Re: Done Wrong? - CORacing's 1 year OBRA ban

tony kic

2012-10-08

to answer your question, yes... the board of directors IS the mediation plan. the knowledge, experience, and common goal of the group provide the necessary elements to deal with issues such as this appropriately. more structure to a promoter penalty system would be pointless- the framework OBRA has designed for race promotion is thorough enough that shortfalls such as this are uncommon. as for your final comment, i disagree. from every angle; insurance, equipment, officials, fee structure, and communication, i've experienced nothing but support and helpful feedback (even when i've made mistakes), and it's safe to say that after organizing, co-promoting, and volunteering at over 40 events i have a well formed opinion.
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:14:12 -0700
From: rickcjohnson1@gmail.com
To: obra@list.obra.org
CC: bendcycling@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Done Wrong? - CORacing's 1 year OBRA ban





The question I have is this: Does OBRA
have a mediation plan for dealing with promoters when race
standards are not met? Are there steps leading up to the "off with
their head" punishment that help resolve the problems in a
constructive manner or is the only solution punitive?

This is a very key detail not well explained in the story. If OBRA
has such a program and Matt did not make use of opportunities to
develop corrective measures with assistance from OBRA then the ban
could be considered fair. However, in the absence of such
assistive solutions leading up to sanctions I think the ban is
excessively punitive.

Unfortunately it is easy to assume "big city" solutions but the
fact is that Bend is a small and somewhat isolated environment to
put on lower tier races. We don't have a PIR for weekly races. We
don't have an Alpenrose. Even industrial area space is limited.
Therefore every event has to occur somewhere that somebody will
object to. Northwest Crossing is no exception and I can tell you
with certainty that some people that live there have no patience
for putting up with a bike race. It may well be that nothing short
of the Police would have prevented the course incursion incidents
that occurred.

Matt is also up against some tough competition when it comes to
getting volunteers. In fact the disparity created when large
promoters come from out of town to our small community works
directly against Matt - in a manner of speaking they "suck the air
out of the room" when it comes to getting volunteer help. To cite
my own example in previous years I have provided up to 18 hours of
volunteer time to the Cascade Classic alone. When that happens it
directly affects my opportunities to get out for other things I
also care about - such as helping with building and maintaining
local trails or supporting other events. There are many other
people here struggling with the same balance. That is not
something Matt has control over.

The Mission Statement of OBRA says, "The mission of OBRA is to
promote and develop the sport of bicycle racing in Oregon by
providing the tools and resources necessary for competition. OBRA
values safety, participation, sportsmanship, teamwork, camaraderie
and fun."

So, it seems to me that the action here regarding Central Oregon
Racing falls short in several areas of OBRA's mission.
Specifically, driving away from OBRA through sanction one of the
few local promoters willing to take on the regionally specific
challenges does not best serve bicycle racing in Oregon generally.
This action does not promote or develop better bicycle racing. It
also exhibits shortcomings in providing resources and displays a
lack of teamwork that I find disturbing.

--
Rick Johnson
Bend Oregon

* * *

On 10/7/2012 11:04 PM, ottolf91 wrote:









A penny (actually a $50 gift cert comment contest) for
your thoughts...

Do you think the ban was too harsh? How do you think it
impact Central Oregon racers? Does an event having or not
having OBRA's sanction influence your decision to
participate?

Post your comments at the website:

http://www.bikearoundbend.com/2012/10/done-wrong/




__._,_.___




Reply
via web post

Reply to sender
Reply
to group
Start
a New Topic
Messages
in this topic (1)







Recent Activity:

New Members
1


Visit Your Group


Switch to: Text-Only, Daily
Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback










.

__,_._,___






_______________________________________________
OBRA mailing list
obra@list.obra.org
http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org


Rick Johnson

2012-10-08

The question I have is this: Does OBRA have a mediation plan for dealing
with promoters when race standards are not met? Are there steps leading
up to the "off with their head" punishment that help resolve the
problems in a constructive manner or is the only solution punitive?

This is a very key detail not well explained in the story. If OBRA has
such a program and Matt did not make use of opportunities to develop
corrective measures with assistance from OBRA then the ban could be
considered fair. However, in the absence of such assistive solutions
leading up to sanctions I think the ban is excessively punitive.

Unfortunately it is easy to assume "big city" solutions but the fact is
that Bend is a small and somewhat isolated environment to put on lower
tier races. We don't have a PIR for weekly races. We don't have an
Alpenrose. Even industrial area space is limited. Therefore every event
has to occur somewhere that somebody will object to. Northwest Crossing
is no exception and I can tell you with certainty that some people that
live there have no patience for putting up with a bike race. It may well
be that nothing short of the Police would have prevented the course
incursion incidents that occurred.

Matt is also up against some tough competition when it comes to getting
volunteers. In fact the disparity created when large promoters come from
out of town to our small community works directly against Matt - in a
manner of speaking they "suck the air out of the room" when it comes to
getting volunteer help. To cite my own example in previous years I have
provided up to 18 hours of volunteer time to the Cascade Classic alone.
When that happens it directly affects my opportunities to get out for
other things I also care about - such as helping with building and
maintaining local trails or supporting other events. There are many
other people here struggling with the same balance. That is not
something Matt has control over.

The Mission Statement of OBRA says, "The mission of OBRA is to promote
and develop the sport of bicycle racing in Oregon by providing the tools
and resources necessary for competition. OBRA values safety,
participation, sportsmanship, teamwork, camaraderie and fun."

So, it seems to me that the action here regarding Central Oregon Racing
falls short in several areas of OBRA's mission. Specifically, driving
away from OBRA through sanction one of the few local promoters willing
to take on the regionally specific challenges does not best serve
bicycle racing in Oregon generally. This action does not promote or
develop better bicycle racing. It also exhibits shortcomings in
providing resources and displays a lack of teamwork that I find disturbing.

--
Rick Johnson
Bend Oregon

* * *

On 10/7/2012 11:04 PM, ottolf91 wrote:
>
>
> A penny (actually a $50 gift cert comment contest) for your thoughts...
>
> Do you think the ban was too harsh? How do you think it impact Central
> Oregon racers? Does an event having or not having OBRA's sanction
> influence your decision to participate?
>
> Post your comments at the website:
> http://www.bikearoundbend.com/2012/10/done-wrong/
>
> __._,_.___
> Reply via web post
>
> Reply to sender
>
> Reply to group
>
> Start a New Topic
>
> Messages in this topic
>
> (1)
>
> Recent Activity:
>
> * New Members
>
> 1
>
> Visit Your Group
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups
>
>
> Switch to: Text-Only
> ,
> Daily Digest
>
> . Unsubscribe
> .
> Terms of Use . Send us Feedback
>
> .
>
> __,_._,___